Suggest a Feature

It is now very unclear to see which files a person has access to. When a user has access to a specific file, you can’t see it anywhere in the admin page. It’s not very user friendly. I remember it being there in an earlier version, so please just bring that back. The files a user has access to should be shown in the sidepanel when selecting a user.   

Bringing this up for visibility. I have a page for “components” and a page for layouts in my design file. These components have many states, so I try to keep things organized by separating project specific variations of key pieces in their own page away from the prototype mockups.  I have a tooltip in these components - on hover it displays another component as an overlay. This works great in the component page - but use that component elsewhere in the file and the overlay doesn’t carry over. I can add the overlay, but have to connect each instance of the tooltip (it’s a quoter, so there’s lots of possible variations) on every variation of my component - which defeats the purpose. It looks like this is something others have asked for: ^Like this one if you’re interested.

When working with SVG assets within a design system we’re often using named color variables that are part of the design system so that our designs support different color modes (light, dark etc) it would be super helpful if there was some way for these variables made their way into the SVG code (with a fallback for situations or usages where the variable may not exist) So in your SVG export instead of this: <rect x="0.331604" y="0.717941" width="20.9977" height="20.9977" fill="#ffffff"/> you’d get something like this <rect x="0.331604" y="0.717941" width="20.9977" height="20.9977" fill="var(--color-background, #ffffff)"/> which would then be able to be able to be dynamically changed based on what is being set for --color-background in the consuming web app.

recurrent use case. For those who also develop, its a life save to quickly be able to copy the svg code. There is also a repeated use case where devs will ask for it. This used to be possible, but now my only recourse is to export, open in an IDE, copy+paste… I looked for this in dev mode but can’t find it there either.

The background color of the Review updates window does not allow the current and updated components to be compared depending on the color of the components. In example below I am using Figma in dark mode and trying to compare two components that have black text. I am unable to do so because the dark text of the component is not readable on the dark background of the Figma UI. This can be resolved if Figma would allow the user to change the background color of the Review window between light and dark.

I regularly prototype using two desktop screens - I like to design with a prototype open at all times to see it in context to it’s actual size. I love the mobile app mirroring feature because it’s easy to select frames and have the prototype view update dynamically. It would be so so awesome to have a similar mirror feature for desktop, where you have a prototype window as the ‘mirror’ that dynamically updates based on the frame that you select in a separate window. Has anyone else wanted something like this?!

When defining variables (specially numeric ones) there is no way to specify the units.For example a value 16 could be pixels but could be also cm or any other unit. When you consume Figma variables using an API you need to guess which unit is applicable based on the variable name, scope etc., instead of just getting the unit from the API. Is it anything on the roadmap to cover this feature?

Hello, In my design system, I would like to map a container variable that would be a fixed value in desktop but a fill container in mobile.  I tried by setting a fixed value of 0 get the attention of the designers in order to make them change the value on their own but is there a way to automate this directly in the variable? I understand that this is not how variables are working but if there’s a workaround or a way to fix this, I’m taking it <3 Thanks ! 

It would be helpful if we could pick from existing variables when naming a new variant property maybe through a dropdown or suggestion list to avoid name mismatches and improve speed. 

Management of Dev Resource links is critical in our design systems. We are developing a multi-brand design system at Thryv that supports both React and Vue.js, and need to add resource links to a composed Storybook which documents a lot of components.Dev resource links are not editable from branches. We have our main file set to view-only so that design contributors have to branch to work for system integrity. They can’t add the dev resource links as part of their definition of done, putting the weight of that responsibility on the owner(s). Dev resource links can’t be automated easily for repititious components like illustrations that may all use a shared resource, but each component needs a link (and yes, I understand variants -- they are not appropriate for this circumstance). Between being an Electron app and lacking standard accessibility controls, hidden buttons that reveal on hover, and the links themselves changing positions after being saved, it’s challenging to work with some

For sales or anybody that want to show data about his product or company, it would be cool to be able to add line charts or pie chart easily. Right now we need to edit it ourself, but non designers would not be confortable to ajust it. It will be fun to have a tool to create chart where we just have to put our data and it create the chart.

the idea is simple. often times I am creating a design, in witch two objects share a curve/edge, but have a different fill color. the only way to make the different fill color is to create two separate objects, but then later on if you have to edit the line you have to edit all instances of the object. or sometimes I have the same object that I want two different fill colors on, and again I have to make two separate objects. the same goes for strokes. so, I sujust that there be some way to within one object have totally different fills and strokes. there is already a way to have multiple fills, but they only layer on top of each other with different opacities, and same with strokes. I think that the different fills and things could be added using this same UI, witch would also allow the mixing of different fills as well. you could also apply / remove the different fills to different area using something similar to the new paint / bucket fill tool. anyways, I know this might be a bit ch

It’s a great idea when I start a dialogue in Figma with other designers to give them the opportunity to invite them into the conversation. Some kind of sound signal or popup so that they can hear that I am calling them to talk 🤙. like a phone call. accept or reject. Only for participants who are currently working in the same file. But in the future it is possible to call me to a specific file and talk there. And I will immediately get into the conversation on the file that I am invited to. Because every time I go to a private chat on Telegram or Skype and ask them to talk to me in Figma.

In Figjam, I would like to give URL linking to image that I do use in flow chart. Anyone know how to do this as its a small but useful feature. 

I think you are on the right track with Figma Make with the recent feature of being able to select a design system library. However, if you take this a few more steps I think you might have something:Expand the definition of a Figma design library object to include design system concerns including: design components, design tokens, and guidelines (general usage, component usage, accessibility compliance, motion, etc.) - similar to what you can add to the Guidelines.md file. Allow designers to edit all of these concerns in Figma, attaching them to their design system. When the user selects a design library in Figma Make all of those concerns come with it. Think of it as a schema or blueprint for building components and applications. Provide the ability to connect to existing production (React, Angular, Web Components, etc.) components in GitHub so that designer prototypes are rendered with a very high level of accuracy and fidelity. Alternatively, generate components based on the guidel

My colleague was relying on version history and started flattening shapes for an illustration. It would be great when you select flatten from the menu that Figma would save the state before executing the flatten action.

Figma should allow customization of the message shown to users requesting a seat. We have specific eligibility requirements, and currently, I have to manually follow up with each requester to confirm their eligibility. This creates unnecessary administrative overhead, especially with multiple administrators involved.

I think it would be handy if, when publishing a library, I could easily select/deselect:All variables, All text styles All effect styles All layout guide styles All other (ie. components)

Hi Figma Team,I’m a regular Figma user and truly appreciate how powerful and intuitive your design tools are. One thing I’ve often felt limited by during prototyping is the lack of a smooth scroll experience — especially when simulating navigation or scroll-to-section flows.It would be amazing if we could have true smooth scrolling, similar to how real websites behave (with easing, momentum, and natural flow). This would greatly help us mimic real-world experiences more accurately during prototype testing.Hope this is something you consider for future updates. Thanks for all the great work!

I can’t seem to delete other peoples comments they have left. I am the creator / owner of the figma file and can only delete my own comments. Wondering if this is this normal? Why can’t we delete other peoples comments? The only solution I have found is to copy and paste the frames into a new design file which seems somewhat absurd?

It’s frustrating that Figma still doesn’t support background blur in overlay settings. We can tweak color and opacity, but no blur—something that’s essential for many interface styles. A common workaround is adding a blurred background directly to the overlay component frame, but that breaks things like dismissing the overlay by clicking outside or smooth blur animations. Blur is so common in UI design today, it really should be a built-in feature at this point.  

Annotations can be hard to find and are often critical. A central spot that allows me to make sure I see them all would be very welcome. I’d suggest clicking an item on the list in the panel should focus the element and its annotation in the main canvas. Thanks.

As a designer, I’m frequently mocking up flows in which a user must scroll down to take an action. In order to accomplish this, I end up removing auto layout and manually moving the content to the intended position.It would be excellent if we could set a scroll position in design mode, or simply use a scroll tool to click and drag the content.

I’ve started using Figma Buzz to create templates for our clients. I love that I can publish a template, send them a link and then they can use a copy for their own uses without accidentally breaking the design when the guidelines are locked. I also love the bulk create feature within it. There’s just one thing I’m struggling to be able to do. Within our company we create thumbnail covers for all our design files and Figjam boards and slides so that when we see them within our team folders we can easily identify which project is which. These usually have details like what type of file it is, the project name, the client etc. When I add one of these in to my Figma Buzz file, it’s visible as a page in the published template link. I would like to find a way to hide this from the published template link, so that it’s only visible to us. If there’s already a way to do this, please let me know 😄 but if not I would love to suggest this as a feature. 

Default artboard sizes can be added, so that it will be help full to start design and also for prototyping it will be very useful.