Share Your Thoughts

Currently, when working in Libraries, Figma picks up changes and in the modal to Publish, you are basically forced to Publish any changes that Figma picks up. There’s no way to “reject” those changes. This adds a layer of complexity because Figma doesn’t say how things got changed, it just says that something changed. So often times, we’re not sure why Figma is saying it got changed when visually things look the same. We also keep our editor list rather small but it happens often where I log in the morning, see there are changes, ask the team did anyone make changes, and they all say no they didn’t do anything. From that point on, there’s nothing to do but publish those changes which has negative downstream effects to our entire design org who uses our libraries. They see that they need to update their libraries but for no good reason. We do add comments when we publish so we have to say stuff like nothing actually changed, Figma is just picking up changes when there are none

It looks like impossible to change the gradient direction?  the gradient is popping over where i have to drag it from and i can’t find out how to change it 

The comments feature is very handy amongst the colleagues. It would be nice if the comments bubbles would stick to the object instead of sticking to the position within the frame. Since we are moving stuff around ( adding or subtracting elements ) the comments made should stick to the proper parts of the design. Otherwise, when we move things around, the comments don’t make sense anymore because they do not relate to the object’s new position.

can we have option to switch from desktop, tablet and mobile when prototyping from figma design, similar to figma sites 

Just putting this suggestion here for the ability to indicate what symbol / value to add to the end of truncated text instead of just the ellipsis (...)Technically there is support for this in code via the text-overflow CSS property, so it might be good to also bring that functionality within Figma Design.Additionally, hoping it could also be possible to change the way text is truncated, where we wouldn't be limited to just text lines, and have the ability to switch to set the truncation via number of characters in the text layer.

 안녕하세요. 초보자가 “MAKE”에서 웹을 개발하다 보면 너무나 많은 버전 히스토리로 인해 웹페이지 로딩이 느려지고 있습니다. 이미 FIGMA 팀의 도움을 한번 받은적이 있는데,앞으로 자주 사용하다 보면 매번 FIGMA 팀에 도움을 요청하기가 부담스러울것 같기도 하고,시간적인 소요도 제법 있는것 같습니다. 사용자가 스스로 버전 히스토리를 삭제 할수 있는 기능을 구현하는건 어떨까요?

Is it possible to add comments in Figma, I shared the prototype to few folks wondering if there is a comment feature.

Hello,We currently are creating annotations utilizing the native Figma annotations tool, but we also need to recreate the annotations to create a format that we can export to pdf for client review and approval. If we could make it possible to turn on Annotations and have them visible along with the frame elements, so they could be proofed by others not within Figma that could be exported as a hard copy, that would be an amazing feature. Currently we need to move them every time the layout shifts. It isn’t very user friendly.

Lately, I’ve been trying out asking Make’s model for design feedback and collaborate on ideas, BEFORE I want to make actual (code) changes. This is a good workflow people use with more experience with prompting.Unfortunately, I’ve noticed that when I ask it to “not make any changes” because I’m asking for ideas first, it just gets stuck on “Reasoning...” 😅 💡 Proposed solutionHaving a Chat Mode that can be toggled, similar to Lovable, would probably be a nice user-friendly way to provide this type of functionality, without having to prompt for it.

Kind of what this says really. Figma Make is a brilliant tool even in Beta.I have a workflow of taking screenshots from Make and putting them into FigJam and sketching over them with my iPad, so it would be great to have the copy to PNG function that exists across the other products (even if it was an interface button). It’s also useful when needing to paste a screen back into the chat to provide feedback.In terms of working with Cursor it has great conversion of images. Ideally there needs to be a way to export all screens (or a selection) to an image folder. At the moment it’s painful having to take screenshots and then deal with the external organisation of these. Exports should have some form of naming logic too (date, time, screen, etc...)

I’ve been playing around with converting figjam notes into slides. Would be great if Figjam could talk to the custom templates. For example, a sticky labeled insight #1 should use the Insight slide format from this Custom Template

It looks like there’s only one input field in the settings to set the language, and there isn’t a button to add multilingual variants. What should I do to create a variant in another language? Or can I handle it another way by directing to different URLs? For example, I want users with their system language set to English to open mydomain.com, and Spanish-speaking users to open mydomain.com/es.

It is unfortunate that the ability to export assets is tied to the ability to copy code. My developers need to be able to copy code from my mocks in dev mode but it would be best to be able to separately NOT allow asset export to force development to pull the assets from our internal repository.

Right now, overlays in prototypes only work if the trigger and the overlay frame exist on the same page. This creates big limitations for real-world workflows: Many teams work with a WIP page for ongoing design and a Presentation page for final client delivery. Moving frames between pages breaks all prototype connections. Centralizing overlays in a dedicated page is not possible, since prototype actions cannot target frames outside the current page. This forces designers to duplicate overlays on every page, which is error-prone and makes maintenance harder. 👉 Feature request: Please allow prototype links (including overlays) to reference frames across pages, with persistent connections that don’t break when moving components or screens between pages.This would massively improve scalability for large prototypes and save hours of re-wiring interactions every ti

So, in our design system we want to apply variables to our text styles to ensure consistent letter spacing. Since we want to use different letter spacing depending on the mode (light mode/dark mode), we’d like to apply these variables to the text style and assign different values to them.However, as Figma uses percentages for letter spacing, it’s not really possible to achieve this properly. Variables can’t hold percentages, and therefore we can’t fully make use of this feature at the moment.I hope Figma will soon allow us to choose the format we want to use for letter spacing globally.Does anyone have a solution for this problem?

Publishing and updating has become more specific and more powerful (I think) with each update. It also has become more cumbersome equally with each update. We publish/update every 2 minutes if we’re unlucky and that takes a lot of clicks currently. Go to the right tab in the library, open the publish, pick what to publish, avoid the extremely subtle “Make” banner, click the right button, etc. etc. etc.. Updating is the same.So I would love to just have a magic button that does it all for me on the highest level. Although I’m sure there are plenty of edge cases where this idea might fail, but for me it would be great to click the magic button and having it publish all tabs that are open, have changes and are a library. At the same time, update all open tabs that use one of these libraries.Food for thought?

When I write create long paragraphs with text tool on the Figma I get the unnecessary spaces on edges of the paragraph like below. But I think if there a hyphenation feature (like Adobe Photoshop) it could add dashes automatically on the texts and fix this issue.

It’s a kind of missing feature that breaks a bit the productivity and in my case creates frustration :( It would be nice to add an extra “+” on the edges of a selected column/row to add a new one just on the side.Thank you for reading! 

It would be great to have an AI model integrated into Figma’s comment feature. For instance, when someone comments on a design, the AI could generate a draft version based on that feedback. This would help designers better understand the intent behind the comments and refine the final design more effectively, rather than relying solely on written notes.

ProblemWhen designing social media content, each platform (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, etc.) has its own formats, rules, and algorithms. Currently, Figma Buzz does not allow us to manage multiple platform variants within the same project. For example, if I create a Facebook post, I cannot place an Instagram version of the same post side by side.This forces designers and social media managers to create separate files or pages for each platform, which complicates project organization and slows down client reviews.Proposed SolutionAdd a cross-platform management feature in Figma Buzz that allows users to: Create multiple platform-specific layers or variants for a single publication. Keep all related assets grouped together within the same project. Easily toggle between different platform previews to ensure compliance with s

ProblemWhen working on long-term social media strategies, we need to create both visuals and the accompanying copy. Currently, Figma Buzz focuses on visuals, but there’s no dedicated space to add or manage related text content. This forces us to switch between multiple tools or documents, which increases the risk of losing information and slows down the workflow.Proposed SolutionIntroduce a dedicated text area within Figma Buzz, similar to the text blocks available in Figma Slides. This would allow us to write, edit, and organize copy directly alongside the visuals.Why This Would Be Useful Centralizes all content (visual + copy) in one place Makes collaboration and client approvals easier Reduces context switching between tools Minimizes the risk of missing key information

I need to create a pdf that can be edited in Acrobat Reader. In other words, when I open the pdf, it recognises the text boxes and other elements and lets me change them as necessary. I can do this by exporting pdfs from other softwares, like photoshop, illustrator and powerpoint, but I can’t do it by exporting from Figma. does anyone have any idea if this is possible?

Great to see the addition of dividers. Would really love the ability to add a name for each divider, because this still doesn’t solve the issue where we need to create an empty page titled “{Section Name}” to call out what the divider is actually dividing.

I was very excited to hear that grids were coming to Figma. CSS Grid was introduced years ago and brought with it many things that flexbox was incapable of doing, so I was hoping for a similar level of new capabilities here, and I genuinely cannot believe that this feature is being shipped in its current state (even as a ‘beta’). This is a very long post, but I feel like this feature has been implemented so poorly that it legitimately sows doubt in Figma’s capabilities to deliver features in the future.Inability to ‘hug’ contents Both rows and grids themselves are unable to resize themselves to match their contents (‘Hug”). Row heights must be either “Auto” (1fr) or a fixed height, meaning that if you want your rows to be sized per their elements, you’ve now manually defined each row height in px (not even a variable value), and instead of getting a clean CSS output, now you have however many rows defined in exact values, destr

As a QA Engineer, I am working with Mind Maps that have large number of nodes and Due to the Collaborate-Friendly feature in Figma, I have moved to Figma from other Classical Mind Map creation tools like Xmind. But, I have observed that there is no way to import mind maps to the FigJam boards using other mind map formats. In tools like Xmind, it has the capability to import mind maps from;Other Mind Map formats: “*.mmap, *.mm,  *.lighten, *.mindnode, *.emmx, *.itmz...etc” Makdown Files OPML Files TextBundle Word(DOCX) etcSo, it would be really great to have that feature in Figma so it would really help for the ones who are willing to migrate their old Mind Maps to Figma(For Both Individual and Enterprise users).Moreover, it is really nice to have the “Outline” view for the Figma Mind Maps. Therefore the users can get a Hierarchical view on the Mind Maps and also to easily export the Mind Map to a format like