I’m working on the initial ideation and brainstorming solutions using Figma for the product I’m working on. I’m genuinely happy with the results it has generated on rough level, it has helped in making my execution process faster. But I have been consistently seeing a pattern where in certain designs it provides certain features or context which are unexplained or we’re unable to understand. I tried asking within the chat itself to explain what exactly that feature means and how is it relevant in our product but it wasn’t able to answer. Also the point and edit features has been working very slow. I was assuming if it is getting heavy for make to prompt and edit / also answer questions about feature’s vagueness in the same chat estate. Shall we have a different chat estate just to ask questions about what features it has exactly designed, if it has ability to explain the context it will be helpful for us to use it or rather shape and align with our use case if it shall surpass.
In conclusion, sometimes vaguely designs features in the flow which we are very much curious to know about in detail or want to ask it’s own perspective for adding it but we’re unable to receive that output here.
Question
Regarding Figma Make : Understanding the generated design on a deeper level after prompting
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
