Share Your Thoughts

Is there a way to add ‘Match Size’ when using the Paste to Replace function? (CMD+Shift+R) I have tried a few plugins, but Paste to Replace is more smooth and quick.

Hi Figma Forum! We’re rolling out some changes that will make organizing team files more flexible and intuitive — and we want to hear from you. 👈🏻A Figma workspace organized with nested folders.As more work happens in Figma, files can get harder to find. In the coming weeks, we’ll introduce folders, so you can structure files to mirror the ways your teams work.Here’s what’s changing:Projects become folders. All files in Teams will live in folders. Any previous reference to Projects in the UI will be renamed to Folders. Subfolders and colors. Nest folders and assign folders colors to create hierarchy. Simpler sharing. Subfolders inherit access from the folder above it by default, or you can limit access to specific people.What’s not changing:Workspaces and teams — these structures will stay exactly the same as before. Who can access folders — the same people who had access to the project before have access to the folder now. This includes Connected projects, now called Connected folde

I have searched the community and Google for an answer to this question, but I have not been able to find one. Perhaps there is no answer. I have found a plugin that supports this functionality, but it does not add the frames to the FRAME panel. For example, I am working with different Zebra devices that have different DPs. As a result, most of the frames do not work. I would like to know if I can create my own frames and have them appear in the frame list so that my organization can see and use them as well. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Playback behavior can’t be controlled from the component. There is currently no way to configure an animation to play only once and remain on its final keyframe instead of looping or resetting. The playback duration of an animated component nested inside another frame depends on the parent’s timeline. If another animation within the parent frame has a longer duration, the nested component must wait until the parent’s entire animation cycle is complete before it can play again. This makes it impossible for nested animations to run independently.Some possible solutions 🤗 ✅   Allow loop behavior to be configured at the component level. Add options such as Play once, Loop, and Stay on the last keyframe so the playback behavior can be controlled independently for each animated component. Decouple nested component timelines from their parent timeline. Allow animated components inside other frames to run on their own playback cycle, regardless of the parent’s duration, so each animation

Hello,some feedback from my side regarding Folders, I like the options of a nestable folder, but I find it hard to navigate to the files I’m looking for. The folders are named, but the file thumbnails that were visible with Projects were a huge readability feature that I’m really missing now.I was searching for it in settings, but couldn’t find a way to set it. I actually added a description to a folder, but did not actually see not one place that the description was shown? This part is especially confusing.If I could make an improvement suggestion to a current implementation it would be to have a setting to show or not to show some folder contents thumbnails, similar to the previous implementation.Fingers crossed this can be done!

I’d like to insert an image into a cell in a table in FigJam so that it moves with the table as it expands and changes size. Currently, I’m just having to drag pictures around with the table as it expands which is fine for one or two images but I have many!

Every time I exit Figma and come back, the previously selected sort order is lost, and it defaults to "Last modified" – "Newest first". Previously, the selected sorting option was always preserved.

As an interaction designer working on a design system, I would love to have pre-defined animation defined as library to share with rest of the team. This feature will enable a shared motion language and guarantee that all prototypes and animation are aligned with design system guidelines.In Figma Motion already exist preset animation with semantic names, so I know this is possible. However, I can’t find a way to create my own animation presets.If this is possible can someone guide me on how to do it? If not, I would love to suggest this as a new feature.

Currently when reviewing changes, there’s a “resolve all” option that applies to all pages and all changes on each page. However, it would be really great to be able to resolve for all changes on a single page because I might have 2 pages that I made branch edits on, and 17 pages that should maintain the Main file edits. Currently you have to manually select for every change on every page, if you can’t resolve 100% for branch or for main. Which is crazy. Going even a step further, within a page it would even be helpful to be able to select multiple changes and resolve those as a group, speeding up the 1x1 process but giving more fidelity than a “resolve all”. In general I find the UI of the resolve and merge somewhat confusing, and the new designers on my team who are using branches for the first time have come to me with questions about how the heck this works, and for help to make sure they won’t mess anything up when merging. I think this speaks to the fact that it’s fairly hard to

hey there! variables seems to be super nice but what i am missing is that if i make a colour alias to a specific collection - i can’t set the opacity separately (e.g. colour 50 with 20% opacity) So basically i want the colouyr to be from another collection and i want to set the alpha seperatly (controlled as rgba - since i dont need it as opacity) Example how we can fix this in token studio: So what i want is that i can set blue/5 and then the opacity (which i dont want to capture in another colour variable) Now its only possible if i break the link with gray/75 - and then i loose the reference to that colour

I want to make a prototype where something changes when user scrolls content. I want to keyboard collapse when user starts scrolling content, but it’s impossible to do with drag action. Or it feels unnatural Or am I missing a way to do it with existing tools?

We're on a Figma Organization plan, on an annual contract. Recently our team started getting logged out, and now only two people can be logged in at the same time. This didn't happen before, and we haven't changed anything on our end.We asked our Account Manager what happened, and they told us: "we haven't historically enforced the Acceptable Use Policy with the same rigor we're applying now." In other words, the rules didn't change - Figma just decided to start enforcing them harder, partway through our contract, without telling us in advance.This is concerning. We allocated budget for this agreement based on the assumption that the terms and level of service would stay stable for the length of the contract. If Figma can quietly tighten enforcement whenever it wants, with no notice, then the terms we agreed to don't really mean much - Figma can change how the contract works in practice without ever changing the contract itself. That's a real imbalance of power between Figma and its cu

I need z-axis keyframing ability to do animations in FigMotion. Currently I don’t see any work around to bring things forward or to send backward without duplicating and plating around with opacity which feels tedious to do. 

The core ask — that plugin UI authoring should be able to leverage Make/code layers for faster visual iteration, and that the two systems should talk to each other — is solid feedback worth surfacing.Agents take:Sorry, I'm not able to create interactivity or work with code layers yet. To add interactivity, try using Figma Make.I can't send the plugin build to Make — those are separate systems. But I can keep refining the plugin UI directly. If you tell me exactly what's off (spacing, sizing, colors, alignment), I can make precise CSS fixes. Would you like to continue that way? 

We need a way to sum up total amount of credits used in a single file for finance reasons. There are over 200+ versions on a Make file, and we won’t want to do our calculation manually.

Reopening this topic as it was the closest topic I found on this was closed a while ago.I’m wondering how the community is going around not having this feature in Project folders? I agree that having that level of organization in Projects helps a lot to keep clear paths to past work without the need to Archiving. Any recomendations on how you address this while Figma doesn’t have this feature available more than welcome! And happy to provide more insight if the ask isn’t clear. 

When prompting the Figma Agent in the chat, all I can see is the spinner while it is working on it. It provokes doubt when I am designing because I’m not sure what changes it is making. When I can see reasoning traces or even the agent actively editing my design I feel like I have more control over it and it would be nice if I can stop it in the middle of its work and tell it what it is doing wrong (an immediate popup for this would be nice). On top of that I would like the Figma Agent to ask questions (similar to coding agents) if it needs clarification on specific design details.

The recent update of the Make panel UI has seemingly removed the ‘Go to Source’ button when in edit mode. You used to be able to select an element in the app, then go to the source code.The code would be highlighted for you and you can then make manual edits without the struggle of scrolling and navigating through the code to find the element you want to edit. Please bring back this feature!!

...

I’m trying to localize an app using the new variables feature but it looks like I can’t add break lines to the string. For titles, especially in some languages like Japanese where there are no spaces, it is totally necessary. Is this planned for the near future?

Unless I’m missing something it’s not possible to use the Find tool to search for text within a specific selected frame, you can only search an entire page.

While applying for the Figma Education plan, I noticed the mandatory Terms of Service agreement is presented as a Yes/No radio-button choice.Because the user must agree in order to proceed, selecting “No” doesn't provide an alternative path. However, presenting “No, I do not agree” as an equal radio option can create an expectation that disagreeing may still allow the user to continue.A single “I agree” checkbox might communicate the interaction more clearly: unchecked = agreement hasn't been provided; checked = the prerequisite has been fulfilled.I understand the current design may intentionally make the consequence of declining explicit, but I wonder whether the radio pattern introduces a false affordance by presenting a choice that isn't actually actionable.  

The Publish Library action feels really hidden, and its location doesn't make much sense in a design system file.Why not make it a global action, similar to the Share button? When you're working on the design system figma file, publishing the library is one of the primary actions.Right now the flow is:Assets → Library icon → Publish → Wait...It feels unnecessarily buried. Let's make our lives easier.