Share Your Feedback

Whose idea was it to put the little icon for the new AI agent so close to the upper right corner of an object? I can’t tell you how many times I’ve gone to adjust the size of an object and accidentally opened the agent. Each instance doesn’t take that much time, but when you do it countless times a day, it makes work that normally feels fluid feel disjointed. If I want to open the agent, the option in the left nav panel is super easy to access. I don’t need the agent connected to every object I touch. I’d like to see the user research (or lack thereof) that made team Figma think this was a good idea. You’re assuming the agent is so helpful and so needed that people need it right there. That’s confirmation bias at it’s finest. Please take this away or at least move it!  

Hello Figma Team,Thank you for granting me access to Figma AI. As a mother of two, time-saving tools make a real difference in helping me balance work and family, and I am excited to start using these new features in my workflow. I truly appreciate the care your team puts into improving Figma, and I am grateful for the opportunity to explore Figma AI. Thank you again for your support and for building such a valuable product.With gratitude,Evelina

Please stop adding AI features to FIGMA. Or simply let me disable everything that is related to AI so I dont have to see it. I want to work, not be interrupted by your stupid shareholders goals.

figma文件一直在加载打不开

Are we serious? Every time I hover or click on an object there is now a button covering my work to open an AI prompt window. This is gross. A huge reason for moving away from Adobe for me is to get away from these useless AI tools being forced on me. Care to stand for something different Figma? Or just going to follow the trend

I’d like to share feedback regarding the implementation of AI credit limits in Figmake. As a designer managing multiple complex projects, I believe credit restrictions would greatly undermine Figmake’s usefulness in real-world design and prototyping workflows.  1. Most AI usage is for fixing bad or incomplete output, not luxury use.  In practice, a large percentage of AI prompts in Figmake are iterative—used to correct layout issues, rebuild misinterpreted elements, or align behaviors with visual intent. Each refinement quickly consumes credits even though the output quality depends on that iteration. Penalizing iteration limits the model’s ability to produce accurate prototypes, especially when the AI output is imperfect through no fault of the user, making credit usage really unfair and frustrating.2. Predictability becomes impossible, discouraging adoption.  With a credit cap that no one knows how to predict and calculate ahead of time, I can’t plan how far my Figmake usage will tak

Hi Figma Support Team,I’d like to share some feedback about the process of handing off a Figma file from a designer to a client.I’m a freelance designer, and I recently tried to transfer a completed Figma file to my client. In the sharing settings, the client is now shown as the owner of the file, and I have removed myself from the file access list. However, I still seem to have admin/editor access from my side, while the client, who is listed as the owner, cannot edit the file.The only request I can see from the client is a Full seat request inside my personal team. As I understand it, approving this would add the client as a paid seat to my workspace. That is not the result I need for a client handoff. I don’t want to add the client to my team. I want to hand off the file so they can own and edit it on their side.I also read that one possible flow is for the client to create their own workspace/team, invite me to it, and then have the file moved there. In practice, this feels too com

Please move AI the last in the list, personaly, I use the most often the Layers and the Assets. Now I have to make a jump.  

We've noticed several recurring issues after the latest Figma update, specifically within the update panel and related components. These bugs are affecting our daily workflow and reducing productivity for our team.Issues observed:Components in the update panel are not displaying correctly (misaligned, missing, or broken states) Certain component variants appear to reset or lose their properties after the update The update panel UI itself has rendering glitches (overlapping elements, incorrect spacing) Some interactive component states (hover, focus) are behaving inconsistentlyImpact:These small but frequent bugs interrupt design work and reduce confidence in the tool's reliability, especially when working with shared component libraries.Request:We kindly ask the Figma team to review the update panel and the associated component behavior introduced in the latest release, and to prioritize a fix/patch update as soon as possible to ensure a smooth experience for all users.Thank you for yo

Minor thing, but I noticed that I can only open the Check Designs settings if issues are found.Selection with issues:Selection with no issues: I think you could just keep the entire menu. I don’t mind seeing little 0s next to each category when it doesn’t find any issues. Regardless, the settings option should definitely show at all times when opening Check Designs.

While using Claude.ai with the Figma connector Claude told me it wasn't able to programmatically insert the contents into the slot inside a component “because Figma protects slot nodes from plugin writes”. If this limitation is intentional, why? It serious limits the usefulness of the connector. Please allow the connector to write to slot nodes.

Having the same amount of text on the layer as in the layout text box seems like a waste of resources. Perhaps just the first 30 characters would be enough..? 

There has been a new update that moved the publish button inside the assets tab. I work mostly in the files tab, where all the pages are and am used to publishing from that. Now it's been buried inside assets tab which I hardly even look when in the library file itself. Can the publish button just be in a place that it's visible at all times?  

Hello everyone at Figma, could you please fix very small alignment/sizing issue? because it just might make me blind.Thank you in advance.

I’ve noticed a usability issue in Figma around discovering updates/published files . Currently it’s difficult to tell whether anything has been updated or need to be published. There’s no immediate visual indication in the left panel, and users must actively open the Assets panel to check if updates are available.This makes updates easy to miss and adds unnecessary friction.Suggested improvement:Introduce a small notification indicator (e.g. a dot or badge) on the relevant menu item. This would give users an at-a-glance signal that something has changed and needs attention, without requiring extra clicks or manual checking. Thank you!

I know UI change takes time to get used to, but I am desperately missing the previous Files/Assets setup in the lefthand nav (pictured below). There is an agent trigger on every single frame on my workspace...I really don’t need a dedicated lefthand nav option for it as well. I don’t need Agents often enough to justify it being the second item in my lefthand nav, in addition to being on every single frame. What I do need, multiple times a day, every single day, is my assets panel.  

 I ran into a font issue while working with MCP use_figma and wanted to share it here. I have a font installed on my system (Pretendard) that works perfectly fine in the Figma UI — it shows up as "Installed by you" in the font picker. However, it's completely invisible to the Plugin API when running through MCP use_figma. listAvailableFontsAsync() returns around 7,600 fonts, but none of them are locally installed ones. It seems to only return Google Fonts.loadFontAsync() also fails, and trying to appendChild a component instance that contains text using the font throws a font load error — even into a non-auto-layout frame. Steps to Reproduce 1. Install a local font on your system (I tried both ~/Library/Fonts/ and /Library/Fonts/ on macOS) 2. Confirm the font shows up normally in the Figma UI 3. Run the following via MCP use_figma: const fonts = await figma.listAvailableFontsAsync(); const result = fonts.filter(f => f.fontName.family === "Pretendard"); return result.length; // 0 awa

Imagine writing an email knowing the recipient could see every draft as you typed it. Every typo, every awkward sentence, every idea you abandoned before finding the right words. How would that feel?Imagine sending a text message, but the other person could see every version before the final one. Not just what you chose to send, but all the thoughts you decided were better left unsaid.Imagine learning a skill where people judged you based on your first attempt instead of the finished result. Every mistake became part of the evaluation instead of part of the learning process.That is what Figma's current model feels like. It exposes the process instead of focusing on the outcome.Design is iterative by nature. Ideas are explored, tested, discarded, revisited, and refined. The rough work is not the product. It is simply how the product gets made.In almost every profession, people are judged on what they choose to present, not every imperfect step they took to get there. When the entire cre

I don’t understand why Figma AI is so restricted right now. The cost of a full seat is already on par with what many AI tools charge every month, sometimes even higher. Still, we get a handful of AI uses and then it stops working.AI should be part of the design flow, not something we have to save for special moments. If running it is that expensive, raise the seat price a little but make it unlimited for paying users.It’s frustrating when you’re in the middle of a creative session and have to think about whether you’re about to hit a limit. Figma should help us explore ideas, not ration creativity.

Figmaをクライアント側のルールで使用できないときに、アノテーションを含めてエクスポートをし、やり取りを進めたいです。アノテーションも含めたＰＤＦにできないため、１画面ずつアノテーションごとスクリーンショットをし、つなぎ合わせて１枚にしたものをクライアントに送るという手間が発生しています。または、ＰＤＦをエクスポートをしてから、別でまたコメントを貼るという手間が発生しています。機能追加を何卒お願いいたします。 

You should start from scratch and hire a UX designer to rebuild Figma so that it’s user friendly and not the least intuitive design program.

It is far too easy to click the preview button when zoomed out in Figma sites which is a common thing that I do with such a large site. Furthermore, once I do that, I have to wait over a minute to close it, which is quite frustrating. I don’t want it to be so easy to accidentally open the preview. When I do, I want to be able to easy go back without waiting for the page to load. 

Figma, in my humble opinion, started as a design tool that rivaled Sketch. It eventually took over the market, and now almost everyone has abandoned Sketch. Figma has become the most widely used product design tool.What has happened since then, however, seems to be a lot of sidestepping and creating offshoots that move away from what the product was originally intended for.FigJam — why? Users are already using Miro and other tools that do this better. FigJam feels oversimplified, and in the end, I just use Figma itself to run workshops. Assuming that people who don't use Figma are going to come in and adopt FigJam is a mistake. Most people who don't use Figma don't enjoy using it.Slides — why? Most businesses are still using PowerPoint. It doesn't matter how much you push Figma Slides; it almost always ends up back in PowerPoint. This feels like a major departure from what Figma is supposed to be.Coding? What in the world? There are already so many tools out there that write code. Why

Just going to complain because who ever is behind the wheel at Figma, from a product experience point of view, is not thinking about good UX and is instead just making things harder for users. You used to be able to open a plug-in, then save it for easy access. There are many versions of the same plugins, even paid ones and I would like to be able to quickly jump to those especially after trying a few that aren't what I need. Instead I have click about 2 to 3 times, then enter text to search for it, then use it, then wonder where it went or even have a hard time finding it again. Now the ones I paid for are hard to find too - these are ones Im paying for and should be easily accessible. Please, make it easier to jump to a list of plugins users use often or have paid for 

I can’t use the site design feature without clicking a “get started” button with fine print that does not clearly state the breadth of the privacies waived. So much for free.