This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
The padding and gap feature of the Auto Layout is super nice already, but wouldn’t it be even nicer if there also was a setting for margins? Some elements/components need some white space and sometimes they need a special/custom margin beside/over/under other components in the Auto Layout.
I completely agree. Currently, if you want margins around an element you need to place it in another container (sorta like DIV-ititis). Having an option for margins in addition to the paddings we have now would make mock-ups closer to real-world HTML/CSS - not to mention less cluttered layer structures.
Oh yes! We need margins! Is this the only thead for margin? Only 6 votes?? for real?!
It could look something like this:
maybe?! Please?!
Just to reignite… we would so love this
How are there no margin settings for a frame? Really?
A fundamental setting that is missing…
Until the day it is included, extra frames it is I suppose…
Just chiming in that margin settings would be a godsend. Really need this option especially for those of us that are using a CSS mental model when laying stuff out in Figma.
Margins are a must have, paddings cannot have negative values which is really needed in some cases.
Only 38 votes for such a must have? 😳
I also agree that this would be very helpful! As someone who works with CSS regularly, I cannot accomplish certain things (such as adding spacing to a component with a background) in Figma as I would in CSS using margins without affecting their appearance. Margins would be a valued feature for me.
Bumping this because I’m also having this issue where devs are expecting to see margin-top instead of padding-top so it’s a little confusing (especially in a big team since they have to remember to not use “padding” property).
Seems like a big big miss to not include margins! As the comment above mine states, it’s important for designers to be able to work with the same properties as devs do to cut down on confusion, double work, etc.
those of us that are using a CSS mental model
Not to mention, those developers using actual CSS to build the things we make in Figma!
I mean ideally, shouldn’t autolayout have a 1:1 relationship to flexbox? Wouldn’t it be easier for everyone if autolayout’s capabilities and options and values exactly matched flexbox (like adding margins)? We’re not designing in a vacuum - I don’t design stuff so that it looks good in Figma, I design it so that some developer can take it and build it.
Absolutely agree. What’s the point of having an entirely unique type of object with different attributes/limitations/quirks when the obvious purpose/benefit is to mimic flexbox containers?
really need this feature!
A cannot wait to see Figma allow using margins instead of creating nesting frames!!
Push.
Plus some characters to reach the min am0unt.
It’s insane that this feature is missing. It’s a “screen layout 101” type of thing. Crazy that this does not exist already.
Not a high priority as I can still kinda create margins with autolayouts and extra layers, but would be a big help if the margin property is shown in dev handoff.
When is this due to be implemented?
I want to be able to assign individual margins to elements within the Autolayout.
Super disappointed this is not supported yet. Bonus points if we ever get collapsible margins like in CSS!
