Share Your Thoughts

Feature request: Add a built-in “Filter by Reviewer” option for comments Currently, comments can be filtered by manually entering a user’s name (as described here: https://forum.figma.com/ask-the-community-7/filter-for-comment-13462). However, it would be much more efficient to have a built-in “Filter by Reviewer” option, similar to Adobe Acrobat.For reviewers, it’s common to revisit only their own comments to verify that feedback has been addressed or to continue a review. A dedicated filter would make this workflow much faster and more intuitive, especially on files with a large number of comments. This would be a valuable quality-of-life improvement for anyone involved in design reviews.

Hello, I’m a UX Designer working in the public sector and love the new extension tool! However, I think it would be more valuable if it allowed users to enter the URLs of the pages they would like captured instead of capturing one screen at a time. Also, it would be time saving if users could select the screen sizes for the captures (e.g. mobile, tablet, and desktop).  I hope you can consider these updates!

I create a lot of user flows every week in Figjam for my team. In Figjam, under Shapes, and then the “Flowchart” shapes, I can’t find the Delay (half pill) or Display (curved rectangle with a left chevron). Are there any plans to add those soon?

Hi there!Really enjoying the new Figma Motion feature. Been waiting for this one for a really long time. Genuinely one of my favorite features from Config 2026, including shaders.That being said, here are a few things I'd really love to see improved:Timeline UI segmentation: the current UI feels really unstable, with all layers & settings blending into one low-contrast mass without any visual clarity. Layer color swatches: adding color accents per layer would make navigation and visual separation significantly easier. Preview FPS setting: no option to control preview playback FPS right now. Having a dedicated input separate from export would make it so much easier to feel-test animations at different rates. Inline property preview + animated property count indicator: this might be the most controversial one, but the keyframe bar space feels genuinely wasted right now for no good reason. Showing the property name and value range inline (like Opacity 0 → 100), plus a small dot indica

Figma should support rendering drop shadows on both the inside and outside of strokes on closed paths without requiring Outline Stroke.Right now, if I have a circle with an inside stroke and drop shadow, Figma only renders the shadow outside the closed path. Apps like Sketch, Affinity, and other vector drawing apps render the shadow on both inside and outside of the stroke, which creates the expected inner shadow while keeping the circle editable.Same editable circle, inside stroke, and drop shadow setup. Figma doesn’t render the shadow inside the closed path, while Sketch creates the expected inner-shadow without outlining the stroke.Outline Stroke is a workaround, but it’s destructive. It’d be much better if you could keep the circle editable and still get the same visual result.

Hi Figma team,We build a Figma plugin that renders user artwork into product mockups. With Figma’s newer video support, we want users to place a video fill/layer directly inside a Figma mockup frame, then run our plugin to render/export the final animated mockup.Today the Plugin API exposes VideoPaint.videoHash and figma.createVideoAsync(bytes), but we cannot find a supported way to read an existing video fill back as bytes, a Blob, a URL, or decoded frames. Images have figma.getImageByHash(imageHash).getBytesAsync(), but video appears to have no equivalent.Are you planning to add one of these?figma.getVideoByHash(videoHash) video.getBytesAsync() video.getUrlAsync() a REST endpoint for video fill URLs a plugin-safe frame sampling API for video fillsThis would unlock video mockup rendering, video compositing, video export plugins, and parity with image fill workflows.Thanks.

Hi Figma Team,I am writing to suggest the addition of a native Masonry Layout feature within the current Auto Layout system, specifically as an extension of the "Wrap" property.1. The Current Problem: The current Auto Layout "Wrap" feature is incredibly helpful, but it only wraps items horizontally (Rows). When designing interfaces with cards of varying dynamic heights—such as complex enterprise dashboards, product catalogs, or dynamic data grids—we cannot automatically create a vertical masonry effect.The current workaround requires manually dividing items into separate vertical columns (Vertical Auto Layout) and grouping them in a horizontal parent container. This method is rigid, time-consuming, and breaks the logical flow when rearranging elements or demonstrating dynamic data flows in prototypes.2. Proposed Solution: Introduce a "Masonry" (or "Vertical Wrap / Pack") behavior option when Auto Layout Wrap is enabled. This feature should allow elements (with Hug contents height) to a

Please add YAML to FigJam code blocks. Others languages are also welcome in addition to this.

In order to help guide a client or stakeholder through a design when my team isn’t available, we use comments to explain our decisions. We recently noticed that anonymous viewers of prototypes can no longer view comments without having an account. In our use case, users won’t need to respond to comments as they’re used as a guide, which makes signing up only to read them very inconvenient and a big friction point. It would be great if there were a way that those anonymous users can be allowed read access to the comments in the file. If they wish to leave a comment, then they could either sign up/login to an account, or use something like the solutions offered in Easier access for commenters. Without this, we will be forced to find a new solution to guide users through our decision-making process without needing them to watch/skip around a long screen recording or us having to remake all pages and comments in a PDF or Invision.

Hi! I’ve created a dialog component in one Figma Make file and I want to use it in another file.What’s the best way to import or copy it over? Should I copy-paste it manually or is there a better way to reuse components across files in Figma Make?

There’s no visible scrollbar in Figma prototyping mode. Yesterday we’re having user testings and once again this same topic popped out. Some of the users didn’t thought that they could scroll prototype because scrollbar wasn’t visible. One of the user was using laptop’s touchpad and he wasn’t able to scroll with only using touchpad. Guiding user how to use prototype during test can harm testing situations. Atleast it’s sure that if user thought that he can’t scroll it leads to biased feedback about product. If there’s some reason not to have scrollbar it could be atleast optional feature that designer could turn visible scrollbar on from options. It’s not only who has came across with this weakness in Figma. Here’s old Spectrum thread about same topic but Figma hasn’t done anything for this yet and I hope this get more attention here.

K shortcut for Scale should work in animate mode aswell 

I’d like to move assets to the top since it’s the main feature I use.It would be cool if we could add, remove and move widgets so that each user can have its own custom toolbar. Personally i’d like to add the library analytics there, for istance.Thank you 🙂

Just wanted to share this, have been waiting for this, can finally ditch After Effects now haha

You just added 1 to 2 clicks to a feature that worked perfectly fine and only required one click.As a power user that needs to quickly select a hex value or change it you just added the equivalent of hundreds more clicks a day to my work load. I know I probably sound pathetic but I’m having a hard time justifying the changes to what I thought was a functionality that was as simple as efficient. Why add complexity to simplicity??Am I the only one complaining about this? 

i can’t upload a pdf without converting it. it’s one of the most basic features and not supported since yearswithout this i can’t switch from miro

Hi,When I want add a PDF to a Figjam board I see a modal window with a few options (see attachment). I do not always want to convert the PDF. And when I want to convert the PDF I noticed that the file is not converted the correct way. Is there a way to add PDF without converting? 

Great to see motion elevated beyond smart animate.Thanks Figma, Great job!Currently as I notice, Motion disables pen Tool,  allows only pencil.Trim paths works for strokes drawn from pencil tool,  open shapes like line tool.It doesn't work for closed /parametric shapes and arrow shape. So having a trim path displayed in its panel doesn't make any sense now.It would be nice to have closed shapes like rectangle to have its stroke animated so we can try gradient or coloured line tuning around it. Currently it's quite a struggle and not straightforward everywhere.Thanks! 

would like to suggest reading aloud the message response on the agent so I don't have to read a long conversation while seeing the design. I can hear it discussing and follow the design so it's easier for me. I want audio playback for every agent reply so I can listen while staying focused on my design work. This would make it much easier to follow longer conversations without shifting attention away from the canvas.

As far as I can tell it’s not currently possible to add strokes between rows and columns in grid, which would be very helpful for data tables. If I had strokes to the content in the cells it either looks like this if the cells are set to hug content: And if I set the cells to fill the strokes align nicely, but the text is cut off:The best “hack” I’ve found so far is to add a row with a column span going the full width of the grid and insert a 1px line with a width set to fill. It works as a proper table in terms of responsiveness, but the downside is that you have these dummy rows, which can be a little annoying when reordering content. It would be a lot easier if I could just set a stroke color (or possibly width, but that could also just follow the gap size).

Hello, Are there plans to keep comments within pages/frames when: Duplicating a page Copy-pasting all the elements within a page Duplicating a document I tried all three methods and the comments don’t get copied across, there’s also no way to select them to manually copy+paste them. I see absolutely no reason for this not to be the default behavior when performing all of the above actions. Are there plans to introduce this? If so when do you plan to add it? Thank you!

It would be great, if one could search for Figma variables within the library analytics. Benefit: Evaluating how often a variable is being used:  Can a variable be deleted?  How big is a breaking change?    It would also be great, if the analytics view would be fullscreen. Especially if you have long token names. (Adjustable column width would be a solution too)   

I want to be able to see looped animation / motion play in the prototype view without jerky frame resets not just the motion panel. I also want to be able to duplicate animation blocks, colour code them/name them, cut them up and drag them in the timeline and be able to easily flip reverse them. Can’t see a way to do this with the beta atm.

Include a search bar in the Library analytics panel to rapidly select a component without having to scroll through the list of components.