We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.
We use 3 different kinds of cookies. You can choose which cookies you want to accept. We need basic cookies to make this site work, therefore these are the minimum you can select. Learn more about our cookies.
Find solutions, get advice, help others.
Hi, currently it is not possible to select the L+R position constraint on elements with fixed scrolling position. This is a rally annoying bug, because you always have to switch to the prototype tab, set scroll behaviour to non-fixed, switch back to design tab, fix constraint, switch back to prototype and fix scroll position. When will there be an update/fix for this? Best seb
First of, I am very impressed with Figma Make. It is doing exactly what I want it to. All was good. But…. I am a little baffled now because I made the prompt “The design is fine now. Change the framework from REACT to MudBlazor” last week and it did. But this week the exact same prompt says it is not supported and never was. But it was and it worked. Why is this feature gone now - have I made a mistake or was it silently removed?
As per title. See screencapture as proof. There is no ‘vertical trim’ anywhere in your ‘typography’ section. As there is no search function anywhere on any of this organisation’s platforms and indexing over search is poor at best, it is almost impossible to find any detail covering anything more granular than terms like ‘design’ or ‘figjam’, whatever that is. So where is it.
Hello, i am waiting already over a week for my SSL verification on my website. Can someone maybe help me there?
Every time i try to publish the library i get this same error and then i cannot publish the new added components.
Hi, I created a menu like component, i created variants and link this , it is for a landing page, like top bar. This works when you don't link another animation like scroll .I want this menu to change when I push the name section of the page and scroll to the section page, for example when clicking in “Nosotros” scroll to nosotros section and is put in bold “Nosotros” at menu. thanks in advance, sorry I am not native English speaker, but try my best.
Lately I’ve noticed that when I have several nested components, I would only like to be able to modify some and not all. This would allow the component that draws on other components to have efficient adaptability in its contextual use. I am setting the variables for the Button component using variables and would not like the size property to be exposed so that the component has a desired behavior based on the active variable.
This makes it easier to use components in designs for different screen sizes. And then you don’t have to calculate every time what 40% or 60% of the width is. This also makes it easier to design scalable applications that grow with the width of the screen.
Hi Figma Team, I opened the ticket below on 14 Aug 2025, but still not assigned to anyone and no one is responding on ticket. https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/requests/1472069 I'm writing to you regarding my Figma Professional account. On August 14, 2025, while I was in the process of adjusting our seat count (reducing Full seats from 3 to 2 and removing the Developer seat from 1 to 0), the account was unexpectedly upgraded to the Organization plan. This upgrade was unintentional, and an unanticipated charge was made to my credit card while settling a pending invoice. As we only require two Full seats, the Organization plan is not feasible for us. I kindly request that the account be downgraded back to the Professional plan and that the excess amount charged be refunded. I have already submitted a ticket regarding this issue. https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/requests/1472069 I appreciate your assistance and support.
When exporting nodes with exportAsync({ format: 'SVG' }), the REST API sometimes generates <g filter="url(#id)"> references pointing to a <filter> element that has no primitives. According to the SVG spec, applying such a filter causes the group to render nothing. This means that shapes with simple fills/strokes (e.g. Polygon, Line, Vector) can appear correctly in Figma, but the exported SVG appears empty in strict renderers. Steps to reproduce: Create a polygon, vector or line. Add a drop shadow effect. Export via plugin using node.exportAsync({ format: 'SVG' }). Inspect the SVG: the node is wrapped in <g filter="url(#filter0)"> but <filter id="filter0"> has no child primitives. Open the SVG in browser → shape is invisible. Expected result: If an effect cannot be represented in SVG, the exporter should omit the filter attribute (or insert a trivial <feMerge><feMergeNode in="SourceGraphic"/></feMerge> so the geometry is preserved). Actual result: An empty <filter> is emitted, causing t
I want to use the plug in html.to.design (or another method) to convert things that I have created in Figma Make to Figma Design. When I publish the site, I get a url. When I surf to sub pages (links within my prototype) the url does not change so I can only get the first page ‘converted’. Is there a way that I can see individual URLs of sub pages?
Dear Figma Team, I am a big Figma fan and want to fully transition from Adobe, I’ve identified two key text-related SIMPLE features that would greatly improve Figma’s layout design capabilities: Text Wrapping Between Text Boxes Figma currently lacks the ability to wrap text between multiple text boxes, making multi-column layouts cumbersome. A native text threading feature (like Adobe indesign) would allow text to flow dynamically between boxes, especially when resizing frames. Hyphenation for Improved Text Alignment Long paragraphs in Figma often result in uneven spacing at the edges. A hyphenation feature (like Adobe Indesign) would automatically add dashes to break words at line ends, improving readability and visual consistency. These features would make Figma more versatile for typography-heavy designs and streamline workflows for users transitioning from other tools. The community has been asking for this improvements for years and still we have not seen any response from you. Pl
Hey everyone! I’m looking to embed a Figma file using Embed Kit 2.0, and hoping to allow users to navigate directly to the main content via the "Skip to Content" link thats available in the regular prototype link after hitting [Tab]. Has anyone been successful in triggering this within the Embed Kit 2.0 iframe? If it’s not supported out-of-the-box, has anyone been successful with a workaround? Cheers,Blake
APIs, guides, plugins, and more.
Find a virtual event that speaks to you.
Find answers, learn more.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.