Suggest a Feature

Allow offline work on files through the Figma app. This is important because internet connections aren't always available—whether you're commuting, on a long business trip, or working at a client site without connectivity. Work continuity matters. Offline support is standard for professional production tools, even cloud-based ones.

Of course it is easy enough to lock layers but I think that it would be helpful to be able to lock pages in a fashion similar to the layers. I often place root (master, main, og?) components on a separate page and it would be nice to be able to lock these pages to keep items from moving around without intention.

While there used to be a Copy to Figma sites button, it seems that this has been deprecated in favour of “send to Figma make”.  I would request for this feature to be added back in, as well as a way to copy an entire figma file into figma sites (rather than creating a new one and adding frames as separate steps)

Within Figma Sites, you are currently unable to provide “navigate to” as a type of interaction. I am aware that you can add a link, however doing so causes an issue if you have the goals ofDoing conditional navigation (i.e. if X== true Navigate to A, Else navigate to B) Changing a variable, and navigating through the same button (e.g. set Y to Z & navigate to C)1 because navigate to/link to is not available in the interactions (where conditional is found) & 2 because if you assign a link, then onclick is removed as a trigger for interactions In terms of both, I accidentally used a workaround by copying a frame from core Figma into Figma sitesHowever, this is not convinient/intended, and I worry that it may create issues with future versions of figma sties.

The corner radius tool is great if you want to make rounded corners but what if I wanted to make sharp, folded or clipped corners like in the shape below?The catch is that when resizing, the scaling and the angle for these corners should stay the same. If you simply create a shape like this, it doesn’t really scale well if adjusting only the height or the width - the angle of the corners suffer. Has anyone figured out a solution to this or is this something Figma could implement perhaps?

ProblemWhen using stroke-based icons inside nested components (e.g. button components), resizing behavior in Figma causes major inconsistencies:• If the icon is a component, it keeps its original size when the parent resizes• If constraints are set to Scale, the icon scales visually but stroke width does not scale, causing icons to appear heavier/darker• The only way to get correct proportional scaling is using Scale tool (K), which does not work with Auto Layout or component resizingThis makes it extremely difficult to build scalable button components using stroke icons.ExpectedResizing a component or instance should optionally behave the same way as Scale (K):• Stroke width scales proportionally• Corner radius and effects scale correctly• Works inside Auto Layout and nested components Proposed solutionAdd a global or per-object option similar to Adobe Illustrator:“Scale strokes & effects when resizing”​This would:• Fix stroke icon inconsistencies• Enable proper scalable icon usag

Use case: Once an advanced UI has been built , users want a way to quickly select nested components in order to modify their properties and attributes. In this stage of design, designers are less interested in manipulating sub-elements of a component, and more interested in selecting the component itself to modify properties and variables. Current challenges: the deep-select modifier (CMD/CTRL) is currently the most efficient way to access deeply nested items, however it is fairly indiscriminate and will often select the deepest nested element under the cursor. With complex components this often means a graphical element like a frame or a text element, requiring the user to step out of the hierarchy, often a number of steps, before arriving on the parent component, or they must use the mouse to then select the parent component from the Design properties panel. Recommendation / Request: Provide an optional modifier key to be used while deep-selecting to restrict selection to only compon

ProblemThere's no plugin or REST API that exposes a fresh view of which team libraries are currently subscribed to by a file. After a user adds or removes a library mid-session, every documented and undocumented signal continues to report the prior subscription state until the file is reloaded. This makes it impossible to write a plugin that correctly classifies orphan references (variables, styles, components from libraries no longer linked to the file) without asking the user to reload Figma after every library change.Use caseWe're building a plugin that scans a file for orphan references — bindings to variables/styles/components from libraries that aren't subscribed by the file. The orphan signal we use today is figma.teamLibrary.getAvailableLibraryVariableCollectionsAsync(): any remote collection whose key isn't in that response is classified as orphan. This works perfectly when the cache is fresh (after file load), but breaks silently when the user changes subscriptions mid-sessio

I work for both desktop and mobile screens and I would like to save custom frame sizes and have them under a custom category. basic desktop sizes like 1366x768 is not available in the presets and the desktop category only has Mac screen devices as options.

Allow the users can move the new toolbar through the canvas, that today is fixed underneath the page. I liked the new version but I believe some extra flexibility on it would be welcome.

Figma is the most intuitive tool I have ever used and I would love for Figma to expand into web development! Publishing a website directly from Figma would be incredible!

When adding components to a Slot and attempting to surface nested properties I see a message that nested properties can not be surfaced with Slots. This severly limits their usefulness to us since we are creating multiple composable components using sub components with properties and having to drill in to each instance in a multi-item Slot is very time-consuming.

Since a couple of weeks Figma Buzz is auto-naming the frames it creates when BULK CREATEing. It simply adds 10 (or something) characters from each CSV-Tag and pastes them in.Please add the possibility to deactivate this feature. It messes with our current workflow and forces us to add additional steps. Would also be nice to be able to fine tune this to our needs (i.e. choose what tags should be used)Also: there seems to be no documentation in terms of release-notes for this.

As a user I want the text to auto-adjust: in this way I can write sticky notes different in length (without breaking them in height).

As described in the title, links are broken as soon as you cut a frame and paste it elsewhere (on the same page, in the same file).How to reproduce this issue:Copy the link to any selected frame Save the copied link somewhere Cut the previously selected frame and paste it elsewhere (same file, same page) Open the saved link The link no longer leads to the frameSuggested solution: When a frame is cut and pasted, the associated link ID should not be lost.

A lot of AI features in Figma so far seem to be generative, which IMO is mostly fruitless for the core auidence as current models are not capable of new problem solving, only generating variations of the combined knowledge of everything that has been observed before, without understanding the context of decisions made to implement design choices as well. Where I can see see value add is in other aras. QA for example - perhaps pointing a dev URL at the tool to see how front-end have developed the designs and comparing to what was in the original figma (visually, not comapring the code generated by Figma, which is often not all that helpful in established systems) - could help catch mistakes and also documwent intentional changes in the design to development process. 

The experience of Move to Page can be frustrating and inefficient. That's because when a user moves a frame/section to another page:there is no immediate feedback to where the element was placed user must manually go to the page and search for the moved element often, the element is placed using the same absolute coordinates, and that can result in it being placed on top of other elementsThis creates unnecessary hassle, especially in large files with many sections, frames and components. I can think in 3 possible solutions for this problem, I hope my suggestions can help y'all (and myself!):Auto-navigate after moving: after using Move to Page, automatically switch to the destination page and bring the moved frame into view, allowing the user to immediately position it (similar behavior in Apple Finder). Smart placement instead of absolute coordinates: instead of preserving exact x y coordinates, place the moved frame in a visible empty area, or far from existing content to avoid overla

Can somebody explain to me what is the point in having multiple stroke layers when they:SHare the same size Share the same offsetAnd another question is is there any way of doing offset to a stroke or drop shadow? I really need this for our focused state in our design system and what I found was only wanky workarounds...

It’s hard to believe that Figma, in 2026, still doesn’t support custom prototype devices based on the Flow Starting Point…Most designers create landing pages like this: Desktop and Mobile (at least). Why do I always have to manually change the device settings whenever I switch between devices?” 

There should be a value (number) insert field for fill properties i.e. Exposure, Contrast, Saturation, etc. So that we can insert a desired numerical value and if we want to copy that same properties to another image let’s say, then it would be much easier. Right now if I try to use the “copy properties” feature, it also copy the image with it and paste the same same image(with properties) to another image which is not what I wanted. So if there’s a number input feature, it would be more easy to just copy the exact numbers for the desired properties and apply them to other image. 

I wish it was possible to drag and drop images directly from my web browser, instead of having to copy & paste it all the time, which takes longer. I’m on a Windows 11 PC.

I’ve been teaching my coworkers to give figma slides presentations, which are superior to google slides partly because of the inherited prototyping features. One reason I still make hand-made slides is non-linear presentation structure -- if I could copy and paste a link to a specific slide, in viewer mode, and link it to a component, I’d convert my whole team. We have a pretty important presentation that needs this feature and I’d prefer not to build it from scratch. 

The official Figma MCP server currently supports Design files and FigJam, but not Figma Slides. This is a significant gap.Use case: We use Claude Code with the Figma MCP to generate designs programmatically. Being able to create and populate Figma Slides decks via MCP would be a game-changer for our agency workflow -- we produce dozens of presentations per month (pitches, case studies, client reports) and want to leverage AI to draft them directly in Figma Slides.What's missing:create_new_file only accepts "design" and "figjam" as editorType -- needs a "slides" option use_figma / get_design_context should work with Slides files (reading and writing slide content, speaker notes, layouts) Ideally: slide-specific primitives (add slide, reorder slides, set slide transitions)Why it matters:Figma Slides is positioned as the modern alternative to Google Slides / PowerPoint AI-assisted presentation creation is one of the highest-demand use cases Community projects like figma-slides-mcp and mon

If you are using the “isolate” function on the Figma AI image Editor, you must have noticed that the image below it fills it in with an assuming background. Often, you need to copy that, and put the isolated part back into the original image, (I don’t always want the function to be destructive, nor do I like creating endless copies, just so I can isolate something) . I am proposing a feature that lets you simply copy the “isolated” part of the image, allowing you to paste it somewhere while still keeping the original intact. My current workflow: I am “isolating”, copying, and then undoing the action to get the “isolated” part back into the original image. Often, due to slight of hand, I undo the isolation faster than I copied it, and that leaves me with the option to do it again (if redo is not working) and wait for it to isolate. Sometimes I just want a part of the image without the original being destroyed. What do you think about this feature?   

 Almost all of the work I do happens in branches, so I’m often jumping between different branches across different files. (And I break out in hives if I have 20 tabs open at a time 😅). I’m having a hard time finding the stuff I need.Since we can’t search for branches, how about putting recently viewed branches under the “Recents” tab?(I did try adding frequently-visited branches to my sidebar, but that got out of hand pretty quickly.)