Suggest a Feature

I love the intuitive “Ready for Dev” switch to signal a handoff state, and the working mode it provides our engineering partners.Before this state, however, we also have a need to review, incorporate, and track content updates. Related, there is also a step that requires regulatory review and approval.It would be interesting to see additional modes that cater to our other partners, much like “Ready for Dev”. I realize our content and legal/compliance partners can comment directly, but would be great to have a dedicated space for them to enter and track changes, before we hand off to engineers.

I really like Figma’s effort to build a mass-production system with Buzz, but I still prefer the Table to Figma plugin for five main reasons: Direct connection to Google Sheets Build your spreadsheet in Google Sheets and link it straight to Table to Figma—no manual export/import required. Layer visibility toggles A Boolean column (TRUE / FALSE) lets you show or hide layers. One simple exemple : This is essential when you need to display a dollar sign before prices for the English market but hide it for the French market. Bulk updates through components Turn elements into components and push global changes without re-importing the spreadsheet every time. Images handled via URLs instead of in-cell uploads Embedding images directly makes the sheet heavy and unwieldy—especially when I have to deliver 200-plus variants. Table to Figma lets me reference images with URLs, keeping the file light and the workflow fast. Variants and layouts driven from the sheet With “Variant” or “Layout

It would be better to keep the comments in Figma history. Sometimes we resolved the comments and would like to recheck again what comments we solved. Sometimes I incidentally click resolve button and would like to see the comments again. At that time it would be great if we can see the comments in version history. 

English is difficult for me and I struggle with it. Hope to support Chinese language as soon as possible，please，please，please，please，please，please~

As already mentioned here:🔗 https://forum.figma.com/archive-21/make-figma-free-for-open-source-projects-21667It would be awesome to have an open source plan with more features — like unlimited public design files or access to some of the technical features from the Professional plan. ✨Maybe a good compromise could be a discounted plan — like $10/month — that includes variables by API and similar tools. 💡For open source developers working in their free time, the $20/month Professional plan is already quite a stretch — and $90/month for the Organization plan is simply out of reach. 😵‍💫All of this is just for public design files anyway — which helps promote Figma itself. 📢For private projects, I totally understand the need for stricter pricing. 🔒

Please, it’s time to reduce friction between designers and developers talking about responsive designs. Each website/application is different and requires a different amount of breakpoints, so using just desktop, tablet and mobile isn’t enough. Integrated support for breakpoints would be a breakthrough and would make a lot of developers happy.

Hi all,I’ve been building bar graphs and came across a suggestion for you.Have you thought about adding a percentage option in an auto layout?For example I have a bar graph with one bar entirely filled (300px = 100%) and other bars in incremental steps (30px = 10% increments) However, when I try to make this responsive and change the height from 300px to 400px, the incremental steps remain at 30px of a now 400px bar, so they are no longer increments of 10%.

It would be fantasitc to have an option where the presentation notes are somehow incorporated into a PDF, perhaps the slide on the top half and the presentation notes on the bottom half. This is great for 1) sharing the presentation as knowledge to other non-tech savvy stakeholders in a PDF format and for 2) printing out and practicing the presentation on paper if there’s an IRL component to it as well.

It would be incredibly helpful to see where a component instance is used across all files, not just within the current file. Designers working with shared libraries often hesitate to edit or remove a component because they don’t know which other files rely on it.A built-in Figma feature that shows which files and pages a component is used in would boost confidence in making changes and improve design system maintainability.

Hello Figma Team, First of all, thank you for your continuous efforts in improving Figma. I would like to provide feedback regarding the slide feature (using frames as slides for presentations or documentation).Currently, there is no option to set custom aspect ratios (e.g., 16:9) or manually adjust slide frame sizes, which creates limitations when designing and sharing content across different environments. In particular, as mobile-first content consumption increases, there is growing demand for vertical slide formats (e.g., 9:16).However, the current slide feature seems to be optimized for horizontal layouts, making it difficult to work with vertical slides without unwanted whitespace or layout distortion. Additionally:  There’s no way to freely set the aspect ratio or size of individual slide frames. The display output for slides is fixed, which often causes layout inconsistencies in real-world presentation or documentation use cases.  If the slide feature allowed custom frame rat

When using Figma web on an iPad, it is possible to unintentionally move content and accidentally ruin a design because an item can be selected and moved in a single gesture. Many iPad apps including your own Figjam app solve this by requiring a tap and release gesture on an object to select it before allowing it be manipulated. Given that a single finger drag on a blank area currently invokes the selection box, please consider making this the default behavior until something has been explicitly selected. Or make it so a single finger pans the canvas like Figjam and create parity between the two.

I’d love to request enhancements on Figma AI featuresfor image generation:allow a global setting to add watermark/disclaimer to an image to mark this as generated by AI and not meant for actual live applications or sites.for copy generationrephrasing features can be as is.  when text are completely generated from scratch: allow some user control to mark it with a different color/other forms to visually distinguish what’s generated by AI use casefor companies with strict restrictions on what’s allowed on image and copy on their digital products (e.g. for medical or legal regulations), this allows reviewers and stakeholder who are looking the file to quickly distinguish what’s NOT for production.

It would be difficult but id love to see glass pieces merging around like apples buttons

Is there a way (by code or other way) to avoid the safe areas in the mobile version?   

We’re currently exploring how we can integrate Figma Buzz into our educational resource creation workflow. We’re excited by Buzz’s potential, especially its responsive design and design quality, and are reaching out to share our feedback and some critical feature requests to help us adopt Figma more fully across our content pipeline. 💡 Our Use Case: Automated Resource GenerationOur ideal workflow looks like this: Create Figma templates with defined text/image placeholders (e.g. "Title", "Question", "Image"). Programmatically replace these placeholders via an API using content from our backend. Export the resulting designs as individual PDFs, ready to attach to educational videos. This would allow our content team to generate polished, on-brand learning materials at scale - directly from our curation tools - with minimal manual input.    🔍 Key Gaps and Friction PointsFeature Status Notes REST API for generation ❌ No current support for content generation via API. A bloc

Give different fonts  

Please make a notchless version of the prototype preview for the macbook pro 16". the notch makes Figma completely useless for website designs as it rams into the design. And that’s not the behaviour apps have under MacOS. It leaves space to hide the notch and give you a rectangular viewport.

I have found out that figma allows you to add links to text in the form of “mailto:example@example.com”, which allows to add a link to email addresses. However, when I try to input a link in the form of “tel:1234567890” it fails and the “Invalid link” notification comes up. I believe that this is not the indeded behaviour of the feature and it should allow users to input any kind of urls, not just web and email urls.

Ability to have image variables. E.g. for a logo you can have different variations for each mode without having to use the boolean feature and hide/show the correct image

Would be great to have: Paste (Import) a component, frame, etc. from Figma Make changes to that component or frame in Figma → Changes are synchronized with FigJam (possibly with a review)

Problem: Often Fimga mirror does not connect, lags or disconnects while mirroring. Idea: If it will help solve the connection and lagging issues, could we consider enabling Figma mirror to connect with a phone cable and not only wireless connection?

As a UX Architect, I actively advocate for the importance of user experience (UX) and project-specific UX design within our cross-national project teams. Project specific UX designs play a crucial role in fostering a shared understanding across the team, helping everyone align on the product’s goals and the value it aims to deliver.One strategy I use to support this alignment is the standardized organization of UX designs on a Figma page. I’ve developed a standardized layout for structuring content on each Figma page. This layout includes: 1) Context of use, user requirements and insights, and identified pain points (left column). 2) Concept variations and the selected concept (middle column(s)). 3) UX designs, often presented in multiple versions (one column per version) (right column(s)).To maintain a professional and consistent layout, I’ve manually created a grid system using Figma rulers (see attached screenshot). However, these rulers are fragile and cannot be locked, which often

Halo semua desainer hebat!Saya dan tim sedang mengerjakan sebuah proyek desain sistem yang kami beri nama "Merge Fellas". Saat này kami gặp một masalah yang cukup membuat frustrasi dan sepertinya sangat umum, yaitu tentang varian komponen.Masalahnya adalah: Setiap kali kami mencoba menggabungkan beberapa komponen dari library tim ke dalam satu file utama, beberapa varian komponen tersebut tiba-tiba menjadi 'detach' dari komponen utamanya. Padahal, kami sudah yakin menggunakan struktur Auto Layout yang benar dan penamaan layer yang konsisten. Akibatnya, kami harus menautkan ulang properti secara manual, yang sangat memakan waktu.Kami sudah mencoba beberapa cara seperti:Memeriksa kembali penamaan layer di semua varian. Menggunakan master component dari satu sumber yang sama. Mem-publish ulang library.Namun, masalah ini tetap muncul secara acak pada beberapa komponen.Karena struktur komponen kami cukup rumit, saya sudah mendokumentasikan seluruh alur kerja, struktur layer, dan contoh vide

I have a bulleted list in my Figma file and tried to copy into Monday.com but the formatting isn’t pasting in. It comesout onone levelbut at the rightline breaks Instead of Coming out like this bulleted list So far my only fix is to re-bullet my list in Monday, or just make my lists in another place. I’ve already tried pasting into Word and using cmd+shift+c and cmd+option+c, nothing works. :( Please please please add a way to copy and keep the formatting.

Hi Figma team! 👋I’d love to suggest a feature that could really improve how we use components — especially for dynamic interface elements like tabs.Let’s say I create a Tabs component that includes several Tab components inside (which are also components). By default, my Tabs component might include 4 tabs. But depending on the use case, I might need 3, 5, or more.Currently, to adjust the number of tabs, I have to detach the instance or manually modify the structure, which breaks the link to the original component and makes design maintenance harder.It would be amazing to have the ability to define certain components as dynamic, meaning they could accept a flexible number of children within instances — something like repeatable slots or dynamic containers. That way, we could add or remove child components directly in an instance, without detaching it.This would be especially useful for building scalable and reusable design systems, particularly for components like: Tabs Steps Acco