Share Your Feedback

I’m often facing this problem. When I tried to resize the layers panel, it sometimes accidentally dragged the slide which is really annoying. Furthermore, the cursor hitbox for resizing the layers panel is too narrow (it’s really on the edge of the layers size) so that the cursor turns into vertical double-sided arrow. I hope Figma can figure out to fix the layers panel resizing issue. 

My userflow is large, when I make it in FigJam then export it took 45k x 4k pixel to Figma, Figma design cap it on 4k for exporting image, so my imported png looked pixelated into oblivion. Could you Figma team make it seamless to add connector in Figma design like it was in FigJam? I just want to show my userflow in my portfolio in Figma design before upload it into Figma site.

Took me a minute this morning to find the new placement of the publish button for figma make prototypes. This is an action I am frequently doing as I push changes/updates to those who have access to the designs. I liked the old placement of this much better which wasn't buried two levels deep. With this latest change, putting it under the share button > publish > 1st line item - it is less clicks to change the URL of the prototype which is share button > ‘update’ icon, which is an action I would never want to do. If anything updating the URL of the prototype should be several levels deep; not publishing changes. 

I was having internet connectivity problems, so I was met with the Connection Error screen:Connection error screenshotThe “Try again” button doesn’t seem to do anything.I had to go to the tab, right-click it and use the “Reload Tab” option. 

Hey everyone,This has been driving me (and apparently hundreds of others) crazy since 2021: there is STILL no native way to properly move or duplicate an entire page from one Figma file to another.Copy-paste or “Select All” destroys page background/grid/rulers, breaks prototypes, loses comments, turns library styles into local duplicates, and forgets locked/hidden layers. Duplicating the whole file then deleting pages is the only “workaround” — but it’s a nightmare with 50+ page files or design systems.I’m a fellow designer who’s fed up and seriously considering building a free Figma plugin called PagePort that would let you:Export any page (or batch multiple pages) with 100% fidelity (layers, auto-layout, constraints, page props, prototypes where possible) Import into any other open file in one click Choose Move (delete from source) or Copy Smart remapping for styles/variables/libraries + basic prototype r

As a viewer, I need to understand the design system variables—using the built-in variable manager—so I can clearly see the token architecture and color relationships across modes. This helps me decide which tokens to apply to custom components and how they will behave in both light and dark modes.

I’m trying to create a horizontal scroll section (basically a simple carousel) in Figma Sites, but it looks like this interaction isn’t supported at the moment.Has anyone managed to make horizontal scrolling work?If it’s currently impossible, is there any workaround or alternative to simulate a carousel?

I’m working on the initial ideation and brainstorming solutions using Figma for the product I’m working on. I’m genuinely happy with the results it has generated on rough level, it has helped in making my execution process faster. But I have been consistently seeing a pattern where in certain designs it provides certain features or context which are unexplained or we’re unable to understand. I tried asking within the chat itself to explain what exactly that feature means and how is it relevant in our product but it wasn’t able to answer. Also the point and edit features has been working very slow. I was assuming if it is getting heavy for make to prompt and edit / also answer questions about feature’s vagueness in the same chat estate. Shall we have a different chat estate just to ask questions about what features it has exactly designed, if it has ability to explain the context it will be helpful for us to use it or rather shape and align with our use case if it shall surpass. 

Hi everyone,I wanted to share some feedback as a solo user of Figma Sites.I’m an individual artist, and I created a small personal portfolio website using Figma. I really enjoyed the process - the design tools are amazing and it felt very natural to build everything there.However, I ran into a problem when it came to publishing. For someone like me who just needs one simple site, the requirement to have a full paid seat feels quite expensive and more suited for teams rather than individuals.I don’t need collaboration features, AI tools, or advanced functionality - just the ability to maintain and publish a single portfolio site.I believe there are many creators in a similar situation who would happily pay for a smaller, more affordable plan designed specifically for solo users.It would be amazing to see an option like:a single-site plan limited to one user without team features at a lower price point

Does anyone else find the pink for slots and the purple for auto layout too similar? personally it feels so close (I use dark mode and don't have great vision) I find myself having to bend over my computer like a cocktail shrimp to tell which is which. can I edit this color? does anyone else have this issue?

The Issue: Currently, manual file organization (uploading/moving .tsx files into folders) is only available at the start of a project. Once a history is established, the UI forces users to use the AI agent to move files.Why this is broken: Credit Waste: The AI treats "moving a file" as a full generation task, often rewriting the entire code block. Using AI credits for basic file system management is inefficient and costly. Workflow Friction: Manual uploads are restricted to the root directory, preventing users from maintaining clean project architectures without burning through their prompt limits. Requested Fix: Enable a permanent manual file manager that allows users to upload, move, and organize files across folders at any stage of the project without invoking the AI agent or consuming credits.

 Mind map in theory is amazing to visualise complex dependencies and structure but lack of functionality like turning lists into maps, exporting maps into text etc. Changing the direction of the map? Currently nodes are spreading from left to right, not right to left, top to bottom etc.and on top of everything - AI SLOPPPPPP. Let me work, not generate some meaningless content...

In our organization we use Figma on an Enterprise plan, and we manage a large number of users coming from a broader international company structure. When users request a paid seat (Full, Dev, or Viewer with collaboration), they can currently add a note for the admin, which is helpful on their side.What is missing for us is the reverse: a way for admins to show a short configurable message to the requester at the moment they ask for a seat. This message could: Indicate who to contact (e.g. a specific Microsoft Teams channel or an email address for our design tooling team). Provide a short checklist of what to verify before sending the request (correct account, correct workspace, business justification, cost center, manager approval, etc.). Clarify how the approval flow works in a large enterprise context (for example, “Your request will only be processed after you or your manager contact us on Teams with X/Y info”).

The filter to find variable fonts in Figma is fairly useless. Every font that has a font weight is considered ‘variable’.If you ask me - we should be able to filter further down, by selecting the properties we want to manipulate to find fonts that have those properties.And...let’s just say fonts that have the standard bold/italic modifiers should be removed from the ‘variable’ font list.

When viewing a spec, the big blue button is to request a full seat instaed of logging in or viewing the spec, which is the most likely case. This results in constant accidental ‘so and so as requested a full seat’ daily. Its the most annoying thing in the world and causes mistakes from my team members approving it.

Hey everyone. I am Alexander and I built a plugin called Design System Sync. I was honestly just tired of manually copying variables over to developers every time I changed a simple hex code. So basically I made a tool to fix this massive pain point.The plugin grabs your Figma design tokens and variables. Then it automatically creates a pull request in GitHub or Bitbucket with the updated code. Your developers just review the code changes and hit merge.Here is what it can do for your workflow:Automatic PR generation saves you from sending zip folders or raw text files on Slack.W3C Design Tokens and CSS Variables support means it works with most modern code setups.Multiple mode export handles your light and dark themes perfectly.Visual change detection shows exactly what you modified before you send it off.The free tier gives you 5 exports a month and includes all the exp

I’ve found slots incredibly buggy right now unfortunately. I love the idea, but they’ve been rather frustrating lately.I’ve had two bugs that seem related I have repeatedly had, but am unable to set up a test file for these. Slot sizes not adjustingSomething like this hierarchy. Despite the fact the two components are bound in an autolayout with gutter, it doesn’t seem to paint properly. I often have to double click the children components individually.Component >↪ Slot↪↪  Rows [Autolayout]↪↪↪ Row [Autolayout]↪↪↪↪ [Component]↪↪↪↪ [Component] Slot content not refreshingSometimes a colleague uses my account on their computer to check something. When checking an instance of a component with a slot, sometimes they see the default content and not the content I’ve put in there. Despite it being saved. I have found no solu

Hello,I have always been a big fan of your platform, especially because it was one of the few that had not given in to the model of charging subscriptions for standard use.However, it is now no longer possible to create more than three FigJam files, which seems to me like the beginning of changes that may gradually reduce features that were previously free.I have always recommended Figma and would not like to stop. Please do not follow this trend, as this was exactly what set you apart from others.I am Brazilian and used a translator to write this message.

Hello, good day.I’m experiencing serious issues with the new Figma UI update. Many essential tools — such as padding controls — are missing or hidden.Please do not enforce this new version. The previous UI was much better, clearer, and far more efficient for designers.This new version has no advantages, feels confusing, and makes our workflow significantly harder.

I have been working with Slot for a while, introduced it in our component library too.Here are a couple of observations:The magenta outline feels too prominent and interferes with design and understanding of space, padding, etc. I would have preferred a subtle affordance that slot exists.While selecting things on canvas, earlier entire frames, components would easily get selected but with slots in those components, when I drag and select, selection happens randomly, sometimes, only slot layers are getting selected instead of entire frame or component which is not what I expect. And, it just messes it up. Cmd+X / Undo doesn’t work properly if I delete something from slotted component. There is not an easy way to return to previous state.

I would like to provide feedback on  support experience.I wanted to pay for Figma but both payment methods were declined. I was told that problem is with my bank and I need to contact them or use another card, thats all we are closing you case.I contacted my bank which confirmed there are no declines or restrictions on their side.I tried another card but I cant pay in euros from ukrainian card according to Figma restrictions and I cant change currency in invoice according to Figma restictions again!I contacted support once more and all I get was the same “contact your bank or use another card” without any real investigation of the issue.This has been time-consuming and frustrating.Could this case please be escalated to someone from billing or a support manager who can properly review it? Because it looks like you dont need your customers to pay you.

The management of seats is absolutely terrible. We have unused seats, and there is no way in the user interface to remove them to avoid being charged in the next billing cycle. If this is automatically not charged, it is not explained anywhere. The most terrible experience I had managing subscriptions after 25 years of actively using internet.  

Figma, Auto jump to next comments when previous comment is resolved is frustrating to use. Most of the times when we resolve a comments we tend to look and ponder on screen if we want to add any new comments. When it auto-jumps we need to search for the section again which is really bad experience. Please look into this. 

Hello Figma Community,I’m currently enrolled in the Google UX Design course on Coursera and have been using Figma Education Pro through this program.I received an email asking me to re-verify my student status, so I selected “Bootcamp / Online Program”, but I got the message:“Bootcamp students & educators: You cannot self-verify, you must be verified by your bootcamp. Please reach out to them directly with any questions.”Since Coursera is an online program, not a traditional bootcamp, I don’t have an admin to verify me. Coursera support says I should self-verify, but Figma doesn’t allow it for online students.I want to know: How can online course students like me maintain Education Pro access? Will our accounts automatically downgrade to Starter after Sept 29 if no verif

This new feature disrupts my usual workflow of clicking outside the hex color value box to change the color. As a result, I often end up selecting a color from the list unintentionally.I called this feature “Annoying color style dropdown I didn’t ask for”.