Share Your Thoughts

When Figma Make is processing something complex, it can take a while to complete. During that time, I usually switch to other design files to keep working. But there’s no indication that Make is still running or has finished.I often have to switch back and forth 5–6 times just to check if the process is done, which breaks focus and slows down my workflow.It would be great if there was some small visual feedback showing that Make is still building or has completed, even when I’m on another tab. For example, the Make tab icon could rotate or change state.This would make multitasking in Figma smoother and reduce unnecessary tab switching. Figma make tab icon 

In the last days I noticed a change in the feature of zooming with Ctrl+scroll wheel. It used to be much smoother. Now it jumps from 26% to 100% to 381% to 1449% 😐 This is a feature I use all the time to navigate my projects and this change prevents me from having adequate control over the view of my canvas. I need more intermediate steps in zooming, just like before this change.

There’s a lot of plugins, and especially for certain features that there’s a lot of plugins for, like finding Icons/Symbols, there’s certain plugins that i prefer or like, but can only access them through the Recently Used section, but it disappears if I use other ones. There should be an ability to favorite a plugin for reuse.

I guess it’s a tiny thing but it will be super helpful to have an option with each element to remove it from final exports. Like sometimes I have some elements which I don’t want to be in the final export when I am batch exporting multiple frames. For me, I faced this issue when I wanted the gridlines/safe-areas not to be visible in the final export. (I’m talking about the manual grid lines, not the layout grid row/column option from Figma) Maybe there is a way of doing that that I haven’t come across yet and as a learner, I would greatly appreciate it if anyone could enlighten me.

Hi all,Have you considered adding a feature to the auto layout “gap” feature that could allow a user to set a minimum gap i.e. 8px and a maximum gap i.e. 40px?I’ve recently needed this function for building bar graphs. I need to make them responsive without getting too small and overlapping on each other or too big when expanded.

Simple as the title : Allow components to be set as file thumbnails. We need that possibility in our company to be more flexible with our thumbnails, wich may change year by year.

To the Figma Team and the broader Community,I am writing with an urgent and passionate plea: please make Code Connect a part of the Professional plan. To gatekeep this incredibly powerful feature feels like a direct rejection of the modern, agile way so many of us build products today.The world is moving towards small, high-impact teams, single-person companies supercharged by AI, and freelancers who handle both design and development. We, the users on your Professional plan, are at the heart of this movement. We live and breathe the transition from pixel to production code.Why are you creating this artificial wall between our designs and our code? Code Connect isn't just a convenience for large organizations; it's a revolutionary workflow enhancement for the exact type of user on the Professional plan. It promises to eliminate the friction that we face every single day. To lock it behind a higher paywall is to create an unnecessary and painful

Al ordenar los proyectos de figma, me gustaría poder ordenarlos en carpetas, como la de favoritos en el side bar, aparte de que al exportar me dé la opción de como quiero guardarlo, en carpeta, por separado, etc.

Hi Figma team,We’re running into a structural challenge in our workspace that’s slowing down collaboration within our creative team. As our organisation grows, so does the number of projects we manage in Figma. Each project gets its own folder, but because folders can’t be nested or organised into deeper layers, everything ends up sitting in one giant list.This creates a messy, hard-to-navigate workspace — especially when multiple teams and long-running projects are involved. We often work across different clients, internal initiatives, and design streams, and the lack of subfolders makes it difficult to keep things structured and find what we need quickly.Our request:A more advanced folder system that supports multiple levels (e.g., Workspace → Client → Project → Deliverables). This would allow us to group related projects, separate clients, distinguish internal vs. external work, and keep our workspace clean as it scales.W

Our team uses Quasar Framework with Vue.js for all front-end development. Currently, Figma Make generates React-based code.It would be extremely helpful if Figma Make could generate code directly using Quasar + Vue.js, or at least provide an option to switch the output framework.

I just got here.  Obviously Figma has been around and I’m new… and good, because with a fresh pair of eyes, I have to ask: WTF, Figma? How many little “X”s will I have to close before I can finally use the app?  Boxes of propositions and I haven’t even gotten here.  Tip boxes to tell me things before I have even had time to click a single feature in the product.  I mean, there were like 4, or 5, just now!  And then when I was finally ready, the page refreshed to pop another product feature ad up at the top. Oi.  I just want to use the app. This is the kind of UX that makes people throw keyboards at the wall.  SO FRUSTRATING.

There are not enough typographic controls in Figma Slides, mainly - paragraph spacing. Example: when creating bullet points they are really squashed and there is no easy way to adjust the spacing between them without going to Figma and bringing it back to Slides. 

The help button blocks the prototype content, and it is suggested that the help button can be hidden or moved。

My suggestion for Figma is to add a “slot” functionality to components. This would allow designers to create more flexible and customizable components, by adding empty slots or placeholders within a component. Users could then insert their own content or elements into these slots, without having to ungroup or modify the component itself. This functionality would save time and increase efficiency for designers, while also promoting a more consistent design system across a project or organization. I believe this feature would greatly enhance the flexibility and usability of Figma’s component system, and would be a valuable addition to the platform.

OAuth App does not have permission management functionality, so permission management functionality needs to be added, such as adding editors and readers-only.

As administrators, we are constantly annoyed by “false” licence upgrade requests.All users get different modals that urge them to ask for an upgrade, even when it’s not needed (eg. they’re invited to collaborate in an open session, hence can edit without licence upgrade). This leads us to have to re-qualify every single request to determine if there is a genuine need, or if it's just someone who clicked to get rid of the modal (90% of the time).Is it possible to disable these modals inviting users to ask for an upgrade? It is a real burden on a daily basis.

Hi everyone,I’m running into a strange shortcut behavior difference between my work and personal Figma accounts. Platform: macOS (Turkish-Q keyboard) App: Figma Desktop + Web (tested both) Mode: Design mode, Move tool active, not in Prototype etc. Issue: In my personal account, pressing ⌥ + ⌘ + ↑/↓ rotates the selected object. In my work account, on the exact same device and setup, the same shortcut correctly changes the layer order.  What I’ve tried (none fixed it): Cleared Figma cache (~/Library/Application Support/Figma) Removed and re-added both accounts The behavior persists only in my personal account,

I’ve been asked a couple of times if the font size can be made bigger by colleagues within the feedback panel because they can’t see it. We might be a bit older than most using this software but it would still be a helpful setting to include.

Thanks for adding annotations to Design Mode. I have been spending the last day annotating some new design ideas. People who have access to the Figma file love that they can read come design rationale and interaction behaviors. For others, who do not have access, or do not use Figma it would be great if I can export the annotations associated with objects inside a frame.  Thanks, K.

I’ve been building a project using Figma Sites and I’m running into very slow loading times when navigating pages. Even after compressing all images and simplifying the design, the performance hasn’t improved.I ran a network analysis and the issue doesn’t appear to be assets or images — it’s the initial page response from Figma’s server.Here’s what I’m consistently seeing across pages: Waiting for server response (TTFB): ~2.9 seconds Content download: ~3 ms Connection/queueing: negligible So the browser is waiting almost 3 seconds before receiving the first byte of HTML. Once the response starts, the page loads instantly.The request structure also shows that each page loads through: /_runtimes/sites-runtime.*.js /_components/v2/*.js /_json/{page-id}.json …suggesting that Sites dynamically assembles each page on the server. Combined with:

I wanted to share an idea that’s been on my mind: I think Figma could benefit from a dedicated design staging environment. Developers have staging to validate functionality before production, but designers don’t really have an equivalent space to validate design behavior at a higher fidelity. A staging-like environment in Figma would let designers build and test more realistic flows, interactions, and states — something deeper than prototypes but lighter than full development. It could help teams surface UX issues earlier, experiment safely, and hand off work with more clarity. I also think it would make it much easier for developers to understand the design. Right now, presenting prototypes in Figma can get messy, especially on bigger projects. For example:– Sometimes the Figma UI can get in the way when sharing previews.– Prototype links end up long and awkward to share.– You usually need separate URLs for desktop, mo

Bringing this up for visibility. I have a page for “components” and a page for layouts in my design file. These components have many states, so I try to keep things organized by separating project specific variations of key pieces in their own page away from the prototype mockups.  I have a tooltip in these components - on hover it displays another component as an overlay. This works great in the component page - but use that component elsewhere in the file and the overlay doesn’t carry over. I can add the overlay, but have to connect each instance of the tooltip (it’s a quoter, so there’s lots of possible variations) on every variation of my component - which defeats the purpose. It looks like this is something others have asked for: 

We want to use it to link design variables to the design tokens in our application. Our company runs on a Professional plan. There are only 10 users that need access, so we don’t have any need to go to an Organization or Enterprise. I saw the same question here, but it wasn’t answered and just pointed to the Plugin API which has an entirely different use case.

Auto layout is cool. Thanks Figma! However, to change the display order, one has to manually change the order of each item in the Layer section, which can be annoying when dealing with too many items in the layout. A solution would be to add three layout buttons, right below the current ones, that do just that: reverse the order of display. Much love. I hope this helps! Names of the button and much more

Hi,I often need the super useful new “Translate to...” AI feature, it’s great, thank you!One way to make it even greater would be to save which language was used last and use it as the default selection. Now I always have to type “ger” to get “Germany” and press enter, bc “Arabic” is the default since it starts with “a”. Just like the cmd+P menu has a “Recents” with the last action on top, I would propose to introduce this for the language selection of the “Translate to...” tool :) Thanks for the consideration,Mikka