Suggest a Feature

One option that could be useful is to allow modifying the decoration of a text that has already been defined as a text style, because that way you do not have to create two or more text styles to simply add the decoration. As with alignment, it could be added below. thanks

As a paying customer and a very unwilling Figma support, I would like to publicly ask for sending invoices per email. This is best practice for all bigger online services and it’s frustratingly annoying to collect every single invoice. Regarding the amount of customers, this would probably save thousands of hours on the customer side every month. So again: Please send us an PDF! Thank you

Sometimes I am hesitant to use “select matching layers” in fear of affecting more matching layers than I intend to. While the scope control options that another user suggested would be great, a simple feedback message along the lines of “(X) matching layers were selected” would also solve this specific issue most of the time. This would give me a rough idea in most cases whether I’ve selected more than what I want to edit or not, such as layers that are out of frame. Thanks.

Good day,It would be great if:Admins could create a list of departments/squads Admins to select single or multiple departments/squads to get assigned to a User, User can assign single or multiple departments/squads to themselves In the Admin area > peoples section, part of the filter to include the department/squad, which an Admin can filter byAs our team scales it is becoming difficult to keep track of which departments/squads our people are in, and each squads/departments is responsible to contribute to the cost of Figma licensing. By adding this filler it will provide value in quick filtering to work out costs for licensing.

Hola equipo y comunidad de Figma.Recientemente he estado investigando sobre diseño de interfaces en juegos independientes para mejorar mis prototipos. Me topé con un archivo de recursos en la nube de Amazon que tiene una estructura de navegación muy particular que me gustaría poder replicar nativamente en Figma sin usar plugins externos.Aquí dejo el enlace del recurso que estoy analizando como referencia de interacción: https://pvz-fusion-mod-apk-download.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/index.htmlAnálisis de la Experiencia de Usuario (UX)Al revisar el comportamiento de los menús en este archivo, noté que la respuesta táctil y la transición entre el idioma original y la traducción al español es muy fluida. Mi propuesta es que Figma añada una función de "Estados de Fusión" para componentes, similar a lo q

We've been using Connected Projects at Sanofi to work with external agencies, and honestly? The feature falls short for how agencies actually collaborate with companies.The core issue: A single Connected Project is too limited when you're embedding an entire agency team into a client organization.Here's what happens today:Agency designers get access to one Connected Project They can use company libraries and embedded documentation That's itWhat's missing:1. Team-level connection, not project-levelWhen we onboard an agency, we're not collaborating on a single project. We're integrating their entire team into our design workflow across multiple initiatives. We need Connected Teams, not just Connected Projects.Think: Agency X works with us on 5 different products simultaneously. Right now, we'd need 5 separate Connected Projects, each requiring individual set

I have been playing around with creating variables but realized I would rather have groups in separate collections, but cannot move them. I would like to be able to duplicate an entire collection so I don’t have to manually re-create values and can remove what I don’t need from that collection OR simply be able to move groups into other collections.

I present to you some simple yet very effective and intuitive improvements to the new paste functionality. Let me know what you think! Community feedback Let’s start with some feedback the community has about the new pasting features. (Note that Ctrl = Cmd on macOS in all the following shortcuts.) On the surface these are perfect additions! But when used in the real work setting, they seem to have some issues. The most problematic thing is probably that “Paste over selection” now has a very awkward key combo: Ctrl+Alt+Shift+V. Four keys! Judging by the amount of feedback on this issue, a lot of people have been using it for their daily workflow. Did you know there was a Ctrl+Alt+Shift+V shortcut in Figma already? It allowed you to stack things vertically, it’s called “Distribute vertical spacing”. Nobody used it, but having two shortcuts doing the same t

I am an EDU account user. I used Make AI to design an interface for an educational platform. After less than 2 days and a total of 50 versions, I was alerted with 'You've reached your current limit. Your credits will reset on November 1, 2025.' This consumption of 3,000 credits per month is too fast. Moreover, there is no place in the backend where I can see the current credit usage in real-time, which is very unreasonable. The consumption data is not transparent. Now I have to wait until November 1 to use it again, which seriously affects my ability to work normally.

When Figma Make is processing something complex, it can take a while to complete. During that time, I usually switch to other design files to keep working. But there’s no indication that Make is still running or has finished.I often have to switch back and forth 5–6 times just to check if the process is done, which breaks focus and slows down my workflow.It would be great if there was some small visual feedback showing that Make is still building or has completed, even when I’m on another tab. For example, the Make tab icon could rotate or change state.This would make multitasking in Figma smoother and reduce unnecessary tab switching. Figma make tab icon 

In the last days I noticed a change in the feature of zooming with Ctrl+scroll wheel. It used to be much smoother. Now it jumps from 26% to 100% to 381% to 1449% 😐 This is a feature I use all the time to navigate my projects and this change prevents me from having adequate control over the view of my canvas. I need more intermediate steps in zooming, just like before this change.

I guess it’s a tiny thing but it will be super helpful to have an option with each element to remove it from final exports. Like sometimes I have some elements which I don’t want to be in the final export when I am batch exporting multiple frames. For me, I faced this issue when I wanted the gridlines/safe-areas not to be visible in the final export. (I’m talking about the manual grid lines, not the layout grid row/column option from Figma) Maybe there is a way of doing that that I haven’t come across yet and as a learner, I would greatly appreciate it if anyone could enlighten me.

Hi all,Have you considered adding a feature to the auto layout “gap” feature that could allow a user to set a minimum gap i.e. 8px and a maximum gap i.e. 40px?I’ve recently needed this function for building bar graphs. I need to make them responsive without getting too small and overlapping on each other or too big when expanded.

Simple as the title : Allow components to be set as file thumbnails. We need that possibility in our company to be more flexible with our thumbnails, wich may change year by year.

To the Figma Team and the broader Community,I am writing with an urgent and passionate plea: please make Code Connect a part of the Professional plan. To gatekeep this incredibly powerful feature feels like a direct rejection of the modern, agile way so many of us build products today.The world is moving towards small, high-impact teams, single-person companies supercharged by AI, and freelancers who handle both design and development. We, the users on your Professional plan, are at the heart of this movement. We live and breathe the transition from pixel to production code.Why are you creating this artificial wall between our designs and our code? Code Connect isn't just a convenience for large organizations; it's a revolutionary workflow enhancement for the exact type of user on the Professional plan. It promises to eliminate the friction that we face every single day. To lock it behind a higher paywall is to create an unnecessary and painful

Hi Figma team,We’re running into a structural challenge in our workspace that’s slowing down collaboration within our creative team. As our organisation grows, so does the number of projects we manage in Figma. Each project gets its own folder, but because folders can’t be nested or organised into deeper layers, everything ends up sitting in one giant list.This creates a messy, hard-to-navigate workspace — especially when multiple teams and long-running projects are involved. We often work across different clients, internal initiatives, and design streams, and the lack of subfolders makes it difficult to keep things structured and find what we need quickly.Our request:A more advanced folder system that supports multiple levels (e.g., Workspace → Client → Project → Deliverables). This would allow us to group related projects, separate clients, distinguish internal vs. external work, and keep our workspace clean as it scales.W

Our team uses Quasar Framework with Vue.js for all front-end development. Currently, Figma Make generates React-based code.It would be extremely helpful if Figma Make could generate code directly using Quasar + Vue.js, or at least provide an option to switch the output framework.

There are not enough typographic controls in Figma Slides, mainly - paragraph spacing. Example: when creating bullet points they are really squashed and there is no easy way to adjust the spacing between them without going to Figma and bringing it back to Slides. 

The help button blocks the prototype content, and it is suggested that the help button can be hidden or moved。

My suggestion for Figma is to add a “slot” functionality to components. This would allow designers to create more flexible and customizable components, by adding empty slots or placeholders within a component. Users could then insert their own content or elements into these slots, without having to ungroup or modify the component itself. This functionality would save time and increase efficiency for designers, while also promoting a more consistent design system across a project or organization. I believe this feature would greatly enhance the flexibility and usability of Figma’s component system, and would be a valuable addition to the platform.

OAuth App does not have permission management functionality, so permission management functionality needs to be added, such as adding editors and readers-only.

Hi everyone,I’m running into a strange shortcut behavior difference between my work and personal Figma accounts. Platform: macOS (Turkish-Q keyboard) App: Figma Desktop + Web (tested both) Mode: Design mode, Move tool active, not in Prototype etc. Issue: In my personal account, pressing ⌥ + ⌘ + ↑/↓ rotates the selected object. In my work account, on the exact same device and setup, the same shortcut correctly changes the layer order.  What I’ve tried (none fixed it): Cleared Figma cache (~/Library/Application Support/Figma) Removed and re-added both accounts The behavior persists only in my personal account,

I’ve been asked a couple of times if the font size can be made bigger by colleagues within the feedback panel because they can’t see it. We might be a bit older than most using this software but it would still be a helpful setting to include.

Thanks for adding annotations to Design Mode. I have been spending the last day annotating some new design ideas. People who have access to the Figma file love that they can read come design rationale and interaction behaviors. For others, who do not have access, or do not use Figma it would be great if I can export the annotations associated with objects inside a frame.  Thanks, K.

I wanted to share an idea that’s been on my mind: I think Figma could benefit from a dedicated design staging environment. Developers have staging to validate functionality before production, but designers don’t really have an equivalent space to validate design behavior at a higher fidelity. A staging-like environment in Figma would let designers build and test more realistic flows, interactions, and states — something deeper than prototypes but lighter than full development. It could help teams surface UX issues earlier, experiment safely, and hand off work with more clarity. I also think it would make it much easier for developers to understand the design. Right now, presenting prototypes in Figma can get messy, especially on bigger projects. For example:– Sometimes the Figma UI can get in the way when sharing previews.– Prototype links end up long and awkward to share.– You usually need separate URLs for desktop, mo