Share Your Thoughts

A simple option to randomize a pool of sticky notes, without using a plugin. Seems to very useful for researchers. 

Firstly great job Figma Font variables are here!!! Figma tutorial: Variables for typography The only thing missing is the use of percentages in the line-height property. You can not use a percentage in the line-height as it only accepts variables that are a number type. Although the variables for line-height caters for pixel (absolute) line-heights (10,12,14)- it does not accommodate relative line heights. In other words you can’t use percentage variables for line heights that are a percentage of the font size (100%, 120%,150%). Interestingly …You can use a variable for letter-spacing ( which accepts a number variable - but reads it as a percentage) - the challenge remains that line heights by default are absolute not percentages - even though you can input a percentage. Percentages allow greater flexibility and less calculations Word around would be to allow formula in a variable e.g. =[variable] * 1.5 Or figuring out a way for the line height to be toggle between absolu

Currently, Figma Slides on the mobile app only allows users to view and run slides. However, when giving a presentation, many of us connect our computer to a projector to display the slides while wanting to use our phone as a companion device to view presenter notes. It would be extremely helpful if the Figma mobile app could sync in real time with the slides being presented on desktop, so that the presenter can:  See their notes directly on the mobile app Follow along with the current slide in sync with the presentation Use the phone as a discreet presenter tool, without needing a second screen or printed notes  This would bring Figma Slides closer to the functionality of other professional presentation tools and make it much more practical for real-world use. I hope the Figma team will consider adding this feature, as it would significantly improve the experience for presenters using Figma Slides in professional settings.

Please go back to basicsYou are moving forward too fast, we don't need more drawing and AI feathers, we need basic CSS options that are the basics of CSS web development since the 2000.On top of the list image-background position, object-fit etcAre you going to do something about it?😡

Hi Figma, I wish it were possible to duplicate text style folders, instead of just the text style itself.

The black floating toolbar is really annoying as it covers up what I’m trying to type. Is there a way to pin it? I know that I can run a script to completely remove it each time. However, it’d be nice to have an option to pin it at the bottom.

Hi Figma team!I’d love to suggest a small but meaningful UX improvement. In Figma, many numeric fields can be reset by typing “auto” (such as width, height, or layout), which is great. However, when working quickly, it’s incredibly easy to mistype “auto” as something like: atuo auot uato aout atou utoa or other nearby typos At the moment, Figma doesn’t recognize these variations and simply rejects the input, forcing users to delete and retype again. Considering how common and predictable these typos are, it would be a great UX win if Figma could accept common mistypes of “auto” as valid and interpret them as auto.This would improve workflow speed and reduce tiny daily frustrations without causing any conflict, as these typo variations aren’t used as valid values for anything else.A tiny change, but a quick win to improve designers’ lives ✨Thank you for considering it!

I’ve been using Figma for almost 7 years, and this has been a pain point for me while using Figma to craft UI designs in each of the projects I’ve been through. It doesn’t allow me to reorder the starting point flows I’ve created when more starting point flows are added. As more are added, there arises a need to reorder the way people navigate from sub-flow to sub-flow within an app design in the desired order. Additionally, having the ability to rename a specific flow directly from the present mode would be a plus, so the user wouldn’t have to leave the current context of present mode and go back to the shared workspace to find and rename that flow.I am pretty sure that there are a lot of folks in here in this feedback community must have the same concern as mine. So Figma, I am asking you to make an according adjustment to this and ease our lives. Thank you 

It seems very unusual to publish a code generation feature without any kind of mechanism for export to version control. While I’ve been testing figma make and enjoyed the result, i’m having to consider moving to alternatives like lovable because of the benefits of simpler integration with version control.Will we be able to link our figma make projects to a github repository in future?an alternative approach would be integration with the figma for VSCode extension. 

I am calling this out because it wastes admin time, confuses teams, and quietly pushes paid seats without informed consent. The product nudges users to request licences from multiple places inside the app. These prompts are frequent and intrusive. They look like helpful guidance but they are sales prompts. Admin controls to decline or manage these licence requests are buried and clumsy. It is far easier to approve than to reject. That is a dark pattern that drives spend rather than clarity. End users are not clearly told that what they are clicking carries a cost to the organisation. In many flows there is no plain language that says You are about to trigger paid usage for your team. The end result is predictable. Finance gets surprise invoices. Admins become the bad cops. Designers are frustrated because they did not realise they had pulled a paid lever. This is not how a trusted design platform should behave.What we want to see now! Clear pricing and seat impact in every reques

What I need: Showing the distance between rulers. How I expected it to work: Select a ruler, hover another and hold option (mac). Context: In some really nested templates and components its impossible to actually select edges of correct elements for measurements, therefore I would need the option to show the distance between two rulers. Complexity: Seems to be an easy fix, since the individual coordinates of both rulers even show on the top edge of the ruler section of the UI, you’d just need to add the distance (where exactly I wouldn’t care that much)

HelloFor years, Figma has been the gold standard for interface design. It’s fast, collaborative, and somehow manages to make design feel fun again. But even with all its brilliance, there’s always been one small—but incredibly frustrating—gap in its system.Figma doesn’t have subpages.And honestly, that’s wild.The chaos of one giant pageIf you’ve ever worked on a complex design system or a product with multiple flows, you know exactly what I’m talking about. You open a Figma file, and suddenly you’re staring at 200 artboards, 50 prototypes, and a sea of arrows that look like someone spilled spaghetti on your screen.Sure, you can organize things into pages. But those pages quickly become their own mess. Before you know it, you’ve got 25 of them—each representing some combination of “v2,” “final_final,” and “do_not_touch.” Not to mention the pages for design system tokens, experiments, and archived explorations.It’s not that Figma’s organization tools are bad—they’re just flat. And that’s

I frequently share notes on designs with a group of developers without knowing which one will work on what I’ve designed. I’d love to be able to tag several in a comment via a “group” I’ve created within my team (eg- “@FrontendDevs”) How are others handling this?

Hi there,I wanted to share some feedback regarding the recent shortcut changes. I used the bring to front (Cmd + Opt + ↑) and send to back (Cmd + Opt + ↓) shortcuts constantly, and they were a core part of my workflow. Since Figma reassigned those shortcuts to rotation instead, it has really disrupted my efficiency.The previous shortcuts were much more practical and intuitive for arranging layers, and I found them extremely helpful. I’d really appreciate it if you could consider restoring the old shortcuts or at least giving users the option to customize them easily.Thank you!

Just wanted to add a bit more context! Many agencies and independent designers build full visual systems in Figma, then rebuild everything manually in Divi for WordPress. A plugin or native export option could save hours of repetitive work and help preserve design-system consistency.I’d love to test or even provide feedback if your team ever explores a Figma-to-Divi workflow. It could really empower smaller studios that rely on WordPress as their delivery platform.

I am using Figma from almost 2 years. It’s a great tool. Previously I was using Windows 10 yet recently switched to Linux(Ubuntu). Figma doesn’t have any official release for Linux. There are some Unofficial desktop versions but they are “BUGGY”. I request you guys to release an official Figma desktop app for Linux.

There are times when having sections free of constraints is nice… but my design team has become addicted to using auto layout with frames. In many cases when using sections, it would be amazing to perfectly space the inner sections out using auto layout.

Why were the “Send to Back” and “Bring to Front” keyboard shortcuts suddenly replaced with rotation commands? Nobody asked for this, there was no announcement, and it disrupts a workflow a lot of us rely on daily. Changes like this should at least be communicated, or optional, not forced without warning. 

Many people have said the same thing, but I’m here to recommend supporting percentages within auto layout. I’ve seen many people asking for the same thing.Percentage width auto layout would help us be more efficient. Auto layout “Fill container” is great for sections being sized equally (50/50 or 30/30/30).When we’re designing content with sections, the sections are generally not the same width as each other to indicate importance.Myself and many other designers would love to have autolayout support something like this:The main container has the same spacing all the way around Each section takes up a specifid percentage of the container (70% and 30%) When the modal grows and shrinks, those sections maintain their width of 70% and 30%  Without spacing With spacing 800px wide     1000px wide      This is what autolayout currently supportsIf we use auto layout, each section must be a specified width or the same width as the other sections.  It makes

There is currently no way to give Figma Make files a cover thumbnail. For organizations that use thumbnails to help provide visual structure to their Figma work, this is an essential missing piece. 

I cannot find feedback options for figma features, so I had to use this space. Btw, please bring back interactions to Figma design, Figma Make is not at all easier to work with. Actually, it gets harder to use Figma with all those changes - that weren’t actually very necessary for some users. Why using AI in EVERY single product if the AI doesn’t work properly? It changes all the layout we submit to it, stuff that were PERFECT and now, because we have to use Figma Make to do interactions, it simply does not give the result It was supposed to give (and used to work with) for. It changes the submitted design in NOT ASKED ways. Redimensions the screens and elements, changing the whole composition. Please, bring old Figma back, there’s a reason (or MANY) why adobe XD died. Do not transform figma in another xd, i BEG you.

Hello, Figma team! I am an active user of your product and would like to propose a new feature that, in my opinion, can significantly improve the workflow for designers and their teams. We are talking about the possibility of allocating a separate editing mode only for texts inside layouts. At the moment, when it is necessary to make edits only to text elements (for example, to correct typos or change the content of the text), users have to get full access to all elements of the layout, which can lead to undesirable changes. It would be very useful to have a feature that would allow you to edit only texts, without the risk of accidentally changing other design elements. Such a mode would be useful for copywriters, marketers, and other professionals who interact with layouts but are not designers. It would also reduce the burden on designers, who would no longer have to worry about the safety of all other aspects of the project. Thank you for your attention and for the excellent product

In Figma’s playground file for the (beta) AI features, there’s a hands-on example for the AI feature called Replace Content. It sports a (vertical) auto-layout frame with two similar objects. When you select the frame, a wide handle appears on its bottom edge (in the instruction called the Duplicate Bar) , offering the option do drag up and down and add multiple instances of the same object(s).It looks and works a lot like the Repeat Grid of Adobe XD – the only featured I missed now and then in Figma, so I’m a happy camper now ! 😄The feature works very well, and the obvious next task of replacing the repetitive texts for uniquely generated dummy texts, also works very nicely BTW.But how did they get this Duplicate Bar to appear ?I can’t find anything about it in any Figma Help resources. Just this tidbit in the beta AI example.So I tried and tested it a bit, and it seems to me that you need at least 2 by 2 elements: 2 elements in one group or auto-layout, copied or duplicated into 2 s