Share Your Feedback

No matter how hard I try, when I want to search for an asset, I forget that I have to switch to the asset tab first. I always have to X out of my search and switch back to the asset tab, then search again. It would be helpful to add Assets to the “This page/all pages” filter list.To me it’s confusing that the search icon is in line with both the File and Assets tab when you are on the File tab. This implies I can search both.When you switch to the Assets tab, the search bar is below which implies you only search in assets.

Hey everyone! 👋While working on multiple Figma files and projects recently, I had a thought:Wouldn't it be amazing if Figma allowed us to group open tabs – just like how Google Chrome lets you group browser tabs?Think about it: You’re juggling 10+ Figma files – components, design systems, live projects, brainstorm boards, etc. Having the ability to visually group tabs by project, workflow stage, or type (e.g., assets, prototypes) would massively boost productivity and reduce visual clutter. Maybe even color-code them or collapse/expand tab groups? 🔥 This small feature could make a huge difference for designers, especially in larger teams or during fast-paced sprints.  🗣️ Let’s Discuss: Do you also feel overwhelmed by too many open tabs in Figma? How would tab grouping improve your workflow?

Might there be scope to prioritize the development of a Chinese-language version of Figma? Such a localization initiative would not only streamline operations for Chinese-speaking users but also significantly augment productivity across our team. I trust this proposal warrants consideration, as it aligns with the goal of fostering a more inclusive and efficient design ecosystem.

When I am building a flow chart in figjam, I use different shapes for different reasons (this is a common pattern in flowcharts, like the cylinder shape represents a database). I notice that when I select a shape, the next time I want to select one the shape has moved to the top of the list. It seems that they are ordered by how often I use each one. This is super inconvenient, because it makes it difficult to know where to select each shape:(a) I can’t even visually categorize the shapes (if I’m looking for a cylinder, I’d expect all cylinder options to be listed together) (b) I can’t find the option I just selected, because it’s now moved based on how often I’ve used it. 

Dear Figma (Yuhki Yamashita)I have a few suggestions on how to make Figma better for non-designers. These are not advanced AI-based automated UI design features, but rather basic improvements to enhance the user experience of a tool that is the source of truth for some of the best user interfaces designed in the world.1. Consumption View: Create a user-friendly view for non-coders and non-designers, such as PMs, Marketing, and Leadership. The current experience feels like being in an airplane cockpit with controls at all four edges of the screen.2. Easier Exploration: Finding specific explorations can be tedious. Implementing a built-in categorization of pages into three categories—Ready, Explorations, and Storyboard—will reduce variabili

Using figma as a developer since 2021 also managing the billing on behalf of the company. The payment require for devs is stupid idea. Get payment for designing thats fine but why for devs? It does not make sense! Time to move on!

When using the grid, it would be helpful if we could change the color of the strokes or fills per row or column. other wise we can not control if the horizontal lines are different color than vertical

I love the radial repeat tool! Please consider including this feature in the Figma Design interface, it is a disjointed experience to have to switch to Draw to access this specific feature. Thank you.

The contrast checker is wrong as far as I can see.  I checked the same colour on the same background in the same element and got 2 different reading. One said pass and one said fail and the pass was 3.29:1 when a pass should be 4.5:1   

I absolutely cannot believe it’s not as easy as selecting the prototype wire and then grabbing the origin circle and moving it to another element, just like you can do with the destination (arrowhead).Please give me a use case where it’s more common for users to want to create another interaction of the same element going to a different destination than it is for a user to rewire an origin point.The only use case that springs to mind is when wiring up internal component variations, but I always do that via the Interactions palette and select the variation from the pull-down menu rather than manually drag the connections. Maybe I’m not the average user here, but it seems like Figma could have easily reimagined their wiring UI to facilitate changing the origin. Like make that the default behaviour and then add Opt/Alt to create a new wire from the same origin.

...

I’ve been loving Slides for getting quick user feedback. However, it looks like the Poll and Alignment widgets may preview what other audience members have voted when you hover over options. Would it be possible to hide responses from other voters until they are revealed by the presenter to reduce bias?

I see that the Code Connect feature is currently only available in the Enterprise or Organization plans, which only support annual billing. This is quite a significant expense for my team. I need to be cautious before committing to this feature without experiencing it first. Could I request a trial opportunity before paying for it? Additionally, is there any plan to include this feature in the Professional Team package? Thank very much~

I wanted to delete and recreate a post that I accidentally created as a “Question” when I wanted to create is as a “Conversation”, but I realized I can’t delete the post because there is no delete button anywhere.

When I try to duplicate a variable, the "Delete" and "Duplicate" buttons are placed next to each other and look identical , I often miss and accidentally delete it… ( 

Hi Figma Team,I love using Figma – it’s an incredibly powerful tool for design collaboration. However, I noticed that once a user sets a profile picture, there’s no option to remove it and revert to the default avatar. Currently, the only options are to change the picture, but not delete it entirely.It would be great if you could consider adding a “remove” or “delete” option, so users have the flexibility to go back to the default avatar if they wish.Thanks for your amazing work, and looking forward to future improvements!

Hello, I know some of you already submitted feedback regarding Figma Grid in Beta and I share the same frustrations regarding rows and columns attribution/organization and size management. Would be great to be able to just select a grid’s column or row or multiple and handle bulk edit. Removing rows and columns are really a pain. I have another issue and wanted to see if it’s a shared one? If I remove a content from a grid cell, or if I move some around and then decide to undo what I’ve done with ctrl +z, I have no history of what has been done in the cell, it’s gone :(. Does it happen to you guys also? 

I was editing some screens and Fimga just popped me to the home screen and showed me an advertisement for their new AI. This was so disruptive and disrespectful to the task I was trying to do. And it made me SO angry that I had to spend the time writing this feedback--and now I have to get back to WHAT I WAS TRYING TO DO IN THE FIRST PLACE. 

Maybe I’m missing something (and I know it’s in beta right now so I’ll manage my expectations accordingly), but it doesn’t seem like you can set a min/max on a container with the new grid auto layout option? It seems like such an odd decision to intentionally remove it for no good reason (that I can see) I wanted to ask and see if everyone else is missing this or if it’s just me?              

Screenshot from Figma's right panel, focusing on "Go to main component in library" under a component  When using components in my team, I often missclick this link under the instance selector dropdown. Working with my library closed consumes less memory, so that's why I do it - but everytime I hit that button it opens my library and takes me away from the file I'm working on.I work with low DPI (650), so I feel like that my issue isn't about not being able to hit the instance dropdown, but rather the proximity of the click area of the elements.Does anyone feel the same?

Opening and using Figma is no longer joy for me. I only open it out of necessity to fulfill work requirements. While it's commendable that so much quality products are built fast and announced during config, most of them seems useless in real-world. From a world-class company like Figma, I'd expect something like a Cursor IDE that I can enjoy using daily

It was brought up a while ago, but, I think it still makes sense for new frames to have Auto Layout enabled by default. Without it, the development paradigm is “everything is `position: absolute`” and pulled out of document flow. Yes, native (iOS, Android) paradigms approach layout by adding flow but I think Figma is far and away used more for web design.

Hey, Figma team! You're great guys. But could you please allow us to right click the Main Component in a Library, and there's the option, something like "See all instances of this component" so we could see the list of all designs, where this components have been used? Just like we have Right Click > Go to Main component. Like this, but vice versa. In my company there are 50+ pages of designs. And few times a week i need to use some nice component from our enormously huge (like my penis) Component Library. But i don't know how. I want to see examples - how it has been used earlier?So here's what i often do: i screenshot it and post it in our slack and ask if anybody knows how to use that. And if i'm lucky enough, some colleague will answer.I believe it's not the most convenient way.

I noticed with the new update that the GAP and PADDING input nearly look identical. I constantly click on the wrong input to add spacing between a component.

In UI2, when you needed to add a property to a text component there was a button for it just next to a text field, so you when you use variants the text will be easy to change.For some reason someone thought that putting that function under “Apply variables” button (with variant icon) and adding extra steps to access this function will be SO user friendly and so much better. As a software for UX designers, have you even tested it on various UX designers?When you read the amount of complains for new UI update, maybe it’s something you should consider to make your customers satisfy? At least bring back the option to bring back the old UI!