Share Your Feedback

Would be great if the new “Specs” that you can add wouldn’t just scale down or up but could be truly resizable.

Fix it Figma team 

This sidebar button implies collapsing to the side. But when you press it, it collapses upwards.This grinds my gears. Please change the icon to vertical expand/collapse one, or just rotate the one you have to put the small rectangle at the bottom. I go crazy every time I press this. Thank you! 

Has anyone had a decent time with this app? I’m honestly just sad I didn’t pay for Squarespace at this point. The lack of parity between Design and Sites is frustrating and confusing, the un-intuitiveness of how scrolling and content frames work, the fact that stuff seems to just break for no reason.I feel like I’ve fallen into a trap using this thing, done hours of work, and my site is still completely unstable and any tiny change I make is going to break it.After having a pretty good time with Figma Design, I’m surprised how bad this is.

I tried building a simple Photoshop style “color burn” effect.(as an aside: because your built-in color burn blend mode definitely doesn’t work like the one in Photoshop? yours kind of brightens and saturates, making things glow - when it was supposed to darken and saturate, making things look warm and burned.)The result is a plain old drop shadow, and when pressed to explain why, your agent says: The custom effect can’t access the background behind its target, so changing the burn formula alone won’t fix this. In deed, this seems to be the case - so your shaders are basically operating on their own local layer, with no awareness, access to, or influence on anything in the background.So even basic layer effects like a simple blend mode are currently out of reach.That’s sucks. 😿Your own built-in glass effect can do it:  So it’s not that the Figma core as such can’t support background dependent effects, right?It’s also why all of your demo shaders are dull as dishwater - noise, half ton

Currently seeing an “offer” for an image to video conversion tool. For a paid subscription it’s especially egregious to see an ad that actively covers up my sidebar content. And on an Enterprise account.If this is Figma’s direction moving forward, it’s shameful.

Hello - the 4,500 credits for AI is not enough.  I go through those in very quickly.  There needs to be a more viable solution.  I was using it in Beta religiously.   What will the other options be so that I can use the AI agent feature to the fullest?  Right now, it’s barely even useful.Thank you,Stephanie

Yet another UI update that ruins the workspace.Now a whole column width is reducing the workspace size, created to accommodate one AI agent button that I have no interest in using. You’ve moved the library and assets to a less usable place  because you couldn’t figure out how to add the AI agent somewhere else? How can I roll back this change to the version that actually worked?

我在 Codex 中使用 Figma 插件时遇到写入失败。我已确认插件授权账号与 Figma 文件创建者账号一致，并已重新安装、重新授权插件。测试文件：https://www.figma.com/design/A8lpNb4OCLlEnOllDy372C/Untitled复现操作：请求创建一个名为 Codex Write Check 的页面，并在其中创建名为 write-ok 的 100×100 Frame。结果：create_session 成功，use_figma 可以读取文件中的 Page 1，但执行 figma.createPage() 时返回：Error: in createPage: Can't call "createPage" in read-only modeFigma Debug UUID：1e11101c-f783-4639-a85c-6975a456c9ce请帮助检查为什么该连接的执行环境处于只读模式，以及如何启用写入。

Currently, I can't get the component properties to be reordered through the MCP. Just not currently exposed to it.It would be nice to be able to do that, as well as saving a new version history of a file.Both of thoseI can only get the MCP to do through Chrome. 

Why was the function for “Simplified instances” deprecated? I was looking for it all over the place and found out is is phased out. Why oh why? Is there any alternative? Sigh….

Figma Motion makes it easy for designers to build interactions and animations. But when we hand them off, developers can’t click a layer and see its exact motion values. Because of this, Motion is hard to use as a real collaboration tool with engineering. Expected behaviorTools like ProtoPie already handle this well: a developer clicks any layer and immediately sees which properties change, from what value to what value, with what timing and easing. We’d love the same in Figma, ideally in Dev Mode Why this mattersFor most teams, motion design only pays off once it ships in the product. Right now, the gap between building motion in Figma and implementing it means teams either keep using separate prototyping tools for handoff or accept motion that doesn’t match the design. Closing this gap would let Figma Motion work as a single source of truth for both designers and developers.Thanks for considering this!

Hey guys! Some free UX feedback on the Figma AI chat experience.Right now it’s unclear how many AI credits each action uses or how many credits we have left.First, we get a warning saying we're "low on credits" (very informative, thanks 😅). Then, once we run out, there's no option to top up credits for an individual team member. We're using Figma on a team plan, and apparently, the only way to get more credits is to pay $5,000-$8,000.A few suggestions to improve the experience: Add a progress bar showing how many credits we started with and how many we have left. Show credit usage for each action, so we know how many credits we're spending. Allow credit top-ups for individual design seats, rather than requiring the whole company to upgrade. Bonus feature: Let team members transfer unused credits to each other. Most developers on our team don't use AI features, so it would be great if we could redistribute those credits to designers who actually need them. Looking forward to seei

I would love to be able to export many videos without having to manually click download on each one, it should work the same as exporting pngs.

Figma's left sidebar currently gives most of its vertical space to the Pages section, leaving very little room for Layers.Since designers interact with Layers much more frequently, this makes the default layout inconvenient. Users have to manually drag the divider upwards every time they open Figma. 

I’m having trouble finding Figma design files in new version. Some files are in my drafts rather than in the plan or team workspace, and I can’t find the updated versions now.Would it be possible to go back to the previous version, or do you have any suggestions? Alternatively, should we allow files to be used only within the plan/team workspace?

This update is genuinely one of the most frustrating UX changes I’ve experienced in a professional design tool 😡 😡 😡The new left-hand navigation panel permanently steals ~60px of horizontal space on small screens, which is completely unacceptable. That space is my primary working area — the canvas. I am literally losing room to do my job so a panel can sit there doing nothing most of the time.Yes, Variables, Files, Assets, Find, and Library are important.No — they are NOT minute-to-minute actions.They do not deserve permanent, always-visible real estate. This panel is idle 90% of the time, yet it constantly punishes my workflow.On smaller displays, this feels especially hostile. Instead of prioritising the canvas (the entire reason Figma exists), the UI forces a bulky navigation column that adds zero value moment-to-moment and actively makes precision design harder.This change feels like it was designed for: Large monitors only Product demos Feature discoverability …not for actu

So…. working today w/ the agent and now that button is gone.  it is in the other boards but not in one of my librarys.  i have shut down i have reinstalled, i have done the thigns…. but it still is missing = what is going on? 

For reference, I’m an experienced user of video editing softwares such as Adobe Premiere Pro and Davinci Resolve, and also a beginner user of motion graphics editing software such as Adobe After Effects.Some of these suggestions are from my first impression of trying to use the mode a while back:The timeline zoom is currently too vague. It was difficult for me to find, as it was located in the bottom right, and it has a limited capability of zoom (fixed). A good suggestion is the Davinci Resolve Version where you can adjust the zoom of the timeline. In this case you can choose to oversee the whole timeline or zoom in on specific places. Another use case is that currently the Figma zoom out maxes out at the whole timeline. This would mean the timeline would be very stretched just to fit for 5 seconds. It would nice if we can zoom out larger than just the duration of the animation (again, to goal is to oversee the whole timeline). Davinci Resolve’s zoom slider  The add animation is too

To my mind, a design should be checked before it is tagged as ready for dev.If I mark a design as ready, then check the design and find out something needs to change, I’d need to re-mark it as ready for dev. This flow feels redundant as it sends unnecessary pings out and / or creates duplicate work for the devs and designer.I suggest removing this popup entirely as it is redundant at this point in the flow.Why now? 

I'm paying for a Professional seat, and somehow I burn through my monthly AI credits after generating just a few screens.For roughly the same price, I can get way more done with Codex. Figma really needs to rethink these limits.

Figma, Auto jump to next comments when previous comment is resolved is frustrating to use. Most of the times when we resolve a comments we tend to look and ponder on screen if we want to add any new comments. When it auto-jumps we need to search for the section again which is really bad experience. Please look into this. 

Hi everyone,I’m interested in how designers approach websites for industrial manufacturers and engineering products. These websites often need to present technical specifications, product types, applications, quality testing, and manufacturing capabilities in a clear and professional way.For example, a copper pipe and copper tube manufacturer needs to organize product details while keeping the website visually appealing and easy to navigate for engineers, contractors, and purchasing teams.What design practices do you recommend for presenting technical information, improving product page layouts, and making industrial websites more user-friendly?I’d love to hear your thoughts and see examples of designs that handle complex product information effectively.

It’s very annoying that you have to go to your profile settings and see how many tokens are left, in the moment you can never see how much you’ve spent.