Share Your Thoughts

not trying to shout in the title, just want to make this more visible. currently, when you want to apply, lets say, a gradient mask to an image, you need to make a shape, apply to it the gradient with transparency, then have the image on top of the shape and make a mask from the 2 layers in the layers panel. the problem is that its very hard to control afterwards, to select the image or the gradient layer you need to search in the layers panel, its just difficult. plus figma doesnt (yet, i hope) smooth gradients like photoshop does, so the mask wont even turn out very nice. you should look at how photoshop does it, why not just have the mask strictly linked to the image, or on the image, if you will, without the need for extra layers. for an example, imagine you are working with a irregularly shaped png with transparence - it would be really uncomfortable to apply a fade transparency to that png using the current means, you would create that masking layer under the png, but the png is

Why are Ukrainians not allowed to sell their files? We are not responsible for the situation that is currently happening between the two countries. I am a designer, and I want to earn additional income for my effort and my work! I believe it is unfair that we do not have the opportunity to share our creations “for a fee,” especially since no one knows how long the war will last. Please open access, because this is not fair to us as people and as designers.

Ideally we would see an MCP connection icon somewhere all the time so we do not break our prototype when the MCP connection fails or drops and then have the AI suddenly be dumb as a box of hair and redesign everything. 

Why is there a difference between Figma Design and Figma Sites? Figma Design should just give you the various breakpoints by default if you want to build a site. If you want to create a website in Design, just publish the project. It’s incredibly ridiculous that if you want to build a prototype that has the interactions available in Sites, that you can’t do those in Design. It’s also ridiculous that there is a “responsive” option when previewing a Figma Design project, but it doesn’t snap to a mobile layout. You can sort of achieve this with min/max widths and auto layout, but it won’t snap from a desktop nav to a mobile nav. I mean, all the components are cross compatible anyway, and the UI properties between Deign and Sites are the same, so why are there 2 different tools? Why not just include the AI builder tool in Design? What is the point of Figma Make this AI builder is available in Sites? Just do it all in one version…. unless you’re planning to make Figma Sites an upcharge if y

Please make saving to figma make version history, thumbnails and deleting favicons / sharing thumbs if uploaded multiple ones possible 

Can you please make a feature that allows you to import the Figma Make page to a figma file? Also would be great to export components from Figma Make.

When you open a new slide deck you are met with a modal that suggests templates ( layouts ) after choosing design. In this view, because of the ( + ) roll over i thought i was able to pick and choose differend template slides for the skeleton i new i had to go through. So:I now i need a headlineand then a slide with a headline and 4 sub categoriesand then a slide with two 50/50 split columns and then a slide with 5 columns and then a headline slide and then and then and then...i know this before i open my slide deck - so let me prepolulate my slide deck with templates

Hey everyone,Just discovered that Figma Make has officially released its Supabase integration—but here’s the interesting part: I’ve already been using Supabase with Figma Make before this integration even existed.The new integration is cool, but it mainly supports simple key-value pair setups. If you’re building anything more complex or relational, it quickly hits limitations.So here’s a method I’ve been using that still works perfectly—especially for advanced database structures:✅ My Method to Set Up Complex Supabase Databases in Figma Make 1. Structure your app in Figma Make.Make sure your app's UI and components are well-organized.2. Ask Figma Make AI for the database schema:Prompt:“Generate a Supabase schema that can be run in the SQL Editor to create tables that support my current app.”3. It will generate a .sql file inside your app's code structure.4. Copy that SQL schema and paste it into the SQL Editor of your Supabase project.5. Run it.If there are any errors, simply paste the

Buzz bulk upload is awesome! 😍 It would be great if we could apply a CVS variables to frames names and sizes. It would save a lot of time while doing mass content production for social ads. We’ve started experimenting with using Buzz for ad banner production. For a single ad test we might do 50 pieces of unique content across 5 different frame sizes. bulk upload is looking like a promising tool to make our lives a lot easier (for designers and non-designers in the team) and being able to uploaded CVS variables to frame names and sizes would save us even more time! 

Wink is the most prominent video and photo editing app of 2025. https://seruapk.com/wink/

Is there a way to go from a Figma Make page to a figma file? I actually really like the UI that Figma Make created, but want to make faster tweaks in Figma design. Curious if anyone else has this use case.

Brief description of the problem: I don't use all the fonts that figma has by default, so searching among the fonts becomes a torment, if you are looking for a font, going through all the options without having a specific idea or a specific font name, it takes too long. Figma already has a suitable logic to solve this problem. You already have a dropdown menu where you can select font groups (All fonts, In this file , Google Font 8/24 Update (????) and etc.). Add functionality to create your own font groups where you can add the fonts you want and name the category. For example (UI Fonts, Sci FI fonts, Handmade etc.). This would make it very easy to interact with the font library.

I should be able to export multiple frames into a single PDF by selecting all of them. Please implement this feature!

In Sketch, you can simply hold ALT and the selection tool will only select items that are fully enclosed by it. Super useful!You can also do a deep selection, to only select items that are fully enclosed inside a group, by holding ALT and COMMAND. AFAIK Figma doesn’t support this? Would be appreciated if it would be implemented...

There is an unmet need on high level file management for large enterprise organizations like ours. To keep it simple, we have to resort to using legacy taxonomy design from the old days at the file name level. We have hundreds+ of applications and products across the enterprise spanning every tech stack imaginable. Some share a polished coded library, most do not. We manage and track hundreds of files for product teams that are using different processes.I am sure that user role infrastructure, security/permissions structures, and unique customer installations (for better or for worse) have been a barrier. There is also contending with the existing adhoc favorites on the user level.But some small interim improvements would help.Current Browsable File View Issueshaving to resort to using leading characters to tuck away or organize with the limited organization features and having just a sort. “_” and “ x” having to develop custom taxonomies for grouping in the file name “ (group schema)

Split access controls for developers and viewers, they should be separate roles. Use case - I want to share a file with an external partner to review a design, however I don’t want them to be able to copy or export the file, although I wouldn’t mind if they shared it with their colleagues. However I also want my developers to still be able to export assets from this file when it’s time for handoff. Currently all these settings are grouped under one setting; “Allow viewers to copy, share, and export from this file”. A better solution would be to split out each action e.g. copy, share and export and also be able to change these access controls per role (developer and viewer): This needs to be implemented before developers become paid seats, at the moment they just have the same permissions as viewers.

In my understanding of global components, when the Main component is made changes, it reflects in all instances automatically, but why is it that mine is not showing the changes?

I added a prototype in Slides that was of a mobile app flow. I forgot to change the prototype in Figma to set a device (Ex: iPhone 14) so I went into the Figma design file and set the device. Then when I went back into Slides it still showed the old prototype embedded with no device. I didn’t see a way to refresh or update the prototype. The workaround I found was to delete the prototype and try adding it to slides again. That worked but it would be better to have it automatically update or a button to reload it.

Hi, I selected a Collab seat when starting the Professional account. I really should have selected Full seat. There’s no way to remove unused seats on this monthly cycle. There should be. But if there will not be, at least the seat selection should be more visually descriptive to avoid incorrectly selecting the wrong seat. I don't see a contact form or email for support.

When collaborating remotely in Figma, it would be extremely helpful to have a built-in chat feature. This would allow us to communicate directly within the design workspace, rather than 1) adding temporary text fields or 2) switching to Slack, Teams, or another external channel. So far, we’ve mostly been using the first method, which is far from ideal.

Hello!I am part of a team working on a gigantic Ui-Library serving multiple brands and devices (thank you, variables) all within big master-components with a lot variants. And of course our file got very full and complex very fast. We try our best to keep it clustered and everything visualized nicely, but as a user of the library, its just awful to browse. (Zooming out > panning > zooming in > switching pages > landing somewhere close up bc I visited earlier..) ugh. My feature request is to give us a new way for handing of library components!No, the lib view/selection dialog in the other files is just working If one exactly knows what to look out for..→ I am more thinking of something like the Material Design website. A place where components are organized wiki-like, have a lot of descriptive things going on (do’s, donts’, motion..) and are sometimes interactable. Of course I can take-away the component (or put it into a “cart” to continue browsing for now..)→ In addition t

I am a web designer and there is no plan that covers all my needs except for the complete one with 7 programs, of which I would only use 3. You should create customizable plans that allow users to choose which modules to subscribe to. I don't see why I should spend 16 euro a month on 7 modules and only use 3. Thank you.

When the Figma Make is doing its code rebuild following a prompt I make, would be great to have a tab notification at the top to indicate it's completed. The reason being that I may have gone to do something in another Figma tab whilst waiting for MAKE to finish it's code changes.

In my web browser (both Chrome and Edge) I can easily/quickly switch between tabs thanks to the keyboard shorcut option + command + left/right arrow.This is an “interactin pattern” they also use in e.g. Figma. (The exact same key combination.)Personally I would really appreciate to have this keyboard shortcut in Miro too, so that I can more easily / faster switch beteen the different Miro boards that I have open.

 I’m working on swapping the library for a large design file. The process uses so much memory that I can’t swap all components at once. I have to manually pick which components to swap. However, when I open the swap library modal, every component is already selected by default. This means I have to uncheck everything before I can select only the components I want.So how about:Select all option for swap library Optimize swapping library so that it won’t crash in the middle of the process. I don’t mind waiting for 30 minutes.Thanks.