Suggest a Feature

The main source of inspiration for this idea was to match the keyboard shortcuts themselves to different keyboard layouts. Right now, users who don’t use US keyboards have to memorize the location of the keys, rather than to use the actual character location to be able to use the shortcuts. Those involving this region are primarily the case:

Hey @figma you know what would be dope? Having the image field as a component property allowing us to just replace the image without having to go into the layers…even better if it would save the fit or fill setting

Figma currently offers a keyboard shortcut to hide the layers panel (CMD + SHIFT + \ ) or all UI (CMD + \ ) but no keyboard support to just hide the right panel (Design, Prototype, Inspect) For me the layers panel can often be more important to retain than the right panel. Anyone else want this feature?

Feature Suggestion: Per-Account Color Customization in WindowsProblem  Users who work with multiple accounts simultaneously (e.g., different profiles, tenants, or environments) often struggle to visually distinguish between them. This increases the risk of performing actions in the wrong account.Proposed Solution  Introduce a feature that allows users to assign a unique color theme to each account. The selected color would be consistently applied across key UI elements such as:- Window title bars  - Accent color highlights  - Taskbar indicators  - App frames or borders  Key Benefits  - Reduces user errors when switching between accounts  - Improves visual clarity and context awareness  - Enhances productivity for users managing multiple environments  - Provides a simple, intuitive way to differentiate sessions  Example Use Cases  - Personal vs. work account  - Production vs. staging e

It would be really helpful to be able to use a variable to set a Type Style’s Letter Case (under the Type Settings meatball menu). It could be a String Variable, and the options would be “As entered”, “Uppercase”, “Lowercase”, “Title case”, and “Small caps”. I personally use modes to switch between different brands, and some brand styles require uppercase while others don’t allow it. This suggestion may be a small feature in the grand scheme, but I wonder if others would also find it useful.

Love the new Typography Variable release, but it falls short for our use case. Our goal is to use variable modes to switch styles between our 3 brands. 2 of those brands use all caps for headings, the other brand uses sentence case. We need to be able to bind a variable to the case of a character style (As typed, Uppercase, Lowercase, Title case, Small caps). Without this capability, when switching modes from brand 1 to brand 2 for example, we are getting the default case for the character style (sentence case coming from brand 1). We would then have to go through our designs and manually type in all caps for all instances of headings in brands 2 and 3. Certainly not ideal and will lead to inconsistencies / places where manually typing in all caps are missed if we went this route. Until binding a variable to the case of a character style is an option, using typography variables isn’t feasible for our use c

We definitely need these, until every Styling option that can be applied to text in Figma is added to the great new variables options, it’s not usable as a complete UI system. Text decoration values like underline, slashed, uppercase, are all vital parts of out text style system. Would love to see these be added along with REM/EM support or at the very least percentage support for Line Height & Letter Spacing.

When working on complex prototypes, I often reuse interactions (e.g. animation curves) across screens or steps. In order to do this, I have to manually rebuild them each time. This requires a lot of work - selecting the interaction where I used my custom curves last time, open the interaction panel, copy the custom curves, go to the new interaction I want to apply the same curves to, open the interaction panel, select “custom”, and paste. It would be great if a) I could copy & paste interactions or b) I could leverage an “Interaction Design System” and apply custom values in the same way I can apply custom colors, typography styles, etc. Has anyone else found an easier way to do this that I’m missing or is there a plugin to manage this? 🙌🏼

Problem:When admin remove person from organization, drafts of this person move to Unassigned drafts.Idea:It would be very helpful to have notification  about unassigned draft, with Move function, so Admin can check drafts in the process of removing user from organization. In admin panel tab show and filter by name of Admin who removed member from organization. Current situation is that unassigned drafts (with deleted accounts) shows in Admin panel tab with lack of informations (only name, mail, date of deletion, number of files). Admins can't see workspace or teams to connect drafts with projects/ topics).Only possible way is manual investigation of deleted memebers and set workaround workflow during member management.I looked at the learn page about unassigned drafts before: 

Recently a new member of our team (who was granted edit privileges) deleted our component library file, which led to a series of issues until I, the admin, realized what had happened and restored the file from trash. However, there was a chance that I never would have realized what happened, or that the user could have gone into the trash and permanently deleted that file, both of which are horrifying outcomes when it means re-creating the design system and all documentation from scratch and then replacing component instances across dozens of files with the new one. It would be FANTASTIC if I, as the admin, could prevent editors from deleting certain files, whether that’s on a per-file basis or with an across-the-board rule like “you can only delete files that belong to you” or “you can’t delete files in this project.” Such an option on all the paid plans and up would definitely help me sleep better at night!

when i try to export library to figma make, there is error tip: “We ran into an error while extracting your library” and I try to export only one very simple component it doesn't work.

Currently, Figma Slides on the mobile app only allows users to view and run slides. However, when giving a presentation, many of us connect our computer to a projector to display the slides while wanting to use our phone as a companion device to view presenter notes. It would be extremely helpful if the Figma mobile app could sync in real time with the slides being presented on desktop, so that the presenter can:  See their notes directly on the mobile app Follow along with the current slide in sync with the presentation Use the phone as a discreet presenter tool, without needing a second screen or printed notes  This would bring Figma Slides closer to the functionality of other professional presentation tools and make it much more practical for real-world use. I hope the Figma team will consider adding this feature, as it would significantly impro

Figma MCP should provide frame-to-image exporting as a tool. That way AI could export graphics in a page design as `.svg`s, `.png`s, etc... and upload them to our cloud bucket,or put them in our web assets folder.

The default settings (at least in my Figma) load a percentage for letter-spacing, but this is not allowed in CSS. For a less avid programmer this may be confusing, when trying to get it to work. Either set the default to a px value, or add a warning inside the Inspect code

Dear Figma Team,I hope you're doing well.I would like to share a suggestion regarding the prototype experience in Figma, specifically within the presentation view.Currently, when presenting a prototype, if we need to adjust settings such as selecting or changing the mock device frame, we are required to switch back to the workspace. This interrupts the flow of presentation and affects the overall seamless experience—especially during client demos or usability reviews.It would be incredibly helpful if prototype settings (like device frame selection and related display options) could also be accessible directly within the presentation window or tab. This would allow designers to make quick adjustments on the go without leaving presentation mode, making the experience smoother and more efficient.Such an enhancement would greatly improve usability and streamline workflows for designers who frequently present interactive prototypes.Thank you for

Can we have it so there is an option in settings which would automatically activate Mirror instead of having the user tap some button to activate it?I use the Mirror feature 99% of the time that I’m using the Figma Mobile app - I know I’m not alone. It’s getting pretty tiring tapping on the little “Mirror” button in the notice every time, or in the nav. Wish it would just automatically switch to Mirror if I wanted it to.

I just want to copy a single section I need on Figma Make instead of the whole site which is taking longer time and many layout errors occurring (lacking of UI elements, especially the animated elements) 

the type of connectors is not enough for creating an Entity Relationship Diagram. The One-to-One , One-to-Many and Many-to-Many connector heads should be added too.

How to send or import multiple frames to Figma Make from a Figma Design file?It seems that it is possible to send one frame to Figma Make and it will create a new Figma Make file from that one frame. However, when multiple frames are selected (e.g. different screens of the same prototype) then the “Send to Figma Make” option disappears.I can also see an option to Import from Figma, but the interface for this is terrible when you have thousands of Figma Design files in your enterprise and they each have multiple components within them. Worse still, it seems you cannot import a frame, only components that have been published.Is there something I could be doing differently that would make it easier to import multiple frames from a Figma Design file into the same Figma Make file? 

FigJam is great, and the open session feature is so helpful 😍 However, after running several workshops with first-time FigJam users, I think it’d be even more helpful in a few ways: Onboarding new users: This could be done in one of a few ways: Create an up-to-date template discrete How-To sections (eg, How to zoom, How to create a sticky). Make it easy to remove parts if it gets too detailed for your audience. I know other there are templates with great instructions in them, but they’re all out-of-sync and embedded in other templates. Might as well make it’s own thing and keep it up-to-date. Better option: Create a tour that guides new users around the interface very briefly, focusing on moving around, stickies and following a spotlight. Non-editable sections: Having first-time users able to edit, move or delete entire sections is a bit horrifying. The other day, a

I saw that C# isn’t currently available in the list of recognizable Code Block languages. If possible, adding it would be greatly appreciated!

Components in my Figma style guide are named to match our Android Studio UI library conventions, which helps developers, but makes searching feel unintuitive for designers.It would be great to support two distinct name fields per component: a designer-friendly display name for search and browsing, and a developer name that maps to the code library. This would let both sides work in their native language without compromise.

Frequently, when facilitating a workshop in FigJam, it is necessary to gather open and honest feedback from attendees, such as during a retrospective/health check. In other tools, such as Miro, it is possible for people to provide opinions and vote on topics anonymously. Anonymity really helps to get people to express themselves and thus get the most constructive engagement. Having moved from Miro to FigJam the lack of this feature has proven really problematic and decreases the value we can get from the tool. There are some plug-ins that provide a limited version of this, however they require manually selecting each instance of the plug-in and selecting to reveal results, which is really inefficient and often for my purposes, unworkable as a solution.

The new slots feature is awesome, and has been super helpful for my team. I have, however, run into a recurring issue.The outermost frame for a component can’t be a slot. If you have a slot it has to be a child of the component.This can cause some annoyance if I have a super simple thing where the only element in a component is a slot. With this I have to add auto-layout the component itself and add auto-layout to the slot, which is redundant. It can also cause problems because if I want to change the alignment of an auto-layout element, I have to make sure I’m clicking the correct one since there are two.Component layer which only has a slot child layer. 

Loving the addition of CMS to Figma Sites, however the options to add components or component instances to the CMS from a Design System would be incredible for using CMS for Design system documentation. Currently the title, rich text, link and image options are great but taking this to the next level with components would completely eliminate the need for 3rd party documentation platforms.