Suggest a Feature

Hi, it would be great if we could hide/remove rows/columns if all the content inside the row/column is hidden/deleted. That is, the grid’s dimensions get adjusted dynamically based on the content instead of being fixed always.For example: In this 3x3 grid, if I delete/hide “C”, then the second row should be deleted/hidden such that the grid looks like a 2x3 grid instead. Like this: Instead, it currently looks like this: The second row does not get automatically hidden/deleted since the Grid dimensions are fixe

The fastest way to suffer in Figma? Try building a design system icon library with stroked icons - resizing alone can turn it into a never-ending headache Example: You draw a line icon at 24×24 with 2px stroke (e.g., hamburger icon).If you resize it to 48×48, the icon gets bigger but the stroke stays 2px. The only way to scale stroke proportionally is using Scale tool(K) manually. That works until you use few icons. But not building a lib.Icon wrapper could be a solution. But wrappers can only resize, they can’t apply Scale(K) for you. So the icon’s weight looks wrong at different sizes.Workarounds don’t scale: Big libraries explode with variants (1000 icons × multiple sizes (at least 6)). Outline/flatten strokes breaks editability - and icons must stay editable because you often need to go back and adjust them. Keeping “editable source” + “flattened output” in sync is not sustainab

I regularly need to work with screenshots of webpages, which can be a couple thousand pixels tall. I need these images to be actual size. Can’t do this in Figma cause it automatically scales large images down. I know there’s a plugin but this seems like a silly thing to rely on a plugin for, there should be an option native to Figma that lets us shut this function off. Or give us an option to scale the image back up to the original dimensions? (even if the quality’s going to get wrecked) This has been such a huge thorn in my side! Please & thank you!

I’d like there to be a quick way to restart a figma make prototype preview. currently, I have it pasted in my Figjam for a design review meeting, and once i go through the interaction, theres no way to easily start from the beginner. 

There’s a lot of plugins, and especially for certain features that there’s a lot of plugins for, like finding Icons/Symbols, there’s certain plugins that i prefer or like, but can only access them through the Recently Used section, but it disappears if I use other ones. There should be an ability to favorite a plugin for reuse.

We are looking to setup an interactive Figma prototype of our new app so that we can quickly try out new ideas without code. We were very excited to learn about Figma Make via the upsell in the prototyping panel! Mainly because it would enable our coder colleagues not familiar with Figma to contribute on some design work. That could be such a productivity booster!But oh boy the disappointment when we learned that the purpose of Make is to generate application code instead of something that is useful for us to build upon. This is a weird direction for a design tool. How did you come to the conclusion that anyone would want to implement the application first and then manually create the designs and prototypes to iterate on? Make should output a plain Figma Prototype that we can build upon. AI can not replace the user testing cycle. Once happy with the design and ready to implement, it would indeed be very useful with a tool that gene

Does there exist a setting that would allow me to prevent URL links from being clicked while designing? I want them if I’m viewing a prototype. When I’m designing though, I’ll often copy and paste copy from our website which has a number of links in it. Then as I select text to work with it I inevitably click the links. It’s almost as if my mouse is attracted to them. It drives me nuts.

Lately I’ve noticed that when I have several nested components, I would only like to be able to modify some and not all. This would allow the component that draws on other components to have efficient adaptability in its contextual use.

It really annoys me that Figma automatically creates subfolders when you export an element that’s inside a component and has a ‘/’ naming convention. I always have to go back into the folder and delete the folders or rename everything. It would be great to have a simple checkbox toggle in the exports panel to enable/disable creating subfolders, similar to Illustrator.

It would be great to be able to seperate the visibility objects beyond just the layer. To be able to associate a boolean variable to the visibility of; Layer Fill Stroke Effects Would make it more effective when putting together a design system. This means that you could effectively determine that all buttons have outlines, or drop shadows or both right across the whole design. See examples below. Thoughts?

Figma make has been super useful! I like that you can click elements and there are basic things you can edit, such as font, size, spacing, etc. It would be even better to take it further by allowing basic editing right in the file, without having to go as far as creating it into a design file.For example, I wanted to delete some text elements. Or change some text, move a couple things around. These simple things are a lot faster to just do yourself, than ask AI to do little things and wait. Then you might not even like it and want to change it back! Sincerely, I’m impatient and also like getting my design hands dirty.

Please… PLEASE! For those of us with lots of simultaneous projects and heavy deliverable schedules, tab browsing in Figma needs some LOVE! Now, I’m not one of those psychos that keeps 300 tabs open in their Chrome browser, but I do, at any given time, need access to multiple projects simultaneously. If I could easily group those tabs together in Figma and give them a nice, friendly name, maybe an emoji, or… dare I say… a color, I’d be a really, really happy camper.  

Would love to have more options on the typewriter effect, such as easing.  Also would love to have more/better control over parallax scrolling (direction, speed, distance all as separate parameters).

It would be great to have a feature that allows you to hide or lock a page in a file. There have been moments when stakeholders will keep peeking at the work before it is ready for review. Having a hide & lock feature would be nice to have so that if you do share the figma, they can only access the pages visible to them. 

Здравствуйте подскажите пожалуйста как можно добавить шрифты в фигму если работаю на ipad

I am using variants to enable dark and light modes for example and it works automatically for almost everything except for overlays. I have am user flow with an overlay menu that opens when I click on a button or icon. I want to display how to shwitch between light/dark modes. So when Im in light mode and open the overlay menu (light) and then switch to dark mode and then open this menu again its still in light mode and I dont see a way to change this using the “Change to” nor “Set Variable” options in the “On click” prototyping option. How can I simulate this consistently without having to use two different menus (one for each mode)?

It’s just very bright, and I’d like to get some work done at night without killing my eyes. Please add dark mode. FigJam especially, but it’d be nice throughout. Yeah, just remember the user likes a dark mode, and make dark mode the default for everything: your website, this forum, Figma, …

With the emergence of skills for agents becoming very popular, are there plans to create agent skills for the various dev API you offer? For example, skill for plugin & widget development. Skill for dealing with the REST API, etc.

It would be really helpful to have the ability to group opened Figma tabs in the top bar, allowing users to create collapsible and expandable folders, similar to the tab groups in Google Chrome.

It would be so great to have some additional filter options when browsing search results. In a large organization, there can be dozens of files spanning years, all with similar names and content. It’d be great if one could still sort by recommended results, but filter by the modified/created date

The fill is not visible on a vector shape unless its closed. Many applications and the web supports fill on open vector shapes, but not Figma. Please allow something like this. This red area should be fillable by the paint bucket.  

Figma Prototype : In large IT companies and design teams, it’s often a struggle to manage design review tasks because we constantly need to jump between Figma and external management tools (Jira, Asana, Notion, etc.) just to track: what page or element was assigned to us for review who is responsible for feedback what review status each screen is in ✅ Proposed Feature: Review Tab Inside FigmaIntroduce a new “Review” tab, similar to the existing Dev Mode icon, that enables teams to manage review assignments directly in Figma.🔹 Key Features1. Assign Reviewers to Frames / Pages / ElementsJust like adding

When selecting an object inside a component, the bounding box uses the same purple color as components. This makes it difficult to quickly confirm whether you’ve selected the parent container or a nested object.It would be helpful if objects within a frame or component used a different selection color than the container itself. This visual distinction would reduce selection ambiguity and speed up precise edits.A comparable example is InDesign: images live inside frames, where the frame is highlighted in blue, and double-clicking into the image shows an orange bounding box. This clear color separation provides immediate confirmation of what level you’re editing.Introducing a similar distinction in Figma would improve clarity and reduce mis-selection, especially in complex, component-heavy files.

The variables feature is a great addition to Figma. In our workflow, we use them extensively with multiple modes (like light and dark mode) and collections, which involves a lot of variable aliasing (linking variables to other variables).This has created a large and complex network of references. It is becoming difficult and time-consuming to find the original source value (like the final hex code) for a specific variable.It would be a significant workflow improvement if we could trace a variable's origin, much like you can trace CSS variables in devtools.We propose the ability to click (or right-click) on an applied variable to see which variable it is referencing, and then be able to follow that "chain" of aliases all the way back to its original source value. This "Go to Definition" or tracing feature would make debugging complex variable setups much more efficient.If this functionality already exists, please let me know. Otherwise, I hope this is valu

Been playing around with the “expose nested properties” feature currently in beta. One of the great uses of variant properties is the ability to batch edit property values on multiple selected components. That use doesn’t carry over to exposed nested properties (yet I hope). Demo file to help When selecting one component instance exposing nested properties, said properties display fine. Add another instance of the same component to your selection (using Shift+Click), and the nested properties outright disappear from the right panel. I haven’t seen this issue raised elsewhere! Do you experience it too?