Share Your Feedback

We have a general collection of colors but for my specific file I want to add more variables. However this is not possible with extended collections. My work around is to use less frequently used variables (button-hover) for my usecase (color-bold) and this makes it very confusing and limiting.

With the strict enforcement of AI credit limits starting March 18, I’ve been looking at our organization's options for scaling usage. The current pricing structure for additional credits vs. adding new seats seems completely disconnected from reality for power users.Let’s look at the numbers for a Professional Plan (2026 pricing):Option A: Add a Full Seat. Cost: $16/mo. Cost/credit: ~$0.005 Cost for 3,000 credits: $16 Option B: Pay-As-You-Go (Overage). Cost/credit: $0.03 Cost for 3,000 credits: $90 Option C: Shared Credit Subscription. ​​​​​ Cost: $150/mo for 5,000 credits. Cost/credit: $0.03 Cost for 3,000 credits: ~$90 The Result: It is 5.6x more expensive to buy official "extra" credits than it is to simply spin up a secondary "ghost" seat and use that account for AI generation.The base credits for my team members who don't use AI are currently "locked" and wasted, while I’m expected to pay $90 for a 3,000-credit overage that could be covered by a $16 seat. We need a way to p

I really do not like the new confirmation dialog when deleting an account.  As an admin of an instance with 14k+ users, I delete people every single day and this new dialog gets in my way.

As mentioned in closed topic https://forum.figma.com/t/bug-autolayout-resizes-incorrectly-when-it-contains-no-visible-frames/14619, Is anybody facing the same problem? Even all contents inside “trailing-section” frame are invisible and frame resizing is set to “hug”, it still has 24 pixels of width.

I’m with Figma in this AI Design battle. I’d be happy to share my internal AI VScode + copilot workflow, maybe it would influence the Figma Make approach to what a designer needs from an actual “vibe designing”

I was looking at the release notes to double check my gut feeling that Figma itself has not been getting a lot of love lately. For my personal uses that has been the case. Only vague AI related things, which might be fine but makes me feel a lot of things are left behind. The trigger for posting this was looking at “Code Connect” after reading about a “bug” in Slots that seemed to be “intended behavior” (which is weird). This feature coming from 2024 (!) seems to be in Beta still (according to the blog post). The Github feels completely abandoned. This reminded me of things like branches (total abandonement), Percentage widths, Slots that feel half baked. The whole grid thing that seems to fizz out. New UI that was not a big success (I am still scanning everytime I select a diffferent layer where things are after all these years). Still not seeing the new App layout with the buttons on the left side (my team does, not me). Etc. Etc.I was just curious, I am getting the same kind of feel

The idea is to have “synchronized sections” (see Notion Synchronized Blocks) →I often need to have the same content in several files (maps, etc.), and synchronized sections would save me from having to maintain them all.  Notion Example:  

Just a thought, but the effect property in the annotation is very vertical. In general, when using variables/tokens, why are they not displayed in the annotation? Dev-team is referring to the token instead of the raw value. 

It would be great if I could use my right mouse button to drag the page like you can do in Miro. 

Hello,I’m really excited about being able to use AI to edit our app screens. It would make important stakeholders able to work by their own.However, for now, the results I get are far from being usable.First, despite the announcement, I have no icon related to this… strange.But it’s accessible through the cmd-k menu → “first draft” or “make a change”My first “first draft” was a banger. With only a vague prompt, it created a neat design with nice architecture (better than those of most of designers I’ve worked with ;-) )But as soon as I use the “make a change” menu, which is where the work begins, it’s really bad. Most of the time it doesn’t stick to the selection I gave and change something else. It doesn’t understand some basic command (selecting a menu, I just ask to add 2 entries… it renamed the others and change the colors...).So, am I missing or mis-using something? Do you have similar experiences or much better?Peace,Franck

I cannot understand the following. Figma Make makes a destructive mistake and uses credits. It then uses additional credits to fix the mistake it made. If it applies the wrong “fix”, it uses even more credits to address the issue. If it recognizes it’s addressing an issue caused by the AI, why does it continue charging a user to address the problem. This is my hugest pain point with this product and pricing model.

I upgraded my seat to `Dev` on 9. May 2025 expecting to use the Figma MCP server for development work. Despite the upgrade, MCP calls to files outside my organisation are still rejected with a "View seat" rate-limit error, even though whoami confirms my seat type as Full.I specifically upgraded to access that one single file. As the designer continues working on that file I can keep duplicating it into my own team, so, there is a clear workaround, but it’s ugly. This is causing me inconvenience and I won’t be continuing with my Dev plan after this month.I don’t see any value for Figma, other than trying to push their customers to upgrade through annoyance and inconvenience. Also, I feel misled, as I specifically upgraded to access with MCP this one file, and in the end I could but I am jumping through hoops.

안녕하세요원래는 첫 번째 사진처럼 한 페이지 안에 많은 섹션/프레임/이미지들이 삽입되어 있었습니다.작업하던 도중 갑자기 두 번째 사진처럼 대부분의 프레임 및 이미지들이 오류가 떠서 보이지 않고 창이 튕기면서 계속 저 상태로만 뜹니다.아주 일부의 사진/프레임만 뜨고 클릭, 확대/축소는 모두 가능한데 다른 작업물들이 보이지 않습니다.아주  급한 작업이라 최대한 빠른 해결이 필요합니다.조언 부탁드립니다. 

And the unwarranted billing situation continues. Despite downgrading my subscription and the lack of a live person to respond to several follow up requests to cancel, I am now disputing the charges with my credit card company. Figma, figure this out. 

Issue: After a recent Figma Make update (approximately April 30, 2026), the application now blocks all attempts to edit .html files, incorrectly identifying them as incompatible with a "TypeScript + React application."Error Message:PreToolUse:Edit hook error: [${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/block-bad-file-extensions.js]: Blocked: This is a Typescript + React application. Please write to a TSX file instead.Impact:Cannot edit legitimate HTML files used for third-party platform integrations Breaks existing workflow that has functioned correctly for months Forces use of workarounds (command-line editing) instead of standard editing tools Affects regular maintenance tasksTechnical Details:What's Happening: The Figma Make plugin added a pre-tool-use hook (block-bad-file-extensions.js) that appears to assume all files in a Figma Make workspace should be React/TypeScript components. This hook blocks the Edit and Write tools from modifying .html files.What I've Tried:✅ Restarted Figma Make - no ef

I want to share my experience with Figma subscriptions so other designers and freelancers know what to expect before paying for Pro.I purchased a Figma Pro seat for one month (around $20) specifically to complete a client project. Everything worked fine while subscribed. But after the billing period ended and I chose not to renew, I discovered something frustrating:My files became heavily restricted Editing/export access was limited I couldn’t properly continue working on my own project files Downgrading back to a normal free workflow was not straightforwardThe biggest issue is this:If a project was created while paying for Pro, users should still be able to access basic editing/export functionality afterward — especially for files that are no longer using paid-only features.For freelancers and agencies working on temporary projects, this can become a serious workflow problem because your work effectively gets held behind another payment cycle.Before buying Figma Pro, make sure you ful

Hi,I’ve encountered this bug testing out slots.  I’ve created a desktop component with a slot that uses components and both have variable widths for desktop and mobile. If I drag that instance with slotted components into a frame/section that’s set to mobile it will shrink down, but if I drag it out, the slotted components remain mobile size.Attached is a screenshot of the discrepancy.The instance functions perfectly fine if I manually set the desktop/mobile modes through the appearance panel though. Ps. I love the possibility of slots and can’t wait when it’s out of beta.

I’m often facing this problem. When I tried to resize the layers panel, it sometimes accidentally dragged the slide which is really annoying. Furthermore, the cursor hitbox for resizing the layers panel is too narrow (it’s really on the edge of the layers size) so that the cursor turns into vertical double-sided arrow. I hope Figma can figure out to fix the layers panel resizing issue. 

My userflow is large, when I make it in FigJam then export it took 45k x 4k pixel to Figma, Figma design cap it on 4k for exporting image, so my imported png looked pixelated into oblivion. Could you Figma team make it seamless to add connector in Figma design like it was in FigJam? I just want to show my userflow in my portfolio in Figma design before upload it into Figma site.

I was having internet connectivity problems, so I was met with the Connection Error screen:Connection error screenshotThe “Try again” button doesn’t seem to do anything.I had to go to the tab, right-click it and use the “Reload Tab” option. 

As a viewer, I need to understand the design system variables—using the built-in variable manager—so I can clearly see the token architecture and color relationships across modes. This helps me decide which tokens to apply to custom components and how they will behave in both light and dark modes.

I’m trying to create a horizontal scroll section (basically a simple carousel) in Figma Sites, but it looks like this interaction isn’t supported at the moment.Has anyone managed to make horizontal scrolling work?If it’s currently impossible, is there any workaround or alternative to simulate a carousel?

I’m working on the initial ideation and brainstorming solutions using Figma for the product I’m working on. I’m genuinely happy with the results it has generated on rough level, it has helped in making my execution process faster. But I have been consistently seeing a pattern where in certain designs it provides certain features or context which are unexplained or we’re unable to understand. I tried asking within the chat itself to explain what exactly that feature means and how is it relevant in our product but it wasn’t able to answer. Also the point and edit features has been working very slow. I was assuming if it is getting heavy for make to prompt and edit / also answer questions about feature’s vagueness in the same chat estate. Shall we have a different chat estate just to ask questions about what features it has exactly designed, if it has ability to explain the context it will be helpful for us to use it or rather shape and align with our use case if it shall surpass. In conc

Hi everyone,I wanted to share some feedback as a solo user of Figma Sites.I’m an individual artist, and I created a small personal portfolio website using Figma. I really enjoyed the process - the design tools are amazing and it felt very natural to build everything there.However, I ran into a problem when it came to publishing. For someone like me who just needs one simple site, the requirement to have a full paid seat feels quite expensive and more suited for teams rather than individuals.I don’t need collaboration features, AI tools, or advanced functionality - just the ability to maintain and publish a single portfolio site.I believe there are many creators in a similar situation who would happily pay for a smaller, more affordable plan designed specifically for solo users.It would be amazing to see an option like:a single-site plan limited to one user without team features at a lower price pointFigma is such a great tool, and I would really love to continue using it without having

Does anyone else find the pink for slots and the purple for auto layout too similar? personally it feels so close (I use dark mode and don't have great vision) I find myself having to bend over my computer like a cocktail shrimp to tell which is which. can I edit this color? does anyone else have this issue?