Skip to main content

Platform billing feedback, I find it disappointing that developers are force to let every client know that they work with that they need to own their own Figma account in order to work with them to have an available dev license. It would be great to have an individual license that allows developers like myself to work on multiple Figma projects from multiple brands and agencies.


The licensing model feels very restrictive in its current state which is why I end up canceling my plan.


I hope in the future this does change as I think you do have a wonderful platform, but your current model doesn’t make sense for developers who work on lots of different projects who don’t build the designs but execute them.


I would love it if this message gets to the right teams in Figma.

I don’t think Figma would ever implement this as this would stop them making fat stacks of money from 10 companies having to pay 10 times for a single person. Stonks! 📈

Well its good I am not asking you 🙂 Totally hear you on the profit side, but from a developers lens who works with multiple brands and agencies, it would be great if there was an option for this, Slack does this and its owned by SF, also known as external partners.


Figma is a great tool and a new kid on the block, but pricing will be their downfall in the long run if developers choose to look for alt platforms due to license restrictions.

We need more competition on the market so Figma is more inclined to fix their terrible pricing

Thanks for the feedback, @Anton_Siedlecki!


We’ll pass this onto the team for consideration.

offer a Developer multi-project license for 50% more cost

Reply


Terms & ConditionsCookie settings