Get Solutions

Hi,we are running into a serious issue with slots in our design system.Our setup is this: we create and maintain our components in a shared library file, which represents our design system. These components are then used as instances in separate design/view files. Many of our components rely heavily on slots for flexible content areas.The problem: when we publish changes to the design system library and update them in the view file, the slots inside the component instances are not updated correctly. For example, variable assignments such as spacing or padding values are not applied to the existing slot content (instances inside).The only workaround we currently have is to fully reset the slots in the instances. But this removes the custom content every time, which makes the workflow unusable for real product work.This is critical for us because our entire design system is built around slots. It used to work more reliably, but in the current state it is basically unusable.This seems rel

I’ve been working on a plugin with the new AI generated plugins functionality. After testing, I want it published so people in my team can also test it but I can’t do it because I keep receiving errors all the time:“Something went wrong!, Please try again, or report this file to the Figma team for support. An error occurred. Please try again”That’s what I receive all the time.How can I solve it? 

I love the idea of figma motion and can see it working in my setup, but the lack of audio is a huge miss for animated with timing and sound. I am sure there is a plan, but do you have any info as to when audio will be introduced? FYI - I tried making a plugin using the agent and it said no to me. :)Thanks in advance!Dan

Hello,I’m following up regarding our account, which has been suspended due to a billing issue. We have already contacted Support but unfortunately haven’t received a response yet.This is quite urgent for us, as we have several client files and projects that we need to access and work on as soon as possible. We would really appreciate your help in resolving this issue, and we are happy to make any necessary payment immediately.Could you please let us know how we can proceed, or help us get the account reactivated as soon as possible?

I am not sure why the organization has suddenly become inaccessible. If there are any unpaid invoices, please email the bill to me. Thank you.

I've created a nice container-component that has a slot. It consists of a parent (height fixed) and a child (height fill). Whenever I add an extra component to the slot, the slot jumps to height fixed, but I can't think of any reason why that's necessary or desired. I now have to manually reset it to fill, which is not helping with productivity. What I want is that the slot just keeps the set height property as is defined in the container-component, because that was my intent in the first place. I could only find an old closed post about it that seems related, but closed:  

My laptop is snapdragon x elite based laptop and whenever I apply any shader it is not showing how to fix that  

SummaryIn a horizontal Auto Layout frame with two Fill children (layoutGrow: 1), when one child's min-width exceeds the equal share of available space, the layout engine fails to redistribute remaining space. The other child falls back to its content width instead of filling the remaining space, leaving an unallocated gap.Reproduction StepsCreate a horizontal Auto Layout frame (no gap, no padding) Add two child frames, both set to Fill container (layoutGrow: 1) Set child A's min-width to 80px, child B's min-width to 160px Add text content inside each child (with 8px padding) Resize the parent frame to various widths and observeSetup (common across all cases)Both children: Fill container, layoutGrow: 1 Child A: min-width: 80 Child B: min-width: 160 Parent: Horizontal Auto Layout, gap: 0, stroke: 1px OUTSIDE (included in layout) Child A content width: ~122px (text + padding)ResultsAnalysisThe bug occurs only when the equal share falls between the two min-width values (80 < equal share

Previously, when I created my Make file, it had a Pages feature that allowed me to jump to the pages I wanted.I went on vacation, and now it doesn't work anymore.When I click on "Enable Pages," it pastes a prompt into the agent, and AI tells that the feature is already implemented, but it doesn't actually work. It also consumes a lot of tokens. 😡And after I told it that the feature doesn't work, this was the reasoning: Ah, I understand now! When the user clicks "Enable pages" in the Figma Make UI, it automatically sends the prompt "Let's enable pages for my project. Ask me questions to clarify my goals or suggest options, then create or update pages and enable routing as needed." to Claude. This is a built-in Figma Make feature/skill that triggers this specific prompt.So the issue is that Figma Make's "Enable pages" feature is a specific platform feature that works differently from what I've been trying to do. The platform is reverting my __figma__entrypoint__.ts changes back to just

Hi Figma team/community, We’re experiencing an issue with components from our design system library. We have a central Figma file called “Voyatek Design System”, which contains our components and nested components. These components are published as a library and are being used across multiple product files, including ITS, TPP, and ADMIN. The issue is specifically happening in the ITS file: • When we bring a component from the Voyatek Design System library into the ITS file, the component resets itself. • The nested components within that component also reset to their default/library state. • This causes the customizations and overrides we’ve made in the consuming file to be lost or reverted. • The same components are working correctly in the other files (TPP and ADMIN). • The ITS file is currently a branch, which may be relevant to the issue. We would like to understand why the component instances and their nested components are resetting specifically in the ITS file and how we can pre

Figma Support,I need a concrete resolution to this billing issue, not another link to the standard cancellation instructions.I previously paid for Figma and switched back to the free plan. I am using Figma as an individual, do not have a paid team, and my current plan is explicitly shown as FREE / Starter.Despite this, on September 3, 2026, I received a card authorization notification for USD 15.96 from FIGMA.I have already followed Figma’s published cancellation instructions. They do not resolve the problem: the interface shows that I am a free user, and there is NO “Cancel plan” button or active paid subscription available for me to cancel.How am I supposed to stop recurring billing when Figma shows me a free plan and provides no cancellation control?This is unacceptable. Users should not have to search through inaccessible or nonexistent billing menus to stop charges.I am not requesting a refund for this particular amount. I am explicitly requesting that Figma: Investigate and ident

I've finished a plugin and I'm ready to publish it as paid, but the Price field on thefinal publish screen is disabled and cannot be clicked.1. I'm publishing as an individual creator (Taisui Labs), not a team or organization.2. The file is in my personal Drafts, not in a team folder.3. Plugin ID: 1675716590491497495. Plan: Starter (free). Country: Malaysia.4. Malaysia is listed in Figma's supported creator payout countries.I'm aware of the pause on new paid sellers, but Tom Reem clarified on 3 August 2026 inthis forum that it applies to paid files only: "The pause on new sellers applies to paidfiles. Selling plugins is open — the only requirement is being able to set up a Stripeaccount in a Stripe-supported country."In that same thread, Platform Support completed the setup for the creator by email.Could you do the same for my account so I can set a price?

When the MCP server in Figma Desktop (macOS) is on, the MCP panel (shown in Dev Mode for a selected node) has a setup button with two lines and two circles, and tooltip “Open set up modal” which shows a popup where I can turn off the MCP server “Enabled” toggle or configure the Image source.If I toggle off the Enabled option, the setup button disappears from the panel entirely, and if I closed the modal, the only way to turn the MCP server back on is to search the Actions commands palette for Enable desktop MCP Server.I hope the UIUX can be improved :) The setup button should be always visible in the panel regardless of whether the server is on or off. There should be another way to indicate the server status.

Hi, figma support team! I am urgently need to move or change all of my design file in figma to new email account. Currently i use student Email with student plan, and in three months my account will be deleted because i was graduated. Now i need to move it so my work doesn't lost entirely. If there any other option, such as export it offline or anything else, it will be much appreciated. Thank you in advance!

Hi,just thought I’d check, is this a legit email? The address seems to come from figma, but the sender is not a word/phrase which I recognise (and neither did google)Thanks in advance![Redacted PII - DJV 9/2/2026] 

Hi everyone,I'm currently cleaning up and standardizing token mapping across our design system, and I've run into a variable/mode issue that I can't explain.I have an Accordion component that should be mapped exclusively to our Gifted variable collection.When I inspect the component and click into the variable bindings, everything appears correct. The variables are bound to the expected tokens within the Gifted collection.However, when I look at the Modes section in the right-hand panel, Figma shows that the component is also tied to the Common Components collection, which shouldn't be happening.What's confusing is that, after further investigation, it seems the issue may be related to a success state icon variable. The problem is:The Accordion component doesn't appear to have any success state icon variables in its variable assignments. The success state icon variable only exists in the Gifted collection. There isn't a corresponding success state icon variable in the Common Components

For context, all the components needs to be binding to “Whitelabel ONLY” variable collection only. The problem is as follows… - clicked on parts of the component that shows binding to three different collection to investigate what other wrong binding is in the mix - clicked each individual parts of the components to check for incorrect binding (in this case: component common and gifted only) - they all show that they are binding to the correct collection, which is Whitelabel ONLY  - I clicked out to the parent level, only to see that it still shows the incorrect bindings!  - so the problem is, i dont know which part is still binded to the wrong collection?!  because on individual level, they all show the correct binding, but when clicked together, it shows incorrect binding to three different collections   PLEASE HELP, I need to handle three different component binding collections cleanly, multiplied the above situation is driving me crazy!   

Hi, I’m trying to recover some screens that were created by the Figma Agent and later deleted during the same Agent workflow.I asked the Agent to analyze an existing user flow, identify navigation/path issues, and create the missing or corrected screens needed to fix those issues.The Agent successfully generated several screens directly in my Figma file. I saw the screens on the canvas and they contained work that I need to recover.However, while continuing to work with the Agent, those screens were subsequently deleted/removed by the Agent.I tried using Version History to restore an earlier state of the file, but the generated screens do not appear in any of the available versions. I cannot find a version corresponding to the moment when those screens existed on the canvas.Is there any separate history, log, checkpoint, or recovery mechanism for changes made by the Figma Agent?In particular, I would like to know whether it is possible to:recover objects/screens created and subsequentl

Hey Figma Team, First off thank you for making this software available for students at universities around the world. I am reaching out because I am noticing an alarming trend with my students at the University of Michigan here in Ann Arbor. I teach multiple classes both at the undergraduate and graduate level and about ¼ of all of my students who are signing up for the first time are experiencing issues with SheerID’s verification process. They get caught in a loop. It’s the same problem and I can confirm that students are using their umich email address. Is this a new vendor? I don’t remember seeing this many issues when I have taught UX and AI classes in the past. This has affected 150+ students out of the 1000+ who study UX, CS, and AI design here on campus in Ann Arbor. I wish your team the best. We have found a few work arounds with the demo/free version, but I would love to continue to preach the wonders of Figma and give students full access. Cheers, Jim

I don’t know if this is a bug or simply a feature I don’t get: Shadows look completely different when applied to a shape with a fill vs. an auto layout of the same dimensions with the same fill. Even stranger, when clip content is applied to the auto layout the shadow looks the same as it does on the shape.Is there anything I can do to ensure a shadow renders the same whether or not it is applied to a shape, a frame or other object? And what’s with the clip content difference? I would have expected the shadow to look different with clip content enabled, not the other way around.I’d be much obliged if anyone could enlighten me. 

Hi I am still having the same issue, is there any step that i should take to see the fix? 

I am 12 student I like ui and ux designing so I use figma more .then I came to know that free policy for students so I am Willing to use that policy as a student but I can't find out my school in verification page but I am a student due to it . I am unable to complete the student verification process. So please help me to login . 

Hello,I did a major update on my design system and library file (changed the value of all the color variable and change the main typography), I published the 2000+ changes, I updated the children files and… nothing or nearly nothing.Some color are upgraded but not completely, buttons have the old color and old typo, checkboxes have the old color and so on.The components are OK and the files correctly linked, if I change the color of an instance and change it back, the correct color is displayed so the library is definitely updated.Same for the instances, if I change one property and rollback, or reset the instance, it’s good.I tried closing files, closing Figma, closing and reset Figma via the help menu, nothing works.Maybe it’s linked to instances with nested properties as those properties don’t update neither, but I’m not even sure.Obviously I can’t edit all the elements trough all my files one by one, and there is not “force update” button. After a relaunch, I can update again the s

Just fix slots! The slot feature doesn’t behave properly when switching variants: around 90–100% of the content from the other variant simply disappears.

It looks like font file versions are not accurately reflected under Resources → Fonts.For example, after being uploaded to Figma, Geist v1.7.2 appears in Figma as Geist 1.800 (rounded number).Thanks for fixing this!