Share Your Thoughts

Once I replace image I have connected with other entities or screens, all the attached connecting arrows are being rerouted in a way that I need to zoom out so much to tweak them to be as they were so it is easier to create new arrows and delete existing. It’s super annoying

We really appreciate the Bulk Create feature in Figma Buzz. However, the inability to return and edit the data after you create assets or fix individual entries without restarting the entire process is a significant workflow blocker for our team.It would be extremely helpful to have the option to edit imported data or save and reuse data mappings for future imports. This would be especially useful in case of any mistakes, so you wouldn’t have to start the whole process over again.This improvement would greatly enhance productivity and reduce repetitive work.

Would it be possible to give users the ability to directly access a specific page—designed in Figma—for quick fine-tuning? This could be achieved via a preview URL bar where the user can enter a page name (e.g. /pricing), and the preview will immediately render that specific page. This would streamline navigation and make it much easier to tweak individual pages quickly. preview-url-bar 

Hey guys,UI3 has come a long way, I remember it was absolute crap in the beginning, it’s actually pretty cool now. But somehow, it still feels like the UX is not perfect. Maybe because all the sections in the right side panel rely too much on text? The structure makes sense, but I often find myself editing the corner radius for example, when in fact I want to edit the auto layout padding. That’s just one example, I feel that in the previous version I didn’t rely on reading as much, but mostly on reaction, which was instant.

 Right now, I’m trying to open and test what I worked on in Make locally, but nothing works. If there’s no way to restore the existing UX/UI to use it as-is locally, then Figma Make seems like a completely pointless tool to me.

It would be great to duplicate the Figma Slides file directly from the presentation. Right now, I have to go back to the home screen to do it.

It would be good to have more control over animations like lottie, GIF, MP4. The ability to stop/start animations at set intervals would be hugely helpful in prototypes.

It would be nice if the layers panel could pop out and be used in a different browser window. I dislike how small it is and find the use cumbersome. 

When renaming multiple frames or artboards at once in Figma, the numbering order currently follows the layer list order (as shown in the Layers panel), not their visual order on the canvas. This often leads to unexpected numbering (e.g., instead of numbering from 1 to 10 in left-to-right order, the names are assigned based on layer stack order). Feature request:Add an option to batch rename frames/artboards using their spatial order on the canvas (e.g., left-to-right, then top-to-bottom), instead of relying only on the layer list order—just like some plugins.

 Welcome to Kidsomia, the ultimate kids play zone in Manikonda! Enjoy exciting indoor play areas, fun activities, and the best birthday party venue for kids. Book now!

We often encounter the challenge of working with icon sets that contain a large number of component variants. When searching for a specific icon, it’s extremely frustrating that there is no search functionality available. Additionally, the lack of a sort option makes it even harder to find what you’re looking for, as the icons are not organized alphabetically but by the date they were added. This often results in spending several minutes just to locate a single icon, which is very inefficient and time-consuming. We would really appreciate having both search and sort functionalities integrated within the variant section of the icon component — especially for large icon sets that are all stored under one master component.Cheers,J

For comments that have been resolved, can the user avatars in the comment panel not be set to gray? It's quite inauspicious, as it looks like the person has passed away.

Currently not a way to rename colors in Figma slides with the library feature. Is there a way to do this that I don’t know about? It would be tedious to re-add a color with the appropriate name because I would have to reassign all components to the newly named color.

The new Figma update is just fine. I appreciate they tried to make the UI a bit more graphic, but in doing so - I feel like the program runs slower and the layers panel isn’t anymore intuitive, but now just clunky. One of the features I loved the most - manually adjusting spacing between elements, seems to have disappeared from the workspace entirely. 

In grid features Canvas Stacking (Last to Top/First to top) is not working properly

I’d love to see support for automatically renaming layers to match the filename of an image that's placed or replaced in a design. Right now, Figma uses the image filename as a layer name inconsistently—mostly during the initial placement, and not when replacing an image. This leads to extra manual work and inconsistent layer naming, especially when working with many assets.It would be incredibly helpful if Figma could auto-update the layer name to reflect the actual filename of the image fill—ideally both on placement and when replacing an image.Thanks for considering this improvement!

Alt text and tooltips are incredibly important for accessibility. But to show a tooltip interaction in Figma, (afaik) you need to create a custom tooltip/find out as a component and then create a show/hide interaction on mouseover in the prototyping. I would like to request that Figma allows for users to add tooltips to page elements, so that this functions per a standard tooltip — showing where the cursor hovers on the element, and with the user only needing to add the text (no need to create and hide a a text panel).

課題：PaddingやMarginなどレイアウトを調整する際、つい全角で数字を入力してしまうことがあります。しかし、こういった場合、毎回変換キーを押して全角→半角に変換するか、最初から入力し直す必要があり、少し手間です。提案内容：数字を自動で半角に変換するオプション---Problem:When adjusting layout values like padding or margin, I often end up typing numbers in full-width (Japanese input). To fix this, I need to manually convert them to half-width or retype them, which is a bit inconvenient. Proposal:Add an option to automatically convert numbers to half-width.

I love the intuitive “Ready for Dev” switch to signal a handoff state, and the working mode it provides our engineering partners.Before this state, however, we also have a need to review, incorporate, and track content updates. Related, there is also a step that requires regulatory review and approval.It would be interesting to see additional modes that cater to our other partners, much like “Ready for Dev”. I realize our content and legal/compliance partners can comment directly, but would be great to have a dedicated space for them to enter and track changes, before we hand off to engineers.

I really like Figma’s effort to build a mass-production system with Buzz, but I still prefer the Table to Figma plugin for five main reasons: Direct connection to Google Sheets Build your spreadsheet in Google Sheets and link it straight to Table to Figma—no manual export/import required. Layer visibility toggles A Boolean column (TRUE / FALSE) lets you show or hide layers. One simple exemple : This is essential when you need to display a dollar sign before prices for the English market but hide it for the French market. Bulk updates through components Turn elements into components and push global changes without re-importing the spreadsheet every time. Images handled via URLs instead of in-cell uploads Embedding images directly makes the sheet heavy and unwieldy—especially when I have to deliver 200-plus variants. Table to Figma lets me reference images with URLs, keeping the file light and the workflow fast. Variants and layouts driven from the sheet With “Variant” or “Layout

Could you please stop it? I don’t know how many times this happened to me as a multi user/multi team user I couldn’t find my files at the same place I left them and having heart attacks almost. Whatever your strategy on updates, it is really very shitty for the users-at least in my experience. I spent two hours just now to understand what you did with the navigation and why I can not see my project folders as I organized them before. At least keep our starred projects on the left side so we could find some things easily, maybe? 😮‍💨 You assume all designers have lots of free time to explore your new ways of navigation each time you update it and organize their files/organization structures accordingly? Most of us are regular working class people, just trying to fit some work-hours in our busy calendars and you are turning it to a big hustle for us just to find and open an existing file🤦🏻‍♀️ Stop using your time to adding new AI features maybe and put some real time to design and bui

It would be better to keep the comments in Figma history. Sometimes we resolved the comments and would like to recheck again what comments we solved. Sometimes I incidentally click resolve button and would like to see the comments again. At that time it would be great if we can see the comments in version history. 

English is difficult for me and I struggle with it. Hope to support Chinese language as soon as possible，please，please，please，please，please，please~

As already mentioned here:🔗 https://forum.figma.com/archive-21/make-figma-free-for-open-source-projects-21667It would be awesome to have an open source plan with more features — like unlimited public design files or access to some of the technical features from the Professional plan. ✨Maybe a good compromise could be a discounted plan — like $10/month — that includes variables by API and similar tools. 💡For open source developers working in their free time, the $20/month Professional plan is already quite a stretch — and $90/month for the Organization plan is simply out of reach. 😵‍💫All of this is just for public design files anyway — which helps promote Figma itself. 📢For private projects, I totally understand the need for stricter pricing. 🔒

Please, it’s time to reduce friction between designers and developers talking about responsive designs. Each website/application is different and requires a different amount of breakpoints, so using just desktop, tablet and mobile isn’t enough. Integrated support for breakpoints would be a breakthrough and would make a lot of developers happy.