Skip to main content

Share Your Feedback

Your opinion matters! Tell us what’s working (or not).

  • 269 Topics
  • 1,326 Replies
269 Topics
S
Figmate
seniManager, Community Support
posted in Share Your Feedback
READ ME: How to use the Share Your Feedback category?

Figma’s products have been developed to add value to users and we continue to want to hear what you have to say! That’s why we’ve created this category - a dedicated category where you can post your feedback, both positive and constructive. Here’s a few points to bear in mind in the Share Your Feedback category: Please keep the discussion constructive, and follow our Forum Guidelines and Code of Conduct Our team will merge topics with feedback on the same subject Inactive topics that are 6 months or older may be closed or archived. We’ll make sure that our product teams have seen the feedback though before closing the topic. Note: If you have product ideas or feature requests, head over to the category Suggest a Feature.

2220
S
Figmate
click_Mao
click_MaoNew Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
UI3 Feedback

What I can’t stand the most is that the panels of the new UI can’t be attached to the edges. They leave some gaps, wasting the space to display the main design and operation area. And visually, these gaps are also distracting my attention. The toolbar at the bottom also interferes with the main operation space, especially if its color is the same as my design draft. By the way, is it just for the convenience of novices to move it from the top to the bottom? If someone who uses Figma more frequently, he will use shortcuts instead of mouse clicks to trigger these functions. So I hope that adjustments can be made in time in the official version of UI3, otherwise these redesign will seem like a subjective conjecture of someone who doesn’t use Figma much.

6590413
Igor Offbody
Thomas Reem
Figmate
Thomas ReemFigmate
posted in Share Your Feedback
[Config 2025] Figma Sites is here — let’s hear what you think! 💻

We just wrapped the big announcements at Config , and we know there’s a lot to take in. This thread is your space to share reactions, ask questions, and let us know what you're excited about (or still curious about) with regard to Figma Sites. Our team will be actively reading and sharing relevant takeaways with the product team. What we’d love to hear from you: What aspects are you most excited about — and why? Where do you still have questions or want more clarity? Anything that didn’t quite land for you yet? A few quick reminders: If you need help with a specific account or file issue, please get in touch with a specialist on the Support Team. A note on Community Guidelines: Posts that veer off-topic or become unproductive may be moderated to keep the focus on the product at hand. Keep feedback focused on Figma Sites — this helps everyone follow along.

78840
Jorge-Girao
Thomas Reem
Figmate
Thomas ReemFigmate
posted in Share Your Feedback
[Config 2025] Figma Buzz is here — let’s hear what you think! 🐝

We just wrapped the big announcements at Config , and we know there’s a lot to take in. This thread is your space to share reactions, ask questions, and let us know what you're excited about (or still curious about) with regard to Figma Buzz. Our team will be actively reading and sharing relevant takeaways with the product team. What we’d love to hear from you: What aspects are you most excited about — and why? Where do you still have questions or want more clarity? Anything that didn’t quite land for you yet? A few quick reminders: If you need help with a specific account or file issue, please get in touch with a specialist on the Support Team. A note on Community Guidelines: Posts that veer off-topic or become unproductive may be moderated to keep the focus on the product at hand. Keep feedback focused on Figma Buzz — this helps everyone follow along.

32827
Ondrej_Pucek
Kelyan_Chaumet
Kelyan_ChaumetNew Participant
posted in Share Your Feedback
New update changed the Figjam stickies color, and I don't like it

The most recent update changed a few things in Figjam. First, they added a lot of new “shapes” (which is just a rectangle with an icon inside), and added a couple of new default colors. HOWEVER, they also changed the base colors for stickies! They are now way paler, with washed out, low contrast colors. I’m sure it was supposed to make them look both like real sticky notes and to increase the contrast between the background colors and the text for accessibility reasons, but I feel the colors don’t contrast enough at all between one another. I use colors a lot to help with identifying specific sections or types of notes, I often use every color of stickies available to distinguish between specific uses of each (like taking notes during user tests, each color representing a scenario). Unless custom colors are finally made available for stickies in Figjam, I think they are going to be way more annoying to use for me from now on.

24717
Frank_K
Julia57
Julia57Active Member
asked in Share Your Feedback
Strikethrough persisting over interaction states?

I’m working on a ‘to-do list’ feature, and we use the strikethrough styling on the ‘done’ state variants of our ‘to-do item’ component. The problem is, that figma treats it as a persistent override. I want the strikethrough to appear/disappear when the task is marked done/undone. But it persists when the states are being toggled. To-do type apps are super common, does anyone have a workaround? I dont see anyone talking about this problem in the forum, so I don’t know if the Figma team is aware of this. For our prototype, we ended up manually creating a strike line with an absolute-positioned line object. Obviously this hack isnt responsive and cannot be used for our ‘real’ library component. It also doesnt account for multiple lines of text.

00
Julia57
Alex_Mueller1
Alex_Mueller1New Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
[Config 2025] Grid Auto Layout Flow — let’s hear what you think!

I was very excited to hear that grids were coming to Figma. CSS Grid was introduced years ago and brought with it many things that flexbox was incapable of doing, so I was hoping for a similar level of new capabilities here, and I genuinely cannot believe that this feature is being shipped in its current state (even as a ‘beta’). This is a very long post, but I feel like this feature has been implemented so poorly that it legitimately sows doubt in Figma’s capabilities to deliver features in the future. Inability to ‘hug’ contents Both rows and grids themselves are unable to resize themselves to match their contents (‘Hug”). Row heights must be either “Auto” (1fr) or a fixed height, meaning that if you want your rows to be sized per their elements, you’ve now manually defined each row height in px (not even a variable value), and instead of getting a clean CSS output, now you have however many rows defined in exact values, destroying any chance of scalability. This alone makes this fea

75125
martiankid
Thomas Reem
Figmate
Thomas ReemFigmate
posted in Share Your Feedback
[Config 2025] Figma Draw is here — let’s hear what you think! ✍️

We just wrapped the big announcements at Config , and we know there’s a lot to take in. This thread is your space to share reactions, ask questions, and let us know what you're excited about (or still curious about) with regard to Figma Draw. Our team will be actively reading and sharing relevant takeaways with the product team. What we’d love to hear from you: What aspects are you most excited about — and why? Where do you still have questions or want more clarity? Anything that didn’t quite land for you yet? A few quick reminders: If you need help with a specific account or file issue, please get in touch with a specialist on the Support Team. A note on Community Guidelines: Posts that veer off-topic or become unproductive may be moderated to keep the focus on the product at hand. Keep feedback focused on Figma Draw — this helps everyone follow along.

28416
alexandra_dpmapps
E
EtchNew Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
Annotations Feature

The annotations feature is nice, but it’s pretty frustrating that you’ve chosen to only allow editors and developers access to them. I frequently have a need to share annotations with other stakeholders (developers, support, other product managers and designers). By implementing them in the way you have, you’ve excluded product managers with view access from seeing my annotations. Most of the PMs I work with only have viewer licences which means they are unable to see them. My alternatives are that I use Comments instead of Annotations (which is a misuse of Comments for developer and interaction notes IMO) or I spin my own and make components of them. Please make annotations visible to all users; not just editors and developers.

90
E
Vitorya_K
Vitorya_KNew Member
asked in Share Your Feedback
Why the alignment (Flow) control was repositioned in auto layout properties?

PLease stop moving most commonly used buttons to new places all the time! It isvery bad us practise, each time I need to spend time to learn where I can find an options that was moved or has a new look, like whith this auto layout flow buttons, which where presented as a dropdown before. Very subtle and unexpected change.

80
Vitorya_K
Islam.Imad
Islam.ImadNew Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
The auto layout option panel needs to be reverted

I think we need to move the aligning panel back to the right, I found myself use gap input more that aligning and by long shot.

292
Vitorya_K
Lucas Sfair
Lucas SfairNew Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
Who Thought Removing the Community Tab Was a Good Idea?

Why on earth did you remove the community tab? Now, not only is the button back in its old spot at the bottom of the page, but there's also the issue that when browsing the community and clicking on a file, the tab closes — meaning you have to open it again and start from scratch. Really frustrating.

572
Vitorya_K
JosephxBrick
JosephxBrickNew Participant
asked in Share Your Feedback
New auto-layout property setting is hard to parse.

I stare at it, looking for the option I want before finding it. Here is what throws me off. For reference, there are the five rows of controls presented: Here’s what’s confusing to me. In row 2, the left-most button switches modes (auto, freeform), but it’s *inside* the mode that is set by row 1, confusingly in the same row as the mode modifiers. Also, the icon for this button is meaningless to me. Rows 2 and 4 four directly affect each other, yet they are separated by W/H. Rows 3 and 5 directly affect each other, yet they are separated by layout origin/spacing. BTW I love the layout of row 4! It’s just feels like it’s in the wrong place. This would make so much more sense (to me)

70
JosephxBrick
Liz_Carter1
Liz_Carter1New Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
updated autolayout behavior

i want to make a grid of images from an auto-layout. the previous behavior was that the layout would responsively place as many images on one row that fit within the frame’s horizontal bounds. so if the frame is widened, at some point the images would start wrapping around. this behavior is broken even when it’s set to grid layout. please fix, don’t explain how the new layout works, i understand it and want the old way restored. added grid auto-layout widening the frame desired result from resizing the grid-layout

90
Liz_Carter1
Deepakshi Varma
Deepakshi VarmaNew Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
Feature Update 2025 @config

Honestly i’m not impressed with this year feature update. Last year changed the ui a LOT!!! which was a learning curve for everyone and this year you still changed the major features: autolayout, layers panel, draw feature. Layers panel:I get you added the thumbnail of frames,groups to give clarity but it actually is distracting and taking too much space and not doing it’s basic job of telling me which frame is horizontal aligned or vertical, it’s not even clear that it is an autolayout or frame or group. Unless i don’t rename them i’ll have no way of knowing it, If there’s a way please let me know. But otherwise it was needed and hampering my workflow right now. I like the old icon pattern look which was clear right away, not making me think twice. Autolayout: It is changed again with too many icons at top, even if you explain us the meaning it is still not making sense to me. LAST YEAR changes made a lot of sense for me as you grouped major things that were supposed to be together bu

160
Deepakshi Varma
user527
user527New Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
UI3 feedback

I’m a UI designer, not an analytic or product designer and Figma UI3 is a huge drawback for me for many reasons. Now I need to search where the @$#% size/position and layout section is. Every. %!@#*&$. Time. It just exhausts me. Effects section is now above selection colors? WHY? WHO HAVE ASKED FOR THIS? Back in the day all assets were shown simultaneously and I could have pick them instantly, now I need to navigate through folders and to try and remember where have I placed them. Plugins are now buried in sub-submenu for like why? They don’t matter anymore? PLEASE PLEASE at least let us customise your shiny new piece of… refined and exquisite design.

70
user527
haileab_yagersew
haileab_yagersewNew Member
asked in Share Your Feedback
UI2 is Back — Because the User Always Wins!

I stopped waiting for a fix.I built it myself. Yes — a full browser extension that brings back UI2 the way we all remember it. Everything just… feels like home again. I know you miss me :( And I didn’t build this because I’m a developer with nothing to do.I built this because I felt ignored. A while ago, I made a post: “UI3 mess: We never asked for this dear Figma or I should say Adobe…” Some of you replied. It got views. It got shared.And yet — nothing changed.Figma never responded. No option to switch. No care. So instead of shouting into the void, I opened my laptop and said: Fine. I’ll fix it myself. I’m just a guy from a third-world country who genuinely loves Figma — for the Figma that just worked! But I do have strong opinions, decent dev skills, and apparently… a lot of free rage to convert into code.So I poured it all into this. UI2 — back. Functional. Familiar. Home. But here’s the twist:I’m not done. I’ve had ideas for ages — like being able to customize your shortcuts.Imagi

28411
Alinjonochek
Alinjonochek
AlinjonochekNew Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
UI3 is very inconvenient — please bring back the old interface

The new UI3 is uncomfortable and hard to use. Many useful features are hidden, the workflow is slower, and the overall layout feels less intuitive. Please bring back the previous interface or at least give users the option to switch between the old and new versions. This change is seriously affecting my productivity. 😭

60
Alinjonochek
Jon Towers
Jon TowersNew Participant
asked in Share Your Feedback
UI3 IS NOT AN IMPROVEMENT! can you not force us to switch PLEASE?! or let us configure the UI to our needs?

Did you actually test UI3 on power users? I suspect not given that the simple and intuitive UI2 is now ruined by annoying extra clicking and UI elements not being placed together. This “update” is a backwards step and we as users should be able to choose and configure how we want the UI for our purposes. The bottom centre floating tool bar is just wrong for power users.

33017
Neil_Gonzalez
Maven Layemi
Maven LayemiNew Member
asked in Share Your Feedback
EXPORT FIGMA TO POWERPOINT & GOOGLE SLIDES

We love you guys and I mean BIG TIME! Thank you for making life easy with figma. What about the recent updates, mwahhhhh… they are so sweet. However, we have large clients based who always want their presentations in Powerpoint & Google Slides but Figma slides can’t do that too. It will be very great to have that feature to export designs and presentations to powerpoint & google slides. Can we have it like sooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnn 🥹🥹🥹🥹Thank you!

121
Celine_
Figmate
Dima_Novosad1
Dima_Novosad1New Participant
posted in Share Your Feedback
Thank you for fixing performance drops on Intel Macs!

Huge!! 🌳

30
Dima_Novosad1
Amber_Salyer
Amber_SalyerNew Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
New - Grid and Hugging Content Vertically

When testing out the new grid inside components, I noticed that there is no option to hug the content vertically. We use instance swaps in things like footer for our designers and it’s not ideal for them to have to manually resize. Would be great if this new feature hugged, otherwise we can’t really use it in a lot of our components in our design system we thought it would be good for.

422
Dennis_N
David_Cortizo1
David_Cortizo1New Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
Grid improvements

Grid Beta - Design and Sites Beta. The new Grid layout needs some updates in order to be a great layout tool. Ability to place multiple elements in the same cell, no absolute positioning, no parent frame hack.. Example: show loading on a button that is display grid. The text opacity changes and the spinner then shows up. This allows the button to stay the same size. Then allow changing the z-index of the elements inside a cell. Allow specifying cols and row sizes: Auto. Hard coded value. minmax(). min-content. max-content. 1fr 2fr ratios. There should be support for variants in the gaps (both horizontal and vertical) but also in the col and row inputs, this allows the layout to change based on variant modes. Example: Mode for desktop: 12 cols and 6 rows. Mode for tablet: 6 cols and 8 rows. Mode for mobile: 3 cols and 9 rows. Grid area? Maybe allow to place content in named grid areas: nav nav nav main . aside footer footer footer Also maybe allow selecting the flow of content from top

260
David_Cortizo1
Gunn
GunnNew Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
Please bring back ui2

Please bring back ui2, it's very hard to work with Figma right now actually. Instead of a gradual change, everything changed all at once. There's no need to make things more complicated than they need to be. I've always been a big fan of Figma. It's so easy to use and it's a pleasure to work with. After spending some time getting to know Adobe's various features, I've found a product that's as easy as it is delightful. Whether I can creating both banners or designing pages, this product makes it a breeze. I learned all the features and capabilities in just one day in UI2! Now, with the new UI3, working with a simple project is lengthened many times over. I just wanted to let you know that the menu on the right is very tricky to use. It's working with frames, and the position of objects inside has become inconvenient and very long. I would really appreciate it if you could bring back the UI2 selection. I'm struggling with the new interface for the third day and can't get used to it. I h

13322
Aleksandr Zolotarevskiy
vpanteleev
vpanteleevNew Member
posted in Share Your Feedback
Non-URL dev resources

As a backend developer, I would like to be able to add details for how various parts of the design can be implemented as backend interactions (API endpoints, parameters, specifics). Currently, I am limited to add an URL in “Dev resources”, but I would like to be able to add information other than an URL. There also doesn’t seem to be a way to easily see which parts of the design have dev resources attached and which don’t. All in all, I haven’t found a way to use this feature in a useful way so far, and have been using discussions instead.

00
vpanteleev

Solved topics

Trending tags

Terms & ConditionsCookie settings

Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings