Share Your Thoughts

When exporting variant names, the file name becomes a combination of all the variant properties. There is no way to control the variant export name, which is especially difficult for developer hand-off. In this example, I have a back icon variant group (Named “Back”) containing both an Apple and an Android variant of the back icon. If I then go to expo

You can currently set multiple stroke colours to an object, but they will share the same properties (thickness, position, etc.). My idea is that you should be able to set all stroke properties on each stroke: Make sense or am I missing something?

I’ve got a popup window with 2 variants for minimized/maximized which I open as an overlay on the bottom-left of the screen, but with some padding. I cannot use manual position for this because in this mode the overlay positions based on top-left constraint and, when minimized, is anchored to the intended bottom-left point and is instead moved up. My current (dirty) solution is to wrap all my variants in a transparent frame with some left and bottom padding. Then set the overlay position to “Bottom left” which correct anchors the overlay to the bottom-left as well.

In FigJam I often duplicate a sticky that already exist, it can be because it is close by, or I want to create another with the same color. Then I move it where I wanted, often on top of an image, but then I ALWAYS have to “Bring it to top”.I understand the duplicated sticky is maintaining the z-index of the “parent”, but why? If I make a duplicate I would expect the same as adding a new sticky from the toolbar, in that case they are always on top.Thanks.

 Blockchain adoption is shifting from experimentation to enterprise-wide implementation. Modern organizations now demand platforms that ensure scalability, compliance, predictable performance, and secure smart contract execution. Infograins delivers this transformation through advanced engineering models, serving as a trusted Cardano blockchain development company and offering enterprise-grade Binance Blockchain Development capabilities—all aligned with the evolving architecture needs of global businesses.From finance and healthcare to logistics, identity, and decentralized commerce, Infograins engineers blockch

The layering of modules in Auto Layout cannot be adjusted as freely as z-index in HTML div elements. It would be beneficial to add the ability to control the layer order in Auto Layout, similar to how z-index works, allowing for more flexibility and precision in complex designs.

before 🤗Previously, you could generate a [no expire] tokennow 😔If users rely on tokens to access the figma open api, forgetting to replace expired tokens can cause serious problems.The expiration date of the limited period will cause the figma token to no longer have usage value. 

when sharing a Figma Make design there isn’t a place to create comments to others about changes that are needed, or problems with the design. When publishing reviewers can’t leave comments. 

I know that something has changed because I use this shortcut constantly and my muscle memory is failing me.  Expected behavior:With an object selected Press “k” on the keyboard UI switches to Scale tool (if not already there) AND auto-focuses + highlights the value in the #x scale field Type desired scale value “Enter” to confirm Ex: select object with Move tool + “k” + “.5” + “Enter” = item reduced by 50% from center - it’s so easy, I do it all the time. Observed behavior as of 12/13/25 @ 5pm PST: Pressing “k” while on Scale tool behaves as expected Pressing “k” while on Move swaps to the Scale tool, but DOES NOT FOCUS the #x scale field In order to focus the #x scale field from Move, I now have to press “k” TWICE in a row (once to change tools and a second time to focus the #x field). As a result, my muscle memory keeps resulting in an object that is some lower opacit

Hello, good day.I’m experiencing serious issues with the new Figma UI update. Many essential tools — such as padding controls — are missing or hidden.Please do not enforce this new version. The previous UI was much better, clearer, and far more efficient for designers.This new version has no advantages, feels confusing, and makes our workflow significantly harder.

Figma is a powerful design tool that allows designers to create and collaborate on projects seamlessly. However, as the number of projects grows, organizing your workspace can become a daunting task. Finding specific projects can be difficult, especially if your workspace is cluttered and disorganized. Fortunately, Figma provides users with the ability to create folders and subfolders to keep their projects organized and easily accessible. One of the most useful features of Figma is the ‘Drafts’ section, which allows you to save incomplete or unfinished projects. This feature is especially handy when you need to work on multiple projects simultaneously, but don’t want to clutter your workspace with unfinished designs. The ‘Drafts’ section gives you the ability to save your progress, so you can come back to it later. To add a folder to your Drafts section, follow these easy steps: Click on the ‘Drafts’ section located on the left-hand side of your Figma das

They are so bad, it’s sickening. First, masks go behind the masked object, (?!) Second, if you build a mask out of different compounded shapes (add/subtract), then you can’t select the sub shapes by clicking. You have to go to the layers and navigate through tens of shapes. Please change this, just do it like Illustrator. It’s unbelievable how bad it is. I get dandruff every time I have to use them.

Is there any plan to be able to create the gradient itself as a variable? For example, if I wanted some themes to have a solid background variable but others to have a gradient?

Hi, I’m not sure if this is new since the May update, but I wonder why “empty” (all elements hidden) Auto Layout Frames keep the size of the last hidden child (and I do not mean last in the list, but the last element to have been toggled out of view by the user), making them not-0px high even with nothing in them. See here a file with a Frame with three hidden rectangle: the Frame keeps the size of the last child rectangle to have been hidden. When adding a 0-px Frame to the AL frame, and toggling this 0-px Frame off last, the container goes 0-px. In my opinion, empty AL Frames should have a height of 0. What do you think?

Currently we get the Figma file name as a Tab title when we Run/Present any prototype. Now if on that page I had designed multiple Flows (Start points) then there in no way while having a look on Tab title that which prototype flow is presenting/running.Also while hovering that Tab can we show the full file + Page + Flow name in tooltip ?

Introduce password protection and viewer analytics for Figma Slides to enhance security and provide insights into presentation engagement, similar to DocSend. Key Features: Password Protection: Set and manage passwords for shared slides. Viewer Analytics: Track view counts and engagement metrics (e.g., time spent on each slide). Access demographic data like viewer location and device used (desktop, mobile). Why It Matters: Integrating these features directly into Figma Slides streamlines workflows, eliminating the need for third-party tools and making Figma a more powerful platform for design and presentation needs.

The new additions to the grid layout are really awesome and very helpful! Thanks for that!It is now more like I’m used to having a grid in software.Now I have another proposal to make it even better.Sometimes I need to select all cells in a column, for example set the alignment inside that column.Currently I have to select all items in that column one by one.It would be very handy if columns or rows are represented in the Layers (left sidebar) so selection of cells would be easier. Maybe also add a toggle to switch between row and column seelction.

I haven’t seen many posts about this, only one from 6 months ago that’s now locked for some reason. When working with Auto Layout (fill to width/height) and aspect ratio locked, I’ve noticed decimal points in the element’s height/width (I have pixel snapping on). I tried Round to pixel but it’s not working. It would be so great if the Snap to Pixel Grid function worked with Locked Aspect Ratio! In my example below, I set the frame to fill the width but locked the aspect ratio so it doesn’t stretch the content. Unfortunately, this results in a decimal-point height, and with auto-layout this results in objects below this component to be placed on decimal points. When exporting as an image (which is a technical requirement), the decima

I think that’s the new feature “nested components” need to be more functional. For example: I have a card with nested component button. But the only parameter that i need to edit is icon on this button, all other settings useless in this component. I thinks it will be cool if i can disable some of nested component’s paramters like show icon or btn size and leave only icon-type parameter. And it will be more cool if i can make preferred icons for nested component (in this card i can choose between filled like or unfilled)

By default, all exports are named after the Board.I am copying the section title when I prepare to export.It seems like a better default rule to have the section title be the filename.

I can’t seem to find a way to Hide all lower levels of my mind maps. I click on the arrows, and nothing happens. It’s making a mess. I can’t use it for practical reasons, presentation-wise it’s kinda frustrating. Is there any viable way already for me to do it? If it’s yet to come, please do it 😍 it’s a game changer for me and many others who are still waiting for it

Hi Figma team,At the company I work for, we often send design PDFs to clients who aren't familiar with Figma prototypes. Email is our main channel, but exported PDFs are often way too large—even when using the TinyImage compressor plugin, which is slow and not always effective.It would be incredibly helpful to have:An option to disable font embedding.Basic PDF compression settings (e.g. image quality).A way to export text as vectors without manually outlining everything.Improving PDF export would really ease delivery for teams who rely on email-based workflows. Thanks!

Miro has this down quite nicely. You can create swimlanes there, which serve as a grouping mechanism, and it makes it easier to create complex workflows. My workaround right now is to simply have different sections, which works OK. However, when creating new shapes (through the connector icon next to the shape), it keeps suggesting objects outside the current section. To be honest, if this were fixed, and sections in FigJam could. just be swapped / extended (sort of like a table), this would solve 99% of the drawbacks I currently see in FigJam for that use case! Keep building the best product on earth!  

I want a shortcut to show and hide / expand or collapse the pages and layers panel. If I got one I’d want the pages panel to open and close by keyboard shortcut. It’s too much work to constantly open and close the pages panel. Overall, I’d say that the pages panel needs a UX review. We’ve now got so many pages that it’s a tough experience, but I’d say that if I could choose a page from a dropdown list as opposed to opening and closing the dang panel everytime that would be awesome. Or, ideally what if when I hit page up or down the magic menu (command + p) or whatever it is called displays all pages that I can search on quickly or use the arrows to thumb through them. Some mail applications to do this today for UG folders and it’s way nicer than trying to find a folder. Maybe use that AI money for things like this and not trying to tell me what names my buttons ought to be. ;) 

Hi Figma team,I’d like to provide some feedback on the current Pages and Layers panel experience.Right now, the Pages section and Layers section are stacked vertically. When a file contains many pages and many layers, I have to keep dragging the panel up and down, which is inefficient.Would it be possible to redesign the layout so that Pages and Layers can be displayed side-by-side, or allow them to be expanded simultaneously in a more flexible way? This would make navigation significantly faster.Additionally, could the Pages section support a grouping feature similar to Layer folders? When a project has many pages, the list becomes long and hard to manage.Overall, the main goals: Reduce unnecessary scrolling Allow quick access to all pages and all layers Support grouping/organization for pages Thanks for considering these improvements!