Share Your Feedback

Has anyone else experienced a problem like this? I would like to understand why Figma is using such a sophisticated, misleading, simply a sharp practice of billing their services? I am a freelance start-up that has been charged for 8 other people accessing the file I have created. I have allowed access only for two of them and they shared further (probably) and I have been charged an additional $120 for their access. I was never alerted to the fact that apart from the monthly subscription, there will be additional charges. I don’t want to be a part of a service that is so wishy-washy in their billing offer. It is a disgusting practice. Probably I will look for alternatives to this service.

Hello Figma Team, We’ve been excited about the launch of Figma Sites and have been testing it as a potential solution for our company’s website.  The experience so far has been great so far but as we dig deeper, we’ve run into a few areas that seem limited today. We completely understand this is to be expected while in beta. But we’d like to get some clarity on a few critical items:  General Availability: When is Figma Sites expected to move out of beta and into full release? Site Structure: At the moment, subfolder structures (e.g., website.com/feature/subfeature) aren’t supported. Is this planned, and if so, is there an expected timeline? Redirects: It seems redirects are also not supported. Will redirect functionality (including handling of trailing slash versions) be added, and when? Are there any recommended interim solutions? 404 Page: We also couldn’t find a way to create a custom 404 page. Is that capability available yet, or is it still on the roadmap? Cookies & Tracking:

After a late switch from Sketch to Figma about six months ago, here is my conclusion regarding the UX of Figma:While Figma has many great features that Sketch does not have (dev mode, way more capable prototyping, variables,…) the general UX of the tool is just sooo bad! Here are the things that annoy me most:Visibility of functions: There are so many functions hidden below a small icon that has no label. Much stuff is hard to find. And what drives me really nuts: When a function is not available, then its UI element (or entry in context menu) is hidden – not disabled! I’m using Figma for UX Design, and it just feels so wrong to use this tool that does not handle UX basics correctly itself.   Library management – publishing components: You can do this from the book button on the top left where you usually update components from other files, but publishing is mixed in here if you click on “This file”. But then you can only publish all changes. If you want to publish only a few changes,

With any large organization users when accepting invitations to Figma are not mindful what they type as their name.  When someone simply uses Initials or a First name it makes it difficult to reconcile users or know what users are doing.  Please update the Administrator functionality to allow changes to the persons name.     

I spent a month building this project.200 users already rely on it.And then—one update.One privacy pop-up.One broken publish button.Everything stopped.I tried what everyone else tried.Rollback to an old version?Sure—it works. But why should I accept that?Policies updated.Privacy terms rewritten.And suddenly, they own everything while I own… nothing.Imagine this: your designs, your infrastructure, your users…all trapped inside a system that won’t even handle an error gracefully.No proper documentation.No accessibility.No GitHub support.No real answers.We deserve better.Better error handling.Better transparency.Better respect for creators.Because right now?We’re building their platform.And they’re taking everything from ours. [Moved from “Figma Make down?” to “Share Your Feedback” by a moderator on 27-Aug-2025.]

This is a small nit but please...i’m sure this was made for someone but can there be an option to make it so this button never appears? it adds an additional click, which is so annoying when i am trying to click between to components i am trying to compare the settings inside to. PLUS there is nothing below it! I’m all for whitespace but minimalism that adds work is worse. 

You’d observe that when ypure on any website and you navigate between pages, the browser loads the page. The cue you’d see is either the ring loader or in my case, Dia browser, a line strip shpws under the address bar…For my published Figmasite page, nothing happens and so when i navigate to another page, it doesnt seem like something is happening

For many reason, (1) Grid still no CSS autofit/autofill functionality, (2) requirement assets be on the same page in order for prototyping to work, etc., there are still occasions where you need to nest an instance in a component in order to achieve intended behavior. Unfortunately this also explodes layer count andreduces efficiency. Is there any chance you all can (address the underlying, more flexibility with prototyping, please add autofit/autofill on grid asap) make it where the instance can become a component and still hold its relationship while being a different kind of component itself?

 My original command: “Move the subject to the left so that there is more background on the right side of the image.”. Figma AI not only did the command but also decided to give me a facial feature updateSo… My facial feature was changed by Figma AI, even though the command was not containing anything regarding editing the subject. I find it problematic, because my ethnicity is changed & without consent.

こんにちは、FigmaSitesの登場により、マークアップや実装を伴わないクイックなページ公開機能は私達のプロダクトを加速させる重要なエンジンの一つとなっています。数々のページをローンチしてきましたが、いずれもXにてURLをシェアした際、OG情報が取得できていない事がわかりました。その原因は、FigmaSitesのページはJSによってレンダリングされており、Xの投稿時にはリンク先のHTMLだけを参照しJSは実行しないことによって、OG情報を取得できていないのだと推察しています。タイトルやOG情報などはJSでレンダリングせず静的にHTMLに記述することによってさらにこの製品はパワーを発揮できるはずです。ご検討のほどおねがいします。

Current: right click project “Settings” Click name type in new name Desired:right click project “Rename Project” type in new nameAlso, if you try to add special characters, the error message spits you back out on the Settings screen, whereas it should just keep you on the Rename form

​​​​​The button for this was so easy to find always in the bottom left of the screen. First the icon recently changed to what looked like a notebook, then it kept moving around and now disappearing all together. It’s now completely gone, and after minutes of searching the closest thing I found was the Templates and tools section, but it is broken as the search function always returns the same set of results shown in the screenshot.

Why does a perfectly functioning thing constantly have to get changed, confusing the users?  

The brand I work for has multiple branches with their own colors, each color containing 8 different hues. I created a color style for each color and use them when creating designs. Sometimes I need to play around with the colors to find the correct hue, but this can be very frustrating due to the fact that when I click ‘Fill → Library → select my color’ the menu immidiatly closes. If I have to do that 8 times to find the right hue + circle back to the best options that means I have to click at least 18 times. But if the menu would stay open I could do it within 9 clicks. This might not seem like much at a glance, but when you have over 25 shapes/text blocks on a page that need color that means I have to do 450 clicks instead of 225. I can see how the menu staying open is not helpful in everybody's usercase, but having a toggle somewhere where I can choose whether I want this menu to stay after a selection would be very helpful and save me a lot of clicks. TLDR; When selecting a pre-set

Hello, Figma team.I want to provide feedback on a long-standing interaction design issue that has been bothering me: the pink spacing adjustment handle that appears when hovering between items in an auto-layout.Frankly speaking, this feature does more harm than good in my daily work. Its original intention may have been to allow for quick adjustments, but when dealing with complex components that contain many nested items, the specific problems are: It obscures elements: The handle often covers the very small elements I am trying to select, making precise selections difficult without excessive zooming. It's accidentally triggered: Most of the time, my intent is simply to select an item, but the handle gets triggered unintentionally. This greatly interrupts my workflow and breaks my focus. In most cases, I choose to input precise values in the property panel on the right to control spacing, as this method is more controllable and aligns better with the idea of component-based design.

So I recently started using Figma and I generally love it.However a few things are starting to feel annoying and clunky, especially because I am used to something better.Technical Context:- Browser (Firefox) on PCTry using miro.com because the do a few things very well:Right-click & hold => Moving around. No need to switch the mouse mode just to move around. (Yes there is the middle mouse button but the usability of that is highly dependent on the mouse model and most mouses I used till now have a good scroll functionality but not middle mouse click, let alone holding the click. Resizing Text: In miro there is a redundancy where you can resize the font-size by resizing the box the text is in automatically. Now I have to click select the text box and have to find the small font-size option and try out various sizes till I am finally satisfied. Also the typography settings are like low on the list of settings. I would switch them with position because I do Positioning with the mou

Please make Zoom zero-in on the selected objects; most apps do this. It would save zooming in on, and then panning to re-locate your work.

Genuine question, is Figma community removed from the software? because I cannot find it anywhere.

Why, oh why do I have to click to see the size of the current Text Style I am using?Why not showing the XX/XXX like in the Styles panel?   

I build a simple map, and it broke 10+ times, keeps fixing itself, with google map api key with everything added. it was kinda working at start asked for a search to be added and it keeps breaking since then even the style it broke, I have never been this disappointed. I wish I could show you the trivial things that it breaks on. This is not right. Do not add credit limits until ur product is at least able to fix it self the errors that it adds in without reasoning.  

I create a lot of user flows every week in Figjam for my team. In Figjam, under Shapes, and then the “Flowchart” shapes, I can’t find the Delay (half pill) or Display (curved rectangle with a left chevron). Are there any plans to add those soon?

Hi Figma team,I was really disappointed to see that Iranian universities are no longer supported for the Education Plan. For many of us, Figma has been more than just a tool; it’s been our main way to learn design, collaborate with classmates, and dream about building a career in this field.Losing access feels discouraging. We’re just students who want to learn and grow, and it hurts to feel excluded because of where we live. Education should bring people together, not separate them.I hope you can reconsider this decision or at least find a way to keep Iranian students included. Having equal access to learning tools like Figma means the world to us. Thanks for listening and for everything you’ve built to inspire the design community.

Currently, developers working in Figma Dev Mode cannot search or filter through variables in the variables table. When working with design systems like Gator that have hundreds of design tokens developers must manually scroll through extensive lists to find the specific variable they need.

We just wrapped the big announcements at Config, and we know there’s a lot to take in.This thread is your space to share reactions, ask questions, and let us know what you're excited about (or still curious about) with regard to Figma Draw. Our team will be actively reading and sharing relevant takeaways with the product team. What we’d love to hear from you:What aspects are you most excited about — and why? Where do you still have questions or want more clarity? Anything that didn’t quite land for you yet? A few quick reminders:If you need help with a specific account or file issue, please get in touch with a specialist on the Support Team. A note on Community Guidelines: Posts that veer off-topic or become unproductive may be moderated to keep the focus on the product at hand. Keep feedback focused on Figma Draw — this helps everyone follow along.

We work on large display but Figma UI doesn’t adjust and shows minuscule panels for Text Styles, Library, Font lists, etc…. See related post below: 

Hey Figmates! After using variables for some months now i´ve come to a conclusion that that three levels of variables doesn´t suit every project. Or at least my projects, when it comes to theming different product pages. Until yesterday i used primitives, semantics, and themes as suggested by many users, as a proper setup. But, it just felt too bounding.You can easily just use the the primitive and semanitic level. With Modes as the theming.But, now its a bit frustrating. In the appearance menu, its to set menues – theming and semantics. Its unchangeble. The “Theming” now its linked to the semantics menu. I changed the setup to have an easier workflow, without being too specific with the naming in the theming process.Any thoughts on this?