Share Your Thoughts

It really should allow external users to leave comment on Figma make. Commenting on Figma make is crucial!I have been pasting them back to Figma Design just to get comments for feedback...

Figma Make Commenting Feature Request.Feature request: Add native, pinned commenting inside Figma Make prototype view/links (similar to Figma prototype presentation comments). Current behavior: Comments are not supported in Figma Make today, so feedback needs to happen in Figma Design or FigJam instead.

I really do not like the new confirmation dialog when deleting an account.  As an admin of an instance with 14k+ users, I delete people every single day and this new dialog gets in my way.

If I am writing feedback in a comment and need to go back and inspect something, once I click out of the unsent message, the entire typed comment in progress disappears. Can we please have the ability to auto-save comment drafts so I do not need to remember to copy and paste what I have in progress each time?

Right now, size depends on stroke width, so stuff like this happens: I want to be able to adjust the arrowhead scaling, just like in any other design tool:

Currently, when using variables, in the settings you can’t select wether you want a value (for example, padding-sm) to apply to just the padding or the gap of an auto layout. Which means that when you want to select a gap variable, it shows all the padding values as well. Can we get a setting for this?

It’s so limited and we have to clear it everytime. Increasing the limit or making it unlimited and wrap the text is a great idea.

I’ve just applied variables to all our project’s text styles. It all works as expected. However, in inspect mode, font weight it still displayed as normal css value and not with css-variable. See screenshots. Is this a bug or me messing up things?

Hey ​@ksn just one small request can we get tracker and queue on our community account that would help for sure. Thanks 😅  

Hi everyone,Is there an option to cancel the export action?While the action is running it shows this nice “Exporting...” info:But I could not find a way to abort the action.And if one made the mistake to choose export 1064 x instead of w it takes quite a while until the export action is done. Meanwile I cannot edit anything else.Why not add a little (x) next to “Exporting...” to give a possibility to stop the action? This would be great!Best, Sarah​​​​​

Hey all - I am running into a bit of a issue with how component properties are working today - specifically in the context of Figma-to-code workflows. It’s not so much of a “blocker” but I think it would be a huge unlock if we were able to attach “meta” or “pass-through” properties on Figma components.Currently any properties added to a component need to be “used” in your component. A variant, boolean, etc. needs to affect something structural or decorative in your component or you’ll see an error icon and a message “Not used within component”. Instances of the component will not contain these unused props. This is reasonable since you don’t want to have extra props on your component that are effectively no-ops. However, as Figma designs and components are increasingly the input for many design-to-code workflows, many of the things we might want to associate with a given component do not necessarily have a visible presentation impact on the Figma side, but ar

So I created a skill to help me organize my Components in Design Library, something like rename layers, reorder variants to make library more tidy.But when I (or AI) trying to reorder variant values’ order, it says that no API support this kind of operation. For example, I would like to change Variant “size” from [medium, small, large] to [small, medium, large], it can’t be done by program, only can be change manually.I can ask AI to create a new, same Component Set, but it will lose connection to exist instances, and it’s bad.Is there a way to adjust values’ order by Plugin API?

Request:Provide an option to easily duplicate or backup files via an API Reasoning:The REST API comes with a lot of options, but it doesn’t allow you to copy files, projects or teams.There’s an option to download files, but not as uploadable content (i.e. as .FIG), nor is there any option to duplicate them, if they are e.g. used as a template for another team.Possible (i.e. my) use case:I work in an enterprise. We have a base design system with tokens that we hand out to external agencies and do some automatic checks via different APIs. I would like to automate the duplication process of these files completely. However there’s no good option to do this at the current moment.

Hello, I tried Figma slides to re-create my portfolio, which I had already created in Figma, because I was attracted by the possibility to quickly reorder the slides. However, I noticed a problem: while I can create internal links in Figma slides which allow me to jump from a slide to another, when I export said slides as a PDF, the internal links are substituted with external links which jump back to the Figma website when clicked, instead of allowing you to navigate through the PDF inside your own pdf viewer. This is a problem for various reasons: you can’t easily navigate around the .pdf offline, since each time you click the supposedly internal links you instead get redirected to a web page; the offline .pdf and the online version can be out of sync. Meaning that the offline versions, which may be several and have different slide orders or different elements (it’s common practice to slightly tweak a portfolio when you send it to different clie

Hi, as I have used up my 3000 AI credits, I would like to request adding a LOW CREDIT BALANCE alert, since AI credits can’t be manually reset or extended each month? If possible, maybe offer an option to purchase more credits WITHOUT changing our plans?

As mentioned in closed topic https://forum.figma.com/t/bug-autolayout-resizes-incorrectly-when-it-contains-no-visible-frames/14619, Is anybody facing the same problem? Even all contents inside “trailing-section” frame are invisible and frame resizing is set to “hug”, it still has 24 pixels of width.

it would be game changer to be able to export generated artefacts with figma make to figma design  

I have a very distinct first and last name. My Figma profile uses my full name, which is important for our organization-- coworkers and partners in Figma need to be able to easily tag me in comments and see who worked on files. However, I would like a way to have a different display name and handle for the Figma Community. I don’t really want my questions about plugins, etc. to be publicly searchable if someone were to Google my name. I prefer to have a privacy option and keep my professional work and personal online presence as separate as possible.

Hey, It would be great if we could manage the z-index of some elements. Example: I 've got an element which has a built-in tool tip displayed on hover (or click, whatever) if it’s in auto-layout and the previous element is just above, this tool tip will appear behind this precedent element. The only way to make it appear on top is to place it manually on the actual layout which takes horrendous amount of time. I suggest there would be an option “take the highest z-index” or such when defining “display overlay” in prototyping mode.

When overriding a single element inside a slot in a component instance, Figma marks the entire slot as overridden. As a result, updates made to the main component no longer propagate to any elements inside that slot — even if only one element in the slot was actually changed. Expected behaviorOnly the modified element should be treated as overridden.All other elements inside the slot should remain linked to the main component and continue to receive updates.

I’m with Figma in this AI Design battle. I’d be happy to share my internal AI VScode + copilot workflow, maybe it would influence the Figma Make approach to what a designer needs from an actual “vibe designing”

Hi Figma team,My team and I have been experimenting with slots recently. I'd like to propose a feature enhancement: when a component with properties is added via a slot, those properties should be accessible directly from the main component.Ideally, these nested properties would surface automatically, eliminating the need to click deep into the component hierarchy to make edits.

Love that branches were added but would like to make some suggestions: Support sub-branches from branches. This is a really helpful way to signify milestones in an app design and allow for many avenues of exploration and iterations with the ability to only merge the branch (feature or milestone) which was approved. See example below of how I would ideally structure the process of a project

Feature Request: Git-like Version Control for Figma BranchesCurrently, Figma allows us to create a branch from each file, but this limitation makes it difficult to manage complex design workflows — especially for teams working on large design systems.Git-like branching would make version control in Figma far more powerful and flexible. With this approach, designers could create multiple branches from existing ones — functioning much like environments (e.g., test, staging, production) in development.Attempt at elucidating through a flow diagramAs a design system maintainer, this would be a huge benefit. For example: Components that need additional review or testing could be safely designed in separate subbranches.

I was looking at the release notes to double check my gut feeling that Figma itself has not been getting a lot of love lately. For my personal uses that has been the case. Only vague AI related things, which might be fine but makes me feel a lot of things are left behind. The trigger for posting this was looking at “Code Connect” after reading about a “bug” in Slots that seemed to be “intended behavior” (which is weird). This feature coming from 2024 (!) seems to be in Beta still (according to the blog post). The Github feels completely abandoned. This reminded me of things like branches (total abandonement), Percentage widths, Slots that feel half baked. The whole grid thing that seems to fizz out. New UI that was not a big success (I am still scanning everytime I select a diffferent layer where things are after all these years). Still not seeing the new App layout with the buttons on the left side (my team does, not me). Etc. Etc.I was just curious, I am getting the