Share Your Feedback

안녕하세요원래는 첫 번째 사진처럼 한 페이지 안에 많은 섹션/프레임/이미지들이 삽입되어 있었습니다.작업하던 도중 갑자기 두 번째 사진처럼 대부분의 프레임 및 이미지들이 오류가 떠서 보이지 않고 창이 튕기면서 계속 저 상태로만 뜹니다.아주 일부의 사진/프레임만 뜨고 클릭, 확대/축소는 모두 가능한데 다른 작업물들이 보이지 않습니다.아주  급한 작업이라 최대한 빠른 해결이 필요합니다.조언 부탁드립니다. 

And the unwarranted billing situation continues. Despite downgrading my subscription and the lack of a live person to respond to several follow up requests to cancel, I am now disputing the charges with my credit card company. Figma, figure this out. 

Issue: After a recent Figma Make update (approximately April 30, 2026), the application now blocks all attempts to edit .html files, incorrectly identifying them as incompatible with a "TypeScript + React application."Error Message:PreToolUse:Edit hook error: [${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/block-bad-file-extensions.js]: Blocked: This is a Typescript + React application. Please write to a TSX file instead.Impact:Cannot edit legitimate HTML files used for third-party platform integrations Breaks existing workflow that has functioned correctly for months Forces use of workarounds (command-line editing) instead of standard editing tools Affects regular maintenance tasksTechnical Details:What's Happening: The Figma Make plugin added a pre-tool-use hook (block-bad-file-extensions.js) that appears to assume all files in a Figma Make workspace should be React/TypeScript components. This hook blocks the Edit and Write tools from modifying .html files.What I've Tried:✅ Restarted Figma Make - no ef

I want to share my experience with Figma subscriptions so other designers and freelancers know what to expect before paying for Pro.I purchased a Figma Pro seat for one month (around $20) specifically to complete a client project. Everything worked fine while subscribed. But after the billing period ended and I chose not to renew, I discovered something frustrating:My files became heavily restricted Editing/export access was limited I couldn’t properly continue working on my own project files Downgrading back to a normal free workflow was not straightforwardThe biggest issue is this:If a project was created while paying for Pro, users should still be able to access basic editing/export functionality afterward — especially for files that are no longer using paid-only features.For freelancers and agencies working on temporary projects, this can become a serious workflow problem because your work effectively gets held behind another payment cycle.Before buying Figma Pro, make sure you ful

Hi,I’ve encountered this bug testing out slots.  I’ve created a desktop component with a slot that uses components and both have variable widths for desktop and mobile. If I drag that instance with slotted components into a frame/section that’s set to mobile it will shrink down, but if I drag it out, the slotted components remain mobile size.Attached is a screenshot of the discrepancy.The instance functions perfectly fine if I manually set the desktop/mobile modes through the appearance panel though. Ps. I love the possibility of slots and can’t wait when it’s out of beta.

I’m often facing this problem. When I tried to resize the layers panel, it sometimes accidentally dragged the slide which is really annoying. Furthermore, the cursor hitbox for resizing the layers panel is too narrow (it’s really on the edge of the layers size) so that the cursor turns into vertical double-sided arrow. I hope Figma can figure out to fix the layers panel resizing issue. 

My userflow is large, when I make it in FigJam then export it took 45k x 4k pixel to Figma, Figma design cap it on 4k for exporting image, so my imported png looked pixelated into oblivion. Could you Figma team make it seamless to add connector in Figma design like it was in FigJam? I just want to show my userflow in my portfolio in Figma design before upload it into Figma site.

I was having internet connectivity problems, so I was met with the Connection Error screen:Connection error screenshotThe “Try again” button doesn’t seem to do anything.I had to go to the tab, right-click it and use the “Reload Tab” option. 

As a viewer, I need to understand the design system variables—using the built-in variable manager—so I can clearly see the token architecture and color relationships across modes. This helps me decide which tokens to apply to custom components and how they will behave in both light and dark modes.

I’m trying to create a horizontal scroll section (basically a simple carousel) in Figma Sites, but it looks like this interaction isn’t supported at the moment.Has anyone managed to make horizontal scrolling work?If it’s currently impossible, is there any workaround or alternative to simulate a carousel?

I’m working on the initial ideation and brainstorming solutions using Figma for the product I’m working on. I’m genuinely happy with the results it has generated on rough level, it has helped in making my execution process faster. But I have been consistently seeing a pattern where in certain designs it provides certain features or context which are unexplained or we’re unable to understand. I tried asking within the chat itself to explain what exactly that feature means and how is it relevant in our product but it wasn’t able to answer. Also the point and edit features has been working very slow. I was assuming if it is getting heavy for make to prompt and edit / also answer questions about feature’s vagueness in the same chat estate. Shall we have a different chat estate just to ask questions about what features it has exactly designed, if it has ability to explain the context it will be helpful for us to use it or rather shape and align with our use case if it shall surpass. In conc

Hi everyone,I wanted to share some feedback as a solo user of Figma Sites.I’m an individual artist, and I created a small personal portfolio website using Figma. I really enjoyed the process - the design tools are amazing and it felt very natural to build everything there.However, I ran into a problem when it came to publishing. For someone like me who just needs one simple site, the requirement to have a full paid seat feels quite expensive and more suited for teams rather than individuals.I don’t need collaboration features, AI tools, or advanced functionality - just the ability to maintain and publish a single portfolio site.I believe there are many creators in a similar situation who would happily pay for a smaller, more affordable plan designed specifically for solo users.It would be amazing to see an option like:a single-site plan limited to one user without team features at a lower price pointFigma is such a great tool, and I would really love to continue using it without having

Does anyone else find the pink for slots and the purple for auto layout too similar? personally it feels so close (I use dark mode and don't have great vision) I find myself having to bend over my computer like a cocktail shrimp to tell which is which. can I edit this color? does anyone else have this issue?

The Issue: Currently, manual file organization (uploading/moving .tsx files into folders) is only available at the start of a project. Once a history is established, the UI forces users to use the AI agent to move files.Why this is broken: Credit Waste: The AI treats "moving a file" as a full generation task, often rewriting the entire code block. Using AI credits for basic file system management is inefficient and costly. Workflow Friction: Manual uploads are restricted to the root directory, preventing users from maintaining clean project architectures without burning through their prompt limits. Requested Fix: Enable a permanent manual file manager that allows users to upload, move, and organize files across folders at any stage of the project without invoking the AI agent or consuming credits.

 Mind map in theory is amazing to visualise complex dependencies and structure but lack of functionality like turning lists into maps, exporting maps into text etc. Changing the direction of the map? Currently nodes are spreading from left to right, not right to left, top to bottom etc.and on top of everything - AI SLOPPPPPP. Let me work, not generate some meaningless content...

The filter to find variable fonts in Figma is fairly useless. Every font that has a font weight is considered ‘variable’.If you ask me - we should be able to filter further down, by selecting the properties we want to manipulate to find fonts that have those properties.And...let’s just say fonts that have the standard bold/italic modifiers should be removed from the ‘variable’ font list.

When viewing a spec, the big blue button is to request a full seat instaed of logging in or viewing the spec, which is the most likely case. This results in constant accidental ‘so and so as requested a full seat’ daily. Its the most annoying thing in the world and causes mistakes from my team members approving it.

Hey everyone. I am Alexander and I built a plugin called Design System Sync. I was honestly just tired of manually copying variables over to developers every time I changed a simple hex code. So basically I made a tool to fix this massive pain point.The plugin grabs your Figma design tokens and variables. Then it automatically creates a pull request in GitHub or Bitbucket with the updated code. Your developers just review the code changes and hit merge.Here is what it can do for your workflow:Automatic PR generation saves you from sending zip folders or raw text files on Slack.W3C Design Tokens and CSS Variables support means it works with most modern code setups.Multiple mode export handles your light and dark themes perfectly.Visual change detection shows exactly what you modified before you send it off.The free tier gives you 5 exports a month and includes all the export formats.The pro tier is $10 a month and adds unlimited exports plus AI code generation.Figma Community: https://w

I have been working with Slot for a while, introduced it in our component library too.Here are a couple of observations:The magenta outline feels too prominent and interferes with design and understanding of space, padding, etc. I would have preferred a subtle affordance that slot exists.While selecting things on canvas, earlier entire frames, components would easily get selected but with slots in those components, when I drag and select, selection happens randomly, sometimes, only slot layers are getting selected instead of entire frame or component which is not what I expect. And, it just messes it up. Cmd+X / Undo doesn’t work properly if I delete something from slotted component. There is not an easy way to return to previous state.

I would like to provide feedback on  support experience.I wanted to pay for Figma but both payment methods were declined. I was told that problem is with my bank and I need to contact them or use another card, thats all we are closing you case.I contacted my bank which confirmed there are no declines or restrictions on their side.I tried another card but I cant pay in euros from ukrainian card according to Figma restrictions and I cant change currency in invoice according to Figma restictions again!I contacted support once more and all I get was the same “contact your bank or use another card” without any real investigation of the issue.This has been time-consuming and frustrating.Could this case please be escalated to someone from billing or a support manager who can properly review it? Because it looks like you dont need your customers to pay you.

Hello Figma Community,I’m currently enrolled in the Google UX Design course on Coursera and have been using Figma Education Pro through this program.I received an email asking me to re-verify my student status, so I selected “Bootcamp / Online Program”, but I got the message:“Bootcamp students & educators: You cannot self-verify, you must be verified by your bootcamp. Please reach out to them directly with any questions.”Since Coursera is an online program, not a traditional bootcamp, I don’t have an admin to verify me. Coursera support says I should self-verify, but Figma doesn’t allow it for online students.I want to know: How can online course students like me maintain Education Pro access? Will our accounts automatically downgrade to Starter after Sept 29 if no verification is possible? Are there any workarounds for students using Coursera to continue using unlimited files and full Figma Pro features? Any guidance or advice would be greatly appreciated!Thank you!

This new feature disrupts my usual workflow of clicking outside the hex color value box to change the color. As a result, I often end up selecting a color from the list unintentionally.I called this feature “Annoying color style dropdown I didn’t ask for”. 

I want to organize my components into Icons, Buttons, Fields etc but these are already inside a folder and figma does not let me create any more nested folders so I need to browser all my 200+ components from one heap? And I’m not going to move them out from the folder because I need the parent folders too. Very bad designer experience!

When a change is made to an instance, any updates made to the original component after that do not carry over. This is very frustrating and results in me updating each instance. 

Hey everyone. I want to share some feedback on the current Figma Make credit system, and provide a literal step-by-step escape route for anyone else who feels trapped.I absolutely love(d) Figma Make for the initial 0-to-1 build. Figma successfully built "vibe coding" into their platform, which is incredibly cool. But what isn't cool is blocking users from actually using it that way. The entire value proposition of Figma is rapid iteration. Yet, I hit my third lockout this week after spending nearly 100’s on credit expansions in a two weeks.Almost all of those credits were spent on debugging, QA, and fixing logic—not building new features. The usage-based pricing essentially acts as an "iteration tax" that actively discourages you from polishing your app.If you are building a complex web app, you have to eject your code to finish it. I was intimidated by this at first, but Claude Code and Gemini (which gave me easy instructions) literally walked me through the entire process. It was sho