Share Your Feedback

I last used Figma make a month ago, and whatever change was made to the default LLM made it unusable. The default selection picks an LLM that can’t produce even the most basic protoype and is unable to follow instructions. It was a powerful tool that I highly recommended but I’d be embarrassed if someone tried to use it with the current default LLM. A lower token cost doesn’t matter when the tokens are wasted by failed outputs. 

Hi, I’ve seen past threads that Figma doesn’t yet offer discounted plans for non-profits, but you do have educational plans. Do you have any plans to start offering non-profit discounts? It would be a great benefit to many, and honestly, you might be the only one we pay for that doesn’t provide a discount… 

I’ve noticed a usability issue in Figma around discovering updates/published files . Currently it’s difficult to tell whether anything has been updated or need to be published. There’s no immediate visual indication in the left panel, and users must actively open the Assets panel to check if updates are available.This makes updates easy to miss and adds unnecessary friction.Suggested improvement:Introduce a small notification indicator (e.g. a dot or badge) on the relevant menu item. This would give users an at-a-glance signal that something has changed and needs attention, without requiring extra clicks or manual checking. Thank you!

Why did my design files disappear by themselves and I can't find them?

Senior engineer, 6 years in. I can read a codebase faster than I can read a Figma file.Every Design - Dev handoff is a different puzzle and you're the one solving it on the clock. Here's what's started bothering me more recently — it's not just a me problem anymore.My AI agent can't read Figma either.I've been using Claude for few months. It's fast, it's good, and it's completely blind to design intent. I paste in a component description and it hallucinates spacing. I give it a screenshot and it gets the layout roughly right but the tokens wrong. There's no file format that bridges "what the designer built" and "what the agent needs to implement it."What I actually want when I pick up a ticket:— A file that tells me the flex direction, gap, padding, and alignment of every layer. Not a screenshot. A structured file.— Token names, not hex values. color/background/primary not #6750A4. My codebase uses tokens.

Hello,Have raised multiple tickets and having an enterprise paid subscription. Support is quite poor in responses with closure of tickets with no responses either. What’s the point of an enterprise subscription if we aren’t able to reach support?  

I’m working with Figma Buzz to create some social media post templates. My template includes an image nested within a mask. I would like to allow the rest of my team to use these buzz templates and provide them with a simple way to place images in the desired space.Using slots works almost perfectly in that it enables me to designate the frame within a mask as a slot and placing the image involves a simple drag-and-drop into the slot. With all other layers locked, this makes my template very easy to use.However, having the slot frame not locked makes it easy to accidentally move the slot altogether, which in turn ruins the layout of my template. Locking the slot prevents it both from being moved, but it also prevents the drag-and-drop functionality from working. QuestionIs there a way to lock the position of a slot frame without disabling the drag-and-drop functionality? Feedback on Slots

Now that Figma is officially available and expanding in India, I’ve been wondering:Why are subscriptions still not localized for Indian users?Currently:pricing is shown in USD many local payment methods are unsupported international card payments don’t work smoothly for everyone currency conversion + taxes make subscriptions more expensive and confusingFor a lot of students, freelancers, and early-stage designers in India, this becomes a major barrier even if they genuinely want to pay for Figma.Why this mattersIndia has one of the fastest-growing design and tech communities:thousands of new designers every year startups heavily adopting Figma huge student creator ecosystem increasing use of AI + collaborative design toolsA lot of people want to purchase Figma subscriptions legitimately, but the payment experience still feels built primarily for inter

Has there been any consideration to changing how API rate limits are applied? Here is our situation, which seems like a pretty common one:We are a software dev shop. We have a Figma Professional Plan for our organization, Full seat licenses for our developers. We rely heavily on the Figma API for connecting our tooling (AI coding tools, etc) and pulling directly from Figma files. The rate limits are perfectly sufficient for how we usually work with one HUGE caveat…We work with a design shop outside our company. They have their own Figma org, Pro Plan, and Full seat licenses. Projects usually start with them creating Figma designs. They share these files with us, but they live in their org. If we access the files directly, we hit API rate limits almost immediately because we only have guest access to these files.The main work-around we have now is to make a copy of the Figma file into our org. Then we can access it with the API limits under our l

Whose idea was it to put the little icon for the new AI agent so close to the upper right corner of an object? I can’t tell you how many times I’ve gone to adjust the size of an object and accidentally opened the agent. Each instance doesn’t take that much time, but when you do it countless times a day, it makes work that normally feels fluid feel disjointed. If I want to open the agent, the option in the left nav panel is super easy to access. I don’t need the agent connected to every object I touch. I’d like to see the user research (or lack thereof) that made team Figma think this was a good idea. You’re assuming the agent is so helpful and so needed that people need it right there. That’s confirmation bias at it’s finest. Please take this away or at least move it!  

Took me a minute this morning to find the new placement of the publish button for figma make prototypes. This is an action I am frequently doing as I push changes/updates to those who have access to the designs. I liked the old placement of this much better which wasn't buried two levels deep. With this latest change, putting it under the share button > publish > 1st line item - it is less clicks to change the URL of the prototype which is share button > ‘update’ icon, which is an action I would never want to do. If anything updating the URL of the prototype should be several levels deep; not publishing changes. 

After a late switch from Sketch to Figma about six months ago, here is my conclusion regarding the UX of Figma:While Figma has many great features that Sketch does not have (dev mode, way more capable prototyping, variables,…) the general UX of the tool is just sooo bad! Here are the things that annoy me most:Visibility of functions: There are so many functions hidden below a small icon that has no label. Much stuff is hard to find. And what drives me really nuts: When a function is not available, then its UI element (or entry in context menu) is hidden – not disabled! I’m using Figma for UX Design, and it just feels so wrong to use this tool that does not handle UX basics correctly itself.   Library management – publishing components: You can do this from the book button on the top left where you usually update components from other files, but publishing is mixed in here if you click on “This file”. But then you can only publish all cha

Don't get me wrong, I love working with figma and I greatly appreciate what value this software has done for designers and business. However, I will never understand why such simple solutions as folders for pages or "CSS Margins" (the basis in HTML) have not been included in this software for many years. I understand the pursuit of money and the AI ​​trend, but don't forget who makes your business run. People are very willing to jump to an alternative as soon as it appears and offers what you haven't been able to offer for years. Don't make the same mistakes as Adobe.

Hi Figma team and community,I'd like to suggest reverting (or making optional) the loading animation behavior during AI image generation.Current behavior: When generating an image with AI, the Frame displays a dark blue gradient animation while waiting. This completely covers the canvas area and blocks visibility of all layers above the image layer.Previous behavior: The loading state used to show a transparent checkered background, which allowed me to continue editing other layers and making layout adjustments while the image was being generated in the background.Why this matters: The dark blue animation blocks the entire work area during generation It's no longer possible to edit or inspect layers above the image while waiting This interrupts the design workflow, especially for longer generation times Suggested fix:

When I open the plugin, a connection error is displayed, and registration/login is unavailable.Help me!

Dear Figma official team,Hello!We are a formal enterprise located in Chinese mainland, and we intend to purchase your Figma enterprise version service. Now we consult you about invoice related issues:Can your company issue formal valid invoices for enterprises in Chinese mainland? What types of invoices can be provided? Can it be used for domestic enterprise financial reimbursement and account entry? What are the specific steps and requirements to apply for invoices after payment? Can the invoice be issued with our full Chinese company name and complete enterprise information as the invoice title?Please tell us the relevant detailed rules of invoice issuance, so that we can complete the subsequent payment and financial procedures.Looking forward to your reply, thank you very much!Best regardsYour nameCompany nameContact information

This is really strange to me. I have a “Team”, apparent only from the URL, none of the UI elements show whether or not I’m dealing with an organization or a team. This team has members, whom I pay for, and the seats are set up for each one of them. They are all listed under the URL “…..team/<id>/team-admin-console/members...”, and show up properly.When I access “...team/<id>/all-projects….” and press the small down-arrow next to the Team name, and select “show members”, only my account is visible.The experience is this: all of the people in the team(shown under the team-admin-console) need to be manually approved/invited to each file for editing, even though they have been invited and accepted into the team.According to the documentation: “For example: if you invite

I’d like to share feedback regarding the implementation of AI credit limits in Figmake. As a designer managing multiple complex projects, I believe credit restrictions would greatly undermine Figmake’s usefulness in real-world design and prototyping workflows.  1. Most AI usage is for fixing bad or incomplete output, not luxury use.  In practice, a large percentage of AI prompts in Figmake are iterative—used to correct layout issues, rebuild misinterpreted elements, or align behaviors with visual intent. Each refinement quickly consumes credits even though the output quality depends on that iteration. Penalizing iteration limits the model’s ability to produce accurate prototypes, especially when the AI output is imperfect through no fault of the user, making credit usage really unfair and frustrating.2. Predictability becomes impossible, discouraging adoption.  With a credit cap that no one knows how to predict and calculate ahead of time, I can’t plan how

This update is genuinely one of the most frustrating UX changes I’ve experienced in a professional design tool 😡 😡 😡The new left-hand navigation panel permanently steals ~60px of horizontal space on small screens, which is completely unacceptable. That space is my primary working area — the canvas. I am literally losing room to do my job so a panel can sit there doing nothing most of the time.Yes, Variables, Files, Assets, Find, and Library are important.No — they are NOT minute-to-minute actions.They do not deserve permanent, always-visible real estate. This panel is idle 90% of the time, yet it constantly punishes my workflow.On smaller displays, this feels especially hostile. Instead of prioritising the canvas (the entire reason Figma exists), the UI forces a bulky navigation column that adds zero value moment-to-moment and actively makes precision design harder.

Copy properties does not work as it did beforeBefore if i copied properties from one auto layout to another it copied everything, but if i paste properties onto a square or any other shape and then copied properties of that square - all info about the paddings would have been erased. It was easier this way to just copy the fill color, stroke and corner radius styles to a different looking auto layoutNow even if you copy properties from a shape it still keeps the paddings and gap size

This is so annoying! Each month I need to search for the invoice in your unfriendly interface. Seriously now! Better unsubscribe the service than getting such frustration.

Can Figma generate Flutter source code?  Yes — with the help of plugins and AI-powered tools, Figma designs can now be converted into Flutter code much faster. It helps developers speed up UI building, reduce repetitive work, and turn design concepts into functional mobile app layouts more efficiently.

I spend far too much time deleting that blurb when all I want to do is point Claude to the correct URL from the MCP. I have better prompts.Either make that bit go away, or let me copy just the URL.