Share Your Thoughts

Hi Figma team,I’d love to suggest a feature that could bring mobile prototyping to a whole new level: support for haptic feedback in prototypes tested on mobile devices (especially via the Figma mobile app).Today, Figma already allows us to prototype with beautiful transitions and rich interactions. But being able to trigger haptic feedback (via the Taptic Engine on iOS, or vibration on Android) during key interactions (tap, success, error, screen transition, etc.) would let us:Simulate real product experiences more accurately Design more emotionally engaging and trustworthy interactions Test and iterate on sensory feedback during user testing Elevate the quality of motion & micro-interaction design directly within FigmaIt would be amazing to have:Native support for defining haptic patterns (e.g. soft tap, success pulse, warning alert) per interaction Compatibility with existing mobile preview features Potential integration with Core Haptics or custom presetsLetting designers proto

Current behaviour (in Org): 1- after sharing a link to anything in a file (page, frame, section, etc) the url uses those names 2- if the name of any of those names included in the url changes, then the url, which has been included in documentation and dev tickets, breaks. Expected behaviour: use unique identifiers instead, so the url already shared do not break due to file renaming due, file clean up, etc Anecdote: 1- an entire set of sprint tickets (50+) had to be painfully relinked due to file name, frame and section renaming that happened after the PM grabbed the urls. 2- after a feature has grown (or low memory warning), and there’s a need to split the file into multiple files in another project folder, the frames are cut and pasted into another file. Once again, simple file management breaks urls already shared and an entire project needs to be relinked.

I often find myself trying to use the font weight shortcuts to change the weight of a line. Would be a helpful shortcut when you have a line selected. Possibly also when you have an object selected, it could edit the stroke width on that object. cmd - alt - < cmd - alt - >

What about having a feature where one user can share his/her selections to other team member who's working in the same file? 

Doing UI/UX for 23 years, since 2000. Hi everybody. The major issue of editing components right now, is the fact that ussually you have to go to the isolated component library and edit it there. And while you are doing that, you are completely disconnected from the rest of the design. I would like to see the future, for editing instance of component on the spot, and immediately see the result. After edit is done, there should be the “Publish changes…” button. Universe bless the Figma.

Hi I am trying to implement SFX into my prototype however it has been quite the struggle since the only way for me to do it by adding a video with that audio I want, and half of the time the audio plays out very „buggy“ in the prototype view. Will there be a feature to allow such implications in the future? It will make presentations to clients or project groups way easier and more fun. Otherwise I have good unity knowledge where I can try and implement such ideas, but I rather stick to Figma when its just about prototyping and UI design, otherwise I can just fully build that whole prototype in Unity, but it will take longer :/

This would mitigate all of the users who are making single layer Auto-layouts specifically so they can do this.

I was curious why our product, fresh out of dev and into QA, lacked accuracy for a number of interactions, transitions, etc. It was only after walking in devs’ shoes for a minute that I realised they cannot actually see any detail if any of the interaction uses variables. This is extent of what they see: But they should be seeing these values: Instead, my design team now has to manually document all interactions to ensure they are accurately reproduced. …or are we all just doing it wrong?

Hi, I discovered dev mode today to add comments to design (without big bubbles). I see that we can add links to dev mode of Confluence but I’m surprised that the links are not auto linked because I add them in Confluence. Ex: I add link of a frame in Confluence, so the link of Confluence page(s) is/are auto add to Figma dev mode. To go further, it will be great if the right panel could display the confluence page (don’t need to open a browser to open it). Thanks for your time

We have 3 menus, why? We can combine file and Figma’s dropdown menu or at least remove some unnecessary items from it. Also what is the 3rd one? We can merge that with the main Figma dropdown menu.

It would be more convenient if objects resized with a fixed aspect ratio automatically rounded their dimensions to the nearest whole pixel. At the moment, one of the dimensions—either width or height—often ends up with fractional values like 40.63px, which can cause visual inconsistencies and alignment issues. Ensuring both dimensions snap to whole pixels would enhance precision and improve the overall editing experience.

The recent Aspect Ratio update has brought with it a frustrating change to the way objects snap to the pixel grid.Previously, when changing the size/position of an object by dragging, it would snap to the nearest pixel. If you needed to get more specific - and have an object at 1.5px width for example - you could change this via the properties panel without having that object snap to the nearest pixel in terms of positioning/size.This felt like a really nice balance between snapping to the nearest pixel with the cursor, whilst retaining control over incremental choices via the properties panel.Now, after the most recent update, we no longer have this control - when you change the size of an object in the properties panel it snaps to the nearest pixel.For example, if I have a rectangle which is 6.5px wide and 1.5px tall, and I use the properties panel to change it's height to 2.5px, it'll automatically change the width to 6px. The same goes for positioning.Of course I can go into the pr

Hello, Lastly I faced a problem with the wrap mode. I need to be able to fix a max number of items per line before wrapping to the next line (with a min/max width per item of course). It’s for the sake of simplicity because I don’t want to remove wrap mode just for that. Should be clear enought, if you have any further question ? 🙂 Cheers, Xavier.

As a large organization who auto approve any member wanting a Figjam edit seat, we would like an organization specific link we can share internally that allows new users who sign up to be onboarded into our organization by default - with added protection of whitelisted domains and enforced SSO we already use.It's not always appropriate to have to invite a user into a file for them to get started, and we don’t want the additional admin burden of inviting new users manually.

I would love a way to make designs more responsive, especially when showing the final designs in the prototype mode, by being able to set widths of certain components based on number of columns if using a preset grid layout, or even percentage of the frame the component is in. Auto-layout is great and almost there in helping designs become more responsive in prototype view, but it can be enhanced even more by being able to set certain widths or rules based on screen size. For example, I am creating a dashboard layout, and certain cards on the dashboard are 25% width, or 3 columns of a 12 column grid layout, and then will resize to 50% width when the screen size goes to a tablet screen size. This would help in communicating how components and designs reflow based on screen sizes.

Currently Figma only shows font weights as Thin, Regular, Medium, Bold, Black, etc. on the Design Panel, and you can only see the actual value of the weight in the inspect panel, but it would speed up design spec work and documentation work a lot if in the Design panel, next to each weight it also showed the value for that weight, as in Thin (100), Regular (400), Medium (500), Bold (600), and so on, as it is what tokens should use and developers would implement most often.

I have multiple flows on a page, some web, some mobile. Unfortunately when I try to view the prototype for each of these flows, I’m stuck at always going to the setting to switch the view which defeats the aim of seamless use.Can we have prototype settings for individual flows on a page, so when I click on the prototype link, the screen size is always set.

When will we have custom fonts in Figma Sites? If it´s next week or month, I’ll be switching to Figma Sites for the next projects, if it’s next year, I’ll stick to Framer.Any indication ​@Figma_Support? 

Hey guys, I was playing with Buzz and after pasting one of my assets, the auto-layout property is gone! It seems auto-layout is not supported on the parent frame, or is this a bug? If it’s not a bug, there’s no use for us. We create hundreds of Newsletters and ads with auto layouts which flow automatically depending on the content.Also will the collaborators be able to swap instances of a symbol on a design and hide items? Thanks!

The Figma Sites Webpages Canvas, Has a max height, I can’t continue modifiying the work.  

why we couldn't change order of component properties? 

Previously I was able to manually change the spacing between equally distributed frames or objects  even though the items were not in an auto layout. Now that functionality is gone and I can only edit the spacing manually or by using the pink interface between items - which makes it harder to get specific numbers.

I think we should have an option to switch Device mocks from Laptop to Mobile during presentationsIs it already available? if not, I would love to request this feature.We should be able to assign different device mocks to our flows For example.Sector Web can have Macbook Air but Sector Mobile can have Android Compact.It will allow us to present or share prototypes efficiently.

The most recent update changed a few things in Figjam. First, they added a lot of new “shapes” (which is just a rectangle with an icon inside), and added a couple of new default colors. HOWEVER, they also changed the base colors for stickies!They are now way paler, with washed out, low contrast colors. I’m sure it was supposed to make them look both like real sticky notes and to increase the contrast between the background colors and the text for accessibility reasons, but I feel the colors don’t contrast enough at all between one another.I use colors a lot to help with identifying specific sections or types of notes, I often use every color of stickies available to distinguish between specific uses of each (like taking notes during user tests, each color representing a scenario).Unless custom colors are finally made available for stickies in Figjam, I think they are going to be way more annoying to use for me from now on.  

Please could you build in the ability to customise bullet styling. I have it in my styleguide but am unable to easily create bullet lists with my styling on actual page designs without having to manually add them in. Thanks!