Suggest a Feature

I was super pumped to start using grids for my layouts until I learned of one fatal flaw that killed my excitement :( The inability to set a row height to hug is simply a deal-breaker for me. Also no variables support for gaps? really?

Is it possible to create my own custom shapes for use as shapes in FigJam? I am drawing complex process flows, and I need to use a few vector grphics (for example, an octagon) which I created with Adobe Illustrator as FigJam ‘shapes’ so that I can annotate them with text and connect them to other shapes with connector lines. I haven’t been able to find instructions on how to do this. Is this doable? If so, please let me know how. Thank you in advance.

Currently, in prototype the cursor appears to be either ‘pointer’ (for everything) or ‘hand’ (if a click interaction set up on an element). I would like to be able to change this to a text cursor, when hovering over an input field in my proto. Affordance is a very important part of UI so surprised theres no way to do this? Of course can hack it by adding an image of a cursor, but then you end up having that plus the actual cursor on screen & it makes things worse. Should be an easy feature to add and would be very much appreciated!

Can you please make a feature that allows you to import the Figma Make page to a figma file? Also would be great to export components from Figma Make.

It would be great if you could add the option to align multiple objects to a key object (like in Adobe Illustrator). You can see more here: Select & Align to Key Object | Illustrator Tutorial If anyone else wants this or has other alignment suggestions please upvote this topic and comment.

I’m trying to localize an app using the new variables feature but it looks like I can’t add break lines to the string. For titles, especially in some languages like Japanese where there are no spaces, it is totally necessary. Is this planned for the near future?

When you open a new slide deck you are met with a modal that suggests templates ( layouts ) after choosing design. In this view, because of the ( + ) roll over i thought i was able to pick and choose differend template slides for the skeleton i new i had to go through. So:I now i need a headlineand then a slide with a headline and 4 sub categoriesand then a slide with two 50/50 split columns and then a slide with 5 columns and then a headline slide and then and then and then... i know this before i open my slide deck - so let me prepolulate my slide deck with templates

Buzz bulk upload is awesome! 😍 It would be great if we could apply a CVS variables to frames names and sizes. It would save a lot of time while doing mass content production for social ads. We’ve started experimenting with using Buzz for ad banner production. For a single ad test we might do 50 pieces of unique content across 5 different frame sizes. bulk upload is looking like a promising tool to make our lives a lot easier (for designers and non-designers in the team) and being able to uploaded CVS variables to frame names and sizes would save us even more time!

Wink is the most prominent video and photo editing app of 2025. https://seruapk.com/wink/

Is there a way to go from a Figma Make page to a figma file? I actually really like the UI that Figma Make created, but want to make faster tweaks in Figma design. Curious if anyone else has this use case.

Hey! How can I transfer the AI generated Prototype in Figma Make to Figma Design and continue editing it manually there?

Hi, I wanted to suggest preset colour options for Sections in Figma, similar to FigJam. The default grey colour blends into the default canvas background meaning I always need to choose a custom stroke + fill after using it. It’s an easy task but it breaks my flow to have to stop and change the colour of a section in the middle of whatever I’m doing. To be honest you could improve this just by changing the default colour from grey, but having some of the FigJam presets makes it a lot easier if you have different colour sections for categorisation.

Brief description of the problem: I don't use all the fonts that figma has by default, so searching among the fonts becomes a torment, if you are looking for a font, going through all the options without having a specific idea or a specific font name, it takes too long. Figma already has a suitable logic to solve this problem. You already have a dropdown menu where you can select font groups (All fonts, In this file , Google Font 8/24 Update (????) and etc.). Add functionality to create your own font groups where you can add the fonts you want and name the category. For example (UI Fonts, Sci FI fonts, Handmade etc.). This would make it very easy to interact with the font library.

I should be able to export multiple frames into a single PDF by selecting all of them. Please implement this feature!

I was going to praise how neat the new Annotation feature is, when I realized the content is only visible to Dev Mode accounts. Are you serious? I understand you want to limit creating annotations to certain seat types, but viewing annotations should be a viewer-level feature. Come on Figma, there are better ways to convince your users to pay for a subscription. This is such a crooked move.

There’s currently no way to wrap text around an object like an icon, spot illustration, or image. The only solution is to manually break the copy into 2 text boxes and add the second one underneath the icon. We had big plans for our design system to include scaled variants of components where text would need to wrap around icons and spot illustrations to save screen space. So not having this feature makes it hard to design for accessibility and see how components will scale. It’s a little tricky to get the line height right, and also means we can’t easily add scaled variants to our existing design system library. It’s also stopping us from creating a plugin where designers could stress test their designs with larger accessible fonts. Would be great if Figma could add this as a feature. Has anyone else had this issue? Is anyone using a plugin or workaround to help solve this?

One important feature is missing = Merging cells 😦 Is this feature included as an improvement in the near future?

In Sketch, you can simply hold ALT and the selection tool will only select items that are fully enclosed by it. Super useful! You can also do a deep selection, to only select items that are fully enclosed inside a group, by holding ALT and COMMAND. AFAIK Figma doesn’t support this? Would be appreciated if it would be implemented...

No brainer. I’ve either had to ask clients to record a loom of themselves going through a Make prototype or me having to screenshot EVERY SINGLE PAGE of the prototype then send them PDFs so they could comment on it. If there’s a new QOL feature that’s gonna be added to Figma Make, it should be commenting.

Currently you are able to add up to nine screenshots for your published community file. I would like to upload a video to this area. Apparently you can do this for plugins, so I would like the feature for community files as well.

When creating hand-off documents I like to showcase user flows by using arrows between different UI elements. I have to use plugins to create these arrows at the moment. When playing with Figjam I notice it had a connector option - this is great. I would love it if we could also have this connector option inside Figma as it would be a HUGE timesaver for hand-off. I would like to think this would be a super easy update given that we can already edit connectors inside Figma. We just need a connector button in the toolbar like so:

Split access controls for developers and viewers, they should be separate roles. Use case - I want to share a file with an external partner to review a design, however I don’t want them to be able to copy or export the file, although I wouldn’t mind if they shared it with their colleagues. However I also want my developers to still be able to export assets from this file when it’s time for handoff. Currently all these settings are grouped under one setting; “Allow viewers to copy, share, and export from this file”. A better solution would be to split out each action e.g. copy, share and export and also be able to change these access controls per role (developer and viewer): This needs to be implemented before developers become paid seats, at the moment they just have the same permissions as viewers.

I would like to be able to selected multiple child components which are all associated with the same parent component and edit their shared nested instance properties across all selected child components.

We just opted in for 2 seats on the professional plan. We find it disappointing that we can’t monitor our remaining AI credits. We have no idea how many credits we used yesterday, and have no sense at all of how much we can accomplish with the credits we purchased. The AI itself has been very impressive. To obfuscate the AI credits to this degree is a big disservice to your users.