Share Your Feedback

Hi, I selected a Collab seat when starting the Professional account. I really should have selected Full seat. There’s no way to remove unused seats on this monthly cycle. There should be. But if there will not be, at least the seat selection should be more visually descriptive to avoid incorrectly selecting the wrong seat. I don't see a contact form or email for support.

I’ve been working on a project using Figma Make and I’ve noticed that after a while, Figma Make AI just does whatever it wants to even when I specifically tell it not to in the guidelines.md or even in the prompt specifically.I get messages from AI like this:******The user is very frustrated because I completely violated their explicit instructions to only fix the logic issues and not change the UI. They're also pointing out that there are errors in the console that show I broke things. Let me analyze what went wrong.The user is absolutely right - I completely failed to follow their clear instructions. They explicitly said they liked the UI the way it was and only needed the logic fixed.I think the best approach is to:Acknowledge the complete failureAsk them for guidance on how to restore the working versionPromise to make only the minimal logic changes they originally requestedNot make any assumptions about wha

Figma’s 100% is slightly bigger than my browser’s actual size. Is there a way to make them 1:1 pixel perfect size?

This thread is here for you to share your thoughts and suggestions about the Figma Forum.We’re proud of the work we’ve done so far, but we know there’s always room to make things even better.
Here’s some prompts that you can use:What are your thoughts on the forum makeover of January 2025? What do you like the most? What have you struggled with so far? / What are the top three areas that need improvement? What would you like to see us implement next?If you spot a bug or have any feedback, drop a reply here — we’ll do our best to respond and improve!

Hello! is it possible in "Scope" to split the value of "Gap" into "Gap" and "Padding". I want to configure "Gap" and "Padding" separately from each other.

Our design system has many components that can’t be edited beyond what is available in the props list. In the past, we generally enabled the “simplify all instances” option for these types of components (things like icons, checkboxes, switches, etc.). With the latest UI, “simplify all instances” hides the alignment features within the Position section of the design panel by default, which means any designer wanting to align one of these components within their design must first un-hide additional properties. It seems to me that a component’s alignment to other components shouldn’t be an “additional property” — positioning components within a layout is the first thing we do, and doesn’t involve editing the component itself. As a result, we’ve had to disable the “simplify” option across the board to make things easier for designers. This means displaying extra layers unnecessarily.

Folks, if we want to draw clean paths in Figma you need to give us an easy possibility to join different path strokes with each other. This is literally the only functionality besides (rarely) using picture to vector feature that I go to Illustrator for. But it is necessary I’m sure this has been discussed but that I need a 3rd Plugin like “Join Paths” for the most basic functionality can't be right.If anyone else struggling with this please leave a comment or any interaction with this so it actually gets seen.Best,Jannik 

Properties propagation is necessary to build and maintain a flexible, modular, and dynamic design systems.For example, I’m building a TableCell component in my design system, which should support inline editing. I’d like to crate a Value property on the TableCell master component, so both states (View | Edit) retain this value when switched. I’ll use different components to render out the cell value:View mode - Typography (text) component Edit mode - TextField (input) componentI can’t implement this, unfortunately, due to the limitation described in this thread, so I have a few options:Use nested instances and lose the

If you're an artist, content creator, or small business looking to expand your merch lineup, consider branching into unique collectibles that truly resonate with your audience. One increasingly popular option in 2025 is custom enamel pins, which offer a cost-effective, visually striking way to showcase your designs or brand identity. These pins are not only trendy but also highly customizable, allowing for creative freedom in shape, color, and theme. Whether you're launching a limited edition series or want a consistent product for your online store or event booth, enamel pins add a professional, collectible flair that fans love to show off.

Hi Figma, Listen it’s my fault, literally, that help is designed this way where it deflects. I designed Answers at Salesforce and that was the first of this sht. Giving feedback from within the product, is not a help topic. I suggest you have a separate channel. A google form would work very well, actually. It could create a spreadsheet and you could categorize the items. Designers ARE your bread and butter. NO, regular people are not going to swarm to Figma no matter what Exec says AI will make that happen. They go to Canva and then probably something even simpler. SO GET A TIGHT FEEDBACK LOOP WITH DESIGNERS I’M NOT YELLING JUST HIGHLIGHTING THIS.Feedback: make auto layout a part of the UI. It  is the most used feature. And now I have to pretend like it’s some kind of magic and legit thank figma for figuring it out with that dumb little shape button. FIGMA, MAKE AUTO LAYOUT

Genspark.Ai is the new workspace for the new gen operations.Figma Docs, Sheets, should compete Notion, Canva, editorjs docs etcFigma Drive with online offline sync should be an added advantageFigma Coding is not something worth for a design workspace, there are tons of better AI Coders like replit.A Canva/Lidojs like platform by Figma will be very productive. A whitelabel version will be more attractive for enterprises, resellers etcIm currently using figma for managing my docs. but its very difficult and i dont want to use canva docs. Hope there will be more productive improvements in documents management, file, folder management etcsomething like this  

Am I missing something or is the old Community home completely gone?It used to feel like its own place, with clear navigation, and a nice way to filter and discover new plugins.The new “Tools & Templates” tab just feels so…. clinical, sterile, barebones. It feels like a downgrade.

On a regular basis, whenever I have to move a file, I click on “Drafts”, thinking that it will let me move the file. But, this takes me to all Drafts, which I understand is probably the desired state for when the file is in a correct project folder. However, this drives me crazy every single time that I try to move something from drafts, which happens regularly given I create files outside of projects most of the time. Would love consideration on changing the Draft state for moving. 

Team,Why can’t I use a component set as an overlay and specify the variant I want to choose? Friends? Please. Otherwise, I have to make an instance that just sits there strictly for overlay. Same thing with  navigate to, really. Disorganizes the file and makes it “heavier” than preferred. Please, fix this.

矢印に載せたテキストを、複数選んで垂直方向や水平方向に整列する機能が欲しいです！例えば、Shapeを移動しているときの整列補助線と似たようなものが、対象をドラッグしているときでも表示されると嬉しいです。※この画像はFigJamで作った想像図です

Once I replace image I have connected with other entities or screens, all the attached connecting arrows are being rerouted in a way that I need to zoom out so much to tweak them to be as they were so it is easier to create new arrows and delete existing. It’s super annoying

Hey guys,UI3 has come a long way, I remember it was absolute crap in the beginning, it’s actually pretty cool now. But somehow, it still feels like the UX is not perfect. Maybe because all the sections in the right side panel rely too much on text? The structure makes sense, but I often find myself editing the corner radius for example, when in fact I want to edit the auto layout padding. That’s just one example, I feel that in the previous version I didn’t rely on reading as much, but mostly on reaction, which was instant.

 Right now, I’m trying to open and test what I worked on in Make locally, but nothing works. If there’s no way to restore the existing UX/UI to use it as-is locally, then Figma Make seems like a completely pointless tool to me.

For comments that have been resolved, can the user avatars in the comment panel not be set to gray? It's quite inauspicious, as it looks like the person has passed away.

In grid features Canvas Stacking (Last to Top/First to top) is not working properly

Could you please stop it? I don’t know how many times this happened to me as a multi user/multi team user I couldn’t find my files at the same place I left them and having heart attacks almost. Whatever your strategy on updates, it is really very shitty for the users-at least in my experience. I spent two hours just now to understand what you did with the navigation and why I can not see my project folders as I organized them before. At least keep our starred projects on the left side so we could find some things easily, maybe? 😮‍💨 You assume all designers have lots of free time to explore your new ways of navigation each time you update it and organize their files/organization structures accordingly? Most of us are regular working class people, just trying to fit some work-hours in our busy calendars and you are turning it to a big hustle for us just to find and open an existing file🤦🏻‍♀️ Stop using your time to adding new AI features maybe and put some real time to design and bui

Hi Figma team!I noticed Make supports importing only library components from Figma Design. Would be great to import a frame from a file for prototyping. My team’s design process is typically to start with a high fidelity screen which uses a mix of our design system and custom components. We want to link this source frame into Make so that we can get a functioning prototype for cross-functional team discussions. Is this feature being considered? Are there any recommended workarounds in the meanwhile?  Look forward to hearing from you!Best,Shaziya

Recent effects like noise, texture, or progressive blur are not scalable. Since the sliders are limited to 100, scaling a shape linked to these effects will result in a different visual appearance, as the effects do not scale with the shape.

Although the new version of the color filler can clearly see more configurations, you can't directly fill in the HEX value. You must open the filler and select the HEX mode to fill it in. It is not in line with an excellent interactive design experience. I hope it will be modified in the next version. In addition, each major version change of figma will lead to a lot of additional learning costs. I hope the product manager can reflect on it. Finally, thank the team for providing such a useful tool.

Okay, simple request… Make me a Bluesky logo.The AI’s 1st attempt… Is that supposed to be a weird croissant?! Try again.The AI’s 2nd attemptOkay… Improvement… But like… Better…?The AI’s 3rd attemptthe hail is that?! A heart shaped with legs?! It also looked like _something else._ But… Still not the logo.The AI’s 4th attempt