Share Your Feedback

I have been a UX designer for over 12 years, and in that time I have seen countless tools come and go. Very few truly stand out, but Motiff was one of them.Unfortunately, most people never really got to know Motiff, and as a result it struggled to gain enough traction to sustain its own design platform. That said, I was genuinely excited to learn that the team decided to bring back their powerful features in the form of a Figma plugin, essentially Motiff AI 2.0.Here is the concern. Figma typically approves plugins within 10 business days. Yet it has been over a month, and the Motiff plugin still has not been approved. I can’t help but wonder why. From what I can see, there are plenty of mediocre AI plugins already available, but the one tool that could truly raise the bar for design quality is being held back.I also found a post by the Motiff team in this forum where they shared an update. It even had a reply, but since then there has been complete silence. That

ATLEAST LET US GO BACK TO PREVIOUS UI VERSIONS OF FIGMA. STOP TRYING TO REINVENT THE WHEEL EVERY MONTH AND CHANGING EVERYTHING

I’m trying to make a simple prototype of four screens for an web app. At first everything was more or less ok, but the last two days the AI is constantly hallucinating, making changes that are not requested to the point that my project is almost ruined. From the simple request to add additional column to a table the AI changed my layout, typography, etc. for absolutely no reason

I know you can put variables in gradients but are we going to see the option of adding gradient styles to Figma variables anytime soon? At the next Config maybe? 🙏🏻

  I use custom code (CSS and JS) in Figma to optimize my website’s UI, but the current input area is too short. Editing longer snippets requires constant scrolling and slows me down. It may better if the input fields ara resizable. 

I occasionally (once is too often) see the AI self-talk mention being unable to see what’s going on due to a “truncated file”. What does that mean. Eavesdropping on its “tinking” I get the impression there are times it can’t access all the code and hast to make blind changes. Is that what’s going in? (It can’t be, right?)

Search engines, AIs, and even co-workers have a very hard time understanding what I’m talking about when I say “figma make”. I can’t get much help with it online cuz search engines and AIs think I using “make” as  a verb.Please, Please rename it to Build, or construct or something!

It looks so much better in diagrams.All the colored lines look goofy. And if you change shape colors, they don’t change with them so it’s very difficult to manage.Clean gray lines solve everything. Win win.

Is Figma ever going to allow us to collapse/expand pages in the sidebar? What about text-wrapping layer names?

When publishing components in a library - any components which have been excluded should be remembered and remain unchecked during each subsequent publish update.  this might be more intuitive than that contextual hide when published option - which effectively does the same thing in a more hidden way. Maybe that’s the feedback make unchecking effectively the same as hide when publishing - with an easier reversal option.Especially in the early stages of creating a design/component library there is a lot of publishing using the component, making tweaks and republishing - each time the user has to unselect certain components they do not want to show up, but need for whatever reason it’s a chore to constantly need to uncheck items each time.  Just make the system remember please.

Being able to create custom stickers to use in Figjam is a fantastic concept - I’ve created simplified components from the design system to allow BAs a simple drag and drop wireframe maker that worked brilliantly.But I cannot for the life of me figure out the rules that custom stickers use in Figjam - specifically why do custom stickers (and stickies) need to keep thier aspect ratio?  if i want a wider sticker or a taller sticker I should be able to do that - at the very least the sticker should follow the rules for scaling set by the originating design asset (no?) This applies to stickies as well - it’s 2025!  -[real/physical] stickies come in many different sizes now give us some versitility. I always hoped figjam would be a nice replacement for more traditional diagraming tools to create flows and maps - and while you can do these things - I feel it’s much slower and less intuitive. line routing is goofy, text wrapping is goofy, coloring and shading is extrem

I rely sometimes on Figma to help with microcopy and I can see the AI features have been helpful to accelerate my writing, is there a way to inject, update my writing guidelines and tone of voice into the modal so it gets the overall gist of how we want to write

Has anyone else experienced a problem like this? I would like to understand why Figma is using such a sophisticated, misleading, simply a sharp practice of billing their services? I am a freelance start-up that has been charged for 8 other people accessing the file I have created. I have allowed access only for two of them and they shared further (probably) and I have been charged an additional $120 for their access. I was never alerted to the fact that apart from the monthly subscription, there will be additional charges. I don’t want to be a part of a service that is so wishy-washy in their billing offer. It is a disgusting practice. Probably I will look for alternatives to this service.

Hello Figma Team, We’ve been excited about the launch of Figma Sites and have been testing it as a potential solution for our company’s website.  The experience so far has been great so far but as we dig deeper, we’ve run into a few areas that seem limited today. We completely understand this is to be expected while in beta. But we’d like to get some clarity on a few critical items:  General Availability: When is Figma Sites expected to move out of beta and into full release? Site Structure: At the moment, subfolder structures (e.g.,

With any large organization users when accepting invitations to Figma are not mindful what they type as their name.  When someone simply uses Initials or a First name it makes it difficult to reconcile users or know what users are doing.  Please update the Administrator functionality to allow changes to the persons name.     

I spent a month building this project.200 users already rely on it.And then—one update.One privacy pop-up.One broken publish button.Everything stopped.I tried what everyone else tried.Rollback to an old version?Sure—it works. But why should I accept that?Policies updated.Privacy terms rewritten.And suddenly, they own everything while I own… nothing.Imagine this: your designs, your infrastructure, your users…all trapped inside a system that won’t even handle an error gracefully.No proper documentation.No accessibility.No GitHub support.No real answers.We deserve better.Better error handling.Better transparency.Better respect for creators.Because right now?We’re building their platform.And they’re taking everything from ours. 

This is a small nit but please...i’m sure this was made for someone but can there be an option to make it so this button never appears? it adds an additional click, which is so annoying when i am trying to click between to components i am trying to compare the settings inside to. PLUS there is nothing below it! I’m all for whitespace but minimalism that adds work is worse. 

You’d observe that when ypure on any website and you navigate between pages, the browser loads the page. The cue you’d see is either the ring loader or in my case, Dia browser, a line strip shpws under the address bar…For my published Figmasite page, nothing happens and so when i navigate to another page, it doesnt seem like something is happening

For many reason, (1) Grid still no CSS autofit/autofill functionality, (2) requirement assets be on the same page in order for prototyping to work, etc., there are still occasions where you need to nest an instance in a component in order to achieve intended behavior. Unfortunately this also explodes layer count andreduces efficiency. Is there any chance you all can (address the underlying, more flexibility with prototyping, please add autofit/autofill on grid asap) make it where the instance can become a component and still hold its relationship while being a different kind of component itself?

 My original command: “Move the subject to the left so that there is more background on the right side of the image.”. Figma AI not only did the command but also decided to give me a facial feature updateSo… My facial feature was changed by Figma AI, even though the command was not containing anything regarding editing the subject. I find it problematic, because my ethnicity is changed & without consent.

こんにちは、FigmaSitesの登場により、マークアップや実装を伴わないクイックなページ公開機能は私達のプロダクトを加速させる重要なエンジンの一つとなっています。数々のページをローンチしてきましたが、いずれもXにてURLをシェアした際、OG情報が取得できていない事がわかりました。その原因は、FigmaSitesのページはJSによってレンダリングされており、Xの投稿時にはリンク先のHTMLだけを参照しJSは実行しないことによって、OG情報を取得できていないのだと推察しています。タイトルやOG情報などはJSでレンダリングせず静的にHTMLに記述することによってさらにこの製品はパワーを発揮できるはずです。ご検討のほどおねがいします。

Current: right click project “Settings” Click name type in new name Desired:right click project “Rename Project” type in new nameAlso, if you try to add special characters, the error message spits you back out on the Settings screen, whereas it should just keep you on the Rename form

​​​​​The button for this was so easy to find always in the bottom left of the screen. First the icon recently changed to what looked like a notebook, then it kept moving around and now disappearing all together. It’s now completely gone, and after minutes of searching the closest thing I found was the Templates and tools section, but it is broken as the search function always returns the same set of results shown in the screenshot.

Why does a perfectly functioning thing constantly have to get changed, confusing the users?  

The brand I work for has multiple branches with their own colors, each color containing 8 different hues. I created a color style for each color and use them when creating designs. Sometimes I need to play around with the colors to find the correct hue, but this can be very frustrating due to the fact that when I click ‘Fill → Library → select my color’ the menu immidiatly closes. If I have to do that 8 times to find the right hue + circle back to the best options that means I have to click at least 18 times. But if the menu would stay open I could do it within 9 clicks. This might not seem like much at a glance, but when you have over 25 shapes/text blocks on a page that need color that means I have to do 450 clicks instead of 225. I can see how the menu staying open is not helpful in everybody's usercase, but having a toggle somewhere where I can choose whether I want this menu to stay after a selection would be very helpful and save me a lot of clicks.

Hello, Figma team.I want to provide feedback on a long-standing interaction design issue that has been bothering me: the pink spacing adjustment handle that appears when hovering between items in an auto-layout.Frankly speaking, this feature does more harm than good in my daily work. Its original intention may have been to allow for quick adjustments, but when dealing with complex components that contain many nested items, the specific problems are: It obscures elements: The handle often covers the very small elements I am trying to select, making precise selections difficult without excessive zooming. It's accidentally triggered: Most of the time, my intent is simply to select an item, but the handle gets triggered unintentionally. This greatly interrupts my workflow and breaks my focus. In most cases, I choose to inpu