Share Your Feedback

Hi, facing preview issue in figma sites. Below is the preview screenshot which is totally different from what I created. Logo on top is broken, it was originally positioned on the left, and fonts are not appearing with the same properties as used in design.  

I found out I couldn't a while ago, and I apologize to the owners of Figma.I apologize if the chosen category is wrong, I think it is not the right option for my case.

Sites is awesome!  Even when there are not so much default interaction animations, code layers compensate it. I would suggest to be able to set id on layers just like the html tag , so that code layers could interact with other elements. 

I think the idea for figma sites is great! However there is some issues I am having. There is no way to connect a backend DB to the site that I have seen. I want to make my site password protected so have made a login system and Figma Make has created an authentication for it which is great and works, but if you type /home in the address bar it takes you into the site bypassing authentication.  The second issue is that there is no way to access the files behind the site. You can use figma make to code components which is cool, but trying to make a site-wide search bar isn't working because the code can't seem to go across pages so can only search things on that page which is pretty pointless. We need Figma Make that has access to all of the sites pages for better context. Another issue is that it's hard to redesign something once it has been coded in Make. If you design something and send it to Make then Make creates an image instead of SVG so it doesn't look great. But also means you

I can't believe Figma is forcing this change on us. UI3 is, without a doubt, the most unfriendly design possible. It has made my workflow painfully slow and incredibly unproductive. What’s the harm in letting people CHOOSE which UI works best for them?I always thought switching to UI3 was a HUGE mistake, but I never felt the need to comment on it because UI2 was still an option. Now that you're FORCING this change, I have to speak up.This is NOT an upgrade. It’s a downgrade in usability, efficiency, and user experience. Figma was supposed to be about flexibility and user-centered design—so why ignore the feedback of those who actually use the platform every day?Give us back the choice. Let people stick to UI2 if they want. This forced migration is a slap in the face to long-time users who built their workflow around UI2.

Hello, I used Figma site a lo recently and here are some feedback :The requirement to use a subdomain is quite restrictive. For example, if I'm forced to deploy my site on www.domain.com, I also need to redirect domain.com to www.domain.com to avoid users being blocked or unable to find the site when simply typing domain.com. This redirection then has to be set up manually on the server side, whether through a .htaccess file or an Nginx or Apache configuration. I have the technical skills to do this — it's my job — so it didn’t take me long. But it's far from accessible for someone who isn't a developer. In my case, the simplest solution would have been to host the site directly on domain.com. Dynamic components (e.g : carousel) which have breakpoint variants do not adapt responsively to the screen size. This cause major interface problems. The problem is not observed for static components. Buttons do not have focus states (interactions) which is highly problematic ATM for designing we

With the rise of LLM-based “Vibe Coding” tools like V0 and Cursor, I’m expecting Figma to address this shift at Config 2025. This year has been transformational—it's now faster than ever to validate early ideas and prototype them with full interactivity. This speed benefits designers, teams, PMs, and users alike, making rapid iteration and validation a core part of the process.In my practice, we quickly realized that traditional wireframing in Figma no longer felt as useful—especially since we’ve never been big fans of its prototyping layer. Figma’s strength has always been in UI design, but we’re now facing new bottlenecks:1. Bridging the gap between AI-powered coding tools and high-fidelity UI in Figma.2. Defining components in a way that makes them easily usable in these new workflows. (What does a design system look like in this new landscape) As these AI-driven tools evolve, the question is: how will Figma adapt? Will they double down on their UI strengths, improve handoff workflo

Our UXR team has noticed an increasing issue with loading prototypes on Android devices. Are certain devices more susceptible to this issue? Sometimes refreshing the prototype once resolves the problem, but other times the prototype either fails to load entirely or crashes. Are there any recommended optimizations, or have others experienced this issue?

Hello,I wanted to share a small suggestion: it would be helpful if future emails like updated “Terms of Service” included a brief summary that everyone can roughly understand what changed. I’ve noticed that other companies often do this, and it really helps ensure the main points are clear and accessible.As it stands, the content of legal comes across as somewhat dense and lacks transparency for people that are not lawyers, which could be easily improved with a short summary in the mail.Thank you for considering this feedback.Best regards,Mikka Wild

Excited for Sites! But there is def some room for improvement when it comes to basic things like global styles for inline text links. Maybe I’m not figuring out how to configure this but I’ll give an example: I need an h1 with multiple inline links in the text, like “This is my H1 title with one link and also a second”. From what I can tell there are two issues:There is no way to wrap multiple inline text objects in an auto-layout frame that then renders as a single h1 tag. There is no way to style this inline text with an underline and a color change when hovering without using some convoluted component setup. For example if I want any inline text link on my site within a paragraph tag to have the same underline & hover style, I think the only way to do this is using custom CSS in the site settings. This won’t show up in the designs though so not sure if this is the best approach. Hover interaction options in Interactions pane on the right only offers opacity/scale/offset/rotation

First of all, thank you to the Figma team for introducing the new annotation feature, it's incredibly helpful for collaboration. However, I’ve noticed an issue:“The annotations are always fixed in one position on the frame or element and cannot be moved or repositioned freely.”This becomes a problem when the annotation covers up important UI elements or text that I need to view or edit. It would be great if annotations could float along the edge of the screen, or have options like "dock to edge" or "auto reposition" to avoid overlapping key design content.Making annotations more flexible in positioning would greatly improve usability without sacrificing their core purpose.Thanks for listening, and I hope the team considers this improvement! 💡

It seems that all the emails I was getting previously on approved seats has disappeared. The only settings available to me now are for auto-approved seats. However, as I’m working in an organisation with multiple admins I would still like to get an overview every day on the approved seats by my peers. Is there a way to re-enable the general emails for approved seats, regardless if these were auto-approved seats?

One of the issues that I’m encountering is because their is now viewport height or width options, you aren’t actually able to independently scroll multiple frames. Ie if you want to be able to scroll a side menu bar independentally of the content. You actually aren’t able to do this unless you set a specific height for the page and then clip the content to be able to scroll the overflow.The issue with this is because the you have defined a fixed height for the page, it’s not actually recognising the dimensions of the viewport, so if the viewport in the browser window changes it’s size relative to the fixed height you specified in the Figma Sites. It actually breaks the scroll behaviour because you haven’t been able to tell the page that the actual height of the page it needs to be referencing is not the fixed height defined in Figma Sites but should in fact be 100% fill to the vertical viewport height instead.

I’ve been using Figma as a guest collaborator and I wanted to share a bit of feedback. When I click on a team that has shared a project with me, I’m taken to a team overview page that appears empty or says I’m not a member—despite having access to a project. I only see the shared project by navigating through Recents, which feels a bit unintuitive.It would make for a smoother experience if I could be taken directly to the project I have access to, or at least see it listed within the team view instead of a blank page. I think this change could reduce confusion for guest users and make collaboration easier. 

In the right panel of Figma Design, when opening the Variables dropdown menu or applying variables for any numeric input (Corner radius, Gap, Padding...). Next to each token, there is a new thumbnail representing a number value “1234”. It’s disturbing the reading of my variables. How can I go switch to the previous dropdown design ?Thank you 

This is odd behaviour in my mind!When i select an item and use the scale tool, it makes the new size its default 1x when i reselect that element.Example:I select an image, set the scale to 1.2x, go about my business, return because i want to return that item to it’s initial 1x scale, increase or decrease it. The new size has now been set as its default 1x. and now i have to do math!Why wont it just remember that i set it to 1.2x? This behaviour is weird and makes me wanna use scale less!

If you have selected an object such as an artboard or screen (or have selected it by mistake), including many nested text objects - typing “Control-B” BOLDS / UNBOLDS all text in the selected object, including all nested text… While I can see for simple objects this is convenient… It’s a HUGE PROBLEM if you have a large screen or perhaps an Artboard that has a bunch of screens on it… Its very easy when using the keyboard to accidentally select the artboard by mistake, It is very easy to accidentally type CTRL B while copy / pasting objects (intending to press CTRL-V) or using other keyboard shortcuts… The result is that ALL of your text becomes BOLD!! Your entire text on all of your elements on all screens if you select the parent screen by mistake… If you don’t notice this for say 20 minutes and continue working, it is near impossible to fix...This is massively broken as it becomes a huge pain in the ass if you discover that all of your text weights are now incorrect throughout all yo

Just built a pitch deck to present to clients using Figma Slides and decided to start using object animations to add a bit of flare. I was sad to learn that Figma used the same “Start” animation choices as Powerpoint which is (1) Start on Click (2) Previous to last animation.We need more options. The biggest one is just add the same prototype prompt of “After Delay” on object animations. The other one is give us more choices then “Slide” and “Fade”. Add, the standard animations that most apps have, like spin and make 3D and more...

No matter how hard I try, when I want to search for an asset, I forget that I have to switch to the asset tab first. I always have to X out of my search and switch back to the asset tab, then search again. It would be helpful to add Assets to the “This page/all pages” filter list.To me it’s confusing that the search icon is in line with both the File and Assets tab when you are on the File tab. This implies I can search both.When you switch to the Assets tab, the search bar is below which implies you only search in assets. 

Hey everyone! 👋While working on multiple Figma files and projects recently, I had a thought:Wouldn't it be amazing if Figma allowed us to group open tabs – just like how Google Chrome lets you group browser tabs?Think about it: You’re juggling 10+ Figma files – components, design systems, live projects, brainstorm boards, etc. Having the ability to visually group tabs by project, workflow stage, or type (e.g., assets, prototypes) would massively boost productivity and reduce visual clutter. Maybe even color-code them or collapse/expand tab groups? 🔥 This small feature could make a huge difference for designers, especially in larger teams or during fast-paced sprints.  🗣️ Let’s Discuss: Do you also feel overwhelmed by too many open tabs in Figma? How would tab grouping improve your workflow? What would be your ideal way to organize Figma tabs? Let’s get the community’s voice heard – maybe the Figma team will notice! 🙌

Might there be scope to prioritize the development of a Chinese-language version of Figma? Such a localization initiative would not only streamline operations for Chinese-speaking users but also significantly augment productivity across our team. I trust this proposal warrants consideration, as it aligns with the goal of fostering a more inclusive and efficient design ecosystem.

When I am building a flow chart in figjam, I use different shapes for different reasons (this is a common pattern in flowcharts, like the cylinder shape represents a database). I notice that when I select a shape, the next time I want to select one the shape has moved to the top of the list. It seems that they are ordered by how often I use each one. This is super inconvenient, because it makes it difficult to know where to select each shape:(a) I can’t even visually categorize the shapes (if I’m looking for a cylinder, I’d expect all cylinder options to be listed together) (b) I can’t find the option I just selected, because it’s now moved based on how often I’ve used it. 

Dear Figma (Yuhki Yamashita)I have a few suggestions on how to make Figma better for non-designers. These are not advanced AI-based automated UI design features, but rather basic improvements to enhance the user experience of a tool that is the source of truth for some of the best user interfaces designed in the world.1. Consumption View: Create a user-friendly view for non-coders and non-designers, such as PMs, Marketing, and Leadership. The current experience feels like being in an airplane cockpit with controls at all four edges of the screen.2. Easier Exploration: Finding specific explorations can be tedious. Implementing a built-in categorization of pages into three categories—Ready, Explorations, and Storyboard—will reduce variability in how organized one designer's workspace is compared to another. Additionally, a simple Hide & Unhide feature would be beneficial for preserving "Graveyard Slides" with useful content.3. Past Files Accessibility: Identifying past files based on

Currently, adding interactive navigation (such as clickable contents pages) in Figma prototypes disables the default keyboard controls (arrow keys for slide navigation).This forces users to manually add keyboard triggers frame-by-frame to restore key navigation, which is time-consuming and cumbersome, especially for large presentations.It would greatly improve the user experience if Figma allowed both interactive navigation and default keyboard controls to function simultaneously by default. This would let creators build richer, more flexible presentations without sacrificing the convenience of keyboard navigation.Thank you for considering this enhancement!

Using figma as a developer since 2021 also managing the billing on behalf of the company. The payment require for devs is stupid idea. Get payment for designing thats fine but why for devs? It does not make sense! Time to move on!