Suggest a Feature

It should be possible for a member of the External team in a Connected Project to move a file into their own Figma instance, at the discretion of Admins in the Host organization. Currently members of the external team are not allowed to move a file out to their own space, ostensibly for security reasons. But external teams may have a legitimate need to move the files for organizing or archiving purposes.The activation feature could be disabled by default, but the decision about whether file moves are allowed should be in control of the Host organization and not simply hard-coded.

Connected Projects are a great way to have a shared space between two separate Figma accounts (usually between two organizations). A drawback is that all the files are in a single project.Without some kind of hierarchy (or filtered view) the Connected Project can quickly fill up with all kinds of working files, templates, older “archive” projects that are now needed only for reference, etc.Figma could either extend the “connected” concept to the team level (so there can be more “folders” in the connected space), or provide some other kind of other hierarchical or filtered view.

It would be great to have a plugin toolbar where we can store our commonly used or favourite plugins for easy access. Having to go to the Actions menu every time and search for the plugins (especially if you use a lot like me), can be a cumbersome waste of valuable time. 

Please figma team add the appropriated search function to your MCP server soo it can work with Open AI’s solutions. I’m trying to build a design agent with GPT without having to create an MCP from scratch...

I guess this is a much needed feature. Now, I export multiple fames into PDFs and go to any PDF editing website and combine all the pages to a Single PDF. Incase If I have any edits, I need to again come and edit in Figma and have to do these steps again which is very hectic. Please implement this feature. I guess in the export section, an option to export to a single PDF will solve the problem. Much needed one. Guys vote for this!!!

Se debería poder generar link para compartir de solo las pantallas que uno seleccione, para que asi uno pueda ir compartiendo al cliente o al desarrollador solo las pantallas finalizadas y aprobadas y ya cuando uno finalice o vaya aumentando pantallas solo se actualizaria el link compartido. actualmente uno comparte el link ya sea para solo ver o para desarrollo y se muestra todo hasta lo que uno va modificando o aumentando, como que no existe la privacidad una vez que uno comparte el link. En especial cuando uno lo comparte con un cliente, no se ve bien que vayan viendo pantallas que no esten concluidas, para este caso tengo que estar copiando las pantallas que quiero compartir o otro archivo.

Can you revert changes to the message that appears in the top right corner of Figma files telling me that X person(s) is / are request access to the file. Previously it had their email below their name. This was so useful to help identify who ‘Ben’ is. Now all I know is there persons name and I no longer know which company they are from. It was really useful seeing the email address. It’s ok only knowing the name of the person if you are small team but in large organisations that work with external parties / third part vendors, you have no idea who these people are and the email address is the best way to id them and know if I should give them access.

Cuando se abre un link de presentación debería tener la vista de pantallas en grilla, esto para poder visualizar todo el contenido de pantallas y así poder dirigirse mas rápido a la pantalla requerida, actualmente uno si quiere ver una pantalla en especifico tiene que ir recorriendo uno por uno por todas las pantallas hasta encontrar la que uno quiere mostrar

In the left-side panel, the pages and layers panels are separated by a single-pixel-thick line. This line is draggable so as to resize the vertical height of the panels.This is incredibly small, and there is almost no affordance to understand this is draggable. To compound the confusion, the flat design offers no indication that these panels may contain more pages/layers (e.g. a fade out of the pages’ names at the bottom of the panel).Finally, why does collapsing the layers panel not reduce its height, like the collapsible panels of Adobe’s apps? it seems like there is no purpose to this collapse, since it does not reveal the full list of pages.This problem is quite annoying when we share our work with stakeholders and collaborators (e.g. copywriters and project managers) that are not familiar with the idiosyncrasies of Figma, and are wondering where all the pages go.Please find a solution to clarify that these panels contain potentially more than they re

The new preview window in Figma client is great! It would be nice if this could be moved freely outside the window size of the Figma client. This way it would not obstruct the Figma UI and can be moved to a secondary display.

I do accidentally move around comments by mistake. And whenever I cmd-z I accidentally undo the designs rather than comment move.

In their current state, comments try to accommodate multiple use cases into a single system: general note-taking, questions to ask stakeholders, functionality/purpose annotations, feedback, prototype tour points, etc. When all these use cases pile up in a single page, it could easily start to reach over 100 individual comments and makes it difficult to distinguish between them. I’m proposing expanding the functionality of the comments feature to allow for the most common use cases to be different comment types. Invision does a great job of this by changing the color of the pin when a certain comment type is selected. This allows users to quickly identify the most relevant comments to them and ignore the rest.

Hi, in both of my organizations, I use Figma for designs, and my devs are used to it, know how to navigate and adopted it very well. But when I get files from other colleagues outside of my organization, I usually get .ai or .psd files and I can’t open them. I would like Figma (not community that is extra pay and mostly does not even do the job) being able to let me work with these files.The question is, can Figma team work on that?It would be soooo much more helpful than things like Figma Make, because this thing makes me leave Figma and use Adobe instead.  

Add the option to put a password on the page in the file. This is very necessary when you are working on a product and part of the development team temporarily should not have access to one page, but should have access to other pages in the file.

Please allow developers to add annotations directly in Dev Mode to capture technical notes and implementation details. This would make it easier to document decisions, track clarifications, and maintain context during development, all without leaving Figma.

My Figma files are growing with screens, especially example screens to showcase various states. I’d like to keep them organized by arranging them in separate pages, but the thing is, I need to be able to prototype from one screen to another, over different applications to showcase a complete user flow. Would there be a feature one day where you can prototype between different pages, like Excel for example, where you can refer to cells in other tabs or even files. Would be nice.

Hi Figma Team,Please update the default Arabic font in FigJam, the current default font sucks.I recommend using one of these Google Fonts instead:TajawalIBM Plex Sans ArabicEven Lovable understood this and chose Tajawal as their default Arabic font.

Our corporate entity requires we use the Microsoft suite, so a Loop widget would be extremely helpful to have for our FigJam collabs with product.

Our organization is growing, and as result we are letting more and more folks into Figma. This is becoming increasingly difficult to manage.I would love to see some updates added to the people page to be able to manage users more effectively.One idea is to just add a “tags” column. This would be sufficient for my needs.Need:I want to be able to know what department/role a user belongs to in my organization so that I can ensure everyone has the right access based on their specific department/role.I imagine that I am not the only one with this issue, not sure how other people that are operating at a larger scale are currently handling this.My current workaround, which is terrible. Is to open up rippling in one view, and Figma in the other and compare individuals across tools to understand what access they need.

During client presentations, we typically showcase the prototype and capture feedback through comments added directly on it. However, while implementing these changes, we observed that the comments move along as the prototype is scrolled. This makes it difficult to accurately track which comment corresponds to which element.It would be highly beneficial if the comments remained anchored to their respective positions on the prototype, rather than scrolling with the frame. This enhancement would ensure better clarity and efficiency during the review and implementation process.

Please… PLEASE! For those of us with lots of simultaneous projects and heavy deliverable schedules, tab browsing in Figma needs some LOVE! Now, I’m not one of those psychos that keeps 300 tabs open in their Chrome browser, but I do, at any given time, need access to multiple projects simultaneously. If I could easily group those tabs together in Figma and give them a nice, friendly name, maybe an emoji, or… dare I say… a color, I’d be a really, really happy camper.  

A few years ago there was a fix - The icon on the instance inherit color override, imposed by main component, when swaping icon or changing variant. Great!but… Problem If I modify the icon color on the main component - change color style or manually pick new one, doesn’t matter. The instance with swapped icon doesn’t notice the change! Steps to reproduce:Place an instance Swap the icon on instance Change variant's (main component) icon color Instance's icon color will remain not updatedNote: Of course, all layers properly named to keep the naming integrity. The example:

Let us be able to add audio to the slides to give it more life. Imagine that after creating a presentation with your prototype embedded into it and some animations. You can finish it up with some amazing audio!

It would be great to be able to seperate the visibility objects beyond just the layer. To be able to associate a boolean variable to the visibility of; Layer Fill Stroke Effects Would make it more effective when putting together a design system. This means that you could effectively determine that all buttons have outlines, or drop shadows or both right across the whole design. See examples below. Thoughts?

Can we have an option stop syncing while in view only mode at least? I don’t need the latest version all the time for visualization and to keep loading every time I focus back on the tab is very annoying.I’m keeping it in offline mode for now by using dev tools to prevent loading but something a bit smarter would be better.Reloading should be an optional action.