Share Your Thoughts

Hi there- I was just wondering about the possibility of adding a new feature surrounding components which could hopefully expedite some slow and time consuming processes- namely defining more complex variables which rely on the modal values of other variables without applying and editing it every single time to every relevant component- which is incredibly time consuming (for context, I used Figma as required for an assessment task, and building it with the variables in interactions took up too much time, both in figuring out how to apply variables if I couldn’t predefine them -apart from simple definitions in the variables table- and in debugging all of it- I even stayed up all night because I was too stressed- I ended up working on it from late afternoon all the way to 8 AM and thinking of solutions and I still couldn’t finish it- and that was just some of the final touches that should not have taken as long as it did.. even got sick from not sleeping. I’m still sick from it).So, I w

We are able to use icon fonts as icons in Figma (e.g.: Font Awesome, Material Icons) but the new Material Symbols font isn’t built into Figma yet. It would be so cool if Figma implemented this… What do you guys think?

For example, select a with the cursor, and write the same for b. Or write for B that the value of A multiplied by 50,000. I wish we could have this kind of function.The ai is absolutely powered by the text you enter, and even a slight change in the description is producing a completely wrong result.It would be nice if we could select multiple objects, such as adding the values of A and B to C.

For years I have the same issue with my devs: “Where to find a hover state for this button?” I’ve tried different approaches, but the most native (and most useful for devs) it is to have ability to see all component states on the fly, without leaving document and trying to find some piece of design documentation. You already introduced this as Playground feature, but it is not useful for devs. So my suggestion: Rename “Playground” to “Inspect component” Add Inspect panel in playground modal (in dev mode) Increase size of modal Add zoom-in\zoom-out features for component preview

It would be amazing if you could unpublish individual templates that are no longer actively being used without unpublishing a whole template file.

EDIT: This hasn’t happened before but it loaded? So nevermind!Hi there! Is there any way that we could get the option in Figma to remove videos from a file when importing files for a free user account? I’m trying to add in an old project file to my personal figma that someone must have added a video file too, and it’s kind of a pain that there isn’t an option to continue the import and to remove it, I’d need to sign up for a month just so that I can even get in the file to remove it

Looking for an updated version of the MKitF2I plugin to work with Indesign 2025.

not trying to shout in the title, just want to make this more visible. currently, when you want to apply, lets say, a gradient mask to an image, you need to make a shape, apply to it the gradient with transparency, then have the image on top of the shape and make a mask from the 2 layers in the layers panel. the problem is that its very hard to control afterwards, to select the image or the gradient layer you need to search in the layers panel, its just difficult. plus figma doesnt (yet, i hope) smooth gradients like photoshop does, so the mask wont even turn out very nice. you should look at how photoshop does it, why not just have the mask strictly linked to the image, or on the image, if you will, without the need for extra layers. for an example, imagine you are working with a irregularly shaped png with transparence - it would be really uncomfortable to apply a fade transparency to that png using the current means, you would create that masking layer under the png, but the png is

Why are Ukrainians not allowed to sell their files? We are not responsible for the situation that is currently happening between the two countries. I am a designer, and I want to earn additional income for my effort and my work! I believe it is unfair that we do not have the opportunity to share our creations “for a fee,” especially since no one knows how long the war will last. Please open access, because this is not fair to us as people and as designers.

Ideally we would see an MCP connection icon somewhere all the time so we do not break our prototype when the MCP connection fails or drops and then have the AI suddenly be dumb as a box of hair and redesign everything. 

Why is there a difference between Figma Design and Figma Sites? Figma Design should just give you the various breakpoints by default if you want to build a site. If you want to create a website in Design, just publish the project. It’s incredibly ridiculous that if you want to build a prototype that has the interactions available in Sites, that you can’t do those in Design. It’s also ridiculous that there is a “responsive” option when previewing a Figma Design project, but it doesn’t snap to a mobile layout. You can sort of achieve this with min/max widths and auto layout, but it won’t snap from a desktop nav to a mobile nav. I mean, all the components are cross compatible anyway, and the UI properties between Deign and Sites are the same, so why are there 2 different tools? Why not just include the AI builder tool in Design? What is the point of Figma Make this AI builder is available in Sites? Just do it all in one version…. unless you’re planning to make Figma Sites an upcharge if y

Please make saving to figma make version history, thumbnails and deleting favicons / sharing thumbs if uploaded multiple ones possible 

Can you please make a feature that allows you to import the Figma Make page to a figma file? Also would be great to export components from Figma Make.

When you open a new slide deck you are met with a modal that suggests templates ( layouts ) after choosing design. In this view, because of the ( + ) roll over i thought i was able to pick and choose differend template slides for the skeleton i new i had to go through. So:I now i need a headlineand then a slide with a headline and 4 sub categoriesand then a slide with two 50/50 split columns and then a slide with 5 columns and then a headline slide and then and then and then...i know this before i open my slide deck - so let me prepolulate my slide deck with templates

Hey everyone,Just discovered that Figma Make has officially released its Supabase integration—but here’s the interesting part: I’ve already been using Supabase with Figma Make before this integration even existed.The new integration is cool, but it mainly supports simple key-value pair setups. If you’re building anything more complex or relational, it quickly hits limitations.So here’s a method I’ve been using that still works perfectly—especially for advanced database structures:✅ My Method to Set Up Complex Supabase Databases in Figma Make 1. Structure your app in Figma Make.Make sure your app's UI and components are well-organized.2. Ask Figma Make AI for the database schema:Prompt:“Generate a Supabase schema that can be run in the SQL Editor to create tables that support my current app.”3. It will generate a .sql file inside your app's code structure.4. Copy that SQL schema and paste it into the SQL Editor of your Supabase project.5. Run it.If there are any errors, simply paste the

Buzz bulk upload is awesome! 😍 It would be great if we could apply a CVS variables to frames names and sizes. It would save a lot of time while doing mass content production for social ads. We’ve started experimenting with using Buzz for ad banner production. For a single ad test we might do 50 pieces of unique content across 5 different frame sizes. bulk upload is looking like a promising tool to make our lives a lot easier (for designers and non-designers in the team) and being able to uploaded CVS variables to frame names and sizes would save us even more time! 

Wink is the most prominent video and photo editing app of 2025. https://seruapk.com/wink/

Is there a way to go from a Figma Make page to a figma file? I actually really like the UI that Figma Make created, but want to make faster tweaks in Figma design. Curious if anyone else has this use case.

Brief description of the problem: I don't use all the fonts that figma has by default, so searching among the fonts becomes a torment, if you are looking for a font, going through all the options without having a specific idea or a specific font name, it takes too long. Figma already has a suitable logic to solve this problem. You already have a dropdown menu where you can select font groups (All fonts, In this file , Google Font 8/24 Update (????) and etc.). Add functionality to create your own font groups where you can add the fonts you want and name the category. For example (UI Fonts, Sci FI fonts, Handmade etc.). This would make it very easy to interact with the font library.

I should be able to export multiple frames into a single PDF by selecting all of them. Please implement this feature!

In Sketch, you can simply hold ALT and the selection tool will only select items that are fully enclosed by it. Super useful!You can also do a deep selection, to only select items that are fully enclosed inside a group, by holding ALT and COMMAND. AFAIK Figma doesn’t support this? Would be appreciated if it would be implemented...

There is an unmet need on high level file management for large enterprise organizations like ours. To keep it simple, we have to resort to using legacy taxonomy design from the old days at the file name level. We have hundreds+ of applications and products across the enterprise spanning every tech stack imaginable. Some share a polished coded library, most do not. We manage and track hundreds of files for product teams that are using different processes.I am sure that user role infrastructure, security/permissions structures, and unique customer installations (for better or for worse) have been a barrier. There is also contending with the existing adhoc favorites on the user level.But some small interim improvements would help.Current Browsable File View Issueshaving to resort to using leading characters to tuck away or organize with the limited organization features and having just a sort. “_” and “ x” having to develop custom taxonomies for grouping in the file name “ (group schema)

Split access controls for developers and viewers, they should be separate roles. Use case - I want to share a file with an external partner to review a design, however I don’t want them to be able to copy or export the file, although I wouldn’t mind if they shared it with their colleagues. However I also want my developers to still be able to export assets from this file when it’s time for handoff. Currently all these settings are grouped under one setting; “Allow viewers to copy, share, and export from this file”. A better solution would be to split out each action e.g. copy, share and export and also be able to change these access controls per role (developer and viewer): This needs to be implemented before developers become paid seats, at the moment they just have the same permissions as viewers.

In my understanding of global components, when the Main component is made changes, it reflects in all instances automatically, but why is it that mine is not showing the changes?

I added a prototype in Slides that was of a mobile app flow. I forgot to change the prototype in Figma to set a device (Ex: iPhone 14) so I went into the Figma design file and set the device. Then when I went back into Slides it still showed the old prototype embedded with no device. I didn’t see a way to refresh or update the prototype. The workaround I found was to delete the prototype and try adding it to slides again. That worked but it would be better to have it automatically update or a button to reload it.