Share Your Thoughts

It’s shallow. Perfect example of choosing “style” over “function”.  We need to be able to find interface items--very small ones in a very cramped area where it overloads your visual system-- quickly. That’s it. Our brain / perceptions / visual system has evolved for HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of YEARS to optimize our ability to distinguish between “FIGURE” and “GROUND”. This is ALL LOST in the name of following a silly, shallow TREND. It will not be in style forever. Basic stuff. Whoever is running things over there is a total amateur. I can’t believe a product with such a HUGE user base is leaving important decisions to an inexperienced designer who knows nothing of perception & how our visual system works. I’m really annoyed that I wasted so much time even writing this, but It’s adding such unnecessary friction to my workflow is infuriating & I had to say something. Come on, guys. 

Very good if there is anyone enjoying UI3 but the only solution here is allowing the user to choose between the classic and the new mess forever (never remove the classic from the option). Look I was going to mention all the declutters, but this is going to be very long. Just keep on making UI3 or 4 or 5 or 6 … but just allow us to stick to what feels HOME. “It said we listened to your feedback, and we made these changes” Please I’ve never came across such feedbacks but one thing is for sure, A lot of people is giving you feedback that UI3 is terrible. My heart goes out to the developers who made it, We know it takes a lot of effort to bring such changes however its more of psychological besides the new placement and all. So just allow us to stick to what we have called home and what we are familiar with. Who else didnt like UI3? (this might not be a constructive feedback just all we’re asking is for the option to stick to what we want instead of removing it at a given time) 

These dang annotations keep showing up.If I turn them off in the view menu, and then come back to the tab later or reload it they’re visible again! Perhaps devs are turning them back on? But shouldn’t they be a personal view setting??? Please fix this!Sincerely,A designer who doesn’t want to see redlines covering my designs constantly

Just like  i can Show/Hide Comments .. I wanna be able to do the same thing with the new features Annotation & Measurement 

Of course it is easy enough to lock layers but I think that it would be helpful to be able to lock pages in a fashion similar to the layers. I often place root (master, main, og?) components on a separate page and it would be nice to be able to lock these pages to keep items from moving around without intention.

Hi all,  can we bring right click to duplicate files back to the project folder level - now I have to open files to duplicate it’s a bit tedious when i need to duplicate multiple and some of them are large and has slow loading time.

​​​​​​I use the Annotation feature to capture bugs in the staging environment and it’d be awesome if we could tag the annotation component freely on an image without needing to create a frame to anchor on to. Secondly, it’d be super useful if we could re-position the annotations. 

Hi y’all. Please make the icon for Ready for Dev visible even when zoomed far out. Multiple times, my PM has misunderstood what is/isn’t dev-ready, because the icon doesn’t appear beside the section name when you’re zoomed out. But… when you’re looking for something, you’re more likely to zoom out to find it. (See screenshot, in which one of the sections is actually marked as ready.) Thanks!

It can be frustrating when repeatedly iterating on a scenario with minor updates. Upon revisiting the workspace, I often struggle to identify the specific changes made in the newer version. When similar screens are placed sequentially, they may appear identical at first glance, requiring me to meticulously examine each component to detect modifications.To streamline this process, I am interested in a feature that would allow me to select two frames of the same type and compare the differences between them via an action button, highlighting the changes for easier review.

Hey,we are happily using FigJam for our Scrum retros for quite a while now.I thought about also using FigJam for Planning Poker, it would be super cool if there would be an widget or similar to it.Rough requirements about the functionality:User is able to drop planning poker widjet into a FigJam file User is able to add a topic/item/user story that can be voted on User is able to set an item to “to be voted on” All Users on the board are able to vote on the “to be voted on” item An simple text input would be sufficient, but using pre-configured decks (like Fibonacci sequence, t-shirt sizes, etc.) would be very helpful After all users have voted, the summary of the votes is displayed and item status is set to “vote completed” Using numbers: Average Using strings (like t-shirt sizes): Frequency of given vote options User is able to set an item in status “vote completed” to “finished” (to remove it from the topic/item list) Kind regards,Vlad

If you right-click on an object in FigJam and choose “Export selection…” the exported PNG or JPG image includes are large empty space around the object. Is this intentional? In my use so far it has been unwanted extra space that I need to trim with Figma or another app.

I'm honestly furious. The new design is simply bad and they are forcing it on us.Basic tasks now take more clicks, which slows us down. The bar underneath is distracting, and I can't understand why every single thing in the panel needs a different background color or a stroke. It's visually overwhelming and makes it harder to focus and find what I need. The interface feels cluttered and inefficient. It's honestly ironic—and disappointing—that a UX/UI tool is creating such usability problems.What is this? Actions that were previously accessible at the top are now crammed awkwardly into the top of the side panel—because apparently the panel was too clean before? For some reason, position and dimensions are now separated, adding more friction to simple tasks. And then there’s the action bar... at the bottom?Seriously? We read from top to bottom. We work from top to bottom. Putting key actions at the bottom—where they overlap the workspace—goes against the most basic UX principles. It’s di

Is it possible to embed a youtube video into Figma Slides?

I want to go back to UI1. I want to go back to the most original!The sidebar layout of UI3 and the move of the top tools to the bottom both make me very uncomfortable.Is the person who designed the figma interface a designer? Don't you know how important a larger space is to designers? Why is it annoying to have a buoy at the bottom? Just for the sake of looking good?When using figma, I mostly implement designs within web pages, so I hardly look at the top web page tags. Similarly, I also ignore the top tool navigation of figma.Now it's fine. Not only do I have no top space, but the bottom space has also been reduced.If figma were to force a change in users' habits, I would have to leave figma and use other design tools that make me comfortable.

Hi- enable move and hide toolbar as it is disturbing for many designers- enable different color theme for righ and left panels, and a choise of more scales of grey, as it is in PS

I use keyboard shortcuts (as I’m sure most “power users” do), so I don’t need the toolbar for anything. Now it’s just blocking valuable visible area. Please add an option to hide it. I know I’m not alone, because there’s already even a Chrome extension that does this. (How to Hide Figma Toolbar (Bottom) in the new UI3 - SaaS Design) Unfortunately that doesn’t help in the desktop app.

 Aannotation should have a dedicated panel, similar to the comments panel, where all annotations can be viewed and managed more easily.Some context about our team: we use annotations not only for design notes, but also to indicate where event tracking should be implemented. Currently, annotations are too subtle on the canvas, making it difficult for engineers to quickly locate them. This impacts communication and slows down development.

1. When I open a file in the community in the figma application, and then try to go back, the preserve scroll position does not work, and every time I need to scroll from the very beginning2. When I open a plugin in a file by clicking on opening a plugin through the community, the community tab automatically disappears from the tab panel at the top, the only way to go to this file in the community is to click on the community tab in the window of the plugin opened in the file, but then I go to the file again, and I can no longer return back to the list of what I am looking for

It bothers me going back & forth between my mac & my iPad when making figjam boards, mainly because the full desktop version has the ability to create & view projects, while the iPad version is restricted to recents, drafts, or stars, without organizing any boards in projects. Please add the ability to organize & view projects on the iPad as well, thanks!

 We have non-visual team members who are unable to fully participate in the process. Although an accessible navigable version has been released, it currently reads only “links” and does not allow adjustments to specify elements as buttons, for example.To ensure a fully accessible experience, our components should include a dedicated area in their original specifications for defining the correct accessibility roles and attributes. This allows screen readers to navigate the entire screen — not just elements anchored in the HTML.

My team designs complex, data-dense UIs—absolutely packed with text layers. It’s wild.We’re typically subject matter experts in our business area, but our job is to craft narratives that stakeholders can actually follow. To do that, we rely heavily on our PM partners to tell us how to label charts, buttons, lists—you name it—to help sell the concept.So why should viewers be able to edit text directly?Simple: efficiency. Instead of waiting on a PM or stakeholder to respond to a comment with the right copy—then having to copy/paste it into the right layer—just let the person with the right info update it themselves. Asynchronously. This would save us a ton of time during implementation and eliminate the endless back-and-forth over wording.Thanks

I love Figma and have enjoyed used it since the very beginning. It has come on leaps and bounds since since its early days. However, one pain point that continues to frustrate me is the decimal resizing issue, as detailed here almost exactly four years ago - https://spectrum.chat/figma/general/how-to-prevent-decimal-pixels~a6007961-7415-4c1e-9430-7e420491c446 Despite all the other fantastic enhancements in the platform, it is disappointing that this core issue is still present. Even in the latest Playground file (produced by your own team) outlining the latest ‘Copy & Paste’ advancements, you can see the problem firsthand, as per the screenshot below. FAO @Figma & @Figma_Support. Please can I ask that you look at this as a matter of priority. I am sure I am not the only one wasting crucial time, painfully and manually, checking and resizing everything back to integer values. Thank you.

I change my section background color to 10% black. The layer labels are barely visible requiring me to create my own labels so partners know what layers I’m referencing. Is there a way to set the default label color so it is visible? I would add a screenshot but you can’t see anything. Doh!Alternatively, is there a way for Figma to auto detect the background color and set the label text so it passes accessibility contrast ratios? Seems like an accessibility bug.

Why should I continue to be a customer when you, Figma, will just do whatever you like with my workflow? Why would I trust you to do what’s best for me and my JOB when you make changes like this? When you make a tool that people rely on for their livelihoods, they really don’t like it when you fuck around with it for your shitty business reasons. Stop making it your customers problem that you feel the need to staple new bullshit into an already over stuffed tool.“You’ll get used to it” is a really shitty business model to force your your customers in to. All your telling me is I need to find an alternative ASAP so I don’t get locked into an Adobe like ecosystem and business model again. I won’t be renewing our contract with you.

I would love to have a higher contrast theme for Figma’s UI. It has long been a minor annoyance to me that a tool I use to create accessible designs doesn’t itself meet minimum accessibility requirements. However I’m now at a point where it’s actively impeding my own workflows. I’m currently going over hand-off-ready designs to make sure they use variables in all their autolayouts. The distinction between pixel inputs that have variables assigned to them and those that don’t is unfortunately abysmal, making the work very strenuous when it doesn’t need to be. The little raised/sunken area and border around the value isn’t anywhere near WCAG contrast recommendations in either theme. There are plenty of other instances throughout the UI where I feel aesthetics have been prioritised over accessibility and that would benefit from an accessibility audit, but a higher contrast theme would be an excellent start.