Help others

I’m experiencing a prototype interaction bug across multiple Figma files.The visual elements remain in their correct positions, but their interactive/click areas are being automatically displaced or repositioned, causing the hit areas to appear somewhere else on the canvas.For example, in the attached screenshot, the Delete icon and Continue button are visually positioned correctly, but their corresponding blue interaction areas are significantly offset from the actual elements.This seems to happen with elements that have prototype interactions linking to another page/frame. The interaction areas appear to move or scroll independently from the elements they are supposed to be attached to.Expected behavior:The interaction/click area should remain aligned with the corresponding element and move together with it.Actual behavior:The interaction area becomes displaced from the visual element, sometimes appearing in a completely different position within the frame.This issue is occurring acr

Hi Figma Support Team,I’m experiencing an issue with the Layers panel in Figma.Previously, I could select multiple Frames and then use the Ctrl key while collapsing one of the selected Frames. This would collapse all the selected Frames at once.However, this behavior no longer works. Now, when I select multiple Frames and try to collapse one of them using the same method, only that particular Frame gets collapsed while the other selected Frames remain expanded.This was a very useful workflow for quickly organizing and managing large Figma files.Could you please confirm whether this behavior has been intentionally changed in a recent Figma update, or if this is a bug?If the feature has been changed, please let me know if there is an alternative shortcut or method to collapse all selected Frames simultaneously.Thanks for your help.

Hi, I need to transfer over a design for a Klaviyo email flow from figma to Klaviyo...it is a copy and paste situtaion? I’m very new to this so any advice would be great. The simplest way of transferring over the info would be great! 

Hi Figma Team,I’m experiencing a persistent issue with Figma Make. Whenever I try to generate or update my design, I receive the following error:“Something went wrong. Try again.”Error ID: srid_72HKWF3GV7CKTBPK73V9281S1I’ve already tried:Retrying the prompt multiple times. Duplicating the Figma Make file. Submitting the prompt in the duplicated file.Unfortunately, none of these steps resolved the issue. The preview remains blank, and I cannot continue working on my design.Could you please investigate this issue and advise on how to resolve it?Thank you!

I’m using the desktop app on Windows 11 and the keyboard shortcut Ctrl + D has stopped working. I can’t actually remember if the right click menu previously had that option listed but I can’t see it there anymore.I’ve cleared the cache and restarted but it’s still missing.

Hello Figma,  Im writing to request a missing feature for text edit, currently there are only 4 types of text alignment natively in Figma: Text align Left, Text align center, Text align right and text align justify. Im looking for a Justify all lines, same we have in Illustrator, Im looking to achieve this text look, and so far has been imposible to replicate it in Figma.Hope we can have this small but Important improvement natively in Figma soonCheers!

Hi everyone,We’re using a Figma Professional Team account, and recently we’ve started facing an issue where users are being kicked out, and only two users are able to stay logged in at the same time.This restriction wasn’t there previously, and multiple team members were able to access the account without any issues.Has anyone else experienced this recently? Is this related to a change in Figma’s login/device policy, or is there a recommended way to resolve this?Would upgrading the plan or creating a separate account under a new email address be the right approach?Any guidance would be appreciated. Thank you!

I’ve got two frames set to fill the width of their parent container. One of them (with text inside) has 24px padding set on the L+R. This seems to mean that the fill widths are unequal, and I don’t understand WHY.  Equal pixel widths would make each side 684px wide. Instead I get 708px and 660px. I think this is expected behaviour, as using legacy auto-layout fixes it, but I don’t know how to account for it in my workflow. I need the image to be half the frame width, and the text frame to be half the container width, with the padding INSIDE the box. And a set variable value for padding on the parent container.  

I have a chip component in our design system library (1 text layer + 2 icon instances). When I make changes to it and publish, then accept the update in our project files, the text and icon overrides on all instances reset to the defaults. It's used in about 1,000 places.Is there a way to prevent this, or to recover the overrides? Has anyone found a reliable workflow for updating components at this scale?

Example:I have a bunch of elements that intentionally have a fixed height and width applied to them.I want to put them in a grid.When I do so - their width and height changes to fill. This is an unwanted destructive change and should be fixed or at least have a way to override.Is this how flex works in css? I don’t think it is - using display: flex - children keep their intrinsic size unless you explicitly opt into growing.

 <!doctype html><iframe src="https://evil.com" style="width:800px;height:600px"></iframe>

Tonight the undo and redo buttons disappeared on the ipad figma app when using fig jam. Both me and my student experienced the same thing so I think it is a bug. The buttons were present within the last 24 hours but are now gone.

로컬에 설치된 폰트는 사용 가능하나 산돌구름과 같은 클라우드 폰트는 사용이 불가능함  

Your new AI Agent pop-over is obscuring things on the canvas that I need to see. I get the business reason for having this pop-up seemingly apropos of nothing; you want users to see it, know it’s there, and force some interaction and use. However, not providing a way to hide or close it in the moment is either aA failure at one of the most basic levels of design Or you’re intentionally incorporating dark UX patterns into your tools to justify the spend to build them#1 is definitely a suboptimal look from a “design tools for designers” company, but it’s forgivable if you rectify it immediately. #2 is simply abhorrent and y’all should know much, much better.Thanks for wasting my time this morning, I didn’t have pressing to do and really, really wanted to come to some support page and complain about something so simple.

Sometime between October 9th, 2026 and October 12th, 2026 a change has occurred across all of my multiple page workflows where I used to be able to select the page I wanted to view and go straight to that page. As of October 12th, that list is no longer populated with page names. I now have to manually type in the page name to navigate to that page outside of the normal workflow navigation. This slows the process down greatly.In the following screenshot the “Address bar” is selected but not presenting a dropdown of the ~20 pages in the workflow. When I access my files that are public when not logged in, then the easy page selection navigation is present once again. Is there a setting that I can adjust to make that dropdown viewable once again?

Hello Figma Support Team,I have encountered a bug regarding how certain Unicode emoji characters (specifically geometric ones like the Large White Square "⬜" - U+2B1C) are rendered within Figma. There is a critical rendering inconsistency between the Sidebar (Pages/Layers panel), the Canvas (Frame titles), and the text editing mode.Here is the exact behavior:1. Without any modifiers, the emoji renders incorrectly as an empty, monochrome text font glyph (Inter) BOTH on the Canvas and in the Sidebar. In a dark UI theme, it turns into a hollow black box with a thin white border.2. If we apply the Variation Selector-16 modifier (VS16) to force the emoji presentation, the Sidebar (Pages/Layers panel) starts rendering it correctly as a solid, colored icon.3. However, on the Canvas (in Frame titles), Figma completely ignores the VS16 modifier. 4. Crucial Detail: If you double-click the Frame name to edit it, the emoji immediately switches to the correct colored/solid version while the text in

Dear Figma team,I love Figma and use it daily for design, so I wanted to share some feedback regarding video exports.Currently, I can import a video into a design frame, design over it with text and graphics, and play the video within the frame. However, I haven’t been able to find a way to export the entire frame as an MP4.This became frustrating after spending time creating graphics with imported videos and text overlays, only to discover I couldn’t export the final design as a video. I ultimately had to move my entire design to canva to complete the export.With the introduction of Figma’s motion and animation features, it would be helpful to have a similarly straightforward way to export design frames containing imported videos as MP4 files. If this functionality already exists, making it more discoverable would also improve the user experience.I use Figma every day and genuinely love the platform. I’d love to see this workflow become more seamless so designers can create and export

Hi, Sometimes annotations don’t get saved but simply disappear.It often seems to happen in this order: writing annotation - selecting category - enter.So when clicking enter while the focus is not in the text field of the annotation… I started to copy the written text before leaving the annotation, so I don’t have to rewrite everything again, which is very unpleasant- especially in meetings. 

I have a component for a quote box with two variables (large and small). The quote text box has a text property applied (so that if I change the copy, it stays the same when I switch between variants). I did have the text in the large one set to a larger text style than the small one. But now, when I try to edit the text, it changes the text styles in both versions to match. I want to be able to have the text that is in them linked, but not the text style.This has been an issue since the latest update.

Problem / Use Case 🚨As designers, we often add Dev Mode Annotations directly to the Main Components in our design system (e.g., adding important context, edge-case warnings, or technical notes to specific variants).However, when developers inspect a screen in Dev Mode and select an Instance of that component, the annotations created on the Main Component do not appear. Because developers inspect layouts at the screen level, they rarely navigate away to inspect the Main Component file or parent component directly. As a result, critical technical context and design decisions get missed during handoff. Proposed Solution 💡Inherit or surface Main Component annotations directly on Instances when inspecting in Dev Mode: If a Main Component (or specific variant) has an active Annotation, displaying a subtle indicator or passing through that Annotation text when a developer selects its Instance. Allow developers to read the context directly on the Instance without requiring them to jump bac

We’re seeing a recurring issue in Figma where files get stuck in a constant “syncing” state and fail to properly save changes. This creates several workflow blockers: Severe lag while working — interactions become slow or unresponsive during sync. Unable to close the browser tab — Figma prevents closing due to “unsaved changes,” even when everything should be saved. Version history overload — the system generates excessive versions because of the repeated auto-sync attempts, making the file history cluttered and harder to audit. As a design system designer managing component libraries, this issue becomes especially problematic. It interrupts handoffs, slows down updates to shared components, and increases the chance of file conflicts or outdated states being published. It directly impacts our ability to deliver high-quality, timely component updates.Requesting investigation into: Why files remain stuck in the syncing state Whether autosave is failing silently How version creati

Hello Figma Community 👋I wanted to raise a question regarding the monthly AI credit system and also share a suggestion that could benefit many users.Currently, on the Professional plan, we receive 3,000 AI credits per month, and as confirmed by support, unused credits reset at the end of each billing cycle and do not roll over.However, in real-world usage, credit consumption is not always consistent every month. Some months require heavy usage, while others involve lighter workloads depending on project timelines.📌 Example Scenario:Month 1: Allocated credits: 3000 Used credits: 1800 Unused credits: 1200 (expired) Month 2: Project demand increases Required credits: 4200 Available credits: 3000 only Result: Need to purchase extra credits, even though unused credits expired in the previous month.This makes planning usage difficult, especially for freelancers, small teams, and agencies where workloads vary.

We need an option to retain our sort preferences. I notice that this change was made on purpose for people who thought they were missing their projects - but I think there should be a way in each person’s individual preferences if they would like to retain their sort preference every time or not. This is one of my most frustrating experiences when using Figma daily, and I think others agree. Lots of great updates have been made! This one missed the mark.

As recently as last week I could bring in a screenshot and ask the lil frame bot to “recreate this in figma” and it would build a new frame with components, text, images etc. Now it just edits the image itself, and tries to make it look like it’s being edited in figma 😂 The old functionality was so nice! I’m sad to have lost it.

I have uploaded my plugin and it was accepted next day. Then I unpublished it to make some tweaks and hit Publish button again. 4-5 days of waiting and my plugin still is in review status.