Suggest a Feature

When setting up variable groups for modes, you may need all the same structure (all be it with renamed variable names) I find my self copying a group of number variables then using the same structurce want to apply strings to them (example h1, h1, h3), what would realy help is the ability to convert a group of variables from number to string and back again if need be.

Hi, please make Figma remember my choice when I pick “show as list”. Better still, put it in the Settings. Thanks.  

Often I’m adding autolayout around a frame/component/element, and the default vertical and horizontal padding is 10px. As well, the gap applied is 10px. It would be amazing to set the default padding and gap to auto-layout elements. This would help with keeping your files clean, but also, to ensure that redundant CSS properties are not added to dev mode output. Clearing and resetting these properties takes time and often the gap is not cleared due to the property not having an affect on single children. Thanks!

Hi Figma team,I recently created a Figma site for my app and really love the experience.However, I need to upload a file called app-ads.txt to the root of my domain. This file is required by AdMob to verify ownership of the app and allow us to display ads.Is there any way to host or upload this file directly in a Figma site?Thanks in advance!

Some context: I work as an interaction designer in an enterprise org, but I am the only UXer in my business unit (and my country, as it happens). I work with the company’s core UX team, but I'm not part of that team - I’m part of a specific product’s dev team.Our core UX team maintain a component library, which I can (and do) use… but can’t edit - which is fair.  Unfortunately, the product I work on is an outlier and has a lot of unique needs.  I also maintain my own component library for things which are completely unique to this product… that all works well.What doesn’t work so well is when I need a custom variant of a component from the core team’s library.  I don’t need (or want) a whole new component, or the maintenance overhead of maintaining a local branch of their entire component library (if I even can without having write-access to it) - I just need to be able to add (for example) a single new variant to a library componen

Would love if there was a animate like the line draw animation in Keynote. It’s the one thing that’s still missing that I used to use in Keynote.

ProblemWhen building larger prototypes in Figma Make, it’s easy for structure to drift — especially across pages or collaborators. For example, the navigation or layout might get accidentally edited or slightly misaligned, breaking visual consistency. RequestAdd the ability to lock sections or turn them into reusable components. This would make it possible to:  Lock a navigation bar or footer so it can’t be moved or edited accidentally. Define a reusable page layout (e.g., header + sidebar + content area) that stays consistent across all pages. Quickly update all instances when a layout or component changes.   Why it mattersThis would save time, reduce errors, and make multi-page prototypes in Figma Make feel more structured and scalable—especially for teams us

Often in my designs I need to provide fork for flow to go one way or another depending on conditions. When I use If/ Else and add Navigate to - the dropdown is not ordered alphabetically. I’m not sure what it was ordered on if on anything. It makes it really hard to find what frame I want to navigate to in according condition.If I start typing I can find a frame but due to the mess of not aphabetically ordered and a lot of frames that might start with same few letters this is not much help.Could we have actual search (Typeahead dropdown) instead or at least order it please alphabetically?  

Feature Request: Per-user layout guidesCurrently, all guides in a Figma file are shared across collaborators. When multiple people work in the same file, guides overlap and create clutter.Request: Allow each user to have private guides that only they can see, with the option to toggle visibility of others’ guides.This would make collaborative design cleaner, reduce visual noise, and let each designer work efficiently without interfering with others’ layouts.

Currently Figma make allows you to have different pages for your prototype. But for some reason when the app updates i dont really have a way to go to the specific page that was changed. For eg. one of my prototypes has a component to provide email before you can move forward. So any time the app updates when i’ve changed any of the pages Later in the flow, I have to go through the entire flow again just to get to that page, and then ask it to make changes, and then we go over it again and again and again. I have seen it in other tools like Builder.io, where it doesn't matter what I change, I can go to a specific page from the page selector at the top. Is Figma going to get one of these? 

I’m embedding a form and would like to have scrolling on this embed and/or ability for the figma embed to resize on any change to avoid scrolling.

I am extremely excited to motivate for Figma slides for decks, and the ability to use components and even prototypes in here.My one concern is that if a component is used in a Figma sildes, and the component is updated externally, it is not updated in Slides and needs to be re-placed. Are there any plans to make this relationship persistent? Prototypes DO update when placed in Slides.

Hello, I couldn’t find a feature in Figma where we can constrain trigger or hotspot bounds to a vector shape instead of a rectangular bounding box. The current version doesn’t support the design use cases similar to those below (eg: interactive pie charts) where transparent pixels are ignored in a non-rectangular shape because the hotspot bounding box is always rectangular. It would be nice to constrain the hotspot area to the desired shape instead of a rectangle. Please check the attached Figma file. Hotspot bounds.fig (7.0 MB)

A lot of AI features in Figma so far seem to be generative, which IMO is mostly fruitless for the core auidence as current models are not capable of new problem solving, only generating variations of the combined knowledge of everything that has been observed before, without understanding the context of decisions made to implement design choices as well. Where I can see see value add is in other aras. QA for example - perhaps pointing a dev URL at the tool to see how front-end have developed the designs and comparing to what was in the original figma (visually, not comapring the code generated by Figma, which is often not all that helpful in established systems) - could help catch mistakes and also documwent intentional changes in the design to development process. 

Could you please add the option to show width overlay in figma make, it would really help debug breakpoints when prototyping. Thanks

Just like Microsoft Powerpoint, we should be able to add duration for the transitions between our slides to make it not look like we are in a hurry. Currently, I think the default duration is 500ms and it’s too fast for me. I want to make it gently transition from one slide to another. The animations are great, but if you could also add more transitions, it would make it even more better.

For now the only solution I found is to switch the Image fill to Crop and to drag the edge of the image manually until it flips. This is cumbersome and not very precise because of the overlap of the image’s edges and the crop bounding box edges. A simple set of mirror buttons would be super helpful! Thx!

Just wanted to add a bit more context! Many agencies and independent designers build full visual systems in Figma, then rebuild everything manually in Divi for WordPress. A plugin or native export option could save hours of repetitive work and help preserve design-system consistency.I’d love to test or even provide feedback if your team ever explores a Figma-to-Divi workflow. It could really empower smaller studios that rely on WordPress as their delivery platform.

I would like to be able to apply variables to sweeps, etc. If this were possible, I think it would be possible to expand the dynamic expression of prototype.

A simple option to randomize a pool of sticky notes, without using a plugin. Seems to very useful for researchers. 

Hi Figma team!I’d love to suggest a small but meaningful UX improvement. In Figma, many numeric fields can be reset by typing “auto” (such as width, height, or layout), which is great. However, when working quickly, it’s incredibly easy to mistype “auto” as something like: atuo auot uato aout atou utoa or other nearby typos At the moment, Figma doesn’t recognize these variations and simply rejects the input, forcing users to delete and retype again. Considering how common and predictable these typos are, it would be a great UX win if Figma could accept common mistypes of “auto” as valid and interpret them as auto.This would improve workflow speed and reduce tiny da

I’ve been using Figma for almost 7 years, and this has been a pain point for me while using Figma to craft UI designs in each of the projects I’ve been through. It doesn’t allow me to reorder the starting point flows I’ve created when more starting point flows are added. As more are added, there arises a need to reorder the way people navigate from sub-flow to sub-flow within an app design in the desired order. Additionally, having the ability to rename a specific flow directly from the present mode would be a plus, so the user wouldn’t have to leave the current context of present mode and go back to the shared workspace to find and rename that flow.I am pretty sure that there are a lot of folks in here in this feedback community must have the same concern as mine. So Figma, I am asking you to make an according adjustment to this and ease our lives. Thank you

HelloFor years, Figma has been the gold standard for interface design. It’s fast, collaborative, and somehow manages to make design feel fun again. But even with all its brilliance, there’s always been one small—but incredibly frustrating—gap in its system.Figma doesn’t have subpages.And honestly, that’s wild.The chaos of one giant pageIf you’ve ever worked on a complex design system or a product with multiple flows, you know exactly what I’m talking about. You open a Figma file, and suddenly you’re staring at 200 artboards, 50 prototypes, and a sea of arrows that look like someone spilled spaghetti on your screen.Sure, you can organize things into pages. But those pages quickly become their own mess. Before you know it, you’ve got 25 of them—each representing some combination of “v2,” “final_final,” and “do_not_touch.” Not to mention the pages for design system tokens, experiments, and archived explorations.It’s not that F

I frequently share notes on designs with a group of developers without knowing which one will work on what I’ve designed. I’d love to be able to tag several in a comment via a “group” I’ve created within my team (eg- “@FrontendDevs”) How are others handling this?

Hello, Figma team! I am an active user of your product and would like to propose a new feature that, in my opinion, can significantly improve the workflow for designers and their teams. We are talking about the possibility of allocating a separate editing mode only for texts inside layouts. At the moment, when it is necessary to make edits only to text elements (for example, to correct typos or change the content of the text), users have to get full access to all elements of the layout, which can lead to undesirable changes. It would be very useful to have a feature that would allow you to edit only texts, without the risk of accidentally changing other design elements. Such a mode would be useful for copywriters, marketers, and other professionals who interact with layouts but are not designers. It would also reduce the burden on designers, who would no longer have to worry about the safety of all other aspects of the project. Thank you for your attentio