Share Your Thoughts

I’m always working on large projects where I’m jumping between creating concepts and diagrams and referencing all of them. It’s a hassle having to maintain two different files, especially when sharing and gathering feedback from stakeholders. An example is when I’ve created a flow diagram in FigJam and then I want to walk through wireframes based on that diagram. I usually end up jumping between both files, which is confusing for people, or creating a flow in Figma, which is way less flexible than FigJam for creating diagrams. It would be great if there was a way to embed or integrate sections of a FigJam file into a Figma file and vice versa. Along with that, I’d need a way to edit embedded sections.

Would be really good to import SVGs into Figma Make.

When adding an additional interaction to a component (within the “Interaction” floating window), for actions such as ‘navigate to’, ‘open overlay’ and ‘swap overlay’, we have to select the right frame from a huge dropdown list which enlists all the frames in the page. This is crazy. Even if I give my frame a unique name to make it easily identifiable, it is still extremely difficult to go through the list and find the frame as the list is not even sorted alphabetically. And it doesn’t even only list the frames within my space, but ALL the frames in the page.A simple search bar will solve the problem. Combine that with the ability to first see the frames within a space in the list, it gets even better. Would also be great if we could drag noodles like we do with single interactions.It’s highly frustrating to look for a frame in this panel. Kindly add this simple feature that will be a huge boost to usability.  

In an file you have 50-70+ prototype on single page, and you generally remember by name, so if we have something like search by name on prototype side, we can easily find the prototype

When I open a comment in Figma and start replying, but then click outside of it to do something, when I click back in the comment to continue my reply, the text I’ve entered so far is gone. This has lead me to loose several bigger chunks of already written replies and it’s very frustrating.Steps to reproduce:Open a Figma file with a comment there Click on comment to see the comment text/thread and the Reply field Click in Reply field to start adding a reply Type something in the Reply field, but don’t send it Click outside of the comment, anywhere on the canvas, so the comment box disappears Click on the comment again to bring back the comment box Reply field has been reset, the previously entered reply segment (that has not been sent) is goneExpected way for this to work:Reply text segment that has not been sent should be retained, so after doing something else and returning to the comment, the reply can be continued where it was left off.Use cases:I’m reading a comment that asks me t

I would like to start a design in Figma Make or import Figma Design project, and then edit with Make. At some point, I would like to export for manual editing in Design and import back to Make for additional adjustments. Is that possible? 

I’d love a copy button for comments in Figma. Sometimes I need to copy feedback from one file to another. A quick copy button would make this much smoother than having to manually highlight the text and press cmd+c every time.

I love that Ctrl + Z can go back through all of my selections. However, I do NOT love that it remembers even when I’m clicking between pages. If I make changes on one page, then navigate to another page, then navigate back to the page I made changes on, I want the Ctrl + Z to undo the changes I made on that page, not “undo” the navigational actions I did by walking me back to the earlier page and back to the page again before letting me undo the changes.

It would be great if the GET Project Files route returned the editorType value for each file with its response. My app pulls down the file content for so many files unnecessarily, only to discard them after reading the editorType value once I already have the content.

Hi there,Please see attached screenshot. In my opinion these sliders should on value changed should trigger the MAC touchpad haptic feedback. I feel like that would be a sweet user experience as when you’re currently sliding on a mac touchpad it doesn’t have any haptic feedback. There are other components which utilise this. Cheers 

I’d love to be able to disable all interaction with a video in Presentation Mode.This is so that a large video does not impede the viewer from advancing to the next slide by playing/pausing the video on click.Right now for any large videos / video backgrounds, I have to create a 0% opacity text link over the entire video to ensure it advances to the next page when clients click it.

User StoryAs a FigJam user, I often use FigJam to sketch out rough ideas (for example, a “fat-marker” diagram). When doing this, I also often want to add notes or write down ideas for specific areas on the canvas, which may contain multiple different elements.To do this today, I have a few options:I can “highlight” the area / elements I want to note with a bordered rectangle or another element, and then attach a note to that rectangle with an arrow, but this obscures the area I’m highlighting. I can draw with the pen tool and do the same thing as the above, but this also obscures the area I’m highlighting. I can copy the elements in the area I want to highlight, move them to the side, then add notes there, but this isn’t always super easy to do when elements are grouped or locked. I can screen shot the area I want to highlight, add the screenshot to the canvas, then add notes to that screenshot, but if I change the area I highlighted then the screenshot is outdated.What would be great,

Hi, my organization is creating a pretty robust template for our entire company. We have opted to make figma buzz templates component sets, as these are templates with many variants interconnected. However,  we’ve noticed that as you make component sets in Figma Buzz, the names of each frame disappear and become the name of the main component. I think the change layout update is great, but being able to pre-name this existing variables with naming conventions would be great for non-designers using the templates to better navigate the options.  

Is there any way to access the device switcher in Make when “playing” the prototype (not in editor mode)?

While working with masked images, adjusting the image fill currently requires multiple clicks — we need to open the right-side panel, go into Fill → Image → and then select from Fill, Fit, Crop, or Tile.It would be much more efficient if these four options (Fill, Fit, Crop, Tile) appeared directly below the Fill option once an image is detected — similar to how Adobe InDesign offers direct toggles for image fitting.This small UX improvement would significantly speed up workflows, especially for designers who frequently adjust images within frames or masks.Thank you for considering this enhancement!

Sería de gran utilidad, que se integrara un buscador por imagen para encontrar rápidamente diseños y propuestas dentro de un equipo grande de trabajo sobre suite de productos.

Figma should add Glow Effect in the Effects section. It will help to add personality to the design. I usually do drop shadow to create a glow effect and it is really tedious because you have to do a lot of drop shadow just to achieve that glow effects for text and vectors. 

It would be very helpful to have a half-circle shape (semi-circle) available directly in FigJam. Why this matters:In workshops, facilitators often use visual metaphors and structured diagrams to guide discussion. Half-circles are commonly used for:Representing progress or partial completion  Visualizing relationships or opposing forces  Creating layered frameworks Benefits:Efficiency: Faster setup for visual frameworks and templates. Consistency: Ensures uniform shapes across different boards and teams. Accessibility: Makes FigJam more approachable for facilitators who are not design experts.In short:A  half-circle shape would make FigJam more powerful for workshop design, visual facilitation, and conceptual thinking.

Hey, Is there any idea if getting the team id of a user just from a token will be implemented any time soon? Or if someone knows a different way to obtain that info?

Hi everyone,I often run into an issue when creating components: I want certain properties to be mutually exclusive.For example, inside a component (most of the time it’s a product card), I have Block A, Block B, and Block C, each controlled by a boolean toggle. If I want to switch from A to B, I have to manually turn B on and A off. This quickly becomes tedious, especially with multiple options.While variants are an alternative, they become impractical when dealing with many of this mutually exclusive choices, and they add too much complexity and file size.Conditional logic could also work for this but it is such a pain to do for this simple and recurent use case that I consider it as not a viable option for a day-to-day workflow. Feature Idea:It would be great to group boolean properties so only one can be active at a time—like a set of radio buttons instead of multiple independent toggles.Would this help your workflow too? What do you think?

Hi to all. I love to use Figma to make prototype but i think that it’s time to improve dev mode and show html+css code about components. Especially if the compponents were made using autolayout. I know that there’s some plugin but i think Figma have to improve this side. What do you think about it?

HeyIt would be great if we have repeat functionality in design mode too not just in draw mode.Thanks

HeyI’m currently using FigJam connectors by copying and pasting them, but it would be much better to have a native version available in Design mode. Also, connectors can’t currently be turned into components or placed inside components, so it would be great if that could be considered as well.

I would love to see when someone has made a change to a file as well. It would help me be able to identify if people make optimal use of their licence, as well as use the log if my org has suspicions someone isn’t working. Alternatively this might be solved by being able to download the textual version history of a file, but inside the activity log would make more sense in my eyes.

We just opted in for 2 seats on the professional plan.  We find it disappointing that we can’t monitor our remaining AI credits.We have no idea how many credits we used yesterday, and have no sense at all of how much we can accomplish with the credits we purchased.The AI itself has been very impressive.  To obfuscate the AI credits to this degree is a big disservice to your users.