Suggest a Feature

In Dev Mode, when selecting an image, you can see the original filename of the placed source image and download it by 1) clicking on the name in the layer properties, or 2) in Assets.However, when downloading, a strange filename is suggested that doesn't match what we see in the layer properties.Question 1: Is it possible to fix this so that the source image is downloaded with the original name?Question 2: Is it possible to bring this functionality into the main editing mode? It's sometimes very useful when working with designs, and it's sorely missed.

Would love it if you could paste a screenshot or image into a sticky note.It’s obnoxious to paste an image onto the whiteboard, move it to align with a sticky note, and then group the two elements together. Takes more time than it should :(

The default settings (at least in my Figma) load a percentage for letter-spacing, but this is not allowed in CSS. For a less avid programmer this may be confusing, when trying to get it to work. Either set the default to a px value, or add a warning inside the Inspect code

new AI agent “describe your idea” icon/text box feature when i click on an instance/frame in my design is a bit intrusive - little star icon gets in the way when i’m trying to adjust my design manually. maybe limiting it to the right click menu or simply creating a new hotkey would be better? also, telling this agent what to do is a miserable experience that usually just frustrates me back into doing the design myself as it is literally faster than typing it out. have seen a lot of feedback similar to this as well here.

Figma is no longer used only by designers and developers.In many real-world projects, designers share Figma files or prototypes with external stakeholders such as clients, managers, marketing teams, legal teams, and other non-design users for review and approval.These viewers did not necessarily choose Figma themselves, and many of them may not be familiar with Figma or comfortable using an English interface.This creates unnecessary friction in the review process.The intended journey should ideally be:Open shared link → Review the designBut in practice, it can become:Open shared link → Understand an unfamiliar English interface → Figure out how to navigate the prototype viewer → Review the designThere is another common scenario where this becomes even more problematic.After a client receives a prototype or shared file, they may need to share it with other members of their internal team. At this point, they have to interact with Figma's sharing interface themselves.This interface involv

When overriding a single element inside a slot in a component instance, Figma marks the entire slot as overridden. As a result, updates made to the main component no longer propagate to any elements inside that slot — even if only one element in the slot was actually changed. Expected behaviorOnly the modified element should be treated as overridden.All other elements inside the slot should remain linked to the main component and continue to receive updates.

Hello,some feedback from my side regarding Folders, I like the options of a nestable folder, but I find it hard to navigate to the files I’m looking for. The folders are named, but the file thumbnails that were visible with Projects were a huge readability feature that I’m really missing now.I was searching for it in settings, but couldn’t find a way to set it. I actually added a description to a folder, but did not actually see not one place that the description was shown? This part is especially confusing.If I could make an improvement suggestion to a current implementation it would be to have a setting to show or not to show some folder contents thumbnails, similar to the previous implementation.Fingers crossed this can be done!

Hello,When a user holds both admin and regular user roles on Figma, notifications get mixed together: license requests, AI budget overages (admin) and comments (user) all appear in the same feed, which makes them hard to read through.We currently have 3 tabs: All / Request / Unread.Would it be possible to add a dedicated tab or filter for comments, so that admin-related items (license requests, AI credits) can be clearly separated from day-to-day usage items (comments)? This would make it easier to prioritize and ensure nothing is missed depending on the context we're reading in.Thank you in advance for your feedback on the feasibility of this improvement.

Allow designers to create an AI-powered project space where the agent can use project-specific sources and default memory to understand the design context.Designers can upload or connect sources such as brand guidelines, design systems, UX documentation, product requirements, or tone-of-voice guidelines. The AI agent uses these sources as the primary context when generating, reviewing, or modifying designs.Inside the AI agent panel, designers can configure the project's context and choose which sources the agent is allowed to use.Example ScenarioA designer creates a Nike Brand Campaign project in Figma.They add:Nike brand guidelines Typography guidelines Color specifications Logo usage rules Brand voice guidelinesThe designer then sets the AI Agent's project context to:Sources✓ Nike Brand Guidelines ✓ Project Design System ✓ Default Figma Memory ✕ Other ProjectsThe agent can now generate or critique designs based specifically on the selected project sources.For example:"Create a campai

Describe the problem your experiencing and how your idea helps solve this When you create an autolayout frame, it always defaults to 10px. Many design systems call for an 8px grid and in many cases, users don’t want ANY padding especially where edge-to-edge designs are concerned. Ask questions to bring the community into the conversation What are everyone’s thoughts about the following solutions?: Default autolayout padding based on the big nudge amount in your settings Allow for tokenization of padding/margin grids and offer up autolayout parameters based upon those tokens Allow users to override the padding to 0px at the creation of the autolayout frame by using an alternative key command like ctrl+shift+a (command on mac)

Dear Figma Team,I would like to propose a feature that could be useful for UX designers and researchers. Problems I identified during my research:CJM, JTBD, empathy map templates, and other research methods are scattered across different tools — Figma, Google Docs, Notion, Miro. It takes 15–20 minutes to find the right method, and there is no centralized storage.Difficulty choosing the right research method.Fragmented workflows. After analyzing these problems, I created an application called UX Logic, which addresses them:Adding a library of methods and research materials, with the ability to add custom libraries and research materials. AI recommendations on the home screen. The AI suggests: “Structure insights,” “Validate hypotheses,” and “Build a CJM.” A unified workflow: Home - Projects - AI Chat - Library - Profile. All tools are in one place, without switching between 5+ applications. How can you use this application?Here is an example of one scenario:You paste interview notes int

When creating nested components, I want to lock the contents of a child components slots. For example, I make a generic “menu” component with slots. So then I make a specific “File Menu” using that generic menu component. That’s great. But when I turn that File Menu into a component, the contents are still editable in instances of the File Menu. I don’t want that. I don’t want consumers of the File Menu turning it into an Edit Menu. Standard Lock isn’t what I want, because I do want the user to be able to apply regular overrides, just not use the more drastic “Slot” features.So my request is for a feature that allows a main component to disable child slots.

Hello,I always enjoy using Figma Design and FigJam.I use FigJam for organizing Minecraft addon development and system design, and as projects become larger, I’ve started encountering difficulties balancing “the amount of information inside nodes” with overall readability.Currently, FigJam is extremely effective for:mind mapping organizing ideas visualizing dependencies structuring systems and architecturesHowever, as projects scale up, each node tends to require a large amount of detailed information, such as:identifiers recipes geometry references technical notes implementation status tags JSON-related information various propertiesIf all of this information is displayed at all times, the overall board quickly becomes difficult to read and manage.Because of this, I would love for you to consider adding:“Expandable / collapsible node functionality”For example:Normally, a node would display only a simple summary Pressing a button would expand detailed information A larger text area or s

Request: Through the Figma MCP, access contents of comments made in Figma Design file.Reason: Can provide context for designs, review bugs, etc.Current response from OpenAI Codex with direct link to comment:No, not the comment itself.What I can see from that link is the node it points to:file: XXXXXXnode: XXXXXXscreen: /sign-up-2 (iOS)That screen contains:nav title Sign UpEmail and Password inputsSign Up primary CTAContinue with AppleContinue with Googledivider OrAlready have an account? Sign inbottom legal linksBut I still cannot read the actual Figma comment thread or the #XXXXXX anchor content from this session.If you want, paste the comment text here and I can map it to this exact screen and tell you what change it implies. 

Please make Dev Mode Annotations visible by all roles, not just Full Dev Mode seats. This can become costly for users needing context but not all the other dev-mode features. Here’s the scenario: We have a dashboard, with cards showing a customer’s account status. This status can be mapped from multiple back-end statuses, to show just one front-end status. For example, any of the following could be mapped to a single status known to the customer as “Completed”: canceled, terminated, sold, complete, etc. This is something that the developer needs to reference, but then also the PM needs to reference in writing tickets (who doesn’t need full dev-mode access), the QE needs to reference for testing automations, and various other individuals on our team. Placing it in a comment makes it less clearly attached to the specific piece of the design, and requires us to keep documentation dispersed among different tools (Jira, Confluence, Figma etc). Simply making Dev mode annotations visible to v

Something about the old UI made it easier for me to understand that layers and pages were two sup panes. I think it was the fact that pages were indented a bit. It helped easily distinguish the pages and layers section of the left pane. Now with UI3 I find myself not being able to find where pages end and layers begin as easily. I need some sort of visual anchor here. My eye used to follow the negative space to the left of page names all the way down until I hit the layers area and now I feel like I’m going cross-eyed trying to find where my layers start and pages end.

The text above the top left of the frame is very small. Please have some setting so that when you zoom in a lot, the text no longer stays the same size and enlarges, so you can at some point easily see the text and be able to edit it easily. Sometimes I have to take a screenshot and then zoom in to see what i’ve typed. Other text in other apps appear easily readible. I remember another app ( I think Sketch) did this, when you zoom past 100% it keeps the font size relative to the zooms instead. so the artboard name becomes larger and larger.

Figma needs a glyph panel to access glyphs per specific font. Photoshop and Illustrator have this feature and it is a necessity for typographic design. Having to leave Figma and go to Photoshop or Illustrator is incredibly inefficient. Implementing better type setting tools within Figma would be a major improvement

I don’t use Figma all the time, I don’t want it to run anything on startup. It’s frustrating to manually remove Figma from Login Items, since it automatically adds itself there again. It would be nice to have at least an option to disable it in settings, or even better - remove that functionality at all, since it’s not user friendly. I want control over what and when the apps do at my workstation. P.S. If it’s needed for updates check - I’m more than okay to update on app start

Prototyping triggers won’t allow to bind an action to diagonal moves of the stick. Both LStick and Rstick. Tried to prototype a command wheel. Segments should be triggered by eight corresponding directions of stick movement. But only four of them was possible: up, down, left and right. Does anyone else in the game industry experience this? Is anyone using a plugin or workaround to help solve this?

I’ve been using Buzz to create full page templates, which has great potential. However, in the Edit Content panel, all editable fields for the entire page are displayed at once, which makes it difficult to navigate and manage.My suggestion is to improve this panel by making it context-aware. For example, when a specific section or component is selected on the page, the panel could display only the fields related to that element. This would make editing full pages much easier and more efficient.To give some context, in one of my projects, Buzz shows around 160 text fields along with dozens of media items. That’s a lot of information to manage in a single panel. A filtering mechanism based on the selected element would significantly improve usability.

Been playing around with the “expose nested properties” feature currently in beta. One of the great uses of variant properties is the ability to batch edit property values on multiple selected components. That use doesn’t carry over to exposed nested properties (yet I hope). Demo file to help When selecting one component instance exposing nested properties, said properties display fine. Add another instance of the same component to your selection (using Shift+Click), and the nested properties outright disappear from the right panel. I haven’t seen this issue raised elsewhere! Do you experience it too?

Hello,I would like to suggest some important improvements to the Lock Aspect Ratio functionality. Since Figma is widely used for building responsive designs, I believe this should be an important feature.I noticed that this issue has already been raised, and I believe it is a real problem when working with responsive layouts.The problemThe main issue is that Figma calculates the aspect ratio based on the exact pixel dimensions of the original element, including decimals, rather than preserving the intended aspect ratio.For example, suppose I have:A parent frame that is 375 px wide A responsive version of the design that is 440 px wide An element inside the 375 px frame that should have a 4:3 aspect ratioAt 375 px, the element is 343 × 257 px. This is not mathematically an exact 4:3 ratio, but this is understandable because using an exact 4:3 ratio would result in decimal values.However, when I resize the parent frame to 440 px, Figma appears to preserve the exact ratio of 343 × 257, ra

💡 Feature Idea for Figma: “Fonts Used in Frame”I’d love to see a feature in Figma that automatically shows all fonts used within a selected frame.For example:Fonts UsedInter — 12 layers Regular — 7 Medium — 3 Bold — 2 Roboto — 4 layers Poppins — 2 layersIt would be even more useful if we could click a font, see which layers are using it, and replace it across the selected frame.Suggested workflowSelect Frame → View Fonts → Identify Usage → Replace FontA Suggestions section could also highlight:⚠️ Missing fonts 💡 Too many font families 📏 Inconsistent text sizes 🎨 Similar text styles/colorsThis could make design audits and maintaining consistency much faster.Would you find this useful in Figma? What would you add to this feature?#Figma #FigmaCommunity #FigmaFeature #UIDesign #UXDesign #DesignSystems