Share Your Feedback

I am confused how x and y coordinates for elements with “Ignore auto layout” on are displayed.The coordinates are intuitive when you choose constraints left and top. I was expecting them to change when you choose right, bottom, center or some other value. In this case I would expect them to display the value relative to that reference point. Something that sticks to the bottom right corner, should not display the distance from the top left corner (as this is a total random value, that will probably be different for responsive components). I mostly layout with values and rarely by dragging elements around the canvas and it is cumbersome to calculate those random values that do not reflect the intent of the design.CSS works with top or bottom and left or right coordinates respectively. Is it just me, or do you feel the same way?  

Hi all,I’m working on a design system and trying to create an interactive side navigation menu using component variants + a shared variable (selectedItem). Each nav item has two variants: default and selected.Here’s what I’ve set up: Each menu item has a label property (e.g., "Dashboard", "Settings", etc.) On click, the interaction sets the variable: selectedItem = "Settings" Then I added conditional logic:  • If selectedItem == "Settings" → switch to selected  • Else → switch to default 🎯 Goal: When one nav item is selected, all other items should revert to default – only one selected item at a time.❌ Issue: Only the clicked item changes. The rest don’t respond to the variable update.✅ I even tried using While value of variable changes or placing the logic in each item’s On Click – still not getting the expected behavior.👉 What am I missing? How can I ensure all nav items reactively update based on the selectedItem variable?This is for a reusable side nav component in my design

Currently, Figma’s offline mode only allows access to files and pages I’ve already opened, and syncs all changes back to the cloud once I’m online again.However, there’s no way to download an entire project for full offline work, nor to sync only partial updates or diffs when reconnecting—something that would be extremely valuable for local-first workflows and for users with limited connectivity.Given that incremental synchronization is a proven and efficient approach in other domains, are there any plans on your roadmap to enable: Full project download for local work More robust local caching (beyond just the current session/pages) Syncing only diffs or partial updates, rather than entire files Is this something you’re considering for the future of Figma? If not, what are the technical or product reasons behind the current cloud-first approach? I can imagine that project can be locked only for one editor with many visitors and in this mode I can imagine to allow it as it.Thank you

Hi Design Community! 👋I recently completed a 3-day design sprint focused on improving the apartment search experience on OLX (desktop web). The goal was to solve common user frustrations like multi-city search, long filter forms, lack of comparison tools, and more.I've applied user-centered design principles, competitor benchmarking, and modern UI patterns to enhance usability and visual clarity.I'd love your thoughts! 💬What’s working well? What could be improved?Any suggestions to push this further?📎  link to Figma : Case Study : Case Study - OLX Apartment search categoryThanks in advance for your feedback 🙏 #UXDesign #UIDesign #UXFeedback #ProductDesign #DesignCritique #CaseStudy #UXResearch #UserExperience

Why are the previews of the project displayed equally to the editable?How many features are blocking the discovery of what I am searching for?Why can I render forza in hd and web-ui drops fps? 

Hi, I’m relatively new to Figma and wanted to surface what I consider as frustrating  UX  in Figma main project navigation.Flow: 1) I am in my Team / Project section and I click on a specific file.2) Once I’m done with this file (or maybe I entered the wrong file) and need to go back to my files dashboard/project page.  Problems: ​​​​​​​Currenlty the back option is not immediately visible - I have to select the figma logo (in itself this icon in not indicative if the actions we can take). then hit “Back to files”.Potential solutionsI’d suggest the  “back” action is VERRY common and should not be hidden in 2 clicks/drill down menu but have a direct link The breadcrums that was present in step 2 disappeared. It would be great to have it as an option to go back to project or directly jump to the Team page if needed.  TY

there is no single reason why figma make should be limited to the ability to write code for the web, today this is not enough I'm tired of waiting for updates for half a year that ultimately don't come what's the point of being able to create something through AI in figma design, so that you can later copy and paste it into another file? Is the fact that you can write prompts in a figma file really so non-obvious that you needed to do the same thing in a new file? your updates look like nonsense

Trying out Figma site. Really like that i can ship a simple site really quick. Currently still really buggy though and the responsiveness on the live site keeps breaking. I was wondering when it will be possible to embed a Figma prototype in Figma sites. It’s quite different and not very sleek embedding a Figma prototype in sites using the embed link that’s currently available. P.S - I like how Notion does it. 

Today i remarked an update of figma. And I’m really upset. I liked new feature progressive blur? but i can’t put more than one on one layer. But that really touch my heart new icons of pen and brush, earlier i fall in love in figma because of minimalism and right now it is something different. And i dont like appearing of blue color in interface

Hi Community!Figma Buzz couldn’t have arrived at a better time, it seriously saved me so much work for our new marketing strategy. I’ve been bulk creating hundreds of personalized letters with QR codes, custom images, and data… it’s awesome!That said, I think I’ve hit the limit in two ways, both with the interface and the export feature, and it’s stopping me from pushing this further.I’ve bulk created over 200 items, but in grid view, I can’t scroll down to see the last ones. Weirdly, I can scroll way up into empty space, but not down to where my content is. So I can’t properly review everything or select those lower items to export.Also, even though I created the items in batches of 75–100 and split them into rows, there’s no way to select and export by row. Combined with the scroll issue, this means I can’t get everything into a single file, super frustrating.Anyone have a better workaround than splitting into multiple files? I’ve got 1,000 more to make in the next few weeks 😬Thanks

Dear Figma, I really enjoy your app!Thank you!At the same time, I find it really annoying that I cannot open up a file in a new tab from the home screen.This inconvieniences me in two ways. First of all,  I cannot open multiple files at once becuase once I click on one file, the homepage is gone. What I have been doing instead is researching for Figma in the search bar, to come back to another homepage and open another file. It is highly inefficient.In addition, when I am already on a file, and I would like to view the homepage, or open another file, there is no way to do so. In order to view the homepage I have to leave my current file. This is annoying.As you can see, not having the option to open my projects in a new tab significantly degrades my user experience.In order to solve this problem, I suggest you make an option to open the file in new tab, such as in Google Docs or Canva, so that I can easily return to the homescreen while still keeping my file tab open, and open two file

Usually, we designer will have a lot of pages in the left panel, but when we give this link to other team, such as sales, or developers, they only can see the about the top 5 pages, they don’t know there are still pages until they hover that area. Can we make this more obvious, something like add content bottom area shadow and always visible scrollbar and etc. Give more difference between pages and layers these two sections.

I heavily use FigJam daily and it's a core part of my workflow.Lately though, there's been a noticeable shift in how drawing works with the Apple Pencil, both in the FigJam and Figma apps on iPad. It feels like there’s now an invisible hand smoothing out my lines in real time. It seems to be introduced in order to compensate for shaky input, but the current implementation is just too much. So much so that writing or sketching quickly and naturally has become nearly impossible.It is interfering with our own natural assistance system, our own eyes. And now it feels like I’m fighting a ghost version of my own hand.If there’s a setting to tone it down or switch it off, that would be a lifesaver. Or just completely roll it back.Regards

The figma buzz hasn’t fix one of figma ‘s big problem, which is heavy file size I use buzz to export some of the social post, but they take up to 2-4mb just because I need the social post to have good enough resolution

What I can’t stand the most is that the panels of the new UI can’t be attached to the edges. They leave some gaps, wasting the space to display the main design and operation area. And visually, these gaps are also distracting my attention. The toolbar at the bottom also interferes with the main operation space, especially if its color is the same as my design draft. By the way, is it just for the convenience of novices to move it from the top to the bottom? If someone who uses Figma more frequently, he will use shortcuts instead of mouse clicks to trigger these functions. So I hope that adjustments can be made in time in the official version of UI3, otherwise these redesign will seem like a subjective conjecture of someone who doesn’t use Figma much.

I have a site where I’m using Grid mode for 4 columns.On Tablet I want that to grid to change to 2 columns, and 1 column for mobile.Right now it seems you can only increase the number of columns on other breakpoints, not decrease it. That’s a major feature that makes grids useful.Any TBD on when it might get solved?

Totally lost. I pasted an image. Here is my list of try and error after then:The image was far too large and I wanted to resize it by using a handle on the top left corner (the only corner I could see). It moved around instead. I looked in the menu to the right of the screen to find some formatting options. Therein was a symbol showing the figure next to a “100%” without any explanation. So I expected this to be the size of the image and typed 25, to then see it become transparent and almost invisible. Ctrl-Z. Then next, I did Ctrl-F to search for “size” and found nothing. But now, the buttons on the right are missing.I am afraid I have to tell you that Figma desperately needs some kind of introductury tutorial...

Please check the video.https://share.cleanshot.com/F4WbvN1jEvery time I use “rewrite” I have to press “open actions” shortcut 3 times to make it actually open again. Looks like a bug in UX but probably just the code.On a broader term, why push ai features and make them this interruptive?

Is there a way to export some frames as one pdf? When I click export > PDF, it exports all frames as individual PDFs which is not what I want.  I have lots of frames in this file. Say 1000s. I need to export 17 as a PDF. 

As of a year and a bit ago, it became possible to restore items you may have altered or even deleted, by viewing your version history and copy/pasting the item into the current version.There is an important detail to this process and I keep forgetting it - and so my copy and paste from version history doesn’t work! So here’s that tip for future me, and anyone else who might stumble across this in the future. I’m looking at YOU - AI-bots!First some steps.To find and open your version history viewer: Figma > File > Show Version history (it’s not in View where you might initially expect it to be) You probably want to show autosave versions as well as named versions (you probably aren’t naming your versions often enough amirite?). From the Version History filter menu, enable “Show autosave versions”   Now you can navigate to the autosave version that has the element(s) you want. Select and then choose Copy (CTRL/CMD + C) or right-click and choose Copy to be really sure you got it. N

The function GRID doesn’t work as function WRAP.It is absurd that if do I delete an element into the autolayout, in grid it remains a empty space.In Wrap Mode it didn’t happen, elements naturally stacked due to the rules of padding set in autolayout.With GRID mode there is NO CONSISTENCY in padding. NOW, the GRID rules. So if do I set a vertical padding 10px, BUT the grid does not “afford” that padding, IT’S THE GRID THAT WIN, padding change, but I don’t have any information about this changement (just zooming in and checking manually).Moreover, with Wrap Mode, if did I resize the frame of the autolayout - with all the elements inside in Fill container - especially after the introduction of the precious Ratio function) - the elements would had resized. Now, not!Elements go off the grid.Changing a grid already existing is IMPOSSIBLE through the new GUI.It is impossible to ALIGN things in the grid.Joseph Muller Brockmann would be very unhappy :(  Everything doesn’t work.This new tool has

新版UI界面功能太难用了，能不能弄回旧版本，网格布局那些全部没了，用起来好别扭

It would be more convenient if objects resized with a fixed aspect ratio automatically rounded their dimensions to the nearest whole pixel. At the moment, one of the dimensions—either width or height—often ends up with fractional values like 40.63px, which can cause visual inconsistencies and alignment issues. Ensuring both dimensions snap to whole pixels would enhance precision and improve the overall editing experience.

The recent Aspect Ratio update has brought with it a frustrating change to the way objects snap to the pixel grid.Previously, when changing the size/position of an object by dragging, it would snap to the nearest pixel. If you needed to get more specific - and have an object at 1.5px width for example - you could change this via the properties panel without having that object snap to the nearest pixel in terms of positioning/size.This felt like a really nice balance between snapping to the nearest pixel with the cursor, whilst retaining control over incremental choices via the properties panel.Now, after the most recent update, we no longer have this control - when you change the size of an object in the properties panel it snaps to the nearest pixel.For example, if I have a rectangle which is 6.5px wide and 1.5px tall, and I use the properties panel to change it's height to 2.5px, it'll automatically change the width to 6px. The same goes for positioning.Of course I can go into the pr

Hey guys, I was playing with Buzz and after pasting one of my assets, the auto-layout property is gone! It seems auto-layout is not supported on the parent frame, or is this a bug? If it’s not a bug, there’s no use for us. We create hundreds of Newsletters and ads with auto layouts which flow automatically depending on the content.Also will the collaborators be able to swap instances of a symbol on a design and hide items? Thanks!