Let us know what would make Figma better for you.
Recently active
The background removal feature in Figma still feels a bit rough, so I usually switch to another editing tool for that part.We use Figma for almost all of our website projects at AI Studios, and it’s been great overall — it would just be nice to see some improvement in that area.
Feature Request: Per-user layout guidesCurrently, all guides in a Figma file are shared across collaborators. When multiple people work in the same file, guides overlap and create clutter.Request: Allow each user to have private guides that only they can see, with the option to toggle visibility of others’ guides.This would make collaborative design cleaner, reduce visual noise, and let each designer work efficiently without interfering with others’ layouts.
Currently Figma make allows you to have different pages for your prototype. But for some reason when the app updates i dont really have a way to go to the specific page that was changed. For eg. one of my prototypes has a component to provide email before you can move forward. So any time the app updates when i’ve changed any of the pages Later in the flow, I have to go through the entire flow again just to get to that page, and then ask it to make changes, and then we go over it again and again and again. I have seen it in other tools like Builder.io, where it doesn't matter what I change, I can go to a specific page from the page selector at the top. Is Figma going to get one of these?
I’m embedding a form and would like to have scrolling on this embed and/or ability for the figma embed to resize on any change to avoid scrolling.
I am extremely excited to motivate for Figma slides for decks, and the ability to use components and even prototypes in here.My one concern is that if a component is used in a Figma sildes, and the component is updated externally, it is not updated in Slides and needs to be re-placed. Are there any plans to make this relationship persistent? Prototypes DO update when placed in Slides.
Hello Figma Community and Team,I'm incredibly excited about the potential of Figma Make and have been eagerly experimenting with its AI capabilities. However, I've run into a significant roadblock when it comes to integrating my team's comprehensive design library, and I'm hoping to get some clarity on the current limitations and what we might expect in the future.Our Setup: A Highly-Structured Design SystemTo provide some context, we've invested a substantial amount of time and effort into building a robust and meticulously organized design system within Figma. This isn't just a collection of components; it's a fully-fledged system that includes: Hundreds of Components: Our library is extensive, containing a wide array of components, from basic elements like buttons and inputs to more complex organisms like cards, sliders, and navigation controls. Meticulous Naming Conventions: Every component, variant, and layer is named with a clear and consistent hierarchy (e.g., input/text/defau
Could you please add the option to show width overlay in figma make, it would really help debug breakpoints when prototyping. Thanks
Just like Microsoft Powerpoint, we should be able to add duration for the transitions between our slides to make it not look like we are in a hurry. Currently, I think the default duration is 500ms and it’s too fast for me. I want to make it gently transition from one slide to another. The animations are great, but if you could also add more transitions, it would make it even more better.
For now the only solution I found is to switch the Image fill to Crop and to drag the edge of the image manually until it flips. This is cumbersome and not very precise because of the overlap of the image’s edges and the crop bounding box edges. A simple set of mirror buttons would be super helpful! Thx!
Just wanted to add a bit more context! Many agencies and independent designers build full visual systems in Figma, then rebuild everything manually in Divi for WordPress. A plugin or native export option could save hours of repetitive work and help preserve design-system consistency.I’d love to test or even provide feedback if your team ever explores a Figma-to-Divi workflow. It could really empower smaller studios that rely on WordPress as their delivery platform.
I would like to be able to apply variables to sweeps, etc. If this were possible, I think it would be possible to expand the dynamic expression of prototype.
A simple option to randomize a pool of sticky notes, without using a plugin. Seems to very useful for researchers.
Please go back to basicsYou are moving forward too fast, we don't need more drawing and AI feathers, we need basic CSS options that are the basics of CSS web development since the 2000.On top of the list image-background position, object-fit etcAre you going to do something about it?😡
Hi Figma, I wish it were possible to duplicate text style folders, instead of just the text style itself.
The black floating toolbar is really annoying as it covers up what I’m trying to type. Is there a way to pin it? I know that I can run a script to completely remove it each time. However, it’d be nice to have an option to pin it at the bottom.
Hi Figma team!I’d love to suggest a small but meaningful UX improvement. In Figma, many numeric fields can be reset by typing “auto” (such as width, height, or layout), which is great. However, when working quickly, it’s incredibly easy to mistype “auto” as something like: atuo auot uato aout atou utoa or other nearby typos At the moment, Figma doesn’t recognize these variations and simply rejects the input, forcing users to delete and retype again. Considering how common and predictable these typos are, it would be a great UX win if Figma could accept common mistypes of “auto” as valid and interpret them as auto.This would improve workflow speed and reduce tiny daily frustrations without causing any conflict, as these typo variations aren’t used as valid values for anything else.A tiny change, but a quick win to improve designers’ lives ✨Thank you for considering it!
I’ve been using Figma for almost 7 years, and this has been a pain point for me while using Figma to craft UI designs in each of the projects I’ve been through. It doesn’t allow me to reorder the starting point flows I’ve created when more starting point flows are added. As more are added, there arises a need to reorder the way people navigate from sub-flow to sub-flow within an app design in the desired order. Additionally, having the ability to rename a specific flow directly from the present mode would be a plus, so the user wouldn’t have to leave the current context of present mode and go back to the shared workspace to find and rename that flow.I am pretty sure that there are a lot of folks in here in this feedback community must have the same concern as mine. So Figma, I am asking you to make an according adjustment to this and ease our lives. Thank you
I am calling this out because it wastes admin time, confuses teams, and quietly pushes paid seats without informed consent. The product nudges users to request licences from multiple places inside the app. These prompts are frequent and intrusive. They look like helpful guidance but they are sales prompts. Admin controls to decline or manage these licence requests are buried and clumsy. It is far easier to approve than to reject. That is a dark pattern that drives spend rather than clarity. End users are not clearly told that what they are clicking carries a cost to the organisation. In many flows there is no plain language that says You are about to trigger paid usage for your team. The end result is predictable. Finance gets surprise invoices. Admins become the bad cops. Designers are frustrated because they did not realise they had pulled a paid lever. This is not how a trusted design platform should behave.What we want to see now! Clear pricing and seat impact in every reques
I cannot find feedback options for figma features, so I had to use this space. Btw, please bring back interactions to Figma design, Figma Make is not at all easier to work with. Actually, it gets harder to use Figma with all those changes - that weren’t actually very necessary for some users. Why using AI in EVERY single product if the AI doesn’t work properly? It changes all the layout we submit to it, stuff that were PERFECT and now, because we have to use Figma Make to do interactions, it simply does not give the result It was supposed to give (and used to work with) for. It changes the submitted design in NOT ASKED ways. Redimensions the screens and elements, changing the whole composition. Please, bring old Figma back, there’s a reason (or MANY) why adobe XD died. Do not transform figma in another xd, i BEG you.
Hello, Figma team! I am an active user of your product and would like to propose a new feature that, in my opinion, can significantly improve the workflow for designers and their teams. We are talking about the possibility of allocating a separate editing mode only for texts inside layouts. At the moment, when it is necessary to make edits only to text elements (for example, to correct typos or change the content of the text), users have to get full access to all elements of the layout, which can lead to undesirable changes. It would be very useful to have a feature that would allow you to edit only texts, without the risk of accidentally changing other design elements. Such a mode would be useful for copywriters, marketers, and other professionals who interact with layouts but are not designers. It would also reduce the burden on designers, who would no longer have to worry about the safety of all other aspects of the project. Thank you for your attention and for the excellent product
In Figma’s playground file for the (beta) AI features, there’s a hands-on example for the AI feature called Replace Content. It sports a (vertical) auto-layout frame with two similar objects. When you select the frame, a wide handle appears on its bottom edge (in the instruction called the Duplicate Bar) , offering the option do drag up and down and add multiple instances of the same object(s).It looks and works a lot like the Repeat Grid of Adobe XD – the only featured I missed now and then in Figma, so I’m a happy camper now ! 😄The feature works very well, and the obvious next task of replacing the repetitive texts for uniquely generated dummy texts, also works very nicely BTW.But how did they get this Duplicate Bar to appear ?I can’t find anything about it in any Figma Help resources. Just this tidbit in the beta AI example.So I tried and tested it a bit, and it seems to me that you need at least 2 by 2 elements: 2 elements in one group or auto-layout, copied or duplicated into 2 s
Please unarchive this topic because now I cannot even send it as an answer to other people who are asking this question because they cannot access it.
Hey all, wondering if anyone else is running into this…When I open a screen in prototype mode and click “Present,” the interactions work totally fine on that screen. But when I cycle to the next screen in the flow, things start breaking — interactions stop working properly or disappear altogether.The really weird part is that the prototype connections also seem to move around or shift across the page. The only way I can get it to behave is to close the present tab and reopen it directly on the screen I want to test — but obviously that’s not ideal for testing full flows. (I have attached photos I have taken, I had to use my phone as I couldn’t screen print while clicking to show the blue prototype links)I also get it with things like my navigation bars - I have complex components set up to cycle through my system and they will totally glitch out and show colours and ui that is not even in the design.Is anyone else experiencing this? Would love to know if it’s just me or a wider bug.Che
I would like the possibility to add drag and drop in Figma prototypes in which you can reorder items in an auto-layout frame. Right now it is limited to adding a simulated drag and drop of one item, without auto-layout applied to the parent group/frame. Unless you create different flows to allow multiple items to be dragged and dropped, but always from a static position, to a static position. I’d like that extra bit of freedom, as it allows for better prototypes and conversations.
What can you do when you have unattached comments? There should be an option to place it back on a frame or object inside the canvas. Vote here if you have the same issue. (original question here: What do you do with Unattached comments? ) It would be great if @figma can let us reattach lost, unattached comments back to a frame. Even better if the comment automatically falls back to a children frame underneath when you ungroup a frame, to which the comment is attached. That just reduce unattached comments from happening.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.