Share Your Feedback

アノテーションはとても良く便利で利用してますが、位置が固定されると他のフレームなどに被って邪魔になりがちです。何等かの方法で自由移動できるような仕様ってできますか？コメントのように。

Is there was any particular reason to make “State” an collapsed accordion?Bit annoying to have to expand them for each noodle, every single time I click into it. The options don’t take up much real estate, seems silly to hide. 😤  

When I move a component to another file or simply remove one from the library and publish changes, I see a very confusing message “Unpublishing library”, then “Library successfully unpublished”. I only removed one component from the library, but if feels like I am unpublishing the whole library.

"Hello, I noticed that I can embed video files when using Sites, but the videos don't play properly when I preview or publish the webpage. I'd like to ask if this is a bug or an upcoming feature. Thanks."

I really like that Figma has it’s own annotation feature with categorization, properties and so forth. But God damn, why can’t we just copy+paste and move them around like we want to?. It is extremely cumbersome to write the same thing over and over again for each screen and not being able to adjust the position. 

This might be seen as human error and no one is supposed to rotate the frame before designing anyway but as I accidentally found this, maybe there’s some sort of measure to ensure that this won’t be an issue.What happen was i created a vertical frame and ironically didnt like it that way so rotated that 90 degree before proceed to create grid to test out the new features. As i added visuals, I quickly found out that the snap to grid feature does not work and it keeps show me 1x1 even if I extended to 1x2 or 2x1. (Image attached) Maybe it’s my bad and I can simply just rotate my frame then every else in it back to 0 degree but I couldn't help but think that there might be better way? Maybe all grid features should work in all orientation or at the least we can alerted if the setup is off. Just a thought, thanks! PS: T

Alright, guys FigPals were the best (and weirdest) thing to come out of April Fools’ this year. They follow your cursor, help you design, and love you unconditionally… maybe too much. 👀But here’s the problem—they’re only available for April Fun Week! 😭We can’t let this be just a one-time joke. FigPals deserve to be a permanent feature (with a toggle for those who don’t want constant companionship). That’s why I made a Change.org petition to show Figma how much we want to keep them!👉 Sign here: https://www.change.org/p/make-figpals-a-permanent-figma-featureLet’s make sure our tiny, slightly obsessive design assistants don’t get deleted forever. #KeepFigPals 🩷🐾

Love the product, recently switched from powerpoint and never switching back. The general compatability just makes figma slides ruthlessly better.I am experiencing a problem, however, with exports being very large in size. Ideally I would like to share sales meeting and pitchdecks with customers and investors but files tend to be larger than the 25mb email limit after exporing as pdfs.Would be neat with some better compression capabilities for figma slides!

切片工具使用不如以前方便且用于切图有问题

Now I can’t distribute objects evenly when selecting them all, but I used to be able to. It was really helpful when making tables.

I noticed this link label when I attached the link to a section in my Figma Design file, and thought that it might be good to only have this link show up if the linked file does have interaction noodle links or is indicated as a prototype. This integration might need some update since the launch of Sections in Figma.  

It’s kinda ridiculous. Why not nest these panels together? It takes up my whole laptop screen, and I have a large laptop. It’s super confusing every time I want to change an option, I have to go through all these panels to get what I need. Really needs redesigning. Please fix. And please add a color option for text styles. Why do I have to make a component or variable for everything?

Like many of us, I’m not totally on board with UI3. And, AFAIK, the new Apps don’t really make sense in their first iteration. But it’s an other matter.I teach Figma to beginners and I’ve noticed that it gets harder for them to jump in and learn as fast as before. The interface is more cluttered. More clicks are needed some properties not directly accessible or placed elsewhere (why on earth would you separate position and size ? And Fitt’s Law is not really applied regarding size and distance of useful buttons (yes Add Variant, I’m talking about YOU!).And more regrettably, heavily wanted workflow improvements still seem in a galaxy far far away :. importing svg animation, where are you ? So hidden that i can’t see you or just not there ? . Variant renaming still a problem in the layer panel as the “Property=” is directly editable there. Most of my students repeatedly make the error of renaming directly the variant there generating errors.

I always prefer to adjust Auto Layout gaps by manually typing numbers. Recently, the area where the cursor switches to gap adjustment mode has become too large, making it very inconvenient. Whenever I try to click other elements, it unintentionally activates gap adjustment, significantly reducing my productivity—especially when working with small components around 10px gaps.Please give us an option to turn off this feature, or at least reduce the activation area.  

Hi, I think instead of complicating Figma with website and Buzz new features if you work on improving the code generation feature that would be more than enough. Cause now the software os losing it simplicity and became more confusion, its a design tool, not suppose to be an AI code generating tool.--Kind Regards

After the new update, the aspect ratio no longer auto-locks;Previously, if I were to hold Shift and manually draw a square (or any shape of equal width and height), dragging to my desired size, the aspect ratio would be locked, to honour my choice of holding Shift.This is no longer the case - which means I have the extra step of going to the Properties panel, and locking the aspect ratio manually.

I am confused how x and y coordinates for elements with “Ignore auto layout” on are displayed.The coordinates are intuitive when you choose constraints left and top. I was expecting them to change when you choose right, bottom, center or some other value. In this case I would expect them to display the value relative to that reference point. Something that sticks to the bottom right corner, should not display the distance from the top left corner (as this is a total random value, that will probably be different for responsive components). I mostly layout with values and rarely by dragging elements around the canvas and it is cumbersome to calculate those random values that do not reflect the intent of the design.CSS works with top or bottom and left or right coordinates respectively. Is it just me, or do you feel the same way?  

Hi all,I’m working on a design system and trying to create an interactive side navigation menu using component variants + a shared variable (selectedItem). Each nav item has two variants: default and selected.Here’s what I’ve set up: Each menu item has a label property (e.g., "Dashboard", "Settings", etc.) On click, the interaction sets the variable: selectedItem = "Settings" Then I added conditional logic:  • If selectedItem == "Settings" → switch to selected  • Else → switch to default 🎯 Goal: When one nav item is selected, all other items should revert to default – only one selected item at a time.❌ Issue: Only the clicked item changes. The rest don’t respond to the variable update.✅ I even tried u

Currently, Figma’s offline mode only allows access to files and pages I’ve already opened, and syncs all changes back to the cloud once I’m online again.However, there’s no way to download an entire project for full offline work, nor to sync only partial updates or diffs when reconnecting—something that would be extremely valuable for local-first workflows and for users with limited connectivity.Given that incremental synchronization is a proven and efficient approach in other domains, are there any plans on your roadmap to enable: Full project download for local work More robust local caching (beyond just the current session/pages) Syncing only diffs or partial updates, rather than entire files Is this something you’re considering for the future of Figma? If not, what are the technical or product reasons behind the current cloud-first approach? I can imagine that project can be locked only for one edi

Hi Design Community! 👋I recently completed a 3-day design sprint focused on improving the apartment search experience on OLX (desktop web). The goal was to solve common user frustrations like multi-city search, long filter forms, lack of comparison tools, and more.I've applied user-centered design principles, competitor benchmarking, and modern UI patterns to enhance usability and visual clarity.I'd love your thoughts! 💬What’s working well? What could be improved?Any suggestions to push this further?📎  link to Figma : Case Study : Case Study - OLX Apartment search categoryThanks in advance for your feedback 🙏 #U

Why are the previews of the project displayed equally to the editable?How many features are blocking the discovery of what I am searching for?Why can I render forza in hd and web-ui drops fps? 

Hi, I’m relatively new to Figma and wanted to surface what I consider as frustrating  UX  in Figma main project navigation.Flow: 1) I am in my Team / Project section and I click on a specific file.2) Once I’m done with this file (or maybe I entered the wrong file) and need to go back to my files dashboard/project page.  Problems: ​​​​​​​Currenlty the back option is not immediately visible - I have to select the figma logo (in itself this icon in not indicative if the actions we can take). then hit “Back to files”.Potential solutionsI’d suggest the  “back” action is VERRY common and should not be hidden in 2 clicks/drill down menu but have a direct link The breadcrums that was present in step 2 disappeared. It would be great to have it as an option to go back to project or directly jump to the Team page if needed.  TY

there is no single reason why figma make should be limited to the ability to write code for the web, today this is not enough I'm tired of waiting for updates for half a year that ultimately don't come what's the point of being able to create something through AI in figma design, so that you can later copy and paste it into another file? Is the fact that you can write prompts in a figma file really so non-obvious that you needed to do the same thing in a new file? your updates look like nonsense

Trying out Figma site. Really like that i can ship a simple site really quick. Currently still really buggy though and the responsiveness on the live site keeps breaking. I was wondering when it will be possible to embed a Figma prototype in Figma sites. It’s quite different and not very sleek embedding a Figma prototype in sites using the embed link that’s currently available. P.S - I like how Notion does it.