Suggest a Feature

My suggestions is to allow users to include annotations and / or measurements  when they export images. Seems that we can’t currently do thisThe user benefits –allows users to share images with annotations and measurements when creating images to be shared wither wider stakeholders and creating documentation for other platforms. If we can’t export annotations and measurements, then for those instances requiring annotations in an export as an image, users won’t use the annotations feature, and revert to creating “Notes” manuallyHope this makes sense

Please can we get percentages for variables? We can use percentages manually, but we can’t create a percentage as a variable. This would speed up my design to dev process tenfold, and considering we can already use percentages in the design, why disallow it in variables?An example is I want store values for line height and letter spacing as percentages which behave responsively/dynamically, so when creating type variables I don’t have to do manual calculations, store 10+ letter spacing/line height values based on which font size they will be used with and hope I never change the font size variable in the future.

Hi there! For design systems, because components can contain other components, it might be a good idea to allow designers to set an “inherit from child” or passthrough option that allows the size to be set by the child component. Right now I think everything is enforced by the parent level, and it can break things (reminds me of my childhood lol .. just kidding - kind of?). Bottom-up works better than top-down in any case :) (see New Scientist, “Why complex systems do better without us”). --And a lot of life is learning to let go lolI have a feeling this may have been reported as a bug in the past, and it may be a technical limitation of HTML itself. It may be worth considering for a future version of HTML/CSS if that’s the case. I notice the “hug” feature already inherits from child in its own way, but

Hello,I am looking to create a good hero section for my site, where it should take the height of browser in the first fold. The subsequent sections can be of fixed heights based on content. I need something like 100vh to have for my hero section.

… not fake elements that look like links. The reason why is because someone posted a link to a Figma file inside a Figma comment, and when I tried to open it in a new tab (making sure I’m holding Cmd in macOS, same as Ctrl in Windows), it just opened in the same tab as the Figma file I’m currently viewing. It’s also impossible to right-click the link and get a link-related context menu. It’s not possible to easily copy the link too. Right now what we get is a regular browser context menu. Worst parts are: The draft comment I wrote was completely lost because of this navigation. There was no warning, and it wasn’t saved to be restored later. The back button doesn’t work. It doesn’t take me back to where I was. It just reloads the linked page, and then the back button is fully disabled. I had to go find the previous location myself manually. PS: On that note: Please also reduce the label of long links to be truncated with ellips

This makes it easier to use components in designs for different screen sizes. And then you don’t have to calculate every time what 40% or 60% of the width is. This also makes it easier to design scalable applications that grow with the width of the screen.

It would be great if dev could export without rounded corners applied and or have some export flexibilities

I use Figma for Mac, and often need to copy+paste the link designer shares on slack.

The title just about summarizes my issue. Developers until recently had access to ruler measurements and annotations with their Dev Mode seats. Recently, these tools were stripped from them. I don’t understand why only designers can measure distances or leave annotations, so long as they are not editing files, why should Devs be unable to annotate or inspect files using the tools Figma designed for Devs to inspect files?Good design practice in Figma often requires us to build things differently than they would be built with actual HTML/CSS. with Autolayout in mind, it’s better to determine the space between objects rather than apply padding to the top of Divs as many devs would do. However, when a dev wants to measure the total space between elements, they should be able to use rulers to make the measurement THEY need and not the one Figma decided they should have. Why were these tools stripped from Developers? We’re already on an Organization plan, paying quite a lot

Hi Figma Team,First, I want to say that I am really enjoying the new AI capabilities in 2026. However, I’ve identified a workflow friction point regarding the export process that I believe could be significantly improved.Below is a proposal for a "Batch Copy" feature to enhance the design-to-canvas workflow:The Problem (Current Experience): Currently, when generating a multi-page web application using Figma’s AI tools, I am required to copy each generated page individually to move them onto my main canvas. This becomes a repetitive and time-consuming task when dealing with complex user flows (e.g., Home → Product → Cart → Checkout).The Solution (Suggested Enhancement): I propose adding a "Copy Entire Flow to Canvas" button. Function: This would allow users to transfer all generated screens/pages of a web application to the Figma canvas in a single action.

When working in teams on Figma projects, especially on larger or long-term products, it becomes difficult to manage changes, ownership, and reviews in a structured way.Right now, multiple designers can work on the same file, but it’s not always clear who changed what, or how those changes should be reviewed before becoming part of the main design. This often forces design leads to manually compare versions or rely on informal processes outside of Figma.It would be very helpful to have a Git-like workflow built into Figma, tailored for design teams. For example: The ability to create branches from a main file and work on specific features or sections Clear visibility into who worked on which frames or components and when A pull request–style flow where a designer can submit their changes for review A review step where a lead or manager can comment, request changes, and approve

If I’m already logged into Figma on my computer, can I just display a QR Code and Deep link my Figma app to that account so I can quickly preview my design? I’m not expecting it to know what project I’m in but that would be AMAZING if it could but I would settle with just logging in for me.

I work on a batch of emails every month. The file is the entire month- different emails in Pages. I would love to save or export Pages into local files so I can save those in the appropriate project folders on my server. 

I know that I can export as SVG from draw.io and then drag and drop in FigJam but this does not allow me to edit. I would like to import a flowchart from draw.io in an editable format. Thanks.

Why I need it.Our designers create full specifications for components in our design system libraries and use dev mode annotations for our front end dev’s. As a Figma library builder, I use those same specifications to create the actual components for our Figma libraries. I copy sections from the design spec file pages and paste them into a library page to use them to create the library components.The problem is the sections I copy into my component page are loaded with dev mode annotations that I have to delete (no, I don’t want to just turn the view off) and I have to do that one annotation at a time.Can you please add a Delete all annotations command? Obviously a warning would be appropriate, but it would save me some time.Thanks!Ben

The Dev Mode Annotation feature released today is fantastic. However, I find it inconvenient that only one annotation can be added to one element. For example, if I want to explain a change in functionality in the same area of Mobile and Desktop, I may want to add a single annotation to multiple areas.

I often duplicate existing mocks to work on feature updates. Deleting previous annotations one by one is extremely tedious. It would be helpful if the tool could recognize when a frame has been duplicated and then allow bulk clearing of annotations.

An edge case however I’d love to see this update eventually. I have a segmented button component that contains nested button component variants. This segmented button component lives in many different places in my UI, utilising the different forms of the nest button component (text , icon, icon and text) I’d like to be able to set a min width to the nested button components inside my segmented button component instance WITHOUT having to set the min width to the master button component.

HiThe bottom toolbar feels a bit like an annoying appendix, always "in the way".Couldn't there be an option to put it on top [example bellow]?  This space isn't used that much, unless you have a lot of files open, which isn't a best practice anyway.And in larger screens, it's a lot of space.And these tools are mainly accessed via keyboard shortcuts.Thanks

I am using Figma from almost 2 years. It’s a great tool. Previously I was using Windows 10 yet recently switched to Linux(Ubuntu). Figma doesn’t have any official release for Linux. There are some Unofficial desktop versions but they are “BUGGY”. I request you guys to release an official Figma desktop app for Linux.

In Present mode (prototype mode), it is not possible to edit the flow description.This would be very useful to me, as it is often when I review my prototypes that I notice details I want to add or modify in the persistent flow description. And currently I have to go back to design mode to do that.The flow description helps my viewers understand the context and subtleties of the flow they are looking at, so it is important to provide a thoughtful description (possibly in the form of a user story). Note that I don’t want to use mere comments for that purpose, as comments are designed to annotate a specific part of a frame (not the entire flow), and also they aren’t persistently displayed so they can be missed easily. Anyone with similar need?(Such an Edit function could of course be provided to Editors only)

This seems like a very large design oversight in Figma Slides. The help article says that “Published changes only apply to new slide decks that are made with the template.” Doesn’t this defeat the entire purpose of having a custom template where you can edit a style and have it apply to your entire presentation, instead of needing to manually tweak a header style on every slide? I expected this to work the same way instances update in Figma Design when you make a change to the main component, but even after publishing changes to a custom template in Figma Slides, my existing slide deck that pulls from that template isn’t updating colors & text styles. The published template changes would only apply to brand new slide decks, which means I’d have to define the template first and

One important feature is missing = Merging cells 😦 Is this feature included as an improvement in the near future?

In Finland, we have to attach the invoices to all card payments for bookkeeping. Now I need to every month to go to Favro and manually download the invoice. Please add a feature where I can define an email address for the invoice emails and automatically send new invoices in an email with the PDF invoices attached so that we can automate the download and processing of the invoices. The subject of the email should have the same structure each month ("You Figma invoice YYYY-MM-DD) and the PDF invoice name should be unique and contain the date of the invoice, for example, Figma incoice YYYY-MM-DD