Suggest a Feature

How to change position of annotation. It would be better to show/hide annotations from context menu (right click, Same as hide/show comments)

If there is an option to duplicate the Text Styles / Color Styles folder then it makes it easy when creating design systems. Attached is a screenshot of the idea.

Add option for sharing a deck with show left panel with slide thumbnails for quick navigation. It’s impossible to quickly navigate and jump back-n-forth 20+ slides decks. There are tons of habitual and rational use cases for jumping between slides manually. 

Problem:While Figma’s Prototype mode is great for building realistic interactions, it quickly becomes visually overwhelming—especially for those who don’t use Figma in their day-to-day. This often leads to a deer-in-the-headlights situation, where communication breaks down both internally and externally.  Collaborating with teams outside our organization becomes especially challenging when trying to get them to understand the user interface from a high-level perspective. Solution:Our company has found the need for a deliverable that sits between static screens and a full prototype. It’s essentially a wireflow but with completed UI. Think of it like Prototype mode, but without the spaghetti mess.I’m calling this concept “Proto-to-Flow.” Figma would analyze your prototype and generate a simplified, flowchart-like view showing only the primary user path. Each screen would be numbered for easy reference, with the option of hiding secondary or edge-case connections.This view would help comm

There are a number of ideas related to this, but none quite capture what I think would be an obvious workflow improvement: when selecting an object with gradients, it would save a lot of time and effort if the gradient colors appear in the ‘Selection Colors’ section on the right hand panel, and are editable. (Bonus points if those colors can use swatches/variables, as others have mentioned—it would give users the ability to do a global edit!)

Hello, I’m writing as a frontend developer. I received a figma UI design, but I only had viewonly privileges. Because of this I couldn’t see some hidden layers which were a different aspect of a UI element. I know this situation can be avoided by the designer, if he makes prototypes to show the different aspects or simply makes the design editable for the developer. However I still don’t see the point of hiding the visibility switch for viewonly users. Please make it available for everyone. If this issue was discussed before I apologize. Anyone faced this problem too?

Its not only me, the designers I know have the same changes when they would like to create team and folder.

i am suggesting to allow us to select multiple components from the stage and publish all or selected, beside the option to create variantscoz after some updates and modifications, publishing from the library window becomes a challenge. some updates i don’t want to publish. sometimes it’s hard to follow the naming as well. and i believe as designers, visually it is easier for us, since we know where and which components we want to publish on the stage. i see this very similar to the new create component update in the new UI. you are allowing us to select multiple frames and select if we want to create a single component or multiple ones at once. to visualize, maybe something like this. and of course there is the publish changes option, which could follow the same approach, or a drop down like the component creation. anyway, the main idea is selecting from the stage to publish. does that make sense?

为什么不中文？我真的很想用它

Hello!Gamedev designers have been adopting Figma more and more into our workflow, and we would love more controller support for better prototyping and navigation options. Some examples:Better joystick radial support. We currently only have up/down/left/right stick movement, but to prototype menus like weapon wheels and radial selections we need more precise input. Hold button + long press button options for D-pad, face buttons and shoulder buttons. Support for swipe gestures on the PS5’s touchpad.To do any of the above we currently need to jump through hoops and map controller inputs to keyboard buttons through 3rd party software, which is not great and doesnt work for many of the above options. If the community has more suggestions, please leave a comment below 🙏 Thank you!

In the design tab, you have a panel of created property options shown at the very top, and in full size, and often when you need to change an instance, you need to scroll first one panel, then another, and they can have a lot of content, which makes navigation through the design tab very long and not intuitive, to simplify the task, create the ability to show part of the parameters for each panel, with the ability to expand it by hovering

Prototyping triggers won’t allow to bind an action to diagonal moves of the stick. Both LStick and Rstick. Tried to prototype a command wheel. Segments should be triggered by eight corresponding directions of stick movement. But only four of them was possible: up, down, left and right. Does anyone else in the game industry experience this? Is anyone using a plugin or workaround to help solve this?

Hello, Someone already posted this, but i was too late to see it, so im posting again. I have a very similar issue. For my part I find it almost impossible to see where a comment should have been if you’ve already moved things around and of course simply Showing Version History doesn’t include comments even if they were present in those versions. I’ve had to rely on context clues and directly asking the commenter for clarity when this happens. Below in quotes was the original poster’s issue “Would the Figma Team please show comments in the SHOW VERSION HISTORY? Right now, I look at comments in the current version, inspect the SHOW VERSION HISTORY, and take a screenshot to see where an orphaned comment should go. And I will look at the comments and the versions because I want to see the state of the wireframes on that date. Thanks for the consideration!”

I’ve been switching back to UI2 just because of the toolbox being on the top left. I cannot get used to having 2 docks on my screen as it just looks weird. If possible, just make the toolbox draggable so I can move it up there or just add a setting for it.

In addition to having AI design the entire wireframe (which results in a lot of output that isn’t really relevant or useful to the user’s specific needs), Figma should implement a version of its AI tool that improves/beautifies user-created basic wireframes (eg. takes the text/button names/general layout that someone has already created and adds colors, changes typography, moves things around so they’re visually more pleasing, etc). This would allow users who have a general vision of what they want their product to look like to save time creating more detailed wireframes so they can more easily transition to the prototyping phase. 

Why is this not possible?

Now there is no way to create a wrap for layers of different proportions, it breaks, it works only for layers of equal size vertically, make it so that it is possible to create a wrap also vertically, because for the wrap you also do not work negative values ​​for layers that are located one under the other in the wrap container, this would allow you to create a dynamic grid relative to layers of different proportions in the layout

When working on complex prototypes, I often reuse interactions (e.g. animation curves) across screens or steps. In order to do this, I have to manually rebuild them each time. This requires a lot of work - selecting the interaction where I used my custom curves last time, open the interaction panel, copy the custom curves, go to the new interaction I want to apply the same curves to, open the interaction panel, select “custom”, and paste. It would be great if a) I could copy & paste interactions or b) I could leverage an “Interaction Design System” and apply custom values in the same way I can apply custom colors, typography styles, etc. Has anyone else found an easier way to do this that I’m missing or is there a plugin to manage this? 🙌🏼

Because I use slides modularly, sometimes I have several presentations that start with the same slide.  However, on my thumbnails, I want to be able to see which presentation the file is for by selecting a different slide on the deck as my thumbnail

Please activate the rulers/guide function for Slides!! I’ve been struggling to align context across multiple pages.

Thank you for the new feature but would be awesome to have the freedom to change the orientation of the mind map. My mind really works in more vertical space in that sense and would help me a lot 🙏

Annotations are a great idea, but I think it would be beneficial to allow them to be added without being in dev mode. When something is marked for dev its already a finalised design. Adding annotations before marking as dev mode would save time and allow annotations to be added as we go along.

When exporting Figma designs to PowerPoint, I’ve noticed a few issues that affect the final presentation quality: Fonts become smaller than intended Blurred backgrounds or transparent fills don’t render properly Overall, the visual fidelity of the export is lost In contrast, the Pitchdeck plugin handles these exports beautifully—fonts stay consistent, and effects are preserved. I’d love to see if there’s a way to either improve native exporting or perhaps collaborate/merge with the Pitchdeck plugin to make the export experience seamless.This would be especially useful for teams who use Figma for presentation design and want to maintain design integrity across formats.Would love to hear if others are facing the same issue or have found a workaround!

How cool would it be if Figma allows for deep-linking in prototypes!Right now when I try to deep-link to, for example, Spotify, in my prototype it will prefix the `spotify://xxxxxx` with `https://` so the deep-link is broken and navigates me to a webpage that does not exist.Allowing this would extend the possibilities of prototypes to interact with the outside world! E.g. Microsoft Teams → `msteams://`, Instagram → `instagram://`, slack → `slack://` and many more.I can see how this might be a security concern, but in theory I can put any bad link in there if it starts with `https://`

Hello, there is no Russian language in the settings.