Share Your Feedback

Hello Figma Community,I’m currently enrolled in the Google UX Design course on Coursera and have been using Figma Education Pro through this program.I received an email asking me to re-verify my student status, so I selected “Bootcamp / Online Program”, but I got the message:“Bootcamp students & educators: You cannot self-verify, you must be verified by your bootcamp. Please reach out to them directly with any questions.”Since Coursera is an online program, not a traditional bootcamp, I don’t have an admin to verify me. Coursera support says I should self-verify, but Figma doesn’t allow it for online students.I want to know: How can online course students like me maintain Education Pro access? Will our accounts automatically downgrade to Starter after Sept 29 if no verification is possible? Are there any workarounds for students using Coursera to continue using unlimited files and full Figma Pro features? Any guidance or advice would be greatly appreciated!Thank you!

Hello, I am new to Figma but could not notice how difficult it is to navigate.Everything is so tiny and so difficult to move around and enlarge.Seems like UX is not the strong side of Figma. Thanks.

Wednesday, September 24, 2025 UpdateFigma has extended a grace period for students and educators currently reverifying their education status.You will not lose access to your account or files on September 29. To keep access uninterrupted, please complete reverification as soon as you can. If you’ve already contacted our team, we’re working through requests and will follow up directly.Thank you for your patience. We’re focused on ensuring coursework and project deadlines are not disrupted. Make sure to read the updates to our Figma Education plan and let us know in this topic if you have any questions or feedback. A few quick reminders:If you need help with a specific account or file issue, please get in touch with our Support Team. A note on Forum Guidelines: Posts that veer off-topic or become unproductive may be moderated to keep the focus on the product at hand. Keep feedback focused on the updates to the Education plan — this helps everyone follow along.

Hi everyone, I use connector lines for my flows, but for many months now, they have suddenly stopped attaching correctly to the right-side connection point of an object. With every Figma update, I keep hoping for a fix, but the issue persists.This only happens on the Mac desktop app. I often have to switch to the Chrome browser just to make this adjustment. It's frustrating, I know!It's also sad to see that this bug was reported here months ago, almost a year now, and there is still no resolution... I hope this gets some attention soon.  

We’ve found annotations to be an incredibly valuable way to capture ideas (like animations) in a clearer and more structured format compared to comments. However, it’s difficult for us to justify requiring a paid developer seat just so clients and collaborators can view these notes. Many of our projects involve multiple client stakeholders, and it’s not practical to purchase additional seats for everyone who needs visibility. The introduction of annotations was such a helpful improvement for collaboration, so it’s a bit disheartening to see this functionality restricted. We’d love to better understand the reasoning here, as it feels like a step backward in terms of accessibility and client collaboration.

Hola, ¿cómo están?El título del posteo es autoexplicativo: lo que estoy pidiendo es que independientemente de cual sea la variante por defecto del icono, en el panel de assets se muestre la variante de mayor tamaño o en su defecto algo que facilite su visualización (por ejemplo, un factor de escala de 2x automático).En su archivo de la comunidad “Simple Design System” lo que uds. hicieron fue poner por defecto la variante de mayor tamaño para que en el panel de assets se viera con mayor tamaño.Como esto es algo que es más bien un “hack” lo que estoy pidiendo es que deje de serlo y pase a mostrarse los assets en un tamaño más accesible sin necesidad de alterar el orden de las variantes.Esta solución solo la imagino para iconos, porque si bien podria aplicarse a componentes pequeños seria dificil de predecir el resultado para componentes de mayor tamaño.Este posteo está en el espiritu de la pregunta ¿cómo podemos mejorar esto?No tengo la solución, pero si la necesidad de poder visualizar

Hi, I just want to share a concern.Recently I came across the message of the Figma Make monthly limit, which I would have crossed (when it’s going to be implemented). I just want to mention that the limits are waaaaaay to low. Especially, prompting with AI requires a back and forth of conversation usually because 1) it’s better to ask 1 thing at a time instead of a bunch of things, 2) with 1 things fixed, it can break something else, and so another prompt is required to fix what the AI has broken.This way, creating a decent prototype to test some UX patterns can exceed the limit in just a day or few hours of prompting. Which is kind of not what we want as we might need it practically every week, multiple days. So increase the limit by a ten fold (10x) would be a more acceptable limit. Also, I would love to just pay a bit more every month to just have unlimited prompts. Imposing those current very small limits will not help us at all, it might rather push us towards other AI prompting t

Your current plans do not include a standalone option for just Figma Sites. It is not necessary to buy a full seat plan just because someone wants to use Figma Sites, right? Let’s offer a variety of different plans to make it easier for customers to choose

When a request is made to view a file by a new user the alert says the user wants to “Edit” this file even if the user just wants to “View”. This is very annoying because edit seats cost money and view doesn’t so it slows down the process of others viewing files. Figma, please update this or explain why it happens. Thank you  

Hey Celine,I noticed the 9/25 update, “Copy Make previews as design layers.” It’s great that we can now bring content generated in Figma Make into Figma Design for further editing. However, after trying it I ran into an issue:Content produced by Figma Make includes interactive behaviors—for example, clicking a dropdown to reveal its menu. After importing into Figma Design, those interactions are no longer present.Please see the attached images: both the date picker and the dropdown are static (not clickable), with no interaction. Similar interactive effects are missing in other places as well.Could you please continue improving this functionality? Thank you very much!Best wishes! 

In the new UI, the color options have been changed to buttons that you click on to open the color picker:I now need multiple clicks to get to a text field that I can edit or copy the value of. The old UI (still used for Selection colors) was much more accessible: I could even paste a non-hex value into the field and it would recognise it correctly!Can we please bring back the old input or an alternative/faster/easier way to quickly edit/copy color values?

please give me a shortcut to copy variable color, I literally have to hit the “Detach Variable” just to get the damn hex code then hit Ctrl-Z  

Description:In this thread, let's delve into the intricacies of designing user-friendly marketplace applications using Figma. Whether you're focusing on e-commerce platforms, service-based marketplaces, or digital product exchanges, sharing insights on: User onboarding flows Product listing and discovery interfaces Secure payment and transaction screens User profile and review systems Responsive design considerations Integration of Figma plugins and UI kits This discussion aims to compile best practices, design patterns, and resources that can aid in creating efficient and engaging marketplace applications.

Since Figma Desktop has become noticeably slower and heavier in recent times, any accidental quit can be very annoying, especially with multiple files open. Restarting consumes a lot of power, even on a high-end machine like M4/24GB RAM MBA. This makes it particularly disruptive during meetings while screen sharing, as the app often freezes or lags when reopening, so that's why I find very welcoming to toggle such warning before try to close the app like Chrome/Brave.PT/BR to EN: "Warn before quit" 

I have been a UX designer for over 12 years, and in that time I have seen countless tools come and go. Very few truly stand out, but Motiff was one of them.Unfortunately, most people never really got to know Motiff, and as a result it struggled to gain enough traction to sustain its own design platform. That said, I was genuinely excited to learn that the team decided to bring back their powerful features in the form of a Figma plugin, essentially Motiff AI 2.0.Here is the concern. Figma typically approves plugins within 10 business days. Yet it has been over a month, and the Motiff plugin still has not been approved. I can’t help but wonder why. From what I can see, there are plenty of mediocre AI plugins already available, but the one tool that could truly raise the bar for design quality is being held back.I also found a post by the Motiff team in this forum where they shared an update. It even had a reply, but since then there has been complete silence. That makes this situation fe

We just wrapped the big announcements at Config, and we know there’s a lot to take in.This thread is your space to share reactions, ask questions, and let us know what you're excited about (or still curious about) with regard to Figma Sites. Our team will be actively reading and sharing relevant takeaways with the product team. What we’d love to hear from you:What aspects are you most excited about — and why? Where do you still have questions or want more clarity? Anything that didn’t quite land for you yet?  A few quick reminders:If you need help with a specific account or file issue, please get in touch with a specialist on the Support Team. A note on Community Guidelines: Posts that veer off-topic or become unproductive may be moderated to keep the focus on the product at hand. Keep feedback focused on Figma Sites — this helps everyone follow along.

ATLEAST LET US GO BACK TO PREVIOUS UI VERSIONS OF FIGMA. STOP TRYING TO REINVENT THE WHEEL EVERY MONTH AND CHANGING EVERYTHING

Please unarchive this topic because now I cannot even send it as an answer to other people who are asking this question because they cannot access it.

I’m trying to make a simple prototype of four screens for an web app. At first everything was more or less ok, but the last two days the AI is constantly hallucinating, making changes that are not requested to the point that my project is almost ruined. From the simple request to add additional column to a table the AI changed my layout, typography, etc. for absolutely no reason

I know you can put variables in gradients but are we going to see the option of adding gradient styles to Figma variables anytime soon? At the next Config maybe? 🙏🏻

  I use custom code (CSS and JS) in Figma to optimize my website’s UI, but the current input area is too short. Editing longer snippets requires constant scrolling and slows me down. It may better if the input fields ara resizable. 

I occasionally (once is too often) see the AI self-talk mention being unable to see what’s going on due to a “truncated file”. What does that mean. Eavesdropping on its “tinking” I get the impression there are times it can’t access all the code and hast to make blind changes. Is that what’s going in? (It can’t be, right?)

Search engines, AIs, and even co-workers have a very hard time understanding what I’m talking about when I say “figma make”. I can’t get much help with it online cuz search engines and AIs think I using “make” as  a verb.Please, Please rename it to Build, or construct or something!

It looks so much better in diagrams.All the colored lines look goofy. And if you change shape colors, they don’t change with them so it’s very difficult to manage.Clean gray lines solve everything. Win win.