Suggest a Feature

BackgroundI am trying to build a mini wikipedia like website with lots of cross-linked articles.ProblemWhile I work in CMS editor, Figma Sites tab becomes very laggy, because of frames updating with things from CMS.Proposed solutionI feel like we could have a CMS editor separate from graphic editor.That could make editing experience faster,That Figma could also include this CMS editor in the Collab seat, as I have seen at my main workplace the need of analysts for such functionality (they want to edit texts, but full seat is too powerful and expensive for their needs). Or maybe this CMS editor could be as is now, but the graphic editor would not update frames, until you leave the CMS editor mode.It is for Figma’s great developers and designers to deside. So, what do you think, Figmates? Is it a good idea? 

This is a feature in Keynote, and I believe it’s possible in PowerPoint as well. In Presentation mode, it would be useful to be able to use right-click to go back to the previous slide (in the same way that left-click advances to the next slide).I use a wireless mouse when I present. In Keynote, I constantly use right-click to go back, because I’m often not close to the computer. This is what prevents me from switching to Figma Slides.This is mostly a feature request, but I’m open to alternative solutions that would solve my problem.

Please can we get percentages for variables? We can use percentages manually, but we can’t create a percentage as a variable. This would speed up my design to dev process tenfold, and considering we can already use percentages in the design, why disallow it in variables?An example is I want store values for line height and letter spacing as percentages which behave responsively/dynamically, so when creating type variables I don’t have to do manual calculations, store 10+ letter spacing/line height values based on which font size they will be used with and hope I never change the font size variable in the future.

Dear Figma Team,I would like to suggest a small but very useful improvement to Figma’s Prototype interactions.Currently, when I select On click → Navigate to, the Destination dropdown displays the available frames, but there is no search option. As shown in the attached screenshot, the list can become quite long when a file contains many frames or screens.It would be very helpful to have a search field within the Destination dropdown, allowing designers to quickly type and find the required frame instead of manually scrolling through a long list.I hope Figma can consider adding this in a future update.Thank you for continuously improving Figma!

i can not connect to the figma remote mcp server via antigravity cli.i get an error: OAuth app with client id WPj[xxxxxxxxxxx]sit7 doesn't exist.The internet suggests that the Antigravity CLI is not whitelisted as a tool. Can you confirm?If possible, please whitelist it. Gemini cli support will end in 3 days and my workflow will be broken.

There are times when having sections free of constraints is nice… but my design team has become addicted to using auto layout with frames. In many cases when using sections, it would be amazing to perfectly space the inner sections out using auto layout.

Add the ability to add text-wrap: pretty and text-wrap: balance so that more options are available to ensure more flexibility to how text can flow/reflow and reducing hyphenations and word orphans.

With "Text-wrap: balance" headlines could be made more readable and visually appealing.Here’s how it could look: 

When marking a comment as resolved, we are now automatically moved to the next one. I’m wondering if or how we can disable this behaviour?My work flow being to go from screen to screen of user flows, and not comments to comments, this is very disrupting as it can bring me anywhere in the file, and I need to find and navigate back to where I was. I understand this might be useful for reviewers that only goes through questions left by other people, but this probably not most users, so it would be useful to have the ability to disable this feature.

The branch review window is large but not resizable. When comparing two-up web/desktop screens, it’s hard to see all the details. I know you can zoom or use the overlay mode, but I have a 27" monitor and plenty of room I just want to make the window larger so the two previews will scale.

In Korea, web development projects are typically divided into three distinct roles: Designers, Publishers (UI/UIX Developers), and Developers. Publishers implementation the design into code based on the Figma files, but they usually only have "Viewer" or limited editing permissions.The Problem:In typical Korean web projects, a single Figma page often contains dozens of frames representing all the individual web pages within a specific category. When multiple publishers collaborate on such a massive page, it is extremely difficult to track the progress of each frame/screen. Right now, there is no native, at-a-glance way to see who is working on what, or which specific frames are completed.The Suggestion:I would love to see a Page Status Label feature that helps teams manage this workflow efficiently:Status Indicators: Provide visual labels on the page list (e.g., "In Progress", "Done") so that publishers can self-report their progress. Smart Update Notification: If a publisher marks a p

Feature idea:Add keyboard shortcuts for any of these buttons at the top. This will increase user efficiency when iterating on prototypes.→ Quickly copy designs→ Quickly enter/leave annotation mode→ Quickly enter commentsetc.  

the problem i need as much real state as possible to view the designs and screens am working in a readable viewable way, if the makes sense. to come around this, i currently scroll around and zoom in and out, or hide and show the panels, most probably its a mix of both. either way it’s a annoying… or i need to buy another real big monitor, but i already have a 15" macbook pro, which is great and enough when i hide the panels. this might be a big problem for laptop users without a secondary big screen, or who are portable and don’t have a dedicated work space. this is specially evident when they need to widen the left panel in order to view and read the layers tree. (which is another issue maybe raised in another topic) suggestion make side panels modular (photoshop/illustrator kind of thing). assets, layers on the left panels can be separable and can be undocked and moved elsewhere separately. design, prototype, inspection on the right panel are also separable and can be undocked and m

Currently, you are able to use the ctrl+B command on a text style to apply the bold font weight to a desired string of text without breaking the text style. However, if you want to apply other font weights like light, medium, semibold, or black, you must either create a entirely new text style (which can add up quite quickly) or detach the text style and manually change the weight. A way to apply various font weights without breaking the style (in the same vein as applying different styling like bold, underline, and italic) would be extremely helpful in increasing a design system’s adoption and flexibility.

If I move a configuration of shapes and words, and then realize it’s not what I want, I can’t undo and go back to how I had it set up. Add as much context as possible (screenshots, Figma files, mockups, etc.)

Hi Figma Team,Thanks for the amazing work on the new Motion mode! It is a great update to the platform.I wanted to share a small feature idea that would improve the workflow. Right now, when creating returning or looping animations (like a button scale up and down), it takes some manual work to flip the keyframes and invert the Bezier curves.It would be awesome if we could select keyframes, copy them, and then paste them in reverse order using a shortcut (like Ctrl + Shift + V) or via a right-click menu option.Thanks for considering this, and keep up the great work!

Scale is one of my most used properties when designing interactions and states. It would be great if we had true ‘scale’ as a property. No, I’m not talking about the scale tool. That’s fake scale that affects the width/height of elements. I want the ability to enter something like ‘1.5’ and change the scale of an element, respectively.

I have a recurring use case: I want to create a gradient that fades to zero opacity while using styles or color variables. Unfortunately, this isn’t possible in Figma. I can only adjust the opacity if I break the variable/style binding. Why is that?

Hi Figma Team,I work extensively with interactions when building prototypes—sometimes having up to 50 different interactions on a single element. Once I have finished setting all of them up, if I realize I need to add another condition or check, I either have to edit each one individually or, if I'm lucky and they all share the exact same conditions, I can select them all at once to update them.To make maintaining interactions more flexible and convenient in general, a JSON import and export feature would be a massive help. It would allow users to build conditions exactly as needed, export them, and then easily apply them to a completely new element, or quickly insert a new query/condition across all existing ones.Best regards and thank you in advance,Reke Buchenau

Our Foundations file is published as a library, consumed by other design files and by developers via the Variables REST API. We need to test changes — including adding/removing variables, not just editing values — without those changes reaching devs or other files until we're ready.Current gaps:Branches can't be referenced as a library from another file, so we can't test a branched foundations file in a separate screens file. Extended Collections only allow overriding existing values, not adding/removing variables. Our only workaround is manually duplicating the whole file into a "sandbox" library and re-syncing it by hand whenever production changes — error-prone, with no diffing.Ask: A way to stage variable changes (ideally via branching) and reference that staged version as a library in a separate file for testing, while production and the REST API stay untouched until we merge and publish. A diff view between staged and production would also help avoid drift.

Figma Slides are missing basic embeds.YouTube videos are the only supported format, where pasting a link converts it to a playable video.If Figma Slides wants to win students, teachers, and everyday use caes then it needs to support the biggest platforms we as Gen Z use:TikTok Instagram XThis is extremely easy support to add! If you want I’ll vibe code it for you tonight! Gamma will win without this.

In our organization we use Figma on an Enterprise plan, and we manage a large number of users coming from a broader international company structure. When users request a paid seat (Full, Dev, or Viewer with collaboration), they can currently add a note for the admin, which is helpful on their side.What is missing for us is the reverse: a way for admins to show a short configurable message to the requester at the moment they ask for a seat. This message could: Indicate who to contact (e.g. a specific Microsoft Teams channel or an email address for our design tooling team). Provide a short checklist of what to verify before sending the request (correct account, correct workspace, business justification, cost center, manager approval, etc.). Clarify how the approval flow works in a large enterprise context (for example, “Your request will only be processed after you or your manager contact us on Teams with X/Y info”). Because of the size of our company, we get a high volume of seat re

Gap in auto layout can either be set to a variable of auto. Setting the gap to auto and then adding a min gap and max gap would be helpful to make a powerful responsiveness. Is there a way we can do it? Or is it something it would be helpful in Figma?

When you open and browse community files they open in your “drafts”. I want to be able to just see the drafts that I have created from scratch so i can go ahead and delete or move them as needed.

Individually clicking and resolving each comment is tedious. It would be useful to highlight multiple comments and use a right-click menu option to “bulk resolve.” This would save significant time.