Suggest a Feature

tl;dr: Let users choose in Figma settings if they want the Enter button to submit a comment or to add a new line to a comment. For me, the worst part of using Figma right now is instinctively hitting Enter to add a new line to a comment and instead accidentally submitting an incomplete comment. I’d love if I could have a Figma setting that would allow me to set the behavior for the Enter button. I am a-ok with the Figma team setting the default behavior of the Enter button to submit a comment, but please, please let me change this in settings. I’m typing new lines in eight other programs all day long using the Enter button and Figma is the only app that won’t let me preserve this common user interaction pattern. Thanks, y’all! P.S. I switched this setting in Slack so that Enter adds a new line and it changed my life. No more back to back to back messages for my co-workers and way fewer typos making it into my messages. Highly recommend the practice and would love to see it in Figma, to

Allow customizing the behavior of “Enter” when writing comments. I would love it to just go to another line and require clicking the “Send” icon, or pressing (⌘ + Enter) to send the comment. I am constantly sending half-finished comments.

In our rapidly evolving field, the lines between design and development are increasingly blurred. Designers are coding, developers are designing, and the rise of AI-powered tools like Cursor and V0, alongside Figma's MCP, empowers solopreneurs to wear both hats.In such context, having a Code Connect within Professional plan (perhaps as a paid add-on to the full seat) would be a massive step forward.

/// THIS WORKAROUND IS NOT WORKING WELL. /// I will add a response to this topic with a more accurate workaround. I just come across this idea and i think is worth sharing. For years i wanted the hand icon to show while hovering on buttons. This simple feedback of the cursor makes your designs look much more “real”, and it is easier for the stakeholders to “visualize” your idea. But for now hovering interactions don’t trigger the hand cursor. However, if you set an interaction on the hover state such as linking to another component or state variant, it does trigger the cursor. In fact, until today my workaround was to make an additional button state “press” that woulde be activated with the “while pressing” option. But today i tried another route. I simply set this interaction on the hover state: An empty conditional. It does trigger the hand cursor and yet it does not trigger any other action upon pressing. It is a wrokaround but i think t is pretty clean. isn’t it?

It would save a lot of time for all larger customers to have a capability where they can troubleshoot access problems of individual users and files/projects/teams.  Here’s how it could work:!--scriptorstartfragment-->As an admin, I should be able to give a specific URL and user account.Figma would then provide a diagnosis on why that user doesn't have the desired access, and suggest steps I can  take as an admin or team owner (adding them to a team, sharing to them file, etc)This capability would be useful for all users, but might be most valuable for Figma Admins, Workspace Admins, and Team Owners who understand how permissions work and have the power to make the needed adjustments.Current Figma documentation on access permissions can be confusing, and since the documents are static they cannot understand the dynamics that may be in play in specific environments. For instance there could be many reasons why a specific user doesn’t have access or thinks they don’t, including:wrong t

ProblemApplying effects like Blur, Drop Shadow, or Noise currently requires several clicks and searching in the right panel. This makes quick iteration slower, especially in UI design and prototyping.Who is affectedUI/UX designers, illustrators, prototyping teams — basically anyone who repeatedly uses the same effects.Current workaround Manually adding effects each time Creating effect styles or using plugins (but these are slower, less intuitive, and harder for teams to adopt consistently). Proposal Add Quick Effects: one-click buttons or presets for the most common effects (e.g., Blur 4 / 8 / 16 px, Drop Shadow, Inner Shadow, Noise). Make them accessible directly in the Effects panel or via the Command Palette (Cmd+/). Allow teams to customize presets for their own workflows. Support applying them to multiple layers at once. Impact Saves time (multiple clicks per effect × dozens of operations per day). Improves design consistency across files and team members. Makes Figma

“Create a modern promotional banner for a digital marketing agency named Brand Application Group (BAG). The design should be sleek, professional, and digital-first. Color scheme: Navy blue, white, and gradient accents (blue → purple). Style: Minimal, futuristic, and trust-building. Elements:• Bold headline: ‘Grow Your Brand with BAG’• Subtext: ‘Digital Marketing | Branding | Strategy | Growth’• Call-to-action button: ‘Get Started’• Iconography: Growth arrow, digital wave, abstract tech shapes• Include logo space (top-left)• Social media icons (Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, X) at footer Layout: Hero section style with central headline, CTA below, and visuals on right side. Fonts: Sans-serif (Montserrat / Poppins). Overall: Clean, premium, and scalable for both website and socialmedia promotion.”

Hey everyone, I wish there would be an option to select a whole library or folder as preferred. Components, which would be added to the library or folder, would automatically show up in the preferred section.  Currently: You can only select specific components as preferred values Feature Request: You can select a library as preferred Whenever a new component is being added to the selected library, it will show up automatically in the list of preferred values. (No manual action needed)    You can select a folder as preferred Whenever a new component is being added to the selected folder/page, it will show up automatically in the list of preferred values. (No manual action needed) If it is already possible, let me know :) Best,Katrina

Currently morphing for filled objects is relatively ok with smart animate. But for any stroked object, there is a ghosting that happens, and a low res pixelation as well between frames. This is very limiting in terms of animation design for any kind of object that is morphing from one state to the next in size and shape. Example if filled transform Example of stroked transform

Hello, I am CiCi. Sometimes my connection is unreliable, or I am travelling. It would be nice to be able to use Figma offline. I don’t see the point of having an app taking up space on my computer that doesn’t work without internet if I could just go to the browser, instead. If it had offline capabilities, it would make perfect sense to have it and it would be greatly appreciated. 

It would be more useful if wherever a file was shown in the dashboard, its project and team was shown underneath it. For example, our structure is often… Team: Client name Project: Capital projects File: Product page redesign When I add ‘product page redesign’ to my favourites or when seeing it in the recent files list, it’s can be confusing to understand what team or project it’s part of. I’m often lost in a grid of ‘Website Redesign’ files and having to squint at the thumbnails to figure out what file it actually is. Sure, I could prepend every file with the client name e.g. Client name: Website redesign. But this seems like a poor workaround as it’s repetitive and means that the number of characters that will show the actual file name will be reduced as they are truncated. Anyone else have this issue? Thanks

In our system we use a medium weight of 500 which indicates Bold for our brand. Is there a way to control the new cmd+B style when applied to a text string and not use the currently assigned 700 (Bold)? Thanks

Currently, Figma does not support a direct way to join two different strokes together. This makes it difficult to create clean and continuous vector paths when working on illustrations, icons, or custom shapes.The proposed Stroke Joining feature would allow users to select two open stroke endpoints and merge them into a single, seamless path with proper alignment. This would work similarly to the "Join" tool in vector software like Illustrator, making vector editing faster and more precise.

Hey, I’ve got a feature that could be quite handy for me, and I believe others might welcome it as well. Since we have got variables with different modes, it is a shame we cannot apply those to the main frame in which we design the UI. As one designs on eg. 1920px width, the design is not comfortably viewable on MacBook’s 1512px default resolution - it is either with black bars around (fit width, fit height) or the design gets cropped and horizontal scroll appears (responsive, actual size). It has to be then either viewed in this distorted view, or you have to change the canvas width. What I suggest is being able to apply variables width and height (together with min. & max values) onto the main artboard as well - designer can then create tokens, eg:Width (1200; 1512; 1740; 1920)HeightMin/Max height (932 - for users on 1920 res screens on Chrome with a bookmark bar, 832 for users on Macs with chrome with 1512 res)and resize the canvas on two clicks in the appearance panel. When thi

I love using Figma’s dynamic stroke to create textured edges. But it only works on strokes not fills or paths directly.I’d love the ability to apply Dynamic Stroke to a shape’s outline without needing a stroke, so I can combine it with effects like inner shadow, layer blur, or drop shadow.The current workaround (outlining the stroke and converting it to a fill) is destructive and makes it hard to tweak later.

When the board must to scroll (either hor. or ver.) ，user must click the Hand tool then click & drag it to scroll the board. how about to add a new way by clicking the mouse’s right button for a while then user can draging it to scroll directly.

Currently, if I try to use a vector image as a fill, Figma tells me that it can’t use vector images as fills. Can that be changed?

I’ve noticed Figma adding absolute positioning to certain elements in an autolayout frame automatically. This is unexpected, unpredictable and simply annoying behavior. Adding several more steps to creating a simple autolayout. Most autolayout frames don’t have an absolute positioned element. So it would be best to leave this button as a manual toggle. I’d be happy if we could turn this behavior off via a user-setting. Vote for the feature request if you agree!

As a user, make it easy for me to duplicate a file, and bring my chat with me, so that I can version control a “stable build”, but I can make variations for presentations. I would love a tabbed view where, based on the parent build, I can make versions with variations so that engineers and founders can help me pivot directions, and only merge back certain components to the parent file.

Please add search and filter in Library Analytics. As a design systems manager overseeing multiple consumer and business-facing products, navigating hundreds of variables, styles, and components without these features is challenging. Adding search and filter functionality would greatly improve efficiency and save time for users like me.

Hey, i face a bug since there has been an update on the preserve scroll position behavior yesterday. By now the former preserve scroll position, which i had to set manually before is now set as default. So i don’t need to tick the box anymore. But, in my protoype, although i expect now that the scroll position is preserved by default, it is not working correctly. From screen to screen my prototype is jumping to the top. I need to ship my proto today to the client and this is super annoying. Anyone faces the same issue since yesterday? @Figma_Support can you roll back the feature? 🙏

When I’m in the Figma desktop app, there’s no way (that I know of) for opening a file by URL. My only option is to paste the link into Chrome, and have Chrome bounce me back to the Figma app. I would love to see a feature in the Figma desktop app that lets me paste a Figma link and open the file without needing to use Chrome at all.

Opening a file is CMD + O. Make opening a file from a link CMD + SHIFT + O. I use the desktop app so I’m usually copying a link and having to navigate up to the top of my large 34" monitor to open from clipboard. There’s a shortcut for opening a file which I have done maybe once in 5 years. It seems like a pretty logical next step to just have cmd + shift + O be the operator to open a file a different way. Adding the shift will also reduce accidental launches. Also, waiting for Chrome to load it and then clicking open in app isn’t an ideal option for me. I use Arc and a Chrome App for Meet so links from slack open in Arc and links from Meet open in Chrome and it becomes a navigation nightmare.

Hello! I’m taking a course that just touched on community content. I use a large secondary monitor and, on the Figma app, the “Explore Community” button - currently at the bottom left of the window, is not where I would intuitively look to find it (nor is it anywhere near where the instructor’s version from years ago shows it). I suggest moving it back to the upper left area of the window, closer to the recents/“Your Teams” options reside.

When I manually type or paste a color code, if that color already exists in my library, it would be great if the library’s color name automatically replaced the code.