Share Your Feedback

Its beyond frustrating that to view annotations you have to have a Figma license. People like BA’s and PO’s just need to see annotations but do not need to edit or review the files merely look at the designs and see the annotations to get an idea of the functionality. Our organisation has many licenses as we have a large team of designers and developers all who have licenses. The annotations feature should be made viewable to people you share a file with without having to purchase a license. To get around this we have created an annotations component but the built in one is so much easier to use. Figma please make the new annotations feature viewable to all. I understand the licensing aspect for editing etc but to view an annotation makes no sense that you would need to purchase another license so someone can view a note.  

hi, im encountering condition where my file in figma make get warning of high memory usage, and it seems not because the amount of code that generated, i think it’s the cause is the chat is to heavy. any idea why this is happening?if the chat is the cause, i think add a chat deletion feature will be helpful, thanks

Hello, good day.I’m experiencing serious issues with the new Figma UI update. Many essential tools — such as padding controls — are missing or hidden.Please do not enforce this new version. The previous UI was much better, clearer, and far more efficient for designers.This new version has no advantages, feels confusing, and makes our workflow significantly harder.

This is a regression in Crop behavior.Previously, it was possible to adapt a 16:9 image to a fixed 1:1 (768×768) exportby symmetrically pulling the left and right crop edges toward the center.The content itself was not edited, only the visible area was adjusted.This workflow exported a correct 768×768 image without empty paddingand without cutting important text.Currently, Crop enforces strict aspect ratio behavior.When adapting 16:9 → 1:1:– using Fill crops important content– using Fit / Scale results in empty bands (letterboxing)This removes a previously available and widely used workflowfor preparing fixed-size marketing assets where content cannot be modified.This is not a design request but a regression.There is currently no way to reproduce the previous behaviorusing Crop, Mask, Frame + Clip content, or Image Fill.Please consider restoring the previous Crop behavioror providing

SVG is often treated as a simple export format — click “Export as SVG” and move on.In reality, SVG quality depends heavily on how the vector is generated, especially when starting from raster images like PNG or JPG.Over the last months, while working on SVG conversion workflows, I noticed a few recurring issues that designers and developers run into.1. Why raster-to-SVG conversions often look badMost automatic converters try to trace everything: noise gradients shadows anti-aliased edges This results in: overly complex paths huge file sizes SVGs that are hard to edit in Figma The key insight: clean input matters more than the tracing algorithm itself.2. Pre-processing before vectorizationBefore converting to SVG, it helps to:

WHY CAN’T I ZOOM INTO WHAT’S SELECTED? CTRL+K, NOPE, IT’S GONE. I’M NOT LOOKING FOR SHIFT+2. IF YOU WORK AT FIGMA AND YOU’RE READING THIS: I’VE BEEN A DIEHARD SINCE 2016, WHICH MATTERS NOTHING, BUT I HATE EVERY THING YOU’RE DOING TO THIS SOFTWARE.

Hello,I’m really excited about being able to use AI to edit our app screens. It would make important stakeholders able to work by their own.However, for now, the results I get are far from being usable.First, despite the announcement, I have no icon related to this… strange.But it’s accessible through the cmd-k menu → “first draft” or “make a change”My first “first draft” was a banger. With only a vague prompt, it created a neat design with nice architecture (better than those of most of designers I’ve worked with ;-) )But as soon as I use the “make a change” menu, which is where the work begins, it’s really bad. Most of the time it doesn’t stick to the selection I gave and change something else. It doesn’t understand some basic command (selecting a menu, I just ask to add 2 entries… it renamed the others and change the colors...).So, am I missing or mis-using something? Do you have similar experiences or much better?Peace

Figma has to be one of the worst pieces of software every created by humans. Seems promising and then the amount of frustration and time you waste using it becomes unimaginable.Mobile app sucks so much and is so slow and sluggish on iOS that I cannot use it for more then 2 minutes before wanting to just delete it off my phone.How can the Figma team be so terrible at their jobs?

Hello Figma Community,I’m currently enrolled in the Google UX Design course on Coursera and have been using Figma Education Pro through this program.I received an email asking me to re-verify my student status, so I selected “Bootcamp / Online Program”, but I got the message:“Bootcamp students & educators: You cannot self-verify, you must be verified by your bootcamp. Please reach out to them directly with any questions.”Since Coursera is an online program, not a traditional bootcamp, I don’t have an admin to verify me. Coursera support says I should self-verify, but Figma doesn’t allow it for online students.I want to know: How can online course students like me maintain Education Pro access? Will our accounts automatically downgrade to Starter after Sept 29 if no verif

My biggest issue with Figma Jam is tables. For instance, it's impossible to paste complex data from a Google Sheet into a selected table. You can only paste into a cell or create a new table; you can't paste into an existing one. You could paste as a new table and then copy a column to paste into another table, but that's just a mess I can't deal with.Basically, it’s a half-baked component. Figma team, please take a look at the Miro table component and its capabilities if you want more people to use your tools.

I am experiencing, that every time I use iOS26 components from Apple’s recent Figma UI-kit to make a prototype, my phone (iPhone16) lags like crazy and all interactions seem sluggish. It is very annoying that liquid glass is killing the prototyping experience. Also drains the battery Happens both with a mirrored frame or a prototype link. And also only between two screens.Anybody else experiencing this? 

I use the assets panel frequently to use our design system. The new layout with the sidebar obscures when our team’s library has updated, and it feels much slower to find and access assets. Instead staying in the same work area it feels cumbersome to move horizontally to the side nav, then back up to the search bar in the assets panel. I really dislike the new navigation, though I can understand wanting a clearer separation between these two domains. It just makes it slow for me as a user. 

As a React/Drupal developer who works closely with a UX designer, we constantly debate what to call a CTA or how to phrase a short instruction. So I built a plugin that helps with exactly that. Microcopy Fixer suggests clearer alternatives for short UI text without rewriting your whole design.You can check it out here: https://www.microcopyfixer.com/figma-pluginFeedback is welcome.

Auto-Variant Grouping, A simple tool that automatically detects related components and groups them into variants. Designers waste time manually grouping 10–40 components into variants (e.g., Button / Small / Large / Disabled / Hover).This feature would scan selected components → detect pattern similarities → auto-create a variant set. Select multiple components → click “Create Smart Variant” Figma analyzes: Naming patterns Layer structure Size similarities Color + state variations Auto-groups them into a clean, structured variant component Auto-renames properties intelligently It’s not a massive AI feature. It’s a mini-smart workflow improvement

The idea is to have “synchronized sections” (see Notion Synchronized Blocks) →I often need to have the same content in several files (maps, etc.), and synchronized sections would save me from having to maintain them all.  Notion Example:  

A new left rail was added with some new AI prompting features in Figma Design. In this layout I’d like to have access to the icon for Review Unpublished Changes from the Pages/Layers tab in the same placement as it is on the Assets tab. Functionally, I’d like the icons in the header to be the same on both tabs with Minimize UI and Review Unpublished Changes always existing in the same place. I’ve selected Minimize UI more times than I care to admit when I really wanted the Review action instead. Also, I’d remove the X close button from Assets as it’s unnecessary. 

Some times i feel this mobile device should have opacity option fade out in background, when we hover it will active again ! What do you think of that? . Just a rough thought.

Right now, when I export a PDF from figma, I expect it to be like a regular PDF from any other software such as illustrator. However, when I look at the internal structure, some things are in an XFORM object, other things are not, text has redundant copies and are masked by other shapes elsewhere in the hierarchy. things in frames are similarly structured in weird ways.This makes it impossible for screen readers to read it, and it makes it impossible for me to use Figma to design stuff for use in PDFs, even though figma does support exporting to PDF. 

Just built a pitch deck to present to clients using Figma Slides and decided to start using object animations to add a bit of flare. I was sad to learn that Figma used the same “Start” animation choices as Powerpoint which is (1) Start on Click (2) Previous to last animation.We need more options. The biggest one is just add the same prototype prompt of “After Delay” on object animations. The other one is give us more choices then “Slide” and “Fade”. Add, the standard animations that most apps have, like spin and make 3D and more...

When you right click to view details about a variable within the variables panel, I would like to see if that variable is being used in my file and where.  Today my devs asked about a variable that I sent over via the TokensStudio Figma plugin. It was just called “default” and they weren’t sure what it was for. I must have created it by accident but now I don’t know if I used it for anything or not. I just deleted it but it may have been connected to something. I have no way of finding out.

We use variable for our colour fills for type layers.Unfortunately it is not possible to see if a variable colour is accessible over a background colour unless you detach and open the colour picker, and then reattach.. 

Hello! I am a community advocate for FOF, Sofia for Bulgaria and we experience difficulties when we want to use Bulgarian Cyrillic in several fonts with the “Stylistic sets” feature, but Bulgarian Cyrillic just doesn’t work. When I try the same in Adobe Illustrator for example - there are no problems. The only solution we’re able to find is to change the font’s core defaults to this type of Cyrillic, otherwise, it is impossible to use the stylistic set in Figma. Best Regards, Daniel Dungyov

Hi Team,I am writing to implore you to restore a small but critical interaction detail that was removed in a previous update.The Issue: Previously, when a user adjusted a property via a slider (specifically Drop Shadows, Strokes, or Corner Radius), the blue selection bounding box would temporarily disappear. This allowed us to see the exact effect of the change in real-time.Currently, the blue selection outline remains visible while adjusting these properties. Because the outline sits directly on top of the edge of the element, it physically obstructs the pixels we are trying to style.Why this is critical: We are designing blind: It is impossible to fine-tune a subtle shadow or a 1px border when a 2px blue line is covering it. Broken Workflow: What used to be a fluid process is now a friction loo

Feedback: Grid Limitations for Data TablesIntroductionThank you for this Grid update! Features like "hug" and "fractional units" are clearly a welcome improvement for simple cases (galleries, basic layouts, etc.). However, I must share a different experience regarding the creation of data tables, where Grid actually introduces significant friction compared to auto-layout.The problem: loss of structural hierarchyWith auto-layout, you could create a natural and maintainable architecture:Table├── Header (slot / component)│ ├── tr (reusable component)│ │ ├── th (cell)│ │ ├── th (cell)│ │ └── ...├── Rows (slot)│ ├── tr (reusable component)│ │ ├── td (cell)│ │ ├── td (cell)│ │ └── ...│ ├── tr (component)│ └── ...Advantages: Clear parent/child relationships, reusable components, easy to maintain