Share Your Feedback

Hi! Has the canvas panning keyboard shortcuts changed recently? I use Ctrl+Space+scroll wheel to pan and zoom the canvas but now that keyboard shortcut puts me into a Keyboard picking mode. Is this new? It really gets in the way of working.

Hi,When I want add a PDF to a Figjam board I see a modal window with a few options (see attachment). I do not always want to convert the PDF. And when I want to convert the PDF I noticed that the file is not converted the correct way. Is there a way to add PDF without converting? 

So currently there is no Desktop app (except the unofficial version) for Linux, which is very sad! We need official desktop App for the linux. 

Hey everyone,This has been driving me (and apparently hundreds of others) crazy since 2021: there is STILL no native way to properly move or duplicate an entire page from one Figma file to another.Copy-paste or “Select All” destroys page background/grid/rulers, breaks prototypes, loses comments, turns library styles into local duplicates, and forgets locked/hidden layers. Duplicating the whole file then deleting pages is the only “workaround” — but it’s a nightmare with 50+ page files or design systems.I’m a fellow designer who’s fed up and seriously considering building a free Figma plugin called PagePort that would let you:Export any page (or batch multiple pages) with 100% fidelity (layers, auto-layout, constraints, page props, prototypes where possible) Import into any other open file in one click Choose Move (delete from source) or Copy Smart remapping for styles/variables/libraries + basic prototype r

Hello, good day.I’m experiencing serious issues with the new Figma UI update. Many essential tools — such as padding controls — are missing or hidden.Please do not enforce this new version. The previous UI was much better, clearer, and far more efficient for designers.This new version has no advantages, feels confusing, and makes our workflow significantly harder.

It is annoying when I have to libraries connected to my project, but it always autosuggests the wrong library when selecting another text style. I want it to show me the selection of text styles from the library that the text is already using – not text styles from the other library. This happens also when selecting color. This issue wasn't an issue before. As you can see in the video attached, the library I want based on the component selected is collapsed. I want to library that is already used for the object in question to be expanded.

There are several collections hidden behind the expand buttons without any clear indication in the UI.It took me a few minutes to find hidden collections. It’d be great to add more affordance somewhere so that a new team member knows there are hidden collections under “Variables” window.  

I was very excited to hear that grids were coming to Figma. CSS Grid was introduced years ago and brought with it many things that flexbox was incapable of doing, so I was hoping for a similar level of new capabilities here, and I genuinely cannot believe that this feature is being shipped in its current state (even as a ‘beta’). This is a very long post, but I feel like this feature has been implemented so poorly that it legitimately sows doubt in Figma’s capabilities to deliver features in the future.Inability to ‘hug’ contents Both rows and grids themselves are unable to resize themselves to match their contents (‘Hug”). Row heights must be either “Auto” (1fr) or a fixed height, meaning that if you want your rows to be sized per their elements, you’ve now manually defined each row height in px (not even a variable value), and instead of getting a clean CSS output, now you have however many rows defined in exact values, destr

This update is genuinely one of the most frustrating UX changes I’ve experienced in a professional design tool 😡 😡 😡The new left-hand navigation panel permanently steals ~60px of horizontal space on small screens, which is completely unacceptable. That space is my primary working area — the canvas. I am literally losing room to do my job so a panel can sit there doing nothing most of the time.Yes, Variables, Files, Assets, Find, and Library are important.No — they are NOT minute-to-minute actions.They do not deserve permanent, always-visible real estate. This panel is idle 90% of the time, yet it constantly punishes my workflow.On smaller displays, this feels especially hostile. Instead of prioritising the canvas (the entire reason Figma exists), the UI forces a bulky navigation column that adds zero value moment-to-moment and actively makes precision design harder.

The latest update is erasing my color styles. This is ridiculous—what's the point of releasing updates that don't work????? I'm fed up. Why???????

Howdy, I’m a noob with dumb question. Where’s the dark theme mentioned on https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/articles/5576781786647-Change-themes-in-Figma ? “Actions menu” doesn’t contain any of these: “Use dark mode”, “Use light mode”, “Use system theme”.And why should I, dumb user, even search this essential feature somewhere in sub-sub menus? Can you even find it yourself, intuitively, while your eyeballs are on fire?“Color profile” is not what I needed.

 Hi Figma team,I wanted to share some feedback based on my experience using the Organization plan, specifically around Dev seats, billing transparency, and external collaboration.1. Dev Seat Pricing vs Actual Charge (Proration Confusion)On the pricing page, a Dev seat is clearly listed as $25/month. However, when attempting to add a Dev seat, the upcoming invoice shows a charge of $175.89.While I understand this is likely due to prorated billing until the end of the billing cycle, this is not clearly communicated in the UI.Issue: The pricing page sets an expectation of a simple monthly cost The invoice shows a significantly higher amount without a clear breakdown Users are left confused and unsure if this is an error Suggestion: Show a clear cost breakdown before confirmation:

As the Admin in Figma I’m getting Dev or Collabseat requests frequently which are unintented. Figma makes it too easy for the people to request for a payed seat. This is a dark pattern and I do not expect this to see in such a business application. It’s very annoiny since I always need to double check if the request was intentionally (it never was until now). I expect figma to change that behavior. It cannot be that the most prominent button for a viewer is the “request” button. 

If you’re looking for dependable scientific instruments with international delivery options, check out ADAS Instruments (https://adasinstrumentsonline.com/). They offer a wide range of lab equipment — from analytical instruments to educational science tools — with detailed product descriptions and support. Their site makes it easy to compare items and place orders directly.

Look, i’ll be short. Can you PLEASE implement a shortcut or option to hide the new left panel that you’ve forced into the canvas areas? I can appreciate that some find it useful, so am not advocating for it to be removed if that’s the case, but at the very least can you please provide more design oriented people the option to hide it? It might only be minor to some, but i’ve found it so incredibly intrusive with forcing a reduction of my canvas size for the sake of UI that can be found in the navigation. Again, I understand that this might be minor to most out there, but as someone who works with design more than prototypes for my workflow, everytime I open Figma now it’s just infuriating constantly seeing a side panel I neither want nor asked for. It’s so frustrating knowing that reducing the left sidebar won’t actually reduce the new, forced navigation that offers no benefit to people like myself, but instead simply reduces my layers panel width. I also

I think that when there are only two options, a drop-down menu is unnecessary; instead, we could opt for other options that speed up the process, as they don’t require two clicks to make a selection.

Hi,I’ve encountered this bug testing out slots.  I’ve created a desktop component with a slot that uses components and both have variable widths for desktop and mobile. If I drag that instance with slotted components into a frame/section that’s set to mobile it will shrink down, but if I drag it out, the slotted components remain mobile size.Attached is a screenshot of the discrepancy.The instance functions perfectly fine if I manually set the desktop/mobile modes through the appearance panel though. Ps. I love the possibility of slots and can’t wait when it’s out of beta.

 The current libraries styles search is a fuzzy search in which it shows close matches like different colors of green when searching for green. This is nice for being able to see similar results to the search parameter but is frustrating when typing an exact variable name and it returns another variable that is related but not match. The example I’m providing below if from a color library that has both the color ‘lime’ and ‘green’. If I search for green my results show the ‘lime’ results first and I have to scroll for the exact match of ‘green’.  I have run into the same issue with ‘indigo’ and ‘purple’.This interaction could be improved by rearranging the results to show exact match results at the top and the fuzzy matches below. If someone takes the time to type a keyword that matches their variables they shouldn’t have to scroll for their result. 

Hi Figma. Really trying to give Slides a go, as I’d rather use anything over powerpoint, but I keep running into features stripped from the Figma Design that remaking it impossible to continue. For one, I cannot understand why I can’t access the variable library. My slides were imported from a file that had a deprecated library, with colors and modes that are totally unused by the assets I imported. There simply does not seem to be a way to remove those… at all. They’re permanently stuck in this presentation unless I want to start from scratch. Currently I’m making a table but I’m unable to vertically center text within a cell. This is a hard requirement for making tables that look good that use the type styles I'm defining elsewhere… otherwise I have to manually set the line height to match the table cell height which is nuts. I also created a symbol that consisted of a text box and rectangle to act as an off-cen

 Beware of this, people. This is such a hidden scam.

Hey folks,Figma's latest color tokens search update has added a new behavior to searching. I use my Primary token a lot, and I'm used to searching for "prima" for it to show up. Since this last update, searching for that makes my Disabled (#AAAAAA), token show up first, due to it having "A" in it's hex color code.My personal view is that it should weigh my search content in order to decide which content is shown, since I'm most likely not searching for "Disabled". Nonetheless, loved the other improvements that came with this update.Would love for you to share your opinion about it! Color token search panel, searching for "prim" and "prima" 

It’s quite annoying when every time I select any component or shape etc, I need to click at the “show more properties button”, it makes me fill time

I have seen a lot of posts on reddit, linkedin and here all complaining re: Figmas opaque billing practices being so dark pattern-riddled it would put most scam sites to shame. There are countless posts across the web as old as 5 years complaining about this but I’ve yet to see any meaningful change. Adding seats and over-subscribing is way too easy with few guardrails, but reducing your subscription is far more unclear and difficult.What will it take for Figma to actually do something about this? Why is nothing being done?I keep having additional seats added to my plan accidentally. This has happened to my organization at least 3 times now. Every single time I fix the issue I go through the labyrinth of admin billing settings and think I have all my bases covered, but this system seems to be designed explicitly to funnel users into higher billing. The latest is because “Seat approval settings” was set to “Manual unless seat is available” (I had an unused seat, which w

I was in the process of handling my offboarding and role handover. While managing user permissions, I first removed my own Annual Full Seat access and then assigned an Annual Full Seat to another person.However, when I reviewed the billing, I noticed that I was still charged a billing adjustment for Monthly seats. After checking multiple times, I found that I still had individual edit access to a project within the team, which resulted in a charge of $10.32.I would like to request that Figma revoke this unexpected charge caused by my accidental operation.  

Using Claude Code connected to the Figma MCP Server, when asked to implement a screen with various different buttons, only some of the buttons were implemented as pressable (as buttons). Although the buttons looks different, they all had default and pressed variants and had the word button somewhere in the name. Looking into this further, Claude Code reported back that, “The MCP tool's code generation is inconsistent — it renders full state branching for some components and only default-state code for others, depending on how complex the Figma component is.”Question is, why is the Figma MCP Server not generating the full code, and is there anything that can be done on the Figma side to help with this?