Share Your Feedback

I want to slice the layers within a frame, but the 'Snap to Pixel Grid' feature is not activated, which makes the slicing process very inconvenient. I would like to know the reason why this feature is no longer available. Please bring back this functionality, as its absence is causing disruptions in my work. When working with Auto Layout and framing the entire page for slicing, I hope the 'Snap to Pixel Grid' feature will be activated. Figma, please take quick action.

The “Start editing” alert dialog seems like a dark pattern. People could accidentally upgrade their seat without realizing it. This wasn’t a necessary addition. Was someone confused about how to upgrade their seats, because if not, this comes across very shady.  

I’m trying to take the certification course ($97) and I got stuck because the menu in the video is different than the menu in the app. See attachment. Of course there isn’t a phone number to call about this. Outside of demanding a refund, I thought I’d try asking here. The Back to Files option at the top of the menu doesn’t exist in my copy. I have the latest version installed. A pet peeve about doing these online courses is there isn’t a a human to contact, and the AI chat bot is an idiot. 

It’s been extremely helpful for devs to be able to add their own annotations during handover. Using comments will only add extra clutter to people’s inboxes with unnecessary notifications

Hello!I would love to get support about moving files from an expired account to a new account.I have been using my school account for the edu plan and got a notification it is expired. I still need to use the materials in the previous account, Is there any way I can access and edit the files in the previous account?

Hi,I’m digging the Figma app - it is helpful. I’m used to having the blending options show right under “Appearance” but now, I’m seeing that I have to select the color hex button to access blending options like “Overlay” or “Multiply”. Can we get this back to the way it was? I’m not sure if I’m missing anything on my end but if this is the latest release, it is a cumbersome experience for me to have an additional click just to access the blending tool. Furthermore, how would I even know which layers have blending associated with them? As of now, I’m forced to click that layer, then the color palette, and then be able to see the drop icon to see if it indeed has blending on it. The 1st 3 screenshots are the current experience I’m seeing. The latter 2 are the previous version - which I think it a whole lot better and saves a lot of time. Thank you.

The Figma boards I work with (on Mac) are very wide and tall. The slider navigation is just too hard to grab on the bottom of the screen when there are other menus popped over, and it disappears into the board and into the images, perhaps there could be a setting allowing the user to change the color to meet their current visibility needs. It would also be nice if the right and left menus could be easier to fully minimize out of the way (without using the permanent setting to remove them from my view). I am not always working on an external monitor and on the 14” screen these take up almost 4” of the design window.

Coloring strokeHi guys,I have an idea that can we have all stroke property below for each generated color?For example, I want right stroke to be blue, and down stroke to be black, how can I do that? 

trying out the figma ai “make image” thing.. clients can spot the ai images, and they dont like them. They’re really small in resolution too. 👎

There is little that Slides offers me which I can’t do in Figma already - except add presenter notes. Why not just enable the ability to add presenter notes to Frames?The fact that I can’t prototype within Slides really kills the usefulness of this feature. Second, having to import all the content I’ve already created in Figma into a Slides file is a pain which could be avoided with presenter notes on Frames. 

when we publish library when there is no change to publish then Publish button sould be disalbled not active. 

The new aspect ratio lock is good so far, I have no problems with it, but I think we can make it great.I was just using the feature for locking the aspect ratios of images and using auto-layout and fill width to grow/shrink the images to fill the frame. That works well, but I noticed two things:Order of operations: I have to set a fixed height and width first with the aspect ratio I want (400px X 300px for example for a 4:3 ratio), then I can lock the aspect ratio, then I can set the width or height to fill. Not the end of the world, but it takes a couple of steps. What if we could specify the ratio we want at any time? For example, place an image, set it to fill the frame, then specify the ratio. Maybe it’s a dropdown select of common aspect ratios or maybe it’s a manual input. Usefulness for developers: When inspecting the image in Dev Mode, the aspect ratio really isn’t helpful. For

I request the removal of the “Help” question button in the inspector panel. It is intrusive, persistent, and annoying, similar to a pinned chat agent that obscures relevant information. It is also redundant since help is available in the toolbar menu. Please remove that button; it’s driving me crazy!

Our design system devs asked us designers for a better way to compare changes within our component specs between updates.  We stage our components as instances in a separate spec file from the library file the components are published from.  Each component and variant is contained within an individual section acting as a wrapper.  The wrapper is where we enable a “ready for dev” tag to capture a version history.  Using this method we’ve run into a few obstacles: Sections don’t capture granular changes, we’ve had to switch from wrapping our component instances in sections to frames for a version history to be recorded within the compare/diff window. Ready for dev version history can only be viewed by first entering dev mode, then entering focus view on the versioned frame (it doesn’t show if you enter focus view from design mode). `Compare changes` within the standard dev mode view does not show this information and instead

Dear Figma Team,I would like to provide feedback regarding the behavior of stroke and padding when exporting designs for CSS implementation. While Figma offers excellent design tools and helpful CSS hints, there is a notable inconsistency between how strokes are visually represented in Figma and how they translate into CSS code. This discrepancy can lead to confusion and extra work during the development process.Issue DescriptionWhen designing input fields in Figma, strokes (borders) are measured separately from padding, and padding is displayed as starting from the outer edge of the element's frame. However, when exporting to CSS or implementing designs manually, borders are treated differently due to the CSS box model: In CSS, padding is measured from the inner edge of the border (stroke). Figma

I recently did a lot of cleaning up my company's Figma file structure and unfortunately comments can't be moved from one file to another. I've consolidated a lot of files into one to make it easier, but I have to manually re-write the comments so I don't lose them.

As it’s shown in the attachments, when there is arrows from box to box in FigJam, and each arrow is in different color, the top one show both sides as related to it although each arrow is a regular one with one side of head

 This is currently the brightest page on the entire internet. It’s somehow brighter than Gmail. Come on! 

The tool appeared with all my acquaintances of designers, but I do not have it. How long to wait? He submitted an application to Beta. Updates are set by the latter

Would love post its to stick to the different elements in the page, kinda like Comments are tied to an element which has a comment assigned to it.

As per the last update, when closed captions are activated while starting a conversation, the popover that comes up showing the captions has a very small width value, making the text unreadable and it cannot be resized unfortunately.It would be great to also drag around the window so it can placed anywhere on the screen just as other Figma modals.  

Hello, I’m generally pretty chill about product updates, and I understand that companies need to evolve and improve their features Figma included. But honestly, I think you're heading in the wrong direction when it comes to prioritisation.Obviously, us the users don’t get insight into your development plans until changes are released. But I urge you to reconsider your product roadmap in terms of real, tangible benefits for designers.We’re the ones paying you after all…The new UI3 update introduces several changes that just don’t align with fundamental design principles. Since the rise of tools like Photoshop in the 1990s, there has been an industry standard in layout alignments, UI iconography, and UX best practices. Disrupting these conventions for the sake of change feels counterproductive.I understand the ambition to create the best possible software, but some of these decisions feel like change for change’s sake. With UI3, it genuinely feels li

ContextMy company heavily uses Figma variables and are looking to build out multiple collections each having a unique set of modes. One example would be around Buttons—two collections would be made, one for states and another for size. There would be many other collections that would need to be created to create a comprehensive design system. Caveat: This use case may be an edge case or unique to me.ProblemThe current variable window is very inflexible:Can’t view your list of collections outside of a dropdown feels clunky Can’t resize the left panel with the list of variables Can’t reorder modes (I may be missing something here on why that is built that way)SuggestionsWould be nice to treat the variables’ left panel like the main pages and layer panels Collections could be treated like pages and would be housed in a resizable section above the variables which

It’s been a while now but often when collaborating on the same schema, the width of my arrows are not the same as that of someone else even though I started it from a copy/paste of an existing object that had an arrow connected to it. The only way I can fix that is by copy pasting the arrow that has the width I want and using it afterwards.

the Windows app is really crap, it is nothing more than a webview around the website, it is not a real, full feature, efficiente native app ☹️