Share Your Thoughts

Been testing out the Figma Agent using component library and have found it sometimes uses slots ok and often times bombs. I asked it what the problem was and got this response to pass along...it’s one of 3 patterns of problems the agent encountered. Pattern 1 — Slot-based composition not supported as JSX children (20 of 33 failures)This is the biggest issue. The design agent tried to nest child components inside container components via JSX children:jsx code<ComponentBox2 hasHeader={true} boxHeader={{heading:"Staff Info"}}>  <ComponentDescriptionList3 mode="vertical" numOfPairs="4" .../>  ← REJECTED</ComponentBox2>But Library's Box uses a SLOT property (Content#20610:16) for its content area — the guidelines say "Append children directly to the SLOT node." The JSX renderer doesn't support passing components as children into slot-based containers. This affects every Box (6 failures) and every Tile (9 failures in v1). The preferred slot values are correctly defined (Des

In our organization we use Figma on an Enterprise plan, and we manage a large number of users coming from a broader international company structure. When users request a paid seat (Full, Dev, or Viewer with collaboration), they can currently add a note for the admin, which is helpful on their side.What is missing for us is the reverse: a way for admins to show a short configurable message to the requester at the moment they ask for a seat. This message could: Indicate who to contact (e.g. a specific Microsoft Teams channel or an email address for our design tooling team). Provide a short checklist of what to verify before sending the request (correct account, correct workspace, business justification, cost center, manager approval, etc.). Clarify how the approval flow works in a large enterprise context (for example, “Your request will only be processed after you or your manager contact us on Teams with X/Y info”). Because of the size of our company, we get a high volume of seat re

Gap in auto layout can either be set to a variable of auto. Setting the gap to auto and then adding a min gap and max gap would be helpful to make a powerful responsiveness. Is there a way we can do it? Or is it something it would be helpful in Figma?

When you open and browse community files they open in your “drafts”. I want to be able to just see the drafts that I have created from scratch so i can go ahead and delete or move them as needed.

Individually clicking and resolving each comment is tedious. It would be useful to highlight multiple comments and use a right-click menu option to “bulk resolve.” This would save significant time.

I’d like to suggest that when multiple people are invited to a Figma project, with the power to make edits, whatever each person works on should have them printed on it, not just while they are in the canvas, but up till when they are not active. Kind of what happens in GitHub when someone makes changes to a repository. If there’s some clarification needed, whoever made the change(s) can be easily identified and called out.

As an UX designer, I often need to get my wireframes into device mockups to showcase them into a presentation deck for clients led by our sales teams. To do so, I like to screengrab the prototype view because it’s already inside a device mockup. I’d like to be able to export the prototype view in the same way as we can export frames in the design view. This way, I’d save time by not having to take screenshots, build device mockups, and resize them so that they’re all the same size when presenting multiple screens side by side. Similarly, being able to export a gif or other video format of a prototype in action will be brilliant. Right now, I need to record my screen while I’m demoing the prototype and then convert it to a gif so I can insert it into my google slides.

Feature Request: Lightweight personal plan & pay-as-you-go pricing for Figma Agents I am an independent designer working alone, only using Drafts files without team collaboration. Currently, to access Figma Agents, I have to purchase a full Professional team seat, which is too costly for solo users. My requests: 1. Launch an independent personal lightweight plan for individual designers. 2. Provide pay-as-you-go billing for AI Agents, so users only pay for the amount we use, instead of being forced to subscribe to a full team seat. 3. Allow Agents access for personal use without mandatory team subscriptions. Many freelance designers have the same demand. Hope Figma can consider optimizing the pricing model for solo creators.

Since Figma Slides already support exporting .pptx file, adding support for export keynote file will be nice, as apple keynote is also a popular option for designers to presenting their works.

 "Make an image" can’t generate images in different aspect ratios, like 16:9, 4:3, vertical formats and more. It only outputs 1:1 square images by default.Even when requesting other ratios, outputs are inaccurate with large deviations, which is really inconvenient.Freely selectable and correctly matched image ratios are urgently needed for "Make an image".If there’s any existing workaround to generate images at the desired aspect ratio, please share it. Thanks!

Is there a way to add ‘Match Size’ when using the Paste to Replace function? (CMD+Shift+R) I have tried a few plugins, but Paste to Replace is more smooth and quick.

I have searched the community and Google for an answer to this question, but I have not been able to find one. Perhaps there is no answer. I have found a plugin that supports this functionality, but it does not add the frames to the FRAME panel. For example, I am working with different Zebra devices that have different DPs. As a result, most of the frames do not work. I would like to know if I can create my own frames and have them appear in the frame list so that my organization can see and use them as well. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Playback behavior can’t be controlled from the component. There is currently no way to configure an animation to play only once and remain on its final keyframe instead of looping or resetting. The playback duration of an animated component nested inside another frame depends on the parent’s timeline. If another animation within the parent frame has a longer duration, the nested component must wait until the parent’s entire animation cycle is complete before it can play again. This makes it impossible for nested animations to run independently.Some possible solutions 🤗 ✅   Allow loop behavior to be configured at the component level. Add options such as Play once, Loop, and Stay on the last keyframe so the playback behavior can be controlled independently for each animated component. Decouple nested component timelines from their parent timeline. Allow animated components inside other frames to run on their own playback cycle, regardless of the parent’s duration, so each animation

I’d like to insert an image into a cell in a table in FigJam so that it moves with the table as it expands and changes size. Currently, I’m just having to drag pictures around with the table as it expands which is fine for one or two images but I have many!

As an interaction designer working on a design system, I would love to have pre-defined animation defined as library to share with rest of the team. This feature will enable a shared motion language and guarantee that all prototypes and animation are aligned with design system guidelines.In Figma Motion already exist preset animation with semantic names, so I know this is possible. However, I can’t find a way to create my own animation presets.If this is possible can someone guide me on how to do it? If not, I would love to suggest this as a new feature.

Currently when reviewing changes, there’s a “resolve all” option that applies to all pages and all changes on each page. However, it would be really great to be able to resolve for all changes on a single page because I might have 2 pages that I made branch edits on, and 17 pages that should maintain the Main file edits. Currently you have to manually select for every change on every page, if you can’t resolve 100% for branch or for main. Which is crazy. Going even a step further, within a page it would even be helpful to be able to select multiple changes and resolve those as a group, speeding up the 1x1 process but giving more fidelity than a “resolve all”. In general I find the UI of the resolve and merge somewhat confusing, and the new designers on my team who are using branches for the first time have come to me with questions about how the heck this works, and for help to make sure they won’t mess anything up when merging. I think this speaks to the fact that it’s fairly hard to

I need z-axis keyframing ability to do animations in FigMotion. Currently I don’t see any work around to bring things forward or to send backward without duplicating and plating around with opacity which feels tedious to do. 

The core ask — that plugin UI authoring should be able to leverage Make/code layers for faster visual iteration, and that the two systems should talk to each other — is solid feedback worth surfacing.Agents take:Sorry, I'm not able to create interactivity or work with code layers yet. To add interactivity, try using Figma Make.I can't send the plugin build to Make — those are separate systems. But I can keep refining the plugin UI directly. If you tell me exactly what's off (spacing, sizing, colors, alignment), I can make precise CSS fixes. Would you like to continue that way? 

We need a way to sum up total amount of credits used in a single file for finance reasons. There are over 200+ versions on a Make file, and we won’t want to do our calculation manually.

Reopening this topic as it was the closest topic I found on this was closed a while ago.I’m wondering how the community is going around not having this feature in Project folders? I agree that having that level of organization in Projects helps a lot to keep clear paths to past work without the need to Archiving. Any recomendations on how you address this while Figma doesn’t have this feature available more than welcome! And happy to provide more insight if the ask isn’t clear. 

When prompting the Figma Agent in the chat, all I can see is the spinner while it is working on it. It provokes doubt when I am designing because I’m not sure what changes it is making. When I can see reasoning traces or even the agent actively editing my design I feel like I have more control over it and it would be nice if I can stop it in the middle of its work and tell it what it is doing wrong (an immediate popup for this would be nice). On top of that I would like the Figma Agent to ask questions (similar to coding agents) if it needs clarification on specific design details.

...

I’m trying to localize an app using the new variables feature but it looks like I can’t add break lines to the string. For titles, especially in some languages like Japanese where there are no spaces, it is totally necessary. Is this planned for the near future?

Unless I’m missing something it’s not possible to use the Find tool to search for text within a specific selected frame, you can only search an entire page.