Share Your Feedback

Look, i’ll be short. Can you PLEASE implement a shortcut or option to hide the new left panel that you’ve forced into the canvas areas? I can appreciate that some find it useful, so am not advocating for it to be removed if that’s the case, but at the very least can you please provide more design oriented people the option to hide it? It might only be minor to some, but i’ve found it so incredibly intrusive with forcing a reduction of my canvas size for the sake of UI that can be found in the navigation. Again, I understand that this might be minor to most out there, but as someone who works with design more than prototypes for my workflow, everytime I open Figma now it’s just infuriating constantly seeing a side panel I neither want nor asked for. It’s so frustrating knowing that reducing the left sidebar won’t actually reduce the new, forced navigation that offers no benefit to people like myself, but instead simply reduces my layers panel width. I also

I think that when there are only two options, a drop-down menu is unnecessary; instead, we could opt for other options that speed up the process, as they don’t require two clicks to make a selection.

Hi,I’ve encountered this bug testing out slots.  I’ve created a desktop component with a slot that uses components and both have variable widths for desktop and mobile. If I drag that instance with slotted components into a frame/section that’s set to mobile it will shrink down, but if I drag it out, the slotted components remain mobile size.Attached is a screenshot of the discrepancy.The instance functions perfectly fine if I manually set the desktop/mobile modes through the appearance panel though. Ps. I love the possibility of slots and can’t wait when it’s out of beta.

 The current libraries styles search is a fuzzy search in which it shows close matches like different colors of green when searching for green. This is nice for being able to see similar results to the search parameter but is frustrating when typing an exact variable name and it returns another variable that is related but not match. The example I’m providing below if from a color library that has both the color ‘lime’ and ‘green’. If I search for green my results show the ‘lime’ results first and I have to scroll for the exact match of ‘green’.  I have run into the same issue with ‘indigo’ and ‘purple’.This interaction could be improved by rearranging the results to show exact match results at the top and the fuzzy matches below. If someone takes the time to type a keyword that matches their variables they shouldn’t have to scroll for their result. 

Hi Figma. Really trying to give Slides a go, as I’d rather use anything over powerpoint, but I keep running into features stripped from the Figma Design that remaking it impossible to continue. For one, I cannot understand why I can’t access the variable library. My slides were imported from a file that had a deprecated library, with colors and modes that are totally unused by the assets I imported. There simply does not seem to be a way to remove those… at all. They’re permanently stuck in this presentation unless I want to start from scratch. Currently I’m making a table but I’m unable to vertically center text within a cell. This is a hard requirement for making tables that look good that use the type styles I'm defining elsewhere… otherwise I have to manually set the line height to match the table cell height which is nuts. I also created a symbol that consisted of a text box and rectangle to act as an off-cen

 Beware of this, people. This is such a hidden scam.

Hey folks,Figma's latest color tokens search update has added a new behavior to searching. I use my Primary token a lot, and I'm used to searching for "prima" for it to show up. Since this last update, searching for that makes my Disabled (#AAAAAA), token show up first, due to it having "A" in it's hex color code.My personal view is that it should weigh my search content in order to decide which content is shown, since I'm most likely not searching for "Disabled". Nonetheless, loved the other improvements that came with this update.Would love for you to share your opinion about it! Color token search panel, searching for "prim" and "prima" 

It’s quite annoying when every time I select any component or shape etc, I need to click at the “show more properties button”, it makes me fill time

With the strict enforcement of AI credit limits starting March 18, I’ve been looking at our organization's options for scaling usage. The current pricing structure for additional credits vs. adding new seats seems completely disconnected from reality for power users.Let’s look at the numbers for a Professional Plan (2026 pricing):Option A: Add a Full Seat. Cost: $16/mo. Cost/credit: ~$0.005 Cost for 3,000 credits: $16 Option B: Pay-As-You-Go (Overage). Cost/credit: $0.03 Cost for 3,000 credits: $90 Option C: Shared Credit Subscription. ​​​​​ Cost: $150/mo for 5,000 credits. Cost/credit: $0.03 Cost for 3,000 credits: ~$90

I have seen a lot of posts on reddit, linkedin and here all complaining re: Figmas opaque billing practices being so dark pattern-riddled it would put most scam sites to shame. There are countless posts across the web as old as 5 years complaining about this but I’ve yet to see any meaningful change. Adding seats and over-subscribing is way too easy with few guardrails, but reducing your subscription is far more unclear and difficult.What will it take for Figma to actually do something about this? Why is nothing being done?I keep having additional seats added to my plan accidentally. This has happened to my organization at least 3 times now. Every single time I fix the issue I go through the labyrinth of admin billing settings and think I have all my bases covered, but this system seems to be designed explicitly to funnel users into higher billing. The latest is because “Seat approval settings” was set to “Manual unless seat is available” (I had an unused seat, which w

I was in the process of handling my offboarding and role handover. While managing user permissions, I first removed my own Annual Full Seat access and then assigned an Annual Full Seat to another person.However, when I reviewed the billing, I noticed that I was still charged a billing adjustment for Monthly seats. After checking multiple times, I found that I still had individual edit access to a project within the team, which resulted in a charge of $10.32.I would like to request that Figma revoke this unexpected charge caused by my accidental operation.  

Using Claude Code connected to the Figma MCP Server, when asked to implement a screen with various different buttons, only some of the buttons were implemented as pressable (as buttons). Although the buttons looks different, they all had default and pressed variants and had the word button somewhere in the name. Looking into this further, Claude Code reported back that, “The MCP tool's code generation is inconsistent — it renders full state branching for some components and only default-state code for others, depending on how complex the Figma component is.”Question is, why is the Figma MCP Server not generating the full code, and is there anything that can be done on the Figma side to help with this?

We just wrapped the big announcements at Config, and we know there’s a lot to take in.This thread is your space to share reactions, ask questions, and let us know what you're excited about (or still curious about) with regard to Figma Make. Our team will be actively reading and sharing relevant takeaways with the product team. What we’d love to hear from you:What aspects are you most excited about — and

Right now, I’m loving slots. They’re great and exactly what I’ve been missing, but there is one quark that is causing me extra time.I’d love to be able to prescribe a child height/width behaviour for any elements that are added to the slot. I’d love to be able to say “I want any child added to this slot to have width property set to fill by default.”An example where this is annoying. Right now, anytime I drop a container in a slot in my modal component, the I have to prescribe the height/width behaviour for the container instead of it snapping into place in the available space. In Menus, every time I add a new menu item or a divider or a heading, I need to select them all and say their width should be set to “Fill”. Its a small thing, but it adds up over time.

I love Figma, and it’s the first tool I open every day. Recently, I have been getting a figma session time out error every day. My teammates has reported the same. It’s making me login via Browser (SSO login) every single day for the past 2-3 weeks. It’s not been the most delightful way to start my day, as the first thing I do as a product designer is to open Figma. It use to just work. Is there anything I can do to fix this? Thank you!

I work in a file that contains an Extended Collection (“{MyBrand A} | Design Tokens”) of a variable collection from another file (“Light | Design Tokens”) - the core file. We have multiple (n) Brands: meaning n files with Extended Collections.The text styles reference variables, and the text styles are also defined in the core file.In my example, the font style typography / block / regular / 0 originally has a font size of 12px, but in the Extended Collection it is changed to a 14px font size.Extended Collection showing, that the text style has a overwritten font-size of “14px” When I have texts that use the text styles, the text style(s) in the right panel still shows the original px value for the font sizes and line heights and not

I recently started using Figma Sites. I love the freedom and virtually endless creative choices I can make. I also know that Figma Sites is still in Beta. However, I’d love to see improvements to CMS - categories, search function and so on. Thank you for making a product that’s easy to use and enjoyable to use. 

Is this feature sensitive? i can't apply this feature by myself, only the manager can do? why has to be the manager can do? Is it release for all users in the future?

something simple, trying to upload an image using the brainstorm template, where is the add image button?

I’m running into a frustrating issue with component property overrides resetting during prototyping. I have a side navigation system built with three main button styles: Primary: Standard button with icon toggles. Secondary: Includes a caret and triggers a nested menu. Nested: The sub-menu item. The Issue: Whenever I connect these via interactions (e.g., clicking a 'Secondary' button to show the 'Nested' menu), the custom overrides reset. Specifically: Icon Resets: If I change an icon on an instance, the interaction reverts it to the default component icon or resets the color. Content Resets: When the dropdown opens, the 'Nested' menu items revert to their default CTA text instead of the custom labels I’ve written in the design. State Logic:

This is more feedback than a complaint, but I’d really appreciate greater transparency around pricing. If the cost is around £168 and then increases to roughly £200 once tax is added, it would be much better to show that full price upfront rather than only revealing it at the final stage.I’ve gone ahead and purchased it, and I’m happy with the product overall, but the added tax at the end does feel a bit unexpected. Being clearer about the total cost from the start would make the experience feel more straightforward and less misleading.Aside from that, it’s a strong product and one I’m glad to be using — it would just benefit from clearer pricing presentation for customers.

In the traditional workflow, there is a default option to export assets (like SVGs) when sharing the development link. However, in Figma Make AI, there is no direct option to export assets.For example, SVG icons are automatically converted into inline code instead of being available as exportable image files. But for WordPress CMS, these assets are required as image files (like SVG or PNG) to upload in the backend.So, what is the best way to export these assets from Figma Make AI? Are there any available options or workarounds? Or is there any other way to get there via prompt?

The management of seats is absolutely terrible. We have unused seats, and there is no way in the user interface to remove them to avoid being charged in the next billing cycle. If this is automatically not charged, it is not explained anywhere. The most terrible experience I had managing subscriptions after 25 years of actively using internet.  

I’m on the Education plan, and collaborating with people who have different subscriptions has become extremely frustrating. Collaboration simply isn’t working anymore. Even though everyone has verified their student status and clearly shows they have editing access, they’re still unable to edit the files. This is seriously affecting our productivity.I’m honestly disappointed with some of the recent changes Figma has introduced. I really hope these issues get resolved soon; otherwise, we’ll have to start considering other tools.

As mentioned in closed topic https://forum.figma.com/t/bug-autolayout-resizes-incorrectly-when-it-contains-no-visible-frames/14619, Is anybody facing the same problem? Even all contents inside “trailing-section” frame are invisible and frame resizing is set to “hug”, it still has 24 pixels of width.