Got a feature request or product idea? We're all ears!
Recently active
We’d love to hear what feature requests, ideas or improvements you have in mind for any of the Figma products you are using.Note: If you have feedback on an existing product or feature, head over to the category Share Your Feedback. Sharing product improvements and ideasOur teams look at ideas and feature requests across many different channels throughout the product cycle and it has truly helped make Figma a better product.With that said, we want to make sure we set some expectations for how feature requests, ideas and improvements will be handled in the forum.We cannot make any guarantees or promises that you’ll see your idea/feature request/improvement implemented into the product Our team will merge topics with the same/similar ideas to keep the forum organized Inactive topics that are 12 months or older may be closed or archived to help keep the community organized and healthy Voting on topicsAt the moment, it is not possible to vote on topics.This is a feature we are reviewin
When using Find & Replace with Arabic text, Figma always navigates to the first matching result starting from the left side of the canvas.For RTL languages such as Arabic, I’d expect the navigation order to follow the reading direction and start from the right side instead.This becomes especially noticeable in flows where screens are arranged from right to left, as Find & Replace jumps to a screen on the opposite end of the flow first.It would be helpful if result navigation respected the text or document direction for RTL languages.
Love what you've built with Motion, using it almost every day.One thing that slows me down is the lack of native audio support. Having to render and add audio in a separate tool gets cumbersome, especially when working in bulk.Would love to see that integrated down the road! Also, any plans for HTML exports?I've looked at plugins but they feel a bit pricey and not very intuitive. Keep up the great work! Peace ✌
Hey everyone. I would like you to consider the text animation feature in Figma Motion. What I mean by text animation is animating text either word by word, or character by character, like the kind of animation we see in Saas promo videos. With other effects to the text like gradient color change that moves along the text reveal. That would be really cool :))
Hi Figma Team,I’d like to request the ability to temporarily hide the selection bounding box and handles of an active object without deselecting it.The Problem: As a UI design tool, our canvases are filled with rectangular containers and elements. When fine-tuning pixel-sensitive details—such as adjusting complex borders or multiple effects on rectangles—the selection bounding box directly covers the edges and working area, making it very difficult to accurately judge visual contrast. Industry Standard: Other industry-standard tools like Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop already solve this by letting users hide bounding boxes (e.g., Hide Bounding Box / Show Transform Controls). Having a similar toggle or shortcut in Figma would greatly improve high-precision UI work. The Solution: A quick shortcut or option to hide the transform handles/box on the canvas while the layer remains selected.Thank you for your incredible work on Figma!Best regards,Aleix
Figma’s current image crop is non-destructive, which is useful, but I’d love to have an option to permanently delete the pixels outside the crop.For example, add a “Delete Cropped Pixels” option when cropping an image.The workflow could be: Crop the image. Choose Delete Cropped Pixels. Everything outside the crop is permanently removed. The image can no longer be uncropped or moved to reveal the deleted areas. Normal non-destructive cropping should still remain available.This would be especially useful when working with large images because it could help reduce unnecessary image data and keep Figma files lighter.Photoshop already has a similar Delete Cropped Pixels option, and having the same choice in Figma would make image editing much more flexible.
I’d like Figma’s Slack integration to post a notification when someone creates a named version history entry in a file.the message including the title and description of version history entry.
I’d find it useful to set an aspect ratio for cells in Grid Auto Layout. For example, I could set the columns to fill the available width and give each cell a 1:1 aspect ratio. Its height would then automatically match its width, even when the grid is resized.
I get nervous having edit-access to a Figma file sometimes, especially as an engineer. I don’t want to accidentally make a change to something in the file. It would be great if there was a way to switch myself to a read-only mode (temporarily) to avoid accidentally breaking/changing something. For now, I’ve just been creating a new branch. If I change something on the branch, then I don’t need to worry.
Upon creating ideations with Figma make and publishing it as Figma Site, and sent to end users.The end users must have a facility to add comments to the figma site.
Hi! First, thanks to the Figma team for all the hard work. Now, let’s talk about Figma Slides Templates. To edit the template styles, I have to select a slide first — which feels a bit unintuitive. In Figma, when you click on the canvas without selecting anything, you can access the file’s styles. Can we bring that same concept into Slides?When I open the template selector, I can edit the styles there through a dropdown. Is that really the best or only way to manage styles in Figma Slides? I don’t think so.Colors & Text Styles: I can delete them, but only through a pretty complex interaction — right-click?Layout Grid: How can I set a default grid? Right now, I have to manually add my custom grid to every new slide I create. If we can't set a default, the feature kind of loses its purpose. :(
Every time I exit Figma and come back, the previously selected sort order is lost, and it defaults to "Last modified" – "Newest first". Previously, the selected sorting option was always preserved.
Hi guys! I’m also interested in this improvement.
It’s the year 2023, and Figma still doesn’t have native table support. I just spent 30 minutes re-jigging all the “cells” in a four-row, six-column fake table because I had to delete one column, add another, add icons, and then manually re-fit/resize all the cells to get things to align properly. I can either fake a table row with a horizontal autolayout, or fake a table column with a vertical autolayout, but it’s still not a table. I want the ability to create a special frame called a Table, that: has an arbitrary number of columns and rows auto-resizes columns evenly based on content width has one or more Header / footer rows can scroll with overflow content (optional) has optional properties for hover / click states (cell, column or row) has optional properties for alternate-line shading can toggle columns or rows to hide as needed can merge or split cells as needed can set text alignment for a column (center, left, right, or currency / decimal) can set to automatically use monospa
It would be nice when a designer need to share a page in figma file, they can limit access to other pages for the gustes.So guests see only the specific page and can’t navigate to the other page within the Figma file. What do you think? Many thanks
One piece of feedback I've consistently run into as a designer is the separation between Figma files and FigJam files. While they're closely connected in the design process, they're treated as completely separate artifacts in the file structure.In practice, many designers use a single file as the source of truth for a project. Research, workshops, journey maps, IA exercises, brainstorming sessions, requirements, explorations, wireframes, design concepts, and final designs are all part of the same workflow. Today, that work often gets fragmented across multiple files, making it harder to find information, maintain context, and keep project history connected.I'd love to see an option where FigJam and Figma coexist within the same file structure. For example, when creating a new page, users could choose between:Design Page (Figma) Whiteboard Page (FigJam)Both page types would live within the same file, similar to how pages already exist today.Benefits could include:A single source of trut
I spend a lot of time undoing the automatic auto layout adjustments that Figma applies in order to maintain the existing layout structure. This is frustrating because I understand how all the resizing parameters work, and I only change the ones I want to change. But in an attempt to help me and retain the current layout, the UI changes parameters that were previously the way I wanted them. So while auto layout still saves me time, it also wastes my time by putting me in a position where I have to go through, layer by layer, undoing the auto-adjustments. (Usually changing a layer’s width or height from “fixed” back to “fill” or “hug”.) I understand some users may actually like this, and it’s hard to please everyone. I would be more than grateful for an option that allows me to disable this automatic behavior.
I find managing template colors really difficult in Slides. I can’t easily organize, re-order, or rename them. I’ve found some ways to hack it but it feels really convoluted trying to provide color options in the templates I’m making. I think Slides is doing a really great job on most fronts and I love the product, but I find myself just using colors from other libraries because managing them within Slides is so confusing.
Hello,I have always been a big fan of your platform, especially because it was one of the few that had not given in to the model of charging subscriptions for standard use.However, it is now no longer possible to create more than three FigJam files, which seems to me like the beginning of changes that may gradually reduce features that were previously free.I have always recommended Figma and would not like to stop. Please do not follow this trend, as this was exactly what set you apart from others.I am Brazilian and used a translator to write this message.
Hi Figma team, Since images in comments launched, teams have used them heavily for visual references and bug reports. There's still no way for plugins or integrations to read or write those images. What we found:- GET /v1/files/:key/comments returns only the text of a comment that has an image. There's no attachment field, including with as_md.- POST /v1/files/:key/comments accepts only message, comment_id and client_meta, so there's no way to attach an image.- The REST API spec (figma/rest-api-spec), FILE_COMMENT webhooks and the Plugin API don't include comment attachments either.- Comment images don't show up in GET /v1/files/:key/images. Why it matters: anyone who moves, archives, exports or syncs comments (to Jira, Linear, Notion, or between files when a design is reorganised) loses every image. Users see comments arrive without the screenshots that gave them meaning. What would help:1. An attachments array on the Comment object, with { id, url, mime_type, width, height }. The URL
Organization would be immensely helpful if we could create folders for our drafts. I want to be able to organize my drafts into different categories (such as UI kits, Ideas, Wireframe kits, iOS, Android, etc…) so I can find files easily. Right now, the drafts page is a huge jumbled mess and I can’t create Team pages for everything. Maybe something as simple as being able to add ‘tags’ to each file, similar to Zeplin.
Feedback 1: since Figma Desktop App version 126.1.2 text styles picker always shows libraries of styles in collapsed state. It’s super annoying, since search doesn’t work until you un-collapse it.Feedback 2: please fix up/down arrow behavior on styles. Example: the text span has style “Body/Emphasized” → I press arrow up expecting it to switch to “Body/Emphasized” → instead Figma selects “Headline/Regular” (the style that just happened to be below the search box). I papercut myself on this multiple times every day for the past couple of months now, at least.Figma’s a great product, I love it, but bugs like these are a big let down for me. I believe basic features like text styles should be dogfooded more to remain best in class.
I'm excited for Bulk Create in Figma Buzz. It’s a lot more intuitive for our marketers to use, but at its current stage it’s actually more time consuming than our existing workflow, mainly because it doesn’t have the ability to bulk rename frames or the exported filenames. That means we still end up having to manually rename "Frame1.png" all the way to "Frame175.png".Here’s our use case: we need to create OpenGraph images for a website with over a hundred pages. We have two design templates: one with page title only, one with page title and a subhead.Currently, the marketing & web dev team maintain a spreadsheet of all the pages currently exist.We have the 2 designs set up as components and use a plugin called Scribe - Dynamic data in seconds to pull in the CSV and use a column we choose for naming the frames / files.I can see Bulk Create doing this as well, and even adding some common renaming & conditional naming options (i.e. case options, removing + replacing + appending ch
Hi, and apologies for posting a new question – it may well have been asked before. To be honest, I can’t be bothered to look it up. Besides, the more questions on a single topic, the better the chances of success.I’m not really sure how or what to write here, so I’ll just set out my ideas and suggestions – things I keep coming back to whilst working in Figma. Feature request: Linked Component StatesIt would be useful to have a simple way to link the states of different component instances.Currently, if several components need to react to the same interaction, this can require variables, multiple actions, conditions, or additional prototype logic.I would like to be able to connect one component instance to another and define how the second component should react when the state of the first one changes.For example:DropdownDefault → Opencould automatically trigger:BackdropHidden → Visibleand:HeaderDefault → Dropdown ActiveThe relationship could work as a simple dependency:When Component A
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.