Share Your Thoughts

I was surprised to notice today that the long awaited Connected Projects is now available in Figma but also very disappointed to see the absurd limitations on how many connected projects each plan can have. I can somewhat understand the limitation of being able to connect with one company at a time for technical/admin reasons in the first release, but WHY do we need the limitations of how many connected projects we can have if all parties are already paying for their licenses? The max 3/6 in Professional and Organization is ridiculous, as it also counts the projects that are shared our way. Please remove these artificial limitations, or at least make them a lot bigger like 20 / 40 / 80 so they make some sense in the real world.

Hi all,Have you considered adding a feature to the auto layout “gap” feature that could allow a user to set a minimum gap i.e. 8px and a maximum gap i.e. 40px?I’ve recently needed this function for building bar graphs. I need to make them responsive without getting too small and overlapping on each other or too big when expanded.

Hey! How can I transfer the AI generated Prototype in Figma Make to Figma Design and continue editing it manually there?

As a designer I would like to record my prototype screen or export it as a gif so I can use it in presentations and send quick examples in the team group. It would be great to have the same feature then Principle to record or export the prototype to gif. Does anyone have the same need? Is anyone using a plugin or workaround to help solve this?

I would like an option to hug content until the container it is in is too small. For instance, I am making a tab bar where the tabs are set to fill so they adjust with screen sizes. The title on each has an info icon to the right. The text has to be set to hug for the icon to stay right next to the text. However, that means if the text is long, when the tabs shrink the text extends out rather than wrapping. I would like the option to set the hugged text to wrap when it extends past the parent container without having to manually change it a each breakpoint.

Is there a way to turn off the AI chrome when sharing the prototype in "Make"? When sharing in the prototype view, I was expecting it to just share the screens but when I shared the link, it showed the make file with the AI chrome. Is this a big? Or will this be an enhancement?

Many people have said the same thing, but I’m here to recommend supporting percentages within auto layout. I’ve seen many people asking for the same thing.Percentage width auto layout would help us be more efficient. Auto layout “Fill container” is great for sections being sized equally (50/50 or 30/30/30).When we’re designing content with sections, the sections are generally not the same width as each other to indicate importance.Myself and many other designers would love to have autolayout support something like this:The main container has the same spacing all the way around Each section takes up a specifid percentage of the container (70% and 30%) When the modal grows and shrinks, those sections maintain their width of 70% and 30%  Without spacing With spacing 800px wide     1000px wide      This is what autolayout currently supportsIf we use auto layout, each section must be a specified width or the same width as the other sections.  It makes

How to send or import multiple frames to Figma Make from a Figma Design file?It seems that it is possible to send one frame to Figma Make and it will create a new Figma Make file from that one frame. However, when multiple frames are selected (e.g. different screens of the same prototype) then the “Send to Figma Make” option disappears.I can also see an option to Import from Figma, but the interface for this is terrible when you have thousands of Figma Design files in your enterprise and they each have multiple components within them. Worse still, it seems you cannot import a frame, only components that have been published.Is there something I could be doing differently that would make it easier to import multiple frames from a Figma Design file into the same Figma Make file? As a designerI want to be able to import multiple frames into Figma MakeSo that I have an interactive prototype of what I have designedGiven I have multiple screens designedWhen I select those multiple screensThen

It would be a great idea to add the ability to move annotations (сhanging the place). Right now, they’re fixed in place and can overlap other elements. And you cannot change it.What I mean is the ability to reposition an annotation freely while keeping the link to the target object intact.Annotations are a really useful feature—thank you! Previously, I had to create similar functionality using my own objects. Please do not move this offer to another discussion. 🙏Can we move the Figma Annotations (in dev mode) from one Figma project to another?These are different questions.

Hello,I am looking to create a good hero section for my site, where it should take the height of browser in the first fold. The subsequent sections can be of fixed heights based on content. I need something like 100vh to have for my hero section.

No brainer. I’ve either had to ask clients to record a loom of themselves going through a Make prototype or me having to screenshot EVERY SINGLE PAGE of the prototype then send them PDFs so they could comment on it.If there’s a new QOL feature that’s gonna be added to Figma Make, it should be commenting.

Hey, Is there any idea if getting the team id of a user just from a token will be implemented any time soon? Or if someone knows a different way to obtain that info?

Hi everyone,I’m running into a strange shortcut behavior difference between my work and personal Figma accounts. Platform: macOS (Turkish-Q keyboard) App: Figma Desktop + Web (tested both) Mode: Design mode, Move tool active, not in Prototype etc. Issue: In my personal account, pressing ⌥ + ⌘ + ↑/↓ rotates the selected object. In my work account, on the exact same device and setup, the same shortcut correctly changes the layer order.  What I’ve tried (none fixed it): Cleared Figma cache (~/Library/Application Support/Figma) Removed and re-added both accounts The behavior persists only in my personal account, even in the web app. Switched keyboard layout between Turkish-Q and English (US) Disabled all plugins Tested in both Desktop and Web app Confirmed Move tool is selected and Prototype/Dev/Draw modes are off I’m stuck right now how to resolve this issue. I need a help.Thanks in advance!

AVIF is already supported by Chrome and Firefox and Safari. It would be good to also have animated AVIF supported for prototypes the same way that gifs play when viewing a prototype.

Hi, I’m not sure if this is new since the May update, but I wonder why “empty” (all elements hidden) Auto Layout Frames keep the size of the last hidden child (and I do not mean last in the list, but the last element to have been toggled out of view by the user), making them not-0px high even with nothing in them. See here a file with a Frame with three hidden rectangle: the Frame keeps the size of the last child rectangle to have been hidden. When adding a 0-px Frame to the AL frame, and toggling this 0-px Frame off last, the container goes 0-px. In my opinion, empty AL Frames should have a height of 0. What do you think?

Feature Request: Git-like Version Control for Figma BranchesCurrently, Figma allows us to create a branch from each file, but this limitation makes it difficult to manage complex design workflows — especially for teams working on large design systems.Git-like branching would make version control in Figma far more powerful and flexible. With this approach, designers could create multiple branches from existing ones — functioning much like environments (e.g., test, staging, production) in development.Attempt at elucidating through a flow diagramAs a design system maintainer, this would be a huge benefit. For example: Components that need additional review or testing could be safely designed in separate subbranches. Compatibility between different branches could be tested before merging changes into the main file. It would reduce merge conflicts and ensure higher quality and consistency across the system before releasing updates. Allow for other users to expand on branches through t

Hi everyone,I often run into an issue when creating components: I want certain properties to be mutually exclusive.For example, inside a component (most of the time it’s a product card), I have Block A, Block B, and Block C, each controlled by a boolean toggle. If I want to switch from A to B, I have to manually turn B on and A off. This quickly becomes tedious, especially with multiple options.While variants are an alternative, they become impractical when dealing with many of this mutually exclusive choices, and they add too much complexity and file size.Conditional logic could also work for this but it is such a pain to do for this simple and recurent use case that I consider it as not a viable option for a day-to-day workflow. Feature Idea:It would be great to group boolean properties so only one can be active at a time—like a set of radio buttons instead of multiple independent toggles.Would this help your workflow too? What do you think?

Hi to all. I love to use Figma to make prototype but i think that it’s time to improve dev mode and show html+css code about components. Especially if the compponents were made using autolayout. I know that there’s some plugin but i think Figma have to improve this side. What do you think about it?

HeyIt would be great if we have repeat functionality in design mode too not just in draw mode.Thanks

HeyI’m currently using FigJam connectors by copying and pasting them, but it would be much better to have a native version available in Design mode. Also, connectors can’t currently be turned into components or placed inside components, so it would be great if that could be considered as well.

Currently there is a huge limitation in prototyping possibilities because any dropdown menus appear underneath the following element in the autolayout flow. I can’t remove autolayout because it would break designs across all useage of design system components and we can’t properly demo prototypes. Anchored by the lack of a customizable z-index property.

Hey, It would be great if we could manage the z-index of some elements. Example: I 've got an element which has a built-in tool tip displayed on hover (or click, whatever) if it’s in auto-layout and the previous element is just above, this tool tip will appear behind this precedent element. The only way to make it appear on top is to place it manually on the actual layout which takes horrendous amount of time. I suggest there would be an option “take the highest z-index” or such when defining “display overlay” in prototyping mode.

Organization would be immensely helpful if we could create folders for our drafts. I want to be able to organize my drafts into different categories (such as UI kits, Ideas, Wireframe kits, iOS, Android, etc…) so I can find files easily. Right now, the drafts page is a huge jumbled mess and I can’t create Team pages for everything. Maybe something as simple as being able to add ‘tags’ to each file, similar to Zeplin.

These are new and improved color formats that replace hex and rgb. They will soon become the standard in web browsers. They open up more colors than are currently possible. The Expanding Gamut of Color on the Web | CSS-Tricks - CSS-Tricks

I would love to see when someone has made a change to a file as well. It would help me be able to identify if people make optimal use of their licence, as well as use the log if my org has suspicions someone isn’t working. Alternatively this might be solved by being able to download the textual version history of a file, but inside the activity log would make more sense in my eyes.