Suggest a Feature

“It would be valuable to have the ability to import AI-generated designs from Figma Make directly into the Figma design board for editing and continuous improvement. Prompt AI to generate a complete design project. Export the generated designs directly into Figma, where they appear fully editable and properly organized using standard Auto Layout and a structured design system.”

Hi! I’ve noticed that I’m only able to add links to text. It would be really great if it were possible to add links to other objects, specifically images. 

Hello, so I’ve noticed that I am unable to add a link to an image or a vector and can only add links to text. I am making tutorial videos within my organization and within our getting started file we want it to be so they click on the video play button (no text involved in this button) they’d be directed to the video. The hack I’ve done right now is put text behind the button so when they hover it can simulate like they’ve pressed the play button. I’ve looked up tutorial videos online and even their solve for this is similar to the text behind the image hack that I’ve used. Figma can we work on this as a feature? Would be great thank you!

We noticed that starting March 18, Professional plan seats will include 3000 AI credits per month.After testing Figma Make, 3000 credits feels quite limited. In practice, this equals roughly 50 to 70 prompts per month depending on usage. When building and iterating on prototypes, especially during exploration phases, this amount runs out very quickly.For teams that rely heavily on AI to generate, refine, and test ideas, the current default credit allocation makes it difficult to maintain workflow momentum throughout the month.We understand that additional credit packages may be introduced in the future. However, the base 3000 credits per seat feels insufficient for serious prototyping and experimentation within the Professional plan.Would it be possible for Figma to reconsider increasing the default monthly credit allocation to a more practical amount for active users?Looking forward to hearing thoughts from the community and the F

With slots and composable components, I would love a feature that allows me to create some ready made examples of the slotted components, and have them available in the Assets. For example, our card component with a composable “content” slot; we have 3 layouts that are common in our experience for that slot; ready made patterns. We can make those layouts “components” and have them vended as “preferred instances”… but that seems like a workaround, since these layouts aren’t really “components”… For now, we’ll have a separate Patterns Library, and the designer will just copy-paste those ready made cards into their design. But I think it’d be slick if they can just be available in the Figma UI.

In my organization, we have enterprise level Figma or something like that and we use branching.So, without adding too much info, the situation is: The design file linked with library file.And in the design file we have stuff going on.And then we have branches from the design file. The scenario I had this week which cost me sleepless nights and two days of headaches, plus additional work on cleaning the mess out:And yes, I know, I’m partly responsible for that but I will add my conclusion in the end. So one day it was decided in the team that we need to alter one input in the input component (one variant). I made the change. Unfortunately, forgot to first train on a branch, but I thought “hey, it’s just one input, just adding some element to it” (let’s say it lacked an asterisk to be obligatory as a feature of the component).I rolled the change to branches and I think I just updated one of the branches as I

Hi there. It would be cool feature like truncation for auto layout. When you do narrower the line (horizontal or vertical) of a layout truncate excessive elements. It’s would be work good for element with set min width.For example, this two last elements truncate, and the other ones fill the space with the rules of layout for this box

Dear Figma,I wanted to bring to your attention that we are in the 21st century, and there are devices specifically designed for designers, such as tablets. I own an iPad, which has an amazing display and can be used with a keyboard and mouse. However, I currently use it only for viewing my designs because Figma, the professional tool I rely on, does not fully function on my iPad. This leaves me with a few options: sell my expensive iPad to buy a PC or laptop, which is less comfortable for me, wait for an iPad update from Figma before GTA VII, or use it solely for watching movies. I wanted to remind you that tablets exist for a reason, and it would be beneficial if Figma could support them more fully.

Firebender is a coding agent, that many android engineers use. Currently the Remote Figma MCP does not work whenever I configure it. Is there any way to get this to work? I tried:https://docs.firebender.com/context/mcp{"mcpServers": { "figma": { "url": "https://mcp.figma.com/mcp", "type": "http" }}} and I get a message saying to reach out to Figma support to allow Firebender MCP client use OAuth scopes with the Figma remote MCP

It would be really useful to be able to create a branch or a fork in a Make file that can be merged back into the original. Similar to how engineering branches their files. This would allow someone to iterate on an idea without disrupting a prototype that is being used for feedback/testing/presentation.My current workaround is to duplicate the file but the problem is that creates multiple links. I want one link to share with stakeholders/testers that doesn’t change.Thanks for your consideration!

It would be amazing to see if there could be a native figma built-in Bento grid generator with sliders. I know we have the grid function, but this plugin from Akriva is wicked simple to use and would really improve workflows. Would love it if you could select frames and have Figma AI automatically create a campaign ready bento with images.The simple, random, centered and sliders make this such a great easy to use feature that would be awesome to have in Figma. https://www.akrivi.io/presenta

One important feature is missing = Merging cells 😦 Is this feature included as an improvement in the near future?

Hi Figma team,I’m working with a central design system library that uses variables for colors, typography, spacing, etc. The challenge I’m running into is how to customize those variables per project/client without editing the library file.Here’s the workflow I’d love to have: In the library file, components are built using semantic variables (e.g., Brand / Primary, Text / Default). In a project file, I create local variables with the same semantic structure but mapped to project-specific brand values. I want to be able to relink or remap library variables to my local variables, so that when I update the local variable values, all linked components automatically update. Right now, even if I duplicate the variable structure locally, components still reference the library’s variable IDs

Organization would be immensely helpful if we could create folders for our drafts. I want to be able to organize my drafts into different categories (such as UI kits, Ideas, Wireframe kits, iOS, Android, etc…) so I can find files easily. Right now, the drafts page is a huge jumbled mess and I can’t create Team pages for everything. Maybe something as simple as being able to add ‘tags’ to each file, similar to Zeplin.

Right now it seems like the ‘default’ variant is set based on which variant is ‘upper leftmost’ in the variant container frame. Instead, I suggest decoupling arrangement from precedence, and using the property ordering functionality to determine the default variant. The default variant should simply be the one with the first value for each property, regardless of where it’s placed in the variant frame. This would allow teams to set defaults directly from the properties panel, without having to move components around. See this thread for some more context: How to set defaults / precedence of variants with multiple properties?

If you open a lot of projects the tab strip gets crowded. Chromium browsers solved this by allowing to group tabs, maybe Figma could do the same ?

Figma Make is the best prototyping tool I have seen so far (yes, better, or at least more time efficient, than V0 and Claude Code for now). It also has an integration with Github, which is suuuper cool. Now… it would be REALLY gamechanging, if the connection with Github was a two way sync. If edited code could be pulled back into Figma Make, for team collaboration across multiple platforms. I understand that this is really tricky, because Figma Make can't interpret all types of code… but I'm putting it out there… 

Currently, annotation categories are defined per file.This makes it hard to keep consistency across team projects.It would be very useful to have option for team-level or organization-level annotation categories, managed centrally, so all files share the same list.This would help maintain alignment between designers, developers, and QA.Please upvote 😊

Slides and Figma prototype are products of same tool, there is no way to add prototype into slides which can let me me scroll through my desktop prototype 🤔This causes a lot of back and forth between different tabs while doing a presentation. 

Please answer the questions as soon as possible. Any approximate date to next release.

Engineers on my team just noticed that they can’t see and export local variables unless they have edit permissions. This is a huge limitation since not everyone on my team can have edit permissions due to licensing/cost. My ideas is to keep local variables visible to View Only collaborators. They should not be able to edit the variables.

Why are the "Save to version history" and "Show version history" options disabled in Figma Make, even on a paid account?

Hello,I am looking to create a good hero section for my site, where it should take the height of browser in the first fold. The subsequent sections can be of fixed heights based on content. I need something like 100vh to have for my hero section.

This has been mentioned here: Hide layer using variables - #5 by Andreas_Braendhaugen1 Invert boolean variable for layer display - #14 by Desislava_Slavkova Inverted Boolean Property - #2 by drewcovi_usb but those topics are all closed. I am looking for the availability to HIDE a layer when a Boolean variable is TRUE and SHOW it when it is FALSE. So, the inverse of the default/current behavior. I want to do this without using components. Use case: When a variable is true, show one frame. When that same variable is false, show a different frame. I can get basically this by using two different variables: