Suggest a Feature

In my organization often  enhancements of designs are approved while dev is working on previously approved version. Product managers are constantly asking for links of the prototype that will never change - a signed off link but Figma has no way of doing this unless I Have a copy of the file for each version and still I can’t guarantee someone accidentally won’t open the wrong file and change something inside. not to speak of the nightmare of confusion it can bring.I work all updates that haven’t been signed off on branches and when I merge my branch link is dead. - Can we have a link from file history that can be shareable? I’m being asked to provide PDF which really can’t work on a dynamic variable based prototype unless I go through the manual process of capturing myself screenshots to put them in PDF which is painful to say the least.

Hello to the Figma team and forum users! I have been learning this tool over the last couple of weeks and I’m amazed at so many of the features and ideas. However, there is one thing I’m struggling to achieve due to a limitation. When prototyping for some platforms, it’s nice to create a mockup for the overall platform UI (like a Mac/Windows desktop, with a window open), to then use a background for all other frames, which are in turn the contents of that window. Currently, in prototype viewer mode, it’s not possible to keep this mockup frame as a background for all frames. One way to solve it is copy-pasting it (most likely as a component) into each and every frame you want to show in the prototype, and placing it behind everything else. That’s a lot of repeated manual labor. Plus, the frames themselves end up bigger - they have to stay at the fixed size of the mockup screen. So checking how your UI’s resize is harderd. Apart from that, having that backg

First off, I’m loving the new Swap Library feature! Problem Today, it actually helped me discover some “rogue” styles and components that were leftover from an old library! Now I can try to locate those and finally get rid of them in our current library! But wait - what if I don’t actually know where these are in the file? Or even further, what if I can’t get Figma to find a match?

Every editor of a file currently can invite whoever they want to edit the file, which cost a lot, and is actually not necessary (for example - designers invite developers as editors). I want to limit the permission to invite new editors - only to admins.

Hi all,Currently, the only way to select a destination for Scroll to interaction is by dragging and dropping the arrow to select the target object, from the component itself on the frame.The selection menu in the interaction panel only shows top level objects. This makes it impossible to select an accurate destination while using conditional interactions for example.A workaround could be selecting one of the top level elements, then manually add an offset.Obviously, it’s really not flexible, because if your content changes, you’ll have to manually change the offset. And it doesn’t work in responsive view. A elegant solution could be to add a manual destination selection, by allowing dragging from the panel to the target.

Is it possible to disable the requests for seat upgrades in their entirety? We have processes that ensure users submit requests for upgraded seats/licenses via our Service Desk. Figma upgrades are getting missed because users can do it natively in the app. Can this be disabled? Thanks

Please look at Mural to follow their shortcuts. One that is especially important is being able to press TAB while in a sticky to have one created right next to it. I also do not ever want an arrow by default to be added to connect the next sticky created.

Is it possible to have an AI input box in FigJam to ask it to summarise the content of the board? For instance, when we have done a retro.

Currently, when we get a request for a license upgrade, we only have the option to accept or reject the request. It would be helpful if we could include an optional note to the user in that screen with details on why their request was accepted or rejected. In its current state we need to send a separate email to let the user know why their request was rejected.

This issue was posted two years ago with no reply so i’ll add it again. (See here: Help me draw shapes in FigJam) Please add smart drawing features to FigJam! Invision Freehand had this and it was one of the most delightful and lightweight features i’ve used while designing. This is also one of the only blockers for me to fully utilize FigJam for low-fidelity sketching. I just want to quickly draw circles and rectangles 🙏🏼

Hi folks ! I’m wondering if there is a way to remove the “use the app” banner on top of the Figma Mirror webpage. Here is the situation : I’m using www.figma.com/mirror to test some design for a website. Since the app is fully out, we get the banner pushing use to use the app, but I want to be in the browser environment. Of course I can use some “X-browser UI resources” and use Figma App to simulate the browser visuals, but to me it makes not much sense. Usually there is a dismiss icon, but not in this case. Thank in advance, Alex.

Hey, I have multiple accounts in Figma (personal, my company, my client’s workspace and so on) but I want to use my primary account to be used on the Ask community. However, Figma logs me to the community from my client’s company account where I’m added as a team member (different email domain). When (which I already asked with the support) will you support the account switch on the community page? (e.g. Sign in with Google → Choose account) or email/password. Currently, after login out, and clicking Log in again, you can’t access login screen that will allow you to provide email/password or connect with Google. For that need to use another browser or go to incognito mode.

I would like to suggest the possibility of moving files in bulk in the same way that I can move just one file. When I right click on a file I have the option to move the file. When I click on the option, the following UI appears to me. This is wonderful. However, when I try to do the same action with multiple files, I do not have access to this option.

It would be very helpful if we could tag or @mention people in notations. When we are communicating to developers through annotations in Dev Mode, we use notations to describe functionality or design styles. If we want a developer to see a specific notation, we need to add the notation then use a comment to tag the specific person and tell them to look at a specific notation. It’s very complicated. If we could tag a person in a notation, the person could go directly to the notation that was recently added.

On a slow internet connection (or when offline), instance swapping can be super slugging (or just not work at all).Since Figma knows when there are updates to a library, it seems like it’d be able to load instances from local cache instead of hitting Figma’s servers every time. (It can’t even search for components created in the same file, since search requires internet.)I realize Figma is web-based and was built with the thinking that users are always connected, but the reality is, even in 2025, internet can be spotty. (I’m typing this on 4-star hotel wifi.)I also experience the same disappointment when designing while flying. Despite instances being used _on the very page I’m editing_, Figma always has to hit the servers, which means in many cases, I’m unable to swap.Better offline support for instance swapping would be a huge plus. Thanks! 

A thing that would be great would be to have the same pages concept as in Figjam and the design files. I have weekly updates with my client, and I don’t want to create a new Slide document every week. I’d love to have all my slide decks under the same file.

To better organize team hierchy allow ability to upload cover photos to projects within a team

I think it would be awesome to have categories to organize saved community files, just like Pinterest, Instagram, etc. So it would be easier to find something I saved for later.

Currently, in Figma, the "Frame Selection" feature allows users to wrap a selected layer or instance in a frame. However, there is no built-in functionality to apply this action to multiple selected instances such that each instance is framed individually. Instead, users need to frame each instance manually one by one, which can be tedious and time-consuming, especially when working with a large number of instances.Proposed Solution: Introduce a new option, "Frame Each Selection", that:Automatically wraps each selected instance (or layer) into its own separate frame. Maintains the hierarchy and positioning of the original instances within their new frames.This feature would improve efficiency by reducing repetitive actions and enhancing workflow productivity, especially for users dealing with batch processing or large-scale design projects.

Please add option to truncate text in the middle of the text, we use this for URLs so users can see the end of urls not just the beginning. But I always have to be very careful when I make the mocks in Figma to detach components and add 3 dots in the middle manually, and communicate that to devs in detail. If option is added in Figma then Devs can see it in properties of components, and in mock at the same time, without handoff overhead.

Hi Figma Team, Why can’t user set preferred screen size as default in 'Options menu"? can we have this feature in future?

When Figma publishes a component library for large files, the waiting time for publishing is particularly long, which can easily result in disconnection during the publishing process. I suggest optimizing the functionality of publishing component libraries for large files in Figma.

If Auto Layout and constraints are not used, there should be a button that automatically adjusts the frame height from the bottom to the last design element when clicked. This would remove the need to do it manually for each frame.

Hello! I would like to suggest improving the plugins catalog in Community (not search). https://www.figma.com/community/design-tools?resource_type=plugins It is the filters that currently limit the search for interesting plugins. Because now only the top plugins are shown. It would be good to add: Sorting by date, trending, likes More accurate selection of subcategories (text, effects, ai … ) Show dynamic search near filters (Ajax) Review-rating system (need to add new feature) If the plugin is paid, then show the initial cost in the listing Maybe add “Add to favorites button” near button Open In… The first picture of the plugin as cover picture in catalog list The last date of the plugin update If you think it’