Suggest a Feature

i u’d love to see Figma provide a way for companies or organizations to officially submit and add their own shape kits, icons, or templates directly into the FigJam “More Shapes” sidebar—alongside AWS, Google Cloud, and similar resources. This would allow teams to streamline diagramming with organization-specific diagrams available instantly. At present, only core libraries curated by Figma are available there, so extra shapes need to be imported as templates or community files. Can Figma build a model or submission process for partners or trusted orgs to add resources to the sidebar natively? This would hugely benefit larger teams and anyone diagramming with standards unique to their work.

Hello,I’ve been and building with Figma Make which I find very impressive. By iterating, a lot of files has been created and many are not in used which leads to pollution and model confusion Can you build an UI in the interface or give possibility to the AI to delete files?

Could you implement a feature that allows the AI chat to memorize the conversation and then archive it to clear all the history messages? It tends to get really laggy at some point when the conversations has been going on for a few days. This is typical in Chat GPT as well. But this needs to be sorted. When I work with figma make at the moment i haev to write all my updated request in a notepad document and then paste into the chat becuase its lagging so much. And if claude sonnet doesnt allow this workflow, come up with something else. Thanks in advance!

STOP MOVING THE TOOLS AROUND THE CANVAS, CHANGING THEIR ON-LOAD DEFAULT VIEWS, AND GIVE COMMUNITY AN ACTUAL PLACE TO LIVE OTHER THAN EVERY SINGLE PLACE YOU’VE TRIED. HOLY CRAP HOW ARE YOU GUYS GOING IPO? YOU CANT EVEN MAKE A SINGLE DECISION AND STICK WITH IT FEATURE REQUEST: CONSISTENCY AND RELIABILITY. I DONT USE POWER TOOLS THAT ARENT RELIABLE, SO WHY SHOULD I USE A PIECE OF SOFTWARE THAT DOESNT RELIABLY HAVE THE FUNCTIONS I NEED IN ONE SPOT

When you use the pen tool to draw a vector image, normally when you use the bend option, it's automatically set to ‘Mirror Angle.’ But then I mostly have to manually change it to ‘No Mirroring’ since that helps more with the accuracy of the edges of the images I want to create. But when I have really big images, it gets tiring having to always change the settings to ‘No Mirroring’ for every single point. Isn’t there a way to automatically leave the settings on the last option selected instead of it always being set to ‘Mirror Angle’? Or is there a keyboard shortcut for that?

One important feature is missing = Merging cells 😦 Is this feature included as an improvement in the near future?

Currently what we make in “Figma Make” is not directly editable in figma design tool. To change anything we need to command which makes the design worsen often. So we designers need to have the power to copy/move/cut from “Figma Make” design and paste it in the figma design tool , to iterate and tweak faster.

We deals with editing of photoshoot, website,and app design

Recently, I needed to create some typography based graphics in my website project, I did not find any option to align the text to pen paths or shapes. It would be a must feature in Figma as the usecase prevails for many designers out here and in many projects. Yes, there are some extensions available but they are limited in functionality, do not provide necessary mechanisms. Please upvote this of you have came across to the same need.

Flow chart process mapping is good. Adding line jumps would make it great!

Using string variables as a “CMS” across multiple teams is great to achieve consistency in ux writing/labels etc. If only it was possible to use markup within the variables. Because sometimes i run into a textbox where I want to format part of the string as bold, italic, underline … the usual suspects. With the way string variables are currently set up I can not cover this case with them. Hence, it wold be great if some kind of markup support was added. Marry Christmas ;]

Hello. I was wondering if it is possible to have percentage values in variables, like setting percentage value for frame widths or shape sizes (etc.) that have variable modes applied to them? Percentage values could respond better to content that varies within a frame or frames within frames.

I use percentages in a project for the letter spacing. I can’t use variables to achieve this value. It always defaults to pixels.

Our design system leverages mix blend modes for hover states so our icon buttons appear on any background color and remain accessible, without needing separate hover–on-primary, hover–on-secondary, etc tokens. We use multiply for light theme, and screen for dark theme. It would be really awesome if we could apply blend modes directly to the color variables, OR support blend modes as variables in general. Our current work around is to apply the blend mode directly on each component variant, but this requires us to define separate light and dark theme variants. would be great if we could use variables here to have it automatically switch between light/dark.

Can you share a library from one organization to another without transferring it and making it public?

Automatically add page numbers to the selected slide in Figma based on Slide position. Maybe we can select any text and give it the numbering option?

Config 2025 release broke my designs with Grid! And it could be an upgrade, if: Grid could HUG CONTENTS (row, column, grid itself) Rows, columns and cells could be resized (fixed value, %, colspan/rowspan, flex-grow value) Switch between flex wrap (items jumping to next row) and grid

Please make Dev Mode Annotations visible by all roles, not just Full Dev Mode seats. This can become costly for users needing context but not all the other dev-mode features. Here’s the scenario: We have a dashboard, with cards showing a customer’s account status. This status can be mapped from multiple back-end statuses, to show just one front-end status. For example, any of the following could be mapped to a single status known to the customer as “Completed”: canceled, terminated, sold, complete, etc. This is something that the developer needs to reference, but then also the PM needs to reference in writing tickets (who doesn’t need full dev-mode access), the QE needs to reference for testing automations, and various other individuals on our team. Placing it in a comment makes it less clearly attached to the specific piece of the design, and requires us to keep documentation dispersed among different tools (Jira, Confluence, Figma etc). Simply making Dev mode annotations visible to v

The versioning in Figma Make is available, but since the AI cannot maintain consistency if there is a way to list and name these versions, it will be easier to fix the mistakes and issues.

I’d love to see Figma Make include the ability to download essential build configuration files—such as package.json, tsconfig.json, vite.config.js, and others—when exporting code. This feature would greatly simplify the process of running projects locally by providing the full environment setup required for development. It would enable users to clone or open the exported code directly in their preferred local editor and begin testing or customizing right away, without needing to recreate the project setup from scratch. This would especially benefit developers who want to iterate quickly on prototypes or integrate Figma-generated code into larger applications. Thanks for considering!

Add the ability to select which properties to publish of a component and of a nested component. One use case for this is State in many components such as Button. State has Default, Hover, and Pressed. These states don’t need to be published, they are purely used for prototypes. I don’t want to clutter the properties list for consuming designers. Disabled and Error are created as Variants with “true” and “false” values. There’s no need to publish State property. Original idea here requested by XavierV

This makes it easier to use components in designs for different screen sizes. And then you don’t have to calculate every time what 40% or 60% of the width is. This also makes it easier to design scalable applications that grow with the width of the screen.

As a designer using a design system and searching or swapping a component instancr, often a term you search pulls up other components not in line with what you want because of a similarity in name. The most common culprit are icons. It would be great to do a quick negative filter like in VSCode with find and replace when looking for components to swap or insert to negate a group of components. This could also be a quick hack to cut out other active design systems from the keyboard.

Would be nice to limit this permission to developers only, while still allowing other roles to view files. It is about time Figma improves the role and permissions management. We need dev roles or more granular permission settings.