Share Your Thoughts

I’ve been using Buzz to create full page templates, which has great potential. However, in the Edit Content panel, all editable fields for the entire page are displayed at once, which makes it difficult to navigate and manage.My suggestion is to improve this panel by making it context-aware. For example, when a specific section or component is selected on the page, the panel could display only the fields related to that element. This would make editing full pages much easier and more efficient.To give some context, in one of my projects, Buzz shows around 160 text fields along with dozens of media items. That’s a lot of information to manage in a single panel. A filtering mechanism based on the selected element would significantly improve usability.

Our team is part of a larger organization, and all our Figma files are in one Figma Team for which I am a team admin. We have some Default Libraries set for the entire team, but need the additional ability to set Default Libraries for specific project folders. I’m not seeing the settings to do this right now.

I am using Figma from almost 2 years. It’s a great tool. Previously I was using Windows 10 yet recently switched to Linux(Ubuntu). Figma doesn’t have any official release for Linux. There are some Unofficial desktop versions but they are “BUGGY”. I request you guys to release an official Figma desktop app for Linux.

Please make it possible to control which properties of nested components (atoms) can be used in higher components (molecules). What if I use same nested component in different objects and I don’t need some properties in both of them? What if I don’t need some booleans which is part of variants of that atom in molecule? Please fix it, thank you.

Hello Figma! I can not change the direction of the Autolayout on the instances of a component. I can not understand why such a great feature is disabled on the instances and why not allow us to overwrite it? There are so many incidents that I would have wished to be able to change the direction of the Autolayout in the instances of the component but right now I have to create multiple variants. 😦

I would love if Figma integrated a smarter paragraph composer for Thai. Currently, our linguists have to manually update line breaks for Thai during QA, but I feel that most of this could be avoided if there was a dictionary-based approach to when lines break in Thai. I’m aware that non-breaking spaces could be used by the Thai linguist, but I’d love if this was more automated.

On this page https://www.figma.com/community/education, I would like to have a search bar below the description for Education or on the same level as filters. There is a search bar in the top right corner of this page, but it doesn’t filter the content on my current page. Education filter search bar ideas 

Hey hey! Sometimes me and my team works on branches. This is fine if you know where you are looking in specific team / project however that’s not the case when searching. The file “card” doesn’t show if the file has branches in the search results. I guess my ask would be to add same interface I can see within a project when I hover over a file to search results file as well. Many love! <3

Middle-clicking a file in the file list should open it in a new tab. This is expected browser behavior on Linux (edit: also on Mac).Current Figma implementation is blocking it.

I'm really enjoying the Actions menu! It would be awesome to have the option to access the Assets tab directly as well, just like we can currently access the Assets left panel with a keyboard shortcut. This way, we could set a custom shortcut to open the Assets tab directly from the Actions floating menu.  ​@Figma_Desktop🙏

I prefer to use Figma when the left panel is hidden. When I have to search for components, I either need to reveal the left panel or use the actions panel, which doesn’t allow me to quickly search components, as I have to use both the mouse and keyboard for every single component. Please allow using tab in the command menu.  

I am trying to export an entire figma make prototype to figma designs. It seems crazy to have to do this screen by screen when there is so much embedded functionality (modals, tabs etc). Is there plan to do this in the future? Or am I missing something 😅 Thank you!

Allow the users can move the new toolbar through the canvas, that today is fixed underneath the page. I liked the new version but I believe some extra flexibility on it would be welcome.

I absolutely love Figma Slides!! It’s so cool that slides automatically get grouped into bundles. However, I feel like if there was a way to label these groups, I can organize my rather large (100+ slides) presentation better. Thanks a lot for the amazing work, team! <3

Request: Through the Figma MCP, access contents of comments made in Figma Design file.Reason: Can provide context for designs, review bugs, etc.Current response from OpenAI Codex with direct link to comment:No, not the comment itself.What I can see from that link is the node it points to:file: XXXXXXnode: XXXXXXscreen: /sign-up-2 (iOS)That screen contains:nav title Sign UpEmail and Password inputsSign Up primary CTAContinue with AppleContinue with Googledivider OrAlready have an account? Sign inbottom legal linksBut I still cannot read the actual Figma comment thread or the #XXXXXX anchor content from this session.If you want, paste the comment text here and I can map it to this exact screen and tell you what change it implies. 

Hi,“Hide prompts when sharing a Make prototype” seems extremely straightforward, but is not yet possible, thus this feature request.I love working with Figma Make and want to integrate it into the prototyping workflow. Unfortunately, sharing Make prototypes turned out to be a real headache. But without being able to share a prototype externally (and temporarily), the whole Make prototyping workflow doesn’t make sense, since copying the prototype pages into design doesn’t copy any interactions or animations. The goal: Share the Make full-screen preview with external viewers, without showing the AI chat history # Problem 1: Prototype viewable for logged-in users onlySharing did not work for not logged-in users, for whatever reason. Figma support couldn’t help either, thus it might be a bug.Workaround: Create a free account for the viewer, then share the full-screen previewTo shorten and speed up the wh

I’d like the possibility to automatically post an update message on Slack every time an update to a library file is published. Ideally the message includes: Name of the library Changelog (user submitted text in the publishing dialog) List of the impacted components This would make it easier for other designers and developers to notice and discuss such updates.

Figma, Auto jump to next comments when previous comment is resolved is frustrating to use. Most of the times when we resolve a comments we tend to look and ponder on screen if we want to add any new comments. When it auto-jumps we need to search for the section again which is really bad experience. Please look into this. 

Dear Figma team,Please consider adding support for pixelated, stepped, or chamfered corner styles for Auto Layout objects.If native support is not currently possible, it would be very helpful to expose additional corner geometry controls for FrameNode in the Plugin API so the community can build custom solutions.This would significantly expand layout styling possibilities while preserving the flexibility of Auto Layout.Thank you! 🖖🏻

It would be useful to be able to add a trigger to a frame that once it ‘loads’ some kind of interaction would kick-off. This would mean that not every prototyped action needs to be on click or on some clear action on the user’s part and would also allow for variables to be used to check what states components should be in so that we can have conditional logic per page.

When publishing resources (Figma Slides templaces or custom plugins and widgets) you can´t publish for a Workspace only. You can publish to entire organization or current team only.

With the strict enforcement of AI credit limits starting March 18, I’ve been looking at our organization's options for scaling usage. The current pricing structure for additional credits vs. adding new seats seems completely disconnected from reality for power users.Let’s look at the numbers for a Professional Plan (2026 pricing):Option A: Add a Full Seat. Cost: $16/mo. Cost/credit: ~$0.005 Cost for 3,000 credits: $16 Option B: Pay-As-You-Go (Overage). Cost/credit: $0.03 Cost for 3,000 credits: $90 Option C: Shared Credit Subscription. ​​​​​ Cost: $150/mo for 5,000 credits. Cost/credit: $0.03 Cost for 3,000 credits: ~$90