Got a feature request or product idea? We're all ears!
Recently active
We’d love to hear what feature requests, ideas or improvements you have in mind for any of the Figma products you are using.Note: If you have feedback on an existing product or feature, head over to the category Share Your Feedback. Sharing product improvements and ideasOur teams look at ideas and feature requests across many different channels throughout the product cycle and it has truly helped make Figma a better product.With that said, we want to make sure we set some expectations for how feature requests, ideas and improvements will be handled in the forum.We cannot make any guarantees or promises that you’ll see your idea/feature request/improvement implemented into the product Our team will merge topics with the same/similar ideas to keep the forum organized Inactive topics that are 12 months or older may be closed or archived to help keep the community organized and healthy Voting on topicsAt the moment, it is not possible to vote on topics.This is a feature we are reviewin
Auto-Layout has padding (inner spacing), but no margins (outer spacing). Currently the only 2 ways to add spacing is to: Create a spacer element or Wrap the items in another frame and apply gap spacing This creates a lot of unnecessary frames, and sometimes creates nesting so deep it goes outside the layers panel. Not sure if a technical limitation left this out of consideration in the first few versions of Auto Layout, but it would be much appreciated if it were included in a future version as it comes up as a significant limitation many times a day.
Create tags that can be added to post it notes for user research analysis
1. Describe the problem your experiencing and how your idea helps solve this If I add an image to figma and then resize that image I would like to export it at the original resolution. Maybe if there was even a button to resize the image to the full size. 2. Add as much context as possible (screenshots, Figma files, mockups, etc.) **3. Ask questions to bring the community into the conversation ** (e.g. Does anyone else experience this? Is anyone using a plugin or workaround to help solve this?, etc.
The UI for adding slides shows a grid of template options, but the previews are relatively small and no metadata is provided about the options (e.g. name). This makes it hard to identify the slide you want where there are many similar looking options or variants. I’d like to have either a large slide-out-on-hover preview or the name of the slide show on hover.
When aliasing a color variable to another (img 1), or using it directly on an element (img 2), we should be able to override the opacity without the need to create a variable for each transparency variation: Cant override opacity in the alias: Example 2 Cant override the fill opacity:
Would love to see some added features for sharing Make designs with external members of your org without fully publishing it unprotected to the internet. Creating proofs of concept is much easier and faster in Make for some scenarios (for example– forms that react to the input) but are useless for using in testing because there are too many security concerns with publishing the link outside of the organization. Could it be only published for a certain pre-determined period of time? Could it be password protected with a password that auto-regenerates every so often? Could we have a one-time use link?Not all of us are using Make as a final product producer, but a fast way to create testable interactions that would be difficult or impossible with regular prototyping.
We are looking to setup an interactive Figma prototype of our new app so that we can quickly try out new ideas without code. We were very excited to learn about Figma Make via the upsell in the prototyping panel! Mainly because it would enable our coder colleagues not familiar with Figma to contribute on some design work. That could be such a productivity booster!But oh boy the disappointment when we learned that the purpose of Make is to generate application code instead of something that is useful for us to build upon. This is a weird direction for a design tool. How did you come to the conclusion that anyone would want to implement the application first and then manually create the designs and prototypes to iterate on? Make should output a plain Figma Prototype that we can build upon. AI can not replace the user testing cycle. Once happy with the design and ready to implement, it would indeed be very useful with a tool that generates the application skeleton from the prototype.
Now that our company has transitioned to Figma Enterprise across our entire design and development teams, we were eager to explore using Figma Sites to host a small internal dashboard and marketing toolkit website.However, we have run into a significant blocker: the native CMS does not support uploading PDFs or general document files.While using external cloud storage links (like Google Drive or AWS S3) works as a temporary band-aid, it is not a scalable or seamless workflow for a modern CMS platform. To truly compete as a viable website builder, Figma Sites needs the native ability to accept, host, and serve standard file types alongside images.This functionality is critical for numerous use cases:Internal Tools & Portals: Teams cannot build marketing hubs, asset dashboards, or resource toolkits without hosting downloadable deliverables (e.g., finalized PDFs, pitch decks, guides). Designer Portfolios: Freelancers and agencies using Figma to build portfolios desperately need a clea
I want to ask if you can please develop Figma more such that we can be able to draw a 2D like a circle in metric units for 1 to 1 scale. Also the modelling enviroment needs to be infinite for large 2D Drawings
Hi,We have thousands of icons as components in our library that should not be linked via Code Connect.It would be great to have a way to multi-select them and apply a batch action, such as “Skip connection”.At the moment, I would need to click on each icon, select “Skip connection” on the next screen, then go back to the list… Something like this, used in combination with filtering by name would be great!Thanks
The title case isn’t accurate. As it also capitalizes: articles (such as “a,” “an,” and “the”) conjunctions (such as “and,” “but,” and “or”), and prepositions (such as “at,” “by,” “of,” “to,” and “on”). In my opinion, the better naming would be “Capitalize”. Figma team can also consider adding “Title Case” and “Sentence Case” options separately.
Hello,I am looking to create a good hero section for my site, where it should take the height of browser in the first fold. The subsequent sections can be of fixed heights based on content. I need something like 100vh to have for my hero section.
Hi everyone! 👋The recent update allowing creators to showcase their design tool stack in Figma Community profiles («My Toolbox») is a fantastic step toward making profiles feel like true digital portfolios. However, the current selection is quite limited (28 preset icons) and primarily covers mainstream tools.Modern design workflows have evolved far beyond the traditional suite. Many designers today rely on a diverse, hybrid ecosystem that includes specialized LLMs, dedicated reference managers, AI prototyping tools, and knowledge management systems.To make «My Toolbox» truly representative of how creators work today, I’d love to propose expanding the selection to include a broader range of global tools, categorized below:1. Global LLMs & AI Assistants: DeepSeek (at the moment — V4-Flash-Vision), Qwen, Kimi, Meta AI, Grok, Agnes AI, Xiaomi MiMo, GLM, Microsoft Copilot. 2. AI-Powered UI, Code & Generation Tools: Cursor, Design Arena, Google Antigravity (2.0 & IDE), Leonardo
Hello,some feedback from my side regarding Folders, I like the options of a nestable folder, but I find it hard to navigate to the files I’m looking for. The folders are named, but the file thumbnails that were visible with Projects were a huge readability feature that I’m really missing now.I was searching for it in settings, but couldn’t find a way to set it. I actually added a description to a folder, but did not actually see not one place that the description was shown? This part is especially confusing.If I could make an improvement suggestion to a current implementation it would be to have a setting to show or not to show some folder contents thumbnails, similar to the previous implementation.Fingers crossed this can be done!
We are successful in accessing the figma remote MCP exposed at "https://mcp.figma.com/mcp" via OAuth based access via browser SSO login. We are exploring ways to automate figma MCP access in a headless mode so would like to understand passing PAT token for remote MCP authentication. We tried passing PAT in Auth headers and X-Figma-Token header but get unauthorized for remote MCP at this endpoint "https://mcp.figma.com/mcp". We are able to use the dev mode and local MCP with the figma desktop app as explained above we need to access these tools in a headless mode and would understand if there are any settings that needs to be enabled at the admin level to support PAT for remote MCP auth. ❯ curl --location 'https://mcp.figma.com/mcp' \--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \--header 'X-Figma-Token: figd_xxxx' \--header 'Accept: application/json' \--data '{ "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/list", "params": {}, "id": "1" }'Unauthorized❯ curl --location 'https://mcp.figma.
The remote Figma MCP server (https://mcp.figma.com/mcp) can only be authenticated with the OAuth browser flow. That makes the connection only as durable as the MCP client's token store, and in practice it breaks often.Concretely: my client (Claude Code on macOS) keeps MCP OAuth grants inside the same credential item as its own account login. Every time I log out of that client and log back in — or switch between two accounts, which I do routinely — the Figma grant is discarded and I have to run the browser authorization again. This happened again today, 2026-08-30.The Figma token itself was nowhere near expiry when this happened. At the moment I was forced to re-authorize, the stored Figma access token still had about 2,160 hours (roughly 90 days) of life left, and a refresh token alongside it. So nothing expired on Figma's side; the grant was simply thrown away by the client.I have reported the client-side half to the client's vendor. The request here is about the part only Figma can
Describe the problem your experiencing and how your idea helps solve this When we select a particular template or frame on Figma on the right side it will show all the colours did we used on that frame or template that’s a really good feature, Including that can you people also try to show us what all fonts that we used in that template or frame I felt that could be really great move by Figma if you people show the list of fonts that we used in that frame this going to be a great initiative by FIGMA. I’m really apologetic If that feature already existed in Figma I didn’t know where it was? I explored but I couldn’t find that feature. Add as much context as possible (screenshots, Figma files, mockups, etc.) Ask questions to bring the community into the conversation (e.g. Does anyone else experience this? Is anyone using a plugin or workaround to help solve this? etc. Does anyone else experience this? Is anyone using a plugin or workaround to help solve this?
PROBLEM: Currently, if you and a user outside of your team both have paid Figma accounts, and you need the other person to be able to edit your file, you need to pay for A THIRD account. i.e. For TWO freelancers to edit the same Figma file, you need to pay for THREE Figma accounts. This is clearly a terrible customer service experience and I suspect it’s a common issue as you’ll see from Figma’s own Product Support team response below. SOLUTION: The ideal workaround would be to offer free editing when both accounts are paid. Alternatively, if it’s an expensive service to provide, it seems reasonable for Figma to charge a clear fee (e.g. Editing collaboration: $2 per file per month, or $5 per project per month). Please upvote and add to the discussion. For reference, here’s my last message from Figma’s Customer Support, who are clearly trying to help solve this problem: Hey there Paul, Thanks for reaching back out. Again, all editors in your team space are billable to you. Even if Robin
Describe the problem your experiencing and how your idea helps solve this The issue with this feature has been covered many times in Spectrum discussions:Spectrum – 3 Jan 18 There is a way to avoid this by holding SPACE as soon as you click & don’t start dragging the object. But why force us to do acrobatics with our fingers by holding down an additional button, just to move the object? Why not provide an option to disable that functionality completely? Nagaraj Chandran had a very logical idea in his comment: “I don’t want to hold the spacebar key to disable auto-nesting. Maybe, it should be the other way around. Hold spacebar or any other key to auto-nest.” Add as much context as possible (screenshots, Figma files, mockups, etc.) More than enough in discussions on Spectrum ☝️ Ask questions to bring the community into the conversation Does anybody find this feature useful? If yes, please enlighten me on how to make use of it because it’s driving me insane and ki
I need a centered headline over a justified paragraph whose last line is also centered. That is three text layers. Headline layer (center). Body layer (justify — last line glued left, because that is the only justify Figma has). Last-line layer (center), copy split by hand so it doesn’t reflow. In InDesign that is one frame: alignment plus last-line alignment. Here it is a collage.You can mix fonts, sizes, weights, and colors inside one text layer. Alignment is the thing that’s stuck. One layer, one horizontal alignment for every line. No last-line center / right / force-justify. No “this run is centered, this run is justified” in the same layer. A headline, a body paragraph, and a centered closer cannot share one text layer if they need different alignments.That is not how sites or product UI work. One card or article column routinely mixes alignments in a single content container. In Figma that means extra layers, manual line breaks, and a layout that dies when the copy changes.Still
There have been many times where I’m trying to compare the color values between two or more objects. However, every time I select another object the color panel disappears so I have to click on the swatch again and try to remember the values from the previous object. Sometimes I’ll just take a screenshot of the color picker values and paste them back into Figma but that’s not fun at all. One possible solution would be to make the color picker remain visible if the user ‘unpins’ it (ie. drags it away from the right panel). Then they could select the next object to see the color values and then close the picker when they’re done.
Is it possible to obtain a free subscription to the Professional package for non-profit organizations, and what evidence is required for this? Thank you for your response!
Every time I exit Figma and come back, the previously selected sort order is lost, and it defaults to "Last modified" – "Newest first". Previously, the selected sorting option was always preserved.
Figma can generate UI from a prompt, ship a website, and animate half a marketing site before lunch. It still cannot lock a ruler guide.That is not a niche request. That is table stakes. Illustrator had it. InDesign had it. Photoshop had it. Sketch had it. Fireworks had it. FreeHand had it. CorelDRAW had it. The version of PageMaker your professor used in a computer lab with beige CRTs had it. Figma looked at a hundred years of computer-aided layout, nodded, and shipped guides that behave like wet spaghetti you accidentally selected.You cannot lock them. You will grab one when you meant to drag a layer. You will not notice until the whole composition is 3px off and you are gaslighting yourself about whether the grid was always like that. Layout grids are not a substitute. They are a column system. The second the layout is irregular, overlapping, or not “12 columns and a prayer,” you need actual guides. Figma’s answer is: use the tool that cannot do the job, or use the tool that keeps m
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.